Is CRCL Expensive Now? Calculating Circle's Stock Price Using the DCF Valuation Model

marsbitPublished on 2026-02-03Last updated on 2026-02-03

Abstract

**Title: Is CRCL Expensive Now? A DCF Valuation Analysis of Circle's Stock** **Summary:** This analysis uses a discounted cash flow (DCF) model to estimate the fair value of Circle (CRCL) stock, focusing on its USDC stablecoin business. Key assumptions include: USDC circulation of $70 billion by end-2025, growing at an average annual rate of 15% from 2026 to 2035; a 2.5% average benchmark interest rate; 38% gross margin; fixed operating costs of $500 million in 2025, increasing 10% annually; 24% effective tax rate; 10% discount rate; and a terminal PE multiple of 20. The fully diluted share count is 275 million. The model calculates EBITDA as interest income (USDC circulation × interest rate × margin) minus fixed costs. Free cash flow (FCF) is derived after taxes. The present value of explicit FCF (2026–2035) is $2.282 billion, and the terminal value (2035 FCF × 20) discounted to 2026 is $7.138 billion. The total enterprise value (EV) is $9.42 billion, implying a fair stock price of $34.25 per share as of January 2026. Sensitivity analysis shows that if USDC growth averages 20% annually, the fair value rises to ~$62 per share, suggesting potential margin of safety at current prices (around $62 in early February 2026). However, short-term volatility, forced sellers, and leverage risks are highlighted. The model is conservative, excluding other revenue streams (e.g., Circle’s emerging products like Arc chain) and emphasizing USDC’s growth and competitive sustainability...

Author: @lufeieth

Preface

This is merely a thought experiment for reference only. Welcome to exchange and clash of views. Not investment advice. Profit or loss is your own responsibility.

Valuing Circle (CRCL) is not easy, especially using the Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) model. Key parameters can vary significantly with slight changes. We can only attempt to find some vague correctness under a relatively conservative approach.

Sending the following prompt to ChatGPT and Gemini yields the same numbers.

Prompt:

According to:Circle's EBITDA ≈ USDC Issuance Scale * USD Benchmark Interest Rate * 38% Gross Margin - Annual Fixed Operating Costs.

Specific numbers:

As of December 31, 2025, USDC issuance is calculated based on 70 billion.

If from January 2026, over 10-year period (2026-2035), USDC issuance is assumed to grow at an average annual rate of 15%.

Use the average annual USDC issuance (not the year-end issuance) to calculate interest and EBITDA.

Annual USD benchmark interest rate is assumed to be 2.5%.

Annual fixed operating costs: $500 million for 2025, assumed to increase by 10% annually from 2026 onwards.

Effective tax rate is assumed to be 24%.

PE multiple is assumed to be 20x.

Fully diluted share count is assumed to be 275 million shares.

Discount rate is assumed to be 10%.

Calculate CRCL's free cash flow, enterprise value, and reasonable stock price discounted back to January 2026.

I. Explanation of Parameters Used in the Valuation Model

1. Gross Margin:

Circle's Q3 2025 financial report showed a gross margin of 39.5%. We use 38% for calculation.

Circle names its key operating metric as RLDC in its performance materials. RLDC is defined as Total Revenue and Reserve Income minus Total Distribution, Transaction, and Other Costs.

RLDC Margin is defined as RLDC divided by Total Revenue and Reserve Income.

2. Benchmark Interest Rate:

As of February 2026, the federal funds rate is 3.5-3.75%. The future path is unknown. We assume an average of 2.5% for the next 10 years.

3. Fixed Operating Costs:

The company's 2025 fixed cost guidance is $495-$510 million. We use $500 million, growing at 10% annually. (Reference: VISA, MA fixed cost growth around 10% in 2025).

4.PE

Multiple:

For CRCL, we use a 10-year average PE of 20x. (Reference: VISA, MA average 10-year PE valuation is 27-35x).

5. USDC Issuance:

As of December 31, 2025, USDC issuance was 75.3 billion, but as of February 1, 2026, it was 70.2 billion. We use 70 billion as the base for calculation.

6. Average Annual Growth Rate of USDC Issuance:

This is the largest variable. First calculated at 15%. Later there is a table showing different valuations corresponding to growth rates from 10% to 40%.

7. Effective Tax Rate:

"Income tax expense or benefit" divided by "pre-tax profit", reflecting the comprehensive tax burden level under the current profit structure. Circle's Q2, Q3 2025 reports showed negative values due to tax credits and exemptions, making it un-referenceable. Temporarily use 24%.

8. Fully Diluted Share Count:

Basic Shares: Refers to the "number of issued and outstanding common shares", the total number of shares actually held by shareholders and existing at a specific disclosure point.

As of November 6, 2025, Circle had issued and outstanding Class A: 216,487,160 shares, Class B: 18,988,431 shares, totaling 235,475,591 shares.

Fully Diluted Shares: Based on basic shares, plus currently existing potential dilutive items, a more commonly used metric for per-share valuation, accounting for currently existing potential dilutive instruments. Includes:

1 Shares corresponding to the granted portion of equity incentives: 35,413,000 shares.

2 Shares issuable related to M&A, subject to service period conditions, etc.: 1,744,000 shares.

3 Potential shares from convertible notes: 1,125,000 shares.

4 Potential shares related to warrants: 1,248,000 shares.

Total approximately 275,005,591 shares, or about 275 million shares.

There is also a Maximum Fully Diluted Share Count (stress test口径, including future un-granted incentive pool):

On top of the 275 million shares, add the "future equity incentive pool available for grant" of 31,348,000 shares. Total approximately 306,353,591 shares, or about 306 million shares.

Our model uses the fully diluted share count of 275 million.

Sections II, III, and IV below are the calculation results:

II. Units and Definitions

1. Unit Explanation

(1) All amounts in the table below are in "Hundreds of Millions of USD".

(2) USDC issuance scale uses "Average Balance for the Year", unit is "Hundreds of Millions of USD".

(3) Stock price unit is "USD per share".

2. Calculation Chain

(1) Annual Interest Benchmark Income = Average USDC Balance for the Year × 2.5%

(2) Retained Gross Profit = Interest Benchmark Income × 38%

(3) EBITDA ≈ Retained Gross Profit − Annual Fixed Operating Costs

(4) Taxes = max(EBITDA, 0) × 24%

(5) FCF ≈ EBITDA − Taxes

(6) Discount rate 10%, discounting annual year-end cash flows back to January 2026

(7) Terminal Value at end of 2035 = 2035 FCF × PE 20x

(8) Fully Diluted Shares = 275 million shares

III. Annual Free Cash Flow from 2026 to 2035 (Hundreds of Millions of USD)

Total Present Value of Explicit Period FCF (2026 to 2035) approximately $2.282 Billion.

IV. Enterprise Value and Reasonable Stock Price as of January 2026 (Based on Fully Diluted 275M Shares)

1、Terminal Value at end of 2035

(1) 2035 FCF = $926 Million

(2) Terminal Value = 9.26 × 20 = $18.513 Billion

(3) Present Value of Terminal Value = 185.13 ÷ 1.1^10 = $7.138 Billion

2、Enterprise Value EV (Discounted to January 2026)

(1) EV = Explicit Period PV 2.282 + Terminal Value PV 7.138 = $9.420 Billion

3、Reasonable Stock Price Discounted to January 2026

(1) Per Share Value = $9.420 Billion ÷ 275 million shares = $34.25 per share

4、A Checkpoint

(1) The present value of the terminal value accounts for approximately 75.8%, which means the valuation is highly sensitive to the 38% retention rate, fixed cost path, and terminal multiple.

V. Summary of Results under Different USDC Average Annual Growth Rates (2026–2035 Explicit Period, 2035 Terminal Value at PE=20, 10% Discount)

Explanation:

(1) Under different scenarios of USDC average annual growth rate from 10% to 40% (increasing by 1%), calculate the enterprise value (EV) and reasonable stock price discounted to January 2026.

(2) EV in the table below is the enterprise value discounted to January 2026, Stock Price = EV ÷ 275 million shares (fully diluted shares).

(3) Units: 2035 year-end USDC scale and EV are in Billions USD (B USD), stock price is in USD/share.

In the table above, 20% is highlighted in red. This means: under conservative estimates, if you believe the future average annual growth rate of USDC can reach 20%, then the current CRCL price of $62 (as of 22:00, February 2, 2026, half an hour before opening) might have a slight margin of safety.

Note: Even if there might be a slight margin of safety, it does not mean it won't fall further. And I also hope it will fall further. It might still fall a lot. Because many factors affect short-term stock price fluctuations, such as the

forced sellers' forced selling behavior

. If you use on-exchange leverage, you might even get liquidated to zero. Remember:

"Preserve principal, don't go to zero."

Do not use leverage. Otherwise, the future has nothing to do with you.

VI. Some Explanations

1. The parameters used in the model are relatively conservative,只是想看看在保守估算下合理的估值是多少。大家可以修改具体的数字,发给chatGPT或Gemini直接计算。

2. The model only considers USDC's reserve interest income and does not include other income items. Circle's Q3 2025 financial report showed other income items as $29 million. Because it's difficult to estimate growth, for conservative estimation, the model did not include them.

3. Products mentioned in Circle's 2026 product vision

, such as the Arc chain, CPN network, xReserve, StableFX, etc., and their potential future income are not included in the model and can be regarded as unvalued upside options.

4. The biggest variable and core question affecting the model's valuation becomes:

  • How large do you think the scale of stablecoins, USDC, will be in 5, 10 years? Can the average annual growth rate of USDC reach 20%?

  • Will Circle still be the leading compliant stablecoin? And maintain its share in an environment of increasing regulation and competition?

5. Although the market generally believes that trends like cross-border payments, "dollarization" in the third world, tokenized stocks, on-chain treasuries, RWA, prediction markets, and even AI Agent payments will benefit stablecoins, for investors who need to put real money on the line, cognition and logic are just the starting point.

What truly determines position sizing and the ability to hold on during volatility is the continuous emergence of trackable, verifiable facts and evidence. Conclusions need to be sought and verified by each individual. Only by holding the chain of evidence in your own hands can you have the capability and determination to resist the fluctuations and noise that will inevitably appear in the future.

VII. Appendix Reference: USDC vs USDT Growth Table Past 6 Years (2020–2025)

Explanation

1. Issuance caliber: Circulation量 as of December 31 each year, unit is Hundreds of Millions of USD

2. YoY Growth Rate: Current year-end ÷ Previous year-end − 1

3. Mind Decoding Content: Added according to the original text of the image you sent

4. "Average Annualized Growth Rate" calculated as CAGR (5 annual intervals) from end-2020 to end-2025

For reference only, to have an intuitive perception of the order of magnitude. Does not represent future growth rates.

Related Questions

QWhat is the key formula used to calculate Circle's EBITDA in the DCF model?

AThe formula used is: EBITDA ≈ (USDC Issuance Size × USD Benchmark Interest Rate × 38% Gross Margin) - Annual Fixed Operating Costs.

QWhat is the assumed average annual growth rate for USDC issuance from 2026 to 2035 in the base case scenario?

AThe base case scenario assumes an average annual growth rate of 15% for USDC issuance from 2026 to 2035.

QWhat is the calculated fair value per share of CRCL as of January 2026 under the model's base assumptions?

AThe calculated fair value per share is $34.25, based on a fully diluted share count of 275 million shares.

QAccording to the analysis, at what USDC annual growth rate does the $62 share price (as of Feb 2, 2026) potentially offer a margin of safety?

AThe $62 share price is highlighted as potentially having a small margin of safety if the future average annual USDC growth rate is 20%.

QWhat are the two major uncertainties or 'core questions' identified that will ultimately determine Circle's valuation?

AThe two core questions are: 1) How large will the stablecoin and USDC market be in the next 5-10 years, and can USDC maintain a 20% average annual growth rate? 2) Will Circle remain the leading compliant stablecoin and maintain its market share amidst increasing regulation and competition?

Related Reads

Has the 'Digital Gold' Narrative for BTC Failed?

**Title: Has the "Digital Gold" Narrative for Bitcoin Failed?** The article argues that Bitcoin's "digital gold" narrative remains valid despite a recent sharp price decline (from a peak near $126k in Oct 2025 to briefly under $61k in Feb 2026). It presents a long-term investment framework based on three core points: **1. Viewing Bitcoin as an Asset:** Bitcoin is presented as a superior potential store of value compared to gold. Key arguments are its absolute scarcity (21 million cap), superior portability, and transparent auditability via its public ledger. While acknowledging its current use in early, volatile stages (~3-4% global adoption), the author draws parallels to the early, disruptive phases of the internet and e-commerce. **2. Understanding the Recent Downturn:** The current ~50% correction is framed as a predictable, consensus-driven cycle following its post-halving peak (the 2024 halving preceded the Oct 2025 high). A crucial factor is a historic "changing of hands": the influx of new institutional buyers via ETFs allowed early, low-cost holders (miners, OG believers) to take profits. The author notes that while severe, Bitcoin's historical drawdowns (e.g., 93% in 2011, 77% in 2021-22) have been progressively smaller, suggesting maturing holder structure and decreasing volatility over time. **3. The Long-Term Perspective:** The long-term thesis hinges on Bitcoin capturing a portion of gold's market value. With Bitcoin's market cap at ~$1.4 trillion (at $70k) versus gold's ~$20 trillion, significant upside potential exists if the "digital gold" narrative is partially realized. However, the author strongly cautions that short-term risks remain, the bottom is unpredictable, and high volatility is inherent. The real risk is not Bitcoin failing but poor personal position management (over-leverage, wrong capital) and a lack of deep understanding, which can force investors out during severe downturns. The conclusion uses Amazon's 95% crash post-2000 dot-com bubble and subsequent 42x recovery as an analogy. The ultimate question is not if Bitcoin's price will rise, but if an investor's strategy and conviction can withstand the volatility to see the long-term play out. The recent divergence (gold up, Bitcoin down) is posed not as a narrative failure, but as potential evidence of this ongoing, painful transition from a speculative asset to a mainstream allocation.

marsbit9h ago

Has the 'Digital Gold' Narrative for BTC Failed?

marsbit9h ago

Has BTC's 'Digital Gold' Narrative Failed?

The article discusses Bitcoin's "digital gold" narrative, its recent price drop, and long-term outlook through the perspective of "Jason". It argues the narrative is not a failure but that Bitcoin represents a superior, new asset class due to its fixed supply (21 million), portability, and auditability. The piece compares its current ~3-4% global adoption rate to early internet/e-commerce, suggesting significant growth potential. Regarding the 2025-2026 price decline (from ~$126k to briefly under $61k), the author views it as a predictable, consensus-driven sell-off within Bitcoin's ~4-year cycle post-halving, exacerbated by a major "handover" from early, low-cost holders to new institutional buyers via ETFs. A key observation is that historical peak-to-trough drawdowns have lessened over time (e.g., 93% in 2011 to ~50% in 2026), indicating maturing volatility as holder structure changes. For the long term, the author uses a simple framework: Bitcoin's total market cap (~$1.4T at $70k) is only about 7% of gold's (~$20T). Even capturing 30-50% of gold's value would imply substantial upside. However, the article strongly cautions against viewing this as investment advice, emphasizing extreme volatility and the critical importance of risk management, position sizing, and deep fundamental understanding to survive severe drawdowns. It concludes by drawing a parallel to Amazon's 95% crash in 2000 and subsequent 42x recovery, stressing that the key is surviving market cycles to realize long-term potential.

链捕手9h ago

Has BTC's 'Digital Gold' Narrative Failed?

链捕手9h ago

From Code to Cognition: A Ten-Thousand-Word Guide to the Evolution of the Robot Brain

"From Code to Cognition: The Evolution of Robot Brains" The journey of robotic intelligence has shifted dramatically from manually coded systems to AI-driven brains. For decades, robots relied on layered software stacks—perception, state estimation, planning, control—each handcrafted. While predictable, they lacked adaptability. The 2010s saw deep learning revolutionize perception (e.g., object detection) and control (via reinforcement learning), but learned skills remained narrow. The arrival of Large Language Models (LLMs) marked a turning point. LLMs acted as high-level planners, interpreting natural language instructions and generating sequences of actions for traditional robotic systems to execute. However, true integration came with Visual-Language-Action (VLA) models, which fused vision, language, and motion prediction into a single network. Pioneered by models like RT-2 and open-source projects like OpenVLA, VLAs enable robots to reason and act directly from visual input and commands. The most advanced humanoid robots now employ a "dual-brain" architecture: a slow-thinking, large VLA (System 2) for reasoning and planning, and a fast-reacting, small network (System 1) for high-frequency motion control, sometimes with an even lower-level System 0 for balance. This split balances cognition with the physics of real-time movement. Computation is split between onboard hardware (e.g., NVIDIA Jetson) for safety-critical control loops and cloud/edge servers for non-critical tasks like learning and interfaces. A crucial driver is the open-source ecosystem—models like GR00T and OpenVLA allow startups to build upon pre-trained brains and fine-tune them with their own data, accelerating development. Despite progress, current systems struggle with recovery from errors, sample inefficiency, and long-horizon tasks. This has spurred the rise of **World Models**—neural networks that predict the consequences of actions. By simulating possible futures before acting (like NVIDIA Cosmos or Meta V-JEPA), robots can plan, recover, and generalize better. This represents the next frontier: shifting intelligence from learned reactions to an internal model of physics and cause-and-effect. The field is rapidly evolving. While not yet at its "ChatGPT moment," the convergence of cheaper hardware, scalable simulation, and world models points toward robots that are increasingly capable, adaptive, and useful. The question is shifting from "what can robots do?" to "what *should* they do?"

marsbit10h ago

From Code to Cognition: A Ten-Thousand-Word Guide to the Evolution of the Robot Brain

marsbit10h ago

Trading

Spot
Futures
活动图片