ING Germany Integrates Bitwise and VanEck ETPs as LiquidChain Unifies Cross-Chain Liquidity

bitcoinistPublished on 2026-02-03Last updated on 2026-02-03

Abstract

ING Germany, serving over 9 million customers, has integrated crypto ETPs from Bitwise and VanEck into its retail banking platform, allowing users direct access to Bitcoin and Ethereum through their banking app. This move signals a major shift toward mainstream crypto adoption in Europe’s largest economy. However, the underlying blockchain infrastructure remains fragmented, isolating liquidity across chains like Bitcoin, Ethereum, and Solana. LiquidChain ($LIQUID) aims to solve this fragmentation with a Layer 3 protocol that unifies liquidity and enables seamless cross-chain transactions. The project has raised over $500K in its presale and offers high staking rewards, targeting the growing need for interconnected DeFi infrastructure as institutional interest increases.

The barrier between traditional finance and digital assets in Europe’s largest economy isn’t just crumbling, it’s gone.

ING Germany, catering to over 9M customers, quietly integrated crypto ETPs (Exchange Traded Products) and ETNs (Exchange Traded Notes) into its retail banking interface. The partners? Asset management heavyweights Bitwise and VanEck.

This collaboration is more than a vendor agreement; it’s a merging of DNA. Bitwise brings the deep-rooted crypto native expertise and research-heavy approach, while VanEck provides the institutional pedigree of a firm that has pioneered ETFs for nearly 70 years.

Together with ING, they’ve created a ‘regulated wrapper’ that satisfies the stringent compliance demands of the German BaFin while offering investors the precise price tracking they expect from high-tier financial instruments.

This matters. Not just for the immediate volume, but for the signal it blasts to risk departments globally. When a conservative institution like ING opens crypto rails to German retail savers, the asset class graduates from ‘speculative fringe’ to ‘portfolio standard.’

Users can now access Bitcoin and Ethereum directly through their banking app. No external exchanges, no friction. Just access.

But there’s a catch. While giants like ING solve the financial exposure problem, the underlying tech is still a mess. It’s fragmented. A user holding a Solana ETP has zero interaction with Ethereum; liquidity is trapped in silos.

As institutional capital pours in, the race is on to build a backend that actually connects Bitcoin, Ethereum, and Solana. That’s the precise gap LiquidChain ($LIQUID) aims to fill.

LiquidChain ($LIQUID) Ends Asset Isolation With Unified L3 Architecture

Right now, DeFi looks a lot like the pre-Internet era of local intranets: disconnected islands of value. To move capital from Ethereum to Solana, you’re forced to navigate complex bridges, wrap assets (risky business), and juggle multiple gas tokens.

LiquidChain fixes this. It positions itself as a Layer 3 (L3) protocol that fuses liquidity from Bitcoin, Ethereum, and Solana into one execution environment. An L3 is a highly specialized, application-specific blockchain built on top of a Layer 2 to provide hyper-scalability, lower gas fees, and custom environments for specific use cases like gaming or high-frequency trading.

Source: LiquidChain

For developers, it’s a ‘Deploy-Once’ setup. Instead of rewriting code for the Ethereum Virtual Machine (EVM) and then doing it all over again for Solana’s Virtual Machine (SVM), they launch on LiquidChain L3 once. That app then accesses liquidity across all connected chains naturally. For the end-user? It’s seamless.

A transaction can source liquidity from a Uniswap pool on Ethereum and settle on Solana without the user ever touching a bridge.

It solves the primary bottleneck preventing true institutional adoption: fragmentation. The protocol’s ‘Cross-Chain VM’ acts as a translation layer for the industry’s three largest ecosystems, allowing verifiable settlement across networks.

BUY LIQUIDCHAIN ($LIQUID) HERE.

Why Smart Money Is Watching Cross-Chain Aggregation Protocols

Banks integrating crypto products signal ubiquity, sure. But it also highlights how limited the current infrastructure really is. Institutions need deep liquidity to execute large orders without slippage. Right now? That liquidity is shattered across dozens of Layer 1 and Layer 2 chains.

This sets the stage for aggregation layers. LiquidChain ($LIQUID) isn’t just a bridge; it’s a unification layer. By enabling Liquidity Staking and using $LIQUID as transaction fuel, the protocol captures value from the velocity of money moving between chains.

The project’s already raised over $500K, and tokens are priced at $0.0135. As it’s early in the presale, staking rewards are also high, currently sitting at 1968%. But this is dynamic and subject to change.

History shows the market rewards infrastructure that simplifies UX. Arbitrum and Optimism thrived by making Ethereum cheaper. LiquidChain targets the next evolution: making the multi-chain world invisible.

For investors looking beyond major caps like $BTC, projects solving this ‘liquidity fracture’ represent a sector with serious potential as the cycle matures.

VISIT THE OFFICIAL LIQUIDCHAIN ($LIQUID) PRESALE SITE.

This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial or investment advice. Cryptocurrencies are volatile assets; always conduct your own research before making investment decisions.

Trending Cryptos

Related Questions

QWhat major step has ING Germany taken regarding digital assets for its retail customers?

AING Germany has integrated crypto Exchange Traded Products (ETPs) and Exchange Traded Notes (ETNs) from Bitwise and VanEck into its retail banking interface, allowing its over 9 million customers to access Bitcoin and Ethereum directly through their banking app.

QWhat is the primary problem that LiquidChain ($LIQUID) aims to solve in the current DeFi landscape?

ALiquidChain aims to solve the problem of fragmented liquidity and asset isolation between different blockchains, such as Bitcoin, Ethereum, and Solana, by providing a unified Layer 3 (L3) protocol that fuses liquidity from these chains into a single execution environment.

QHow does LiquidChain's L3 architecture benefit developers building decentralized applications?

ALiquidChain's L3 architecture offers a 'Deploy-Once' setup, allowing developers to launch their application on the protocol once and have it natively access liquidity across all connected chains without needing to rewrite code for different virtual machines like the EVM and SVM.

QWhat is the significance of ING's integration of crypto ETPs for the broader perception of cryptocurrency?

AING's integration signals a major shift in perception, moving the cryptocurrency asset class from a 'speculative fringe' to a 'portfolio standard' for conservative institutions and their retail customers, demonstrating increased legitimacy and acceptance within traditional finance.

QWhat are some key features or mechanisms that LiquidChain uses to capture value and facilitate cross-chain transactions?

ALiquidChain uses its 'Cross-Chain VM' as a translation layer for settlement, enables Liquidity Staking, and uses its native $LIQUID token as transaction fuel, capturing value from the velocity of money moving between different blockchains.

Related Reads

Wall Street's Most Famous 'Cassandra' Now Has His Sights Set on Nvidia

Michael Burry, the famed "Big Short" investor, has once again captured Wall Street's attention with a series of short positions against major tech and semiconductor stocks, most notably Nvidia. In late June and July, through his "Cassandra Unchained" newsletter, Burry disclosed short bets against Nvidia, Tesla, Applied Materials, Caterpillar, the SOXX semiconductor ETF, and later, Micron Technology. His core thesis revolves around potential distortions in the AI infrastructure boom, specifically questioning whether extended depreciation schedules (e.g., 6 years vs. a realistic 2-3 years for AI chips) by cloud giants like Microsoft and Google artificially inflate profits. He also raises concerns about possible "off-balance-sheet circular financing," where chip demand might be propped up by vendor-backed funding to clients. Nvidia's stock experienced volatility following these disclosures, briefly dipping but largely holding near Burry's reported entry points, leaving his positions roughly flat or slightly underwater as of late July. This move is part of a pattern for Burry, whose track record since his legendary 2008 bet is mixed. He has faced notable losses, such as on Tesla in 2021, while scoring on broader market turns like the 2020 pandemic crash. His methodology focuses intensely on free cash flow and scrutinizing original financial documents to spot overvaluation and structural risks, but it often struggles with timing the market. The article contrasts Burry's stance with other prominent investors. Steve Eisman, another "Big Short" figure, is not shorting Nvidia, citing strong fundamentals but expressing nervousness about sustainability. Jim Chanos agrees with the broad "accounting mismatch" concern—comparing it to the dot-com bubble—but targets financial leverage in private equity firms rather than the chip stocks themselves. While Nvidia's short interest remains relatively low at 1.3-1.4% of float, the massive stock size means absolute short losses have been significant, exceeding $5 billion earlier this year. The piece concludes that for ordinary investors, the key takeaway is not replicating specific short bets but learning from the critical frameworks these investors use: questioning rosy accounting, identifying structural vulnerabilities, and maintaining skepticism during market euphoria, even if pinpointing the exact catalyst for a downturn remains elusive.

marsbit19m ago

Wall Street's Most Famous 'Cassandra' Now Has His Sights Set on Nvidia

marsbit19m ago

Weekly Selection丨Epic Stock Market Volatility, Changxin Tech's IPO Reshapes Storage Landscape, Saylor Aims to Re-Anchor STRC Around September 8th

PANews Weekly Digest: Market Turmoil, Tech Breakthroughs, and Crypto Developments. The week saw significant volatility across global markets. South Korea's KOSPI index experienced extreme turbulence, including multiple trading halts, largely driven by sharp declines in AI hardware stocks like SK Hynix. In contrast, China's Changxin Xinqiao (CXC) achieved a landmark IPO with a market cap surpassing 4 trillion yuan, marking a major success for the domestic DRAM industry after a decade of losses. In the crypto and Web3 space, several key narratives emerged. AI is driving demand for new infrastructure, with projects like AI agent wallets and programmable payments gaining traction, attracting interest from firms like Coinbase. The Bitcoin mining sector is pivoting, with companies like MARA focusing on energy management as electricity becomes a core AI-era asset. Meanwhile, the RWA (Real World Assets) sector faces a "utilization puzzle," with hundreds of billions in on-chain assets remaining dormant. Notable market movements included a historic single-day surge of over 17% for the KOSPI index and a significant migration of $16.5 billion in staked ETH within the Lido ecosystem. Michael Saylor announced a target to re-peg the STRC stablecoin around September 8th. Other highlights include discussions on Ethereum's ambitious 2030 roadmap for scaling and privacy, analysis showing high protocol revenues not always translating to token price gains, and warnings from Citi about potential extreme commodity price shocks by late 2026.

marsbit24m ago

Weekly Selection丨Epic Stock Market Volatility, Changxin Tech's IPO Reshapes Storage Landscape, Saylor Aims to Re-Anchor STRC Around September 8th

marsbit24m ago

When the Market Begins to Question AI Capex: A Full Analysis of Q2 Earnings Reports from Five Tech Giants

In late July 2026, five major US tech giants—Alphabet, Intel, Microsoft, Meta, and Apple—released their Q2 earnings reports. While all companies exceeded revenue and profit expectations, driven by strong AI-related business growth, investor reactions diverged sharply due to concerns over escalating AI capital expenditures (capex) and their impact on free cash flow. Alphabet reported strong revenue growth and a surging cloud business, but its stock fell after announcing a doubled year-on-year capex and negative quarterly free cash flow for the first time. Intel posted its strongest revenue growth in over 15 years, but its stock experienced volatile trading after significantly raising its full-year capex guidance. Microsoft saw its stock surge after beating estimates and, crucially, lowering its capex forecast while projecting positive free cash flow. Meta faced the most severe sell-off as its profits declined despite revenue beats, with free cash flow plunging over 90% and its capex guidance raised. Apple reported record June-quarter results, but its stock plummeted after providing Q4 revenue guidance that fell short of expectations, citing supply chain constraints and forex headwinds. The overall takeaway is that the market's focus has shifted from validating AI demand to scrutinizing the timeline for returns on massive AI investments. Companies demonstrating a clearer path to managing capex and preserving free cash flow, like Microsoft, were rewarded, while those signaling continued aggressive spending faced investor skepticism.

Odaily星球日报34m ago

When the Market Begins to Question AI Capex: A Full Analysis of Q2 Earnings Reports from Five Tech Giants

Odaily星球日报34m ago

a16z: From Companies to DAOs, DUNA May Become the Next Generation Organizational Form

This article, "From Companies to DAOs: How DUNA Could Become the Next Organizational Form," traces the 500-year evolution of business collaboration. It begins with medieval structures like the *commenda* and Florentine *compagnia*, which exposed partners to personal risk. The modern corporation, exemplified by the Dutch East India Company (VOC), was a revolutionary leap, enabling large-scale, capital-intensive ventures by offering limited liability and reducing coordination costs. However, corporations introduced new challenges like principal-agent problems and bureaucratic overhead. The piece argues that software and internet-native protocols are now reducing these traditional overheads. Decentralized Autonomous Organizations (DAOs) emerged as a new model for coordination without centralized management. Yet, DAOs face a significant legal vacuum: they lack legal recognition, leaving members exposed to unlimited personal liability, and their tokens are vulnerable to being classified as securities under unclear regulations (e.g., the Howey Test). This has forced projects into suboptimal workarounds like offshore foundations. The article identifies the Decentralized Unincorporated Nonprofit Association (DUNA) as a potential solution. Recently legalized in states like Wyoming, the DUNA provides a legal wrapper for decentralized networks. It grants key protections—legal personality, limited liability, and perpetual existence—to a group without imposing a traditional hierarchical management structure. This allows token-holder communities to govern, hold assets, and contract as a single legal entity, aligning with their decentralized nature. While DUNA doesn't solve all governance challenges or magically resolve securities law questions, it represents a crucial step. It fills the legal recognition gap, offering a native legal form for internet-scale, decentralized collaboration and extending the separation of personal risk from organizational venture into a new domain.

marsbit1h ago

a16z: From Companies to DAOs, DUNA May Become the Next Generation Organizational Form

marsbit1h ago

2026 Mid-Year Report On-Chain RWA: Tokenized Stock Market Cap Doubles in a Year, But 90% of Rights Are Hollow Shells

The 2026 Mid-Year Report on On-Chain RWA highlights a significant growth in tokenized stock market capitalization, which nearly doubled from $951 million in March to $1.89 billion by July. However, the report reveals a fundamental contradiction in this "layer 2.5" ecosystem: products with the strongest legal foundation (like regulated U.S. infrastructure) lack liquidity and distribution, while freely tradable offshored wrapper products often lack substantive ownership rights. The increase is driven largely by a few products (SECZ, FGRS, STRCx) and platforms (Ondo, xStocks, Securitize collectively hold over 85% share). While distributed value across networks like Ethereum, Solana, and BNB Chain has grown, the market remains fragmented. Products referencing the same underlying asset (e.g., Apple stock) are distinct legal liabilities with different intermediaries and jurisdictional rules, offering varying degrees of legal claim. The report cautions that headline numbers are misleading, as they reflect changes in distributed token value—driven by issuance, conversions, and price movements—not pure investor inflows. True "canonical shares" with legal ownership, wide wallet distribution, institutional liquidity, and independent on-chain price discovery do not yet exist at scale. Tokenized treasuries show stronger product-market fit, and ETFs may be easier to scale than single stocks. The core takeaway is a trade-off: legal certainty versus liquidity and composability.

marsbit2h ago

2026 Mid-Year Report On-Chain RWA: Tokenized Stock Market Cap Doubles in a Year, But 90% of Rights Are Hollow Shells

marsbit2h ago

Trading

Spot

Hot Articles

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of S (S) are presented below.

活动图片