First Down 1%, Then Surging Over 4%! Nvidia's Dramatic Reversal on Earnings Night. Should You Still Chase at $219?

Published on 2026-08-27Last updated on 2026-08-27

Abstract

Nvidia's shares experienced a roller-coaster ride in after-hours trading following its earnings report, initially falling then rallying. Rubin orders, an approximately 70% growth forecast for the next fiscal year, and the assertion that 'demand exceeds supply' were the key drivers behind the market reversal, while gross margin and financing concerns remain potential risks.

Earnings Figures Comprehensively Exceeded Wall Street Expectations

Nvidia's second-quarter revenue reached $96.22 billion, with adjusted earnings per share at $2.22, both surpassing Wall Street estimates. Market expectations compiled by Visible Alpha were for revenue of $92.37 billion and earnings per share of $2.10. The company's third-quarter revenue guidance is $108 billion, also exceeding analyst consensus.

After the earnings release, Nvidia's stock price first fell and then rose. Earlier concerns primarily revolved around the financial health and duration of AI infrastructure investments; subsequently, the demand, supply, and new product information provided by management during the conference call reinforced the growth narrative. The stock fell 1.6% during the regular trading session, closing around $210, and then turned positive in after-hours trading.

Vera Rubin Orders Cover Major Customers

CFO Colette Kress stated that Vera Rubin, the successor to Blackwell, has had a strong start, with orders already secured from "every major hyperscale cloud provider, AI cloud, and systems OEM." The platform began shipping for production earlier this month. Nvidia expects Vera Rubin to be the fastest-ramping product in the company's history, contributing about 20% of data center revenue in the current quarter.

This information alleviated some investors' concerns about a potential demand gap during the product transition. If Rubin ramps up as planned quickly, there will not be an immediate demand cliff following Blackwell's growth; Nvidia's revenue growth will be sustained by the new platform.

Management Expects ~70% Revenue Growth Next Fiscal Year

Kress indicated the company expects revenue growth of approximately 70% next fiscal year, though supply bottlenecks persist due to shortages of memory components. Jensen Huang further stated that actual demand far exceeds this level, and the company requires assistance from the entire supply chain to increase supply.

Technical analyst Luke Lango believes that Nvidia's revenue growth rate decelerating from 106% to around 70% does not mean the investment thesis is broken. Maintaining such a pace at a market capitalization exceeding $5 trillion remains remarkably strong. The market's initial cautious reaction stemmed more from investors' hopes for even higher growth rates and larger positive surprises.

Gross Margin and Financing Model Remain Risk Points

The second-quarter gross margin was 75%, in line with market expectations, but the company anticipates the current quarter's gross margin to decline to 74%, plus or minus 0.5 percentage points. Concurrently, operating expenses increased by 55% year-over-year. If memory costs, supply constraints, or product transition expenses continue to rise, profit margins could become a trigger for the next round of stock price volatility.

The market is also paying attention to the $500 billion financing platform established by Nvidia with institutions like Apollo, BlackRock, Blackstone, Goldman Sachs, and KKR. Some investors are concerned that Nvidia's practice of financing customers' chip purchases could create circular financing. Bulls, however, argue that the useful life and economic value of GPU infrastructure are higher than previously judged by the market, making it a viable asset for financing.

From a market perspective, the key to the after-hours reversal was not merely the current quarter's "beat," but rather the Rubin orders, the ~70% growth expectation for the next fiscal year, and management's remarks that "demand exceeds supply." In the short term, if the stock price stabilizes above the post-earnings high, the market will continue trading on the expansion of AI capital expenditures. If gross margins decline, financing controversies intensify, or supply bottlenecks impact deliveries, the post-earnings gains could also be quickly erased.

Related Reads

When Real Estate Ownership Goes Digital: What Happens to Your Rights, Risks, and Liquidity?

"Tokenizing Real Estate: Rights, Risks, and the Path to Liquidity" While tokenizing real-world assets (RWA) gains traction, real estate presents unique complexities. Beyond technical token issuance, critical challenges remain: enforcing legal rights, managing the underlying physical asset, and creating genuine secondary market liquidity. This article explores these issues through OneAsset, a Dubai-based commercial real estate (CRE) tokenization platform. OneAsset moves away from simply offering asset fragmentation. Instead, it focuses on institutional-grade infrastructure, prioritizing asset quality, legal enforceability, and operational fundamentals. Each property is held in an independent, single-asset vault, backed by a legally separate Special Purpose Vehicle (SPV) for bankruptcy remoteness. Investors acquire tokens representing the economic rights to a specific property, with precise legal claims defined by the underlying SPV structure. OneAsset emphasizes that tokenization cannot transform a poor-quality asset. Its initial focus is on institutional investors and quality Dubai-based CRE, selected for stable tenant cash flows and a clear regulatory environment. The platform integrates compliance by design, aiming to embed investor qualification and transfer rules directly into the token architecture. A core insight is that asset fragmentation does not automatically create liquidity. True liquidity depends on the asset's inherent quality—its location, cash flow, and valuation—as well as sufficient buyer demand. The goal is not just tradability, but making real estate rights more easily priced, verified, and reallocated. Looking ahead, the article discusses the potential for "AiFi" (AI-powered finance). For AI agents to autonomously allocate capital, investment assets like real estate tokens must become truly "machine-readable." This requires a high degree of standardization in legal rights, valuations, cash flows, and compliance data—a direction OneAsset is pursuing through its structured data reporting. In conclusion, real estate tokenization is shifting from a technology narrative to a focus on asset fundamentals. Blockchain can enhance efficiency and programmability, but it cannot replace sound underwriting, property management, or legal execution. The real work begins after the asset is on-chain.

marsbit21m ago

When Real Estate Ownership Goes Digital: What Happens to Your Rights, Risks, and Liquidity?

marsbit21m ago

After Affecting Two Generations, Meta Ordered to Pay $18 Billion in Damages

After more than two decades, a legal parallel has emerged. In 1998, major U.S. tobacco companies settled for $206 billion, leading to strict advertising bans and warning labels that significantly reduced smoking rates. On August 26, 2026, Meta reached a landmark settlement with U.S. attorneys general, agreeing to pay up to approximately $18 billion and implement mandatory changes to Facebook and Instagram. This historic settlement, one of the largest against a tech company, stems from allegations that Meta deliberately designed addictive features like infinite scroll and push notifications, harming youth mental health and violating child privacy laws. Facing a potential $1.4 trillion lawsuit and a series of unfavorable jury verdicts, Meta chose to settle on the eighth day of trial to avoid a catastrophic ruling. The core of the agreement is not just the financial penalty, which Meta will pay over 10 years, but a series of strict, 10-year product mandates for young users. These include a hard two-hour daily time limit (combined across apps), a default "nighttime block" from midnight to 6 AM, restricted notifications during school hours, hidden "like" counts, an optional non-algorithmic feed, and stronger age verification. An independent auditor will monitor compliance. Crucially, roughly 30% ($5.3 billion) of Meta's payment is contingent on YouTube and TikTok adopting similar measures and paying around $5 billion each. This move aims to create an industry-wide standard and prevent Meta from being competitively disadvantaged. The settlement is being likened to Big Tobacco's "tobacco moment." By legally framing addictive algorithm design as a "public nuisance," it sets a powerful precedent. Nearly 3,000 similar cases are pending against other social media giants, signaling a fundamental shift in regulatory pressure. The era where platforms could deny the addictive impact of their designs on children is effectively over.

marsbit27m ago

After Affecting Two Generations, Meta Ordered to Pay $18 Billion in Damages

marsbit27m ago

Trading

Spot
活动图片