Hormuz Strait Reopening: Will the Fed Turn "Dovish" and the Market Reprice "Rate Cuts"?

marsbitPublished on 2026-06-16Last updated on 2026-06-16

Abstract

The article outlines two key factors that may lead the U.S. Federal Reserve, under Chair Wash, to adopt a more dovish stance at the upcoming FOMC meeting. First, the anticipated reopening of the Strait of Hormuz is expected to ease oil and energy prices, thereby reducing upward inflationary pressures. This shift could lead the Fed to view energy prices as a neutral or even deflationary factor. Second, recent core CPI data showed significant cooling, with a monthly increase of only 0.21%, contrasting with the still-strong core PCE. This divergence supports a dovish interpretation. Market implications are significant. While the FOMC is expected to remove "easing bias" language and project unchanged rates for the year—moves already priced in—Chair Wash's potential for more dovish commentary presents an upside risk. Consequently, there is room for the market to further price out remaining hike expectations and increase expectations for rate cuts. The report notes that the 2-year Treasury yield, though down recently, remains well above February levels, indicating further potential downside as inflation risks fade.

Written by: Zhao Ying

Source: Wall Street News

Two major catalysts for disinflation are simultaneously unfolding, providing ample justification for Fed Chair Wash to adopt a more dovish stance at this week's Federal Open Market Committee (FOMC) meeting.

According to a report from Citi Research released on June 15th via Wind Trading Desk, the planned reopening of the Strait of Hormuz is expected to push oil prices lower, eliminating the upside risk to inflation from energy prices. Meanwhile, last week's core CPI data came in surprisingly cool, with a month-on-month increase of only 0.21%.

The combination of these two developments further weakens the rationale for the Fed to maintain a hawkish stance, bringing the path to eventual rate cuts back onto the table.

For the markets, this assessment has direct pricing implications. The two-year Treasury yield has fallen by about 13 basis points compared to a week ago, but remains more than 60 basis points higher than its February level. There is still room for market pricing of rate hikes to be compressed, and for pricing of rate cuts to be further increased.

Energy Price Pressures Ease, Upside Inflation Risks Blunt

Expectations for the reopening of the Strait of Hormuz are a core driver of the current dovish narrative. Once the strait resumes passage, increased crude oil supply will lead to lower oil and other energy prices.

Gasoline prices have been declining for a full month, with the national average dropping from around $4.50 per gallon to $4.00. Citi expects further declines following other energy commodities. This trend is likely to produce at least several months of negative overall inflation readings in the coming months, prompting Fed officials to shift their characterization of energy prices from an "inflation risk" to a "neutral or even disinflationary factor."

Core CPI Cools, Divergence Among Inflation Metrics Intensifies

On the core inflation front, although May's core PCE is still expected to remain strong, core CPI has shown clear signs of cooling, with a month-on-month increase of only 0.21%.

Core PCE is increasingly becoming an "outlier" among current inflation metrics—both trimmed-mean PCE and core CPI are closer to target levels and show a clearer downward trend. This divergence is being increasingly recognized by both markets and Fed officials, also providing data support for a dovish stance.

FOMC Hawkish Adjustments Fully Priced In, Dovish Signals Have Upside Potential

The report expects this week's FOMC statement to remove the "easing bias" wording, and the median dot in the interest rate projections (dot plot) will indicate rates held steady this year. However, these hawkish adjustments are already fully anticipated by the market and do not constitute new information.

The real variable lies in Chair Wash's wording. Considering the latest developments regarding the Strait of Hormuz reopening and the cooling trend in core inflation, the risk of Wash delivering more dovish signals at this meeting is tilting to the upside. If his wording proves more accommodative than expected, the market's repricing of the rate cut path could accelerate.

Room for Treasury Yields to Fall Further, Market Pricing Has Adjustment Room

From a market pricing perspective, the report believes implied probabilities of rate hikes in interest rate futures remain elevated. Although the two-year Treasury yield has fallen about 13 basis points from a week ago, it is still over 60 basis points higher than its February level, indicating the market has not fully priced in the impact of receding inflation risks.

As the previously supporting upside inflation risks to the hawkish outlook gradually dissipate, the market is expected to further compress pricing for rate hikes while simultaneously increasing pricing for rate cuts, leaving further room for Treasury yields to decline.

Related Questions

QAccording to the article, what are the two catalysts for inflation decline that could push the Fed towards a dovish turn?

AThe two catalysts are: 1) The planned reopening of the Strait of Hormuz, which is expected to push down oil prices and reduce energy price pressure on inflation. 2) The cooler-than-expected core CPI data for the previous week, which showed a monthly increase of only 0.21%.

QHow does the article describe the trend of gasoline prices and its expected impact?

AGasoline prices have been falling for a month, with the national average dropping from about $4.50 per gallon to $4.00. Citi expects them to fall further in line with other energy prices. This trend is projected to deliver several months of negative overall inflation readings and lead the Fed to view energy prices as a neutral or even deflationary factor rather than an inflation risk.

QWhat divergence in inflation indicators does the article highlight, and why is it significant?

AThe article highlights a divergence between core PCE and other inflation metrics like core CPI and trimmed-mean PCE. While core PCE remains strong, core CPI and trimmed-mean PCE are closer to the Fed's target and show a clearer disinflationary trend. This growing recognition of the divergence provides data support for a more dovish Fed stance.

QWhat is the market's current pricing for interest rates according to the report, and what potential adjustment does it see?

AThe market has already priced in expected hawkish adjustments from the FOMC, such as removing "accommodative bias" language. However, the report states that interest rate futures still imply an overly high probability of rate hikes. There is room for the market to further price out hikes and increase pricing for rate cuts, suggesting Treasury yields have more room to fall.

QWhat is the key variable for the market at the upcoming FOMC meeting, according to the article's analysis?

AThe key variable is the tone and wording of Fed Chair Wash's statements. Given the latest developments (Strait of Hormuz reopening, cooling core inflation), the risk is tilted towards Wash delivering a more dovish message than expected. If his wording is more temperate, the market's repricing of the rate cut path could accelerate.

Related Reads

Xpeng and NIO Compete on Computing Power, Li Auto Shifts Architecture

On June 15, 2026, Li Auto unveiled details of its self-developed chip, Mahe M100, for its new L9 Livis model. CTO Xie Yan stated the goal was not just a faster chip, but a fundamentally different one, targeting the chip architecture itself. While competitors like NIO, Xpeng, and Huawei highlight TOPS (computing power) figures for their self-developed chips, Li Auto’s Mahe M100 focuses on redesigning the underlying architecture. It employs a "dynamic data flow architecture" to address memory bandwidth bottlenecks in large model inference, claiming up to 3x the effective computing power of Nvidia's Thor U for its specific workloads and a 40% reduction in latency. The chip's design was peer-reviewed and accepted at ISCA 2026. However, this performance is highly optimized for Li Auto's own VLA2.1 algorithm, meaning it may not generalize as well to other tasks. Li Auto aims to achieve full-stack in-house development with Mahe M100, covering chip, compiler, OS, AI algorithms, and domain controller—a level of vertical integration few competitors match. Beyond the chip, CEO Li Xiang introduced a new strategic narrative: the "embodied intelligent vehicle," defined as an integration of an EV, a professional driver, an AI computer, and a life assistant. This shifts competition from features like large screens to systemic AI capabilities. A key commitment was that Li Auto's Mahe VLA autonomous driving model will match Tesla's FSD V14 by Q4 2026, with specific OTA milestones set for July, September, and December. Financially, Li Auto faces pressure with declining revenue and vehicle gross margins since Q4 2025, while maintaining high R&D investment (approx. ¥12B in 2026, 50% AI-related). Its 2026 sales target is 550,000 vehicles, up from 406,000 in 2025. The new L9 Livis garnered over 10,000 pre-orders in two weeks. The effectiveness of these strategic moves—new products, OTAs, and the novel chip architecture—will begin to show in Q3 2026 financial results, with the year-end FSD V14 benchmark being the ultimate test.

marsbit36m ago

Xpeng and NIO Compete on Computing Power, Li Auto Shifts Architecture

marsbit36m ago

The Year of AI Applications: Saying 'Yes' While Ignoring Risks? A Comprehensive Open Source Log of Software Development's Journey

The Year of AI Applications: Blindly Saying "Yes" While Ignoring Risks? A Software Development Log Goes Fully Open Source. AI-generated code harbors risks hidden within seemingly correct programs, potentially leading to data leaks or asset loss. The open-source project "Narwhal AI Code Risks," from Peking University's Narwhal-Lab, compiles real-world cases, early warning signs, and typical risk pathways. Its goal is to help developers identify potential hazards early and avoid repeating past mistakes. In 2026, code is generated faster than ever but deployed with less scrutiny. The danger often lies not in glaring errors, but in code that appears normal—syntactically correct, passing all checks—yet introduces subtle but critical flaws like non-existent dependencies, excessive permissions, or exposed databases. A stark example is the Moonwell cbETH oracle incident. A configuration file error, where a cryptocurrency price was set to ~$1.12 instead of ~$2,200, slipped through 28 checks and a pull request signed by both AI (Claude, Copilot) and human developers. This "semantic deviation" resulted in a loss of $1.78 million. The risk is that AI can produce functionally valid code that is semantically wrong for the business context. As AI moves beyond simple code completion to modifying configurations, installing dependencies, and operating via autonomous agents, it traverses longer, less traceable paths within software engineering, blurring traditional boundaries and oversight points. The Narwhal AI Code Risks project structures information into three layers: `/cases` for documented real-world incidents, `/inferred` for early warning signals, and `/scenarios` for clear, generalized risk patterns not yet tied to specific events. This aims to create a lasting, public record to prevent collective amnesia about past AI-coding pitfalls. Risks are categorized into seven areas: Software Supply Chain (e.g., recommending fake packages), Code-Level Vulnerabilities (e.g., reintroducing path traversal bugs), Cloud & Infrastructure Misconfiguration (e.g., overly permissive settings), Agent Risks (from autonomous tool execution), Vertical Domain Risks (e.g., in finance, healthcare), Intellectual Property & Compliance issues, and Human Factors (like over-reliance on AI output). The project's core value is transforming isolated incidents into reusable knowledge—a foundational resource for developers to spot similar issues, for security researchers to build upon, for toolmakers to create detection rules, and for the community to contribute new findings. As AI integration accelerates, this open-source "logbook" serves as a crucial navigational aid, charting past errors to help future projects steer clear of the same traps.

marsbit36m ago

The Year of AI Applications: Saying 'Yes' While Ignoring Risks? A Comprehensive Open Source Log of Software Development's Journey

marsbit36m ago

The Foundation of SpaceX's Trillion-Dollar Valuation: Who is Dividing Up Musk's Annual Tens of Billions in Capital Expenditure?

SpaceX's trillion-dollar valuation is built on its three core businesses: Starlink (profitable, 60% of revenue), rockets (driving down launch costs), and AI (a major investment area). This creates a financial cycle: Starlink funds rocket development, which enables low-cost launches for AI hardware, generating future revenue. This cycle fuels annual capital expenditures of tens of billions, flowing to a vast supply chain. Suppliers are categorized by their replaceability. The first group includes irreplaceable players like NVIDIA (GPU/CUDA ecosystem), Eutelsat (critical radio spectrum), Filtronic (specialized amplifiers), Materion (strategic beryllium), and STMicroelectronics (antenna chips). The second group consists of hard-to-replace suppliers due to high switching costs, such as Honeywell (flight control), Carpenter Technology (specialty alloys), Hexcel (carbon fiber), Broadcom (data exchange), and Linde (industrial gases). The third group comprises high-volume, cost-critical suppliers for mass-produced items like Starlink terminals. Key names include Wistron NeWeb (primary manufacturer) and several A-share companies like Shenzhen Sunway (connectors), Pies New Materials (forgings), Western Superconducting (alloys), and Yingliu (castings). Other niche players include Trimble (timing), Astronics (power distribution), and CTS (thermal management). The article argues that investing in these suppliers, rather than SpaceX stock directly, offers an alternative opportunity. The rationale is threefold: procurement is just beginning to scale, SpaceX's IPO brings new transparency to its supply chain, and the situation mirrors early stages of past "super terminal" ecosystems like Apple or Tesla. While risks exist (commodity cycles, geopolitical factors, technology shifts), the core thesis is that SpaceX's massive, ongoing procurement will translate into reliable revenue for its key suppliers, regardless of its own stock price volatility.

marsbit1h ago

The Foundation of SpaceX's Trillion-Dollar Valuation: Who is Dividing Up Musk's Annual Tens of Billions in Capital Expenditure?

marsbit1h ago

SpaceX's Trillion-Dollar Valuation Base: Who's Sharing in Musk's Annual Tens of Billions in Capital Expenditure?

**Title: The Foundation of SpaceX's Trillion-Dollar Valuation: Who Benefits from Musk's Annual $100 Billion Capital Expenditure?** This article argues that investors seeking to benefit from SpaceX's growth might find greater opportunities in its supply chain rather than directly investing in the company itself, drawing parallels to historical successes with Apple, Tesla, and NVIDIA suppliers. **SpaceX's Business Model & Cash Flow:** SpaceX generates revenue from three main areas: 1. **Starlink:** Its profitable core, earning $11.3B in 2023 (60% of revenue), funding other ventures. 2. **Rockets (Falcon/Starship):** Requires $3B+ in annual R&D but achieves the world's lowest launch costs. 3. **AI:** Currently unprofitable (-$6B+ in 2023), investing heavily in ground-based supercomputers (220,000 GPUs) and future orbital data centers. The cycle is: Starlink profits → fund cheaper rockets → low-cost launches deploy AI hardware → AI compute rentals generate future revenue. This cycle drives annual procurement spending of tens of billions of dollars. **The Supply Chain Beneficiaries:** Suppliers are categorized by their replaceability: **1. Nearly Irreplaceable (High Barriers to Entry):** * **NVIDIA:** Powers the Colossus supercomputer; its CUDA ecosystem creates immense switching costs. * **Eutelsat (SATS):** Controls critical radio spectrum for satellite communications; holds a ~3% stake in SpaceX. * **Filtronic (FTC):** Supplies millimeter-wave signal amplifiers for Starlink satellites; SpaceX constitutes 83% of its revenue. * **Materion (MTRN):** Global leader in beryllium production, a strategic material used in Starship structures. * **STMicroelectronics (STM):** Supplies phased-array antenna chips for Starlink satellites. **2. Replaceable, but Switching Cost is Prohibitively High:** * **Honeywell (HON):** Provides flight control and inertial navigation systems with decades of certification. * **Carpenter Technology (CRS):** Manufactures ultra-pure specialty steel alloys for Raptor engines. * **Hexcel (HXL):** Supplies custom carbon fiber composites developed over a decade with SpaceX. * **Broadcom (AVGO):** Manages high-speed data switching. * **Linde Group:** Supplies industrial gases (liquid oxygen/nitrogen) from facilities built near SpaceX launch sites. **3. High-Volume, Cost-Critical Manufacturing:** Focuses on mass-producing components like Starlink user terminals (target: 30 million units). * **Key Players:** Wistron NeWeb (6285, primary terminal manufacturer), several Chinese A-share companies (e.g., Sunway Communication, PAX New Materials, Western Metal Materials, Yingliu Co.), and smaller US firms like Trimble (TRMB, timing systems). **Why Now?** Three factors make the supply chain opportunity timely: 1. **Volume Ramp-Up:** SpaceX plans 100 launches in 2026, aims for 30 million Starlink terminals, and will deploy AI data centers, meaning procurement will accelerate. 2. **Increased Transparency:** The IPO provides public financial data, allowing investors to track supplier order growth. 3. **Historical Precedent:** The current phase is likened to Tesla's early mass-production stage (circa 2018), suggesting a long growth runway for suppliers. **Conclusion:** The article posits that while investing in SpaceX stock is betting on Elon Musk's ambitious vision at a high valuation, investing in its established suppliers is a bet on the tangible, recurring revenue from its massive procurement budget, which is largely decoupled from day-to-day stock price volatility.

链捕手1h ago

SpaceX's Trillion-Dollar Valuation Base: Who's Sharing in Musk's Annual Tens of Billions in Capital Expenditure?

链捕手1h ago

Trading

Spot
Futures
活动图片