Four Months to Ring the Bell: Crypto Custody Pioneer BitGo Showcases Financial Engineering in IPO

marsbitPublished on 2026-01-24Last updated on 2026-01-24

Abstract

BitGo, a leading cryptocurrency custody provider, has successfully completed its initial public offering (IPO) on January 22, 2026, marking the first major crypto IPO of the year. The listing was celebrated with a high-profile lights show in Manhattan and the donation of a framed Bitcoin whitepaper to the NYSE. The company priced its shares at $18, above the initial target range, raising approximately $213 million. Despite an initial 35% surge on the first trading day, the stock later fell below the offering price, with a market cap briefly exceeding $2.8 billion. BitGo also introduced tokenized shares in partnership with Ondo Global Markets, enabling trading on multiple blockchains. Founded in 2013 by Mike Belshe, BitGo pioneered multi-signature wallets and regulated custody services. It has since expanded into a comprehensive financial platform offering trading, lending, and prime brokerage services. The company currently safeguards over $82 billion in assets for more than 5,100 institutional clients globally. While BitGo reported substantial revenue growth—$10 billion in the first nine months of 2025, up from $1.9 billion a year earlier—its net profit margin remained thin at just 0.35%. Critics, including Primitive Ventures’ Dovey Wan, argue that the revenue is largely inflated by GAAP accounting from client trading volume, with real earnings being significantly lower. Key risks include high client concentration in its lending book. Despite mixed analyst views, BitGo’s...

Author: Nancy, PANews

"This morning, we took over Wall Street; tonight, we take over the sky." On January 22, crypto custody giant BitGo officially listed, firing the first shot of the 2026 crypto IPO wave.

To commemorate this milestone, BitGo donated a framed copy of the Bitcoin whitepaper to the NYSE, which was hung on the trading floor wall. That evening, a light show featuring the BitGo logo lit up the sky over Manhattan, New York, showcasing its prominence.

Ringing the Bell in Four Months, Limited Returns for Subscribing Institutions

It took BitGo just four months from filing its prospectus with the U.S. SEC to complete the sprint from application to bell-ringing.

Looking at its performance on the first day of trading, January 22, BitGo's stock price rose by about 35% at one point, with an intraday high corresponding to a market cap of over $2.8 billion, before giving back some of those gains. The next day, BitGo fell below its issue price, closing at $14.5. Compared to other crypto companies that have gone public in the past year, this valuation is not particularly high.

Additionally, as a crypto-native company, BitGo introduced an innovative tokenized play after its listing. Through a partnership with Ondo Global Markets, it tokenized its stock, allowing investors to trade it on Ethereum, Solana, and BNB Chain.

In fact, as early as February of last year, BitGo was rumored to be considering an IPO. It then submitted its IPO application to the U.S. SEC in September, planning to issue 11.8 million shares at a price range of $15 to $17 per share, aiming to raise up to approximately $200 million, with Goldman Sachs Group and Citigroup acting as joint lead underwriters. Ultimately, BitGo set the issue price at $18 per share, higher than the previously indicated range, raising about $213 million.

According to informed sources, BitGo's IPO issuance was several times oversubscribed. For example, YZi Labs announced its participation as a strategic investor. Based on the current market cap, the returns for these subscribing parties are limited for now.

In terms of shareholding structure, after the IPO completion, BitGo's founder and CEO Mike Belshe will retain control of the company, holding about 56% of the voting rights; Valor Equity Partners and Redpoint Ventures hold 4.6% and 3.9% of the voting rights, respectively.

Among them, Redpoint Ventures led BitGo's $12 million Series A funding round in 2014 and continued to invest subsequently; Valor Equity Partners led the approximately $42.5 million Series B round in 2017. Its founder, Antonio Gracias (a board member of Tesla and SpaceX), is also a member of BitGo's board.

In addition, BitGo's investors include Craft Ventures (founded by the first U.S. "AI and Crypto Czar" David Sacks), Goldman Sachs, Galaxy Digital, DRW, and many other institutions. However, as most funding rounds did not disclose specific valuations, the return rates for these institutions are difficult to calculate. Only in 2023, when BitGo completed its $100 million Series C funding round, its valuation was approximately $1.75 billion. Compared to the current listed market cap, the premium space is not substantial.

$10 Billion Revenue Accused of "Financial Engineering"

Having been established for over a decade, BitGo can be considered the "founding father" of the crypto custody business.

As early as 2013, Mike Belshe, an early member of the Google Chrome team and one of the main contributors to the HTTP/2 specification, co-founded BitGo. At its inception, the company launched the industry's first commercially viable multi-signature wallet, requiring users to complete at least two to three confirmations when initiating transactions, significantly improving the security standard for Bitcoin asset storage. Since then, BitGo has continuously iterated its wallet technology and API interfaces and was among the first to enter the compliant custody track, becoming one of the earliest crypto companies to offer regulated qualified custody services.

In 2020, BitGo launched the BitGo Prime platform, beginning its transformation from a single custody provider to a comprehensive institutional financial platform, offering trading, lending, custody, and financing liquidity services to institutional clients. In the following years, BitGo also obtained a trust license from the New York State Department of Financial Services (NYDFS) and several international regulatory approvals, and in 2025, it was approved to transform into a banking institution, further deepening its compliance layout.

It is worth mentioning that Galaxy Digital once planned to acquire BitGo for $1.2 billion, a deal that was poised to become the largest M&A transaction in the crypto industry at the time. However, due to failure to meet closing conditions, Galaxy Digital unilaterally terminated the agreement, leading to litigation between the two parties. BitGo sought $100 million in compensation, but the court ultimately ruled in favor of Galaxy Digital, and the deal fell through.

To date, BitGo's assets under management exceed $82 billion, serving over 5,100 institutional clients in more than 100 countries, including hedge funds, exchanges, mining companies, and traditional financial institutions.

The continuous expansion of its business scale has driven BitGo's rapid revenue growth, making it one of the few crypto companies able to maintain stable profitability. According to its prospectus, in the first nine months of 2025, BitGo achieved revenue of approximately $10 billion, a significant increase from $1.9 billion in the same period of 2024. This growth primarily came from the development of businesses such as digital asset sales, staking, subscription fees, settlement services, and high-frequency trading. However, despite the huge revenue, the net profit was extremely low. The net profit for the first three quarters of last year was about $35.3 million, which, although an increase from the same period in 2024 ($5.1 million), accounted for only about 0.35% of the total revenue.

Behind the rapid numerical growth is BitGo's transformation from a pure custodian to a broker. As a broker, the amount of client trading can be included in revenue, while the actual profit is only the fees paid by clients.

In this regard, Dovey Wan, founding partner of Primitive Ventures, analyzed that, judging from the quality and growth structure of its income, BitGo is not a high-quality target. Its disclosed core revenue is almost entirely GAAP rev (Generally Accepted Accounting Principles revenue), with the real revenue being pitifully small.

She stated that, based on real revenue performance, it was $146.4 million in 2023, dropped to $131.9 million in 2024, and was $100.5 million in the first half of 2025. Considering that data is often inflated before an IPO, this figure still needs to be viewed with caution. The client trading business, which contributes the majority of GAAP revenue, actually has a gross margin of only about 0.3%. In the first half of 2025, this part of the revenue was as high as $58.8 million, compared to only $500,000 in the same period last year. Staking revenue is accounting-type revenue and can be considered zero. The only segment that reflects growth potential—subscription and service business—has instead seen a significant decline. This revenue was $136.8 million in 2023, dropped to $71.7 million in 2024; and was $40.1 million in the first half of 2025, only a slight increase from $38.3 million in the same period last year. Moreover, BitGo's lending book risk is highly concentrated, with the top three clients accounting for over 50%.

Dovey also revealed that last October, investment banks had hinted that BitGo's IPO valuation was expected to be between $2.75 billion and $3 billion, planning to raise about $300 million, but low market interest led to the fundraising target being lowered to about $200 million.

However, Matthew Sigel, Head of Digital Assets Research at VanEck, is optimistic about BitGo's upside potential. He stated that BitGo is the first listed company to provide investors with pure crypto custody business and is one of the few listed crypto companies expected to achieve revenue growth of over 50% in 2025. Benefiting from the growth of tokenization business and the institutionalization of digital assets, as well as a relaxing regulatory environment, BitGo, as a quality custodian with zero hacking incidents, has huge upside potential.

Furthermore, BitGo has demonstrated strong operational momentum. According to Matthew Sigel's predictions, BitGo is expected to maintain a 26% revenue growth before 2028, achieving over $400 million in revenue and more than $120 million in EBITDA, corresponding to a reasonable market cap of over $3 billion.

BitGo has rung the bell for this year's crypto institution listings. After it, many other crypto institutions are waiting to go public. Industry giants such as Kraken, ConsenSys, Ledger, Animoca Brands, Upbit, and Bithumb have plans or have already submitted applications.

Although the market sentiment is somewhat tepid, the crypto bells on Wall Street are destined to ring continuously this year.

Related Questions

QWhat was the significance of BitGo's IPO in the context of the 2026 crypto market?

ABitGo's IPO on January 22, 2026, marked the first crypto IPO of the year, signaling a new wave of public listings for crypto companies.

QHow did BitGo's stock perform on its first day of trading and what was its subsequent price movement?

AOn its first day, BitGo's stock price rose by about 35%, reaching a market cap of over $2.8 billion, but it later gave back some of those gains. The following day, it fell below its IPO price, closing at $14.5 per share.

QWhat innovative method did BitGo use to make its stock available to a broader range of investors after going public?

ABitGo partnered with Ondo Global Markets to tokenize its stock, allowing it to trade on the Ethereum, Solana, and BNB Chain blockchains.

QAccording to the analysis by Dovey Wan, what were the main criticisms regarding the quality of BitGo's reported revenue?

ADovey Wan criticized that BitGo's massive GAAP revenue was largely from principal trading (acting as a broker), which has a very low gross margin of about 0.3%, while its more sustainable subscription and service revenue had actually declined significantly.

QWhich major acquisition deal involving BitGo fell through and what was the outcome?

AGalaxy Digital had planned to acquire BitGo for $1.2 billion, but the deal was terminated by Galaxy Digital for failure to meet closing conditions. BitGo sued for a $100 million termination fee, but the court ruled in Galaxy Digital's favor.

Related Reads

From Shouting 150 Dollars to Liquidating HYPE in Just Three Days, How Much Credibility Does Arthur Hayes Have Left?

How much of Arthur Hayes's market credibility remains? Recently, the "godfather of crypto perpetual swaps" and BitMEX co-founder has faced public criticism, including accusations from on-chain investigator ZachXBT about creating exit liquidity for his followers. Starting last week, Hayes executed multiple sudden sell-offs. He had repeatedly publicly predicted the HYPE token would reach $150. After a $100,000 bet defending Hyperliquid on June 1st, he announced just three days later that he had completely sold his HYPE and NEAR holdings, successfully exiting near the peak. He also sold ZEC and WLD. His sale of WLD appeared to be a classic "pump and dump" maneuver. On June 3rd, he publicly set a $10 target for WLD, causing its price to surge over 35%. By June 6th, he announced he had sold his WLD, citing "anomalous" SpaceX pre-IPO price action, which triggered a sharp price drop. On June 9th, Hayes published a lengthy article explaining his actions, citing factors like rising energy costs and a potential AI bubble burst. Consequently, his family office, Maelstrom, now holds positions in US energy producers and only core crypto assets BTC and ETH, having sold AI-related stocks and non-core cryptocurrencies. This pattern is not new. In 2025, he similarly touted HYPE before selling it at what turned out to be a cycle peak, only to repurchase it at the next cycle's low. Similar scenarios played out with tokens like ETHFI and ENA. Long-term observers have developed a strategy: ignore Hayes's public statements but closely monitor his on-chain actions—be cautious following his buys, but decisively follow his sells. If he continues these tactics, especially as seen with the WLD case, his market credibility risks being permanently damaged. As Hayes himself admitted in his latest article, "I remain an unapologetic gambler."

marsbit17m ago

From Shouting 150 Dollars to Liquidating HYPE in Just Three Days, How Much Credibility Does Arthur Hayes Have Left?

marsbit17m ago

Fundraising is Like a Strange Dance: The 'Absurd Drama' of Silicon Valley Founders' Capital Raises

The article details a series of absurd and revealing anecdotes shared by Silicon Valley founders about their venture capital fundraising experiences, sparked by Greg Isenberg's story of pitching to a sleeping a16z partner. Founders describe surreal pitch meetings: one faced a barefoot, peanut-eating investor who offered triple the requested amount after 30 seconds; another performed a pitch in a VC's parked car; a founder discovered his audience understood no English beyond "yes." These stories highlight the often irrational and performative nature of fundraising. Beyond the absurdity, darker power imbalances are exposed. Stories include investors suggesting founders fire co-founders for their equity, blatant market misjudgments, disrespectful behavior from LPs, and discriminatory remarks. A debate also emerges around "Sequoia's" practice of splitting a round into two valuations. However, the thread isn't solely critical. Positive counter-narratives celebrate supportive VCs who offered crucial advice during crises, respected founders' timelines, and showed simple gestures of respect—like a partner personally fetching coffee before a major pitch. Ultimately, the collective sharing acts as a pressure release, illustrating that fundraising is a complex dance of power, trust, and sometimes sheer theater. It underscores that beyond capital, mutual respect and integrity remain the most enduring foundations of the founder-investor relationship.

marsbit30m ago

Fundraising is Like a Strange Dance: The 'Absurd Drama' of Silicon Valley Founders' Capital Raises

marsbit30m ago

Vitalik's Vision for the Next Evolution of On-Chain Finance: How to Reconstruct DeFi with an 'Options Mindset'?

Vitalik Buterin recently proposed a conceptual shift for DeFi: replacing traditional Collateralized Debt Positions (CDPs) and forced liquidations with an options-based mechanism. This aims to address key vulnerabilities in current DeFi lending. The traditional CDP model, foundational to protocols like MakerDAO and Aave, allows users to borrow against collateral but relies on real-time oracles and triggers sudden, mandatory liquidations during price volatility. This can cause cascading sell-offs, oracle manipulation risks, and significant MEV extraction, exacerbating market stress. Vitalik's alternative envisions splitting an asset like 1 ETH into two complementary components: one offering stable/index-like exposure and the other absorbing the opposite risk/reward. Instead of a hard liquidation threshold, a user's exposure to the target asset would gradually and smoothly deviate (following a near-quadratic curve) as the collateral price moves. The system would primarily depend on "slow oracles" for periodic settlement rather than instant price feeds. Key potential benefits include: the elimination of abrupt, forced liquidations; drastically reduced reliance on vulnerable real-time oracles; and inherent resistance to certain MEV exploits centered on liquidation auctions. The article posits that for Ethereum DeFi to maintain its relevance amid competition from faster, cheaper chains, it must compete on sophisticated financial engineering and robustness—not just transaction speed or yields. The core value proposition should shift towards offering users clearer, more manageable risk structures, greater autonomy, and resilience in extreme scenarios, moving DeFi from high-risk experimentation towards becoming reliable financial infrastructure.

marsbit1h ago

Vitalik's Vision for the Next Evolution of On-Chain Finance: How to Reconstruct DeFi with an 'Options Mindset'?

marsbit1h ago

Trading

Spot
Futures
活动图片