Finance Goes 'Invisible': How Stablecoins Are Becoming the New Arteries of the Digital Economy

Author: Cobo

Original Title: Finance Goes 'Invisible': How Stablecoins Are Becoming the New Arteries of the Digital Economy

This week's highlights:

This week, Coinbase hosted a system-level product launch event with the scale of WWDC, unveiling updates across trading, derivatives, stablecoins, AI, and payment protocols. Coinbase's vision of an "Everything Exchange" not only reflects its ambition to become a super app but also points to a new implementation path for the crypto era—a foundational financial structure centered on stablecoins, asset issuance, and on-chain settlement. Financial capabilities thus become a basic resource, like internet bandwidth, that can be natively called by software and AI and automatically scheduled in the background. Stablecoins have evolved from investment products into infrastructure supporting the operation of the digital economy. In this context, we can say that Coinbase's boundaries extend beyond traditional internet super apps, and finance is beginning to detach from apps, moving towards an omnipresent "invisible finance."

Meanwhile, the mainstream adoption of stablecoins continues to accelerate. On one hand, this is evident in user-perceivable daily scenarios: the UAE's largest fuel retailer, ADNOC, now accepts stablecoin payments at nearly a thousand gas stations; Interactive Brokers supports stablecoin deposits; the fintech company Ramp, which serves businesses, enables direct stablecoin payments for paper checks; YouTube supports creators receiving payments in PayPal's stablecoin PYUSD. Stablecoins are rapidly entering corporate finance and consumer systems. On the other hand, more profound changes are occurring at a level almost imperceptible to users. Visa has launched USDC settlement within the U.S. banking system, allowing certain banks to fulfill settlement obligations directly on VisaNet using USDC. This marks a structural重构 of the settlement layer, happening deep within the banking system—more隐蔽 yet far more impactful.

Market Overview and Growth Highlights

The total market capitalization of stablecoins reached $308.606 billion, decreasing by $1.456 billion week-over-week. In terms of market structure, USDT maintains its dominant position, accounting for 60.32%; USDC ranks second with a market cap of $77.336 billion, representing 25.06%.

Blockchain Network Distribution

Top three networks by stablecoin market cap:

1. Ethereum: $166.19b

2. Tron: $80.993b

3. Solana: $16.048b

Top 3 networks with the highest weekly growth:

Related Questions

QWhat is the core concept of 'Invisible Finance' as described in the article, and how do stablecoins contribute to it?

AThe article describes 'Invisible Finance' as a future where financial capabilities, like internet bandwidth, become a fundamental resource that can be natively called by software and AI, automatically scheduled in the background. Stablecoins evolve from investment products into infrastructure supporting the digital economy. They enable this by becoming a foundational layer for asset issuance and on-chain settlement, allowing financial functions to be integrated seamlessly into any application, moving beyond a single super-app model.

QWhat significant step did Visa take regarding USDC, and why is it considered a key node for stablecoins entering the banking settlement layer?

AVisa began allowing certain US banks to use Circle's USDC directly on the VisaNet to fulfill settlement obligations, with the initial rollout on the Solana network. This is a key node because it integrates stablecoins into the core settlement process itself, moving beyond just being a front-end payment tool. It enables 24/7 settlement, reduces funds in transit time, improves liquidity predictability, and compresses the need for redundant capital reserves, fundamentally changing bank behavior towards liquidity management.

QAccording to the market overview, what are the top three blockchain networks by stablecoin market value, and which stablecoins showed the highest weekly growth?

AThe top three blockchain networks by stablecoin market value are: 1. Ethereum with $166.19 billion, 2. Tron with $80.993 billion, and 3. Solana with $16.048 billion. The stablecoins with the highest weekly growth were: 1. USDD (USDD) at +20.29%, 2. Resolv USD (USR) at +16.97%, and 3. First Digital USD (FDUSD) at +16.35%.

QWhat major regulatory shift is occurring in the US regarding crypto companies and banking, as indicated by the OCC's actions?

AThe US Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC) granted conditional approval for federal trust bank charter applications to several crypto companies including Ripple, Circle, and BitGo. These charters allow the companies to hold customer assets but not accept deposits or make loans. This regulatory shift marks the deep integration of stablecoins, custody, and traditional financial regulation, paving the way for institutional capital entry and providing a clear path for compliant stablecoin expansion within the US banking system.

QHow does JPMorgan's analysis contrast with optimistic projections for stablecoin growth, and what factors does it cite for a more conservative outlook?

AJPMorgan projects the total stablecoin market capitalization to reach only $500-600 billion by 2028, which is far below the often-cited trillion-dollar expectations. The analysis argues that current stablecoin demand is still primarily driven by crypto trading, derivatives, and DeFi, rather than real-world payment scenarios. It also cites competition from bank-issued tokenized deposits, Central Bank Digital Currencies (CBDCs), and potential SWIFT on-chain solutions as factors that will divert demand away from private stablecoins, leading to a future of coexistence and division of labor rather than independent explosive growth for stablecoins alone.

Related Reads

Gary Yang: Agent Economy and AI Submicroeconomics

**Title:** Agent Economy and AI Sub-Microeconomics - Gary Yang **Summary:** Following the AI singularity, the pace of evolution has accelerated rapidly, creating new generational disparities in technological advancement globally. While many regions are still grappling with single-agent bottlenecks, Silicon Valley has moved ahead into the next dimension: the Agent Economy and A2A ecosystems. The article outlines six key areas of this emerging paradigm: 1. **AI Payment Competition & H2A Bottlenecks:** A fierce battle for AI Agent payment protocol standards is underway (e.g., MPP, x402). However, most current efforts remain Human-to-Agent (H2A), essentially grafting AI onto traditional human-centric commerce, which creates a non-AI-native bottleneck. The true potential lies in Agent-to-Agent (A2A) autonomous economies. 2. **Agent Economy & the Inevitable A2A Trend:** The Agent Economy is defined by autonomous AI Agents creating, exchanging, and capitalizing value as independent economic actors. The A2A ecosystem describes their interactions. This represents the next major investment frontier, akin to the early days of e-commerce or DeFi, but with faster iteration and an AI-native, efficiency-first perspective that often diverges from human needs. 3. **AI Protocol vs. Crypto Protocol:** AI Protocols are the foundational rules for Agent interaction in an open network (communication, discovery, collaboration), akin to the governance and economic laws of the AI world. Currently, they focus on communication and weak boundaries, unlike Crypto Protocols which emphasize asset rights and clear ownership. While they appear different due to political-economic factors and legacy system constraints, their eventual convergence into a unified Digital Protocol system is seen as inevitable, driven by first principles. 4. **AI Agent Sub-Microeconomics & Biological Analogy:** AI Agent economics differ fundamentally from human economics: higher frequency/lower value transactions, energy/value direct correlation, efficiency-driven (not emotional) decisions, task-oriented (not consumption-oriented) behavior, and near-zero organizational/communication costs. A powerful analogy frames the Agent economy as a biological system: the LLM is the nucleus, the Agent harness is the cytoplasm, the Agent itself is a cell, its communication protocol is the cell membrane, and external tools (Skills, Prompts) are the extracellular environment. 5. **The Inevitability of AIFi & FinChip:** AIFi (AI Finance) represents the financial system where AI-native value within the Agent economy is tokenized and exchanged. Unlike TradFi/DeFi where value resides *in* finance, in AIFi, value originates *in* AI, and finance becomes its form. This shift is enabled by Agents taking over value discovery. FinChip (Financial Chip) is introduced as a key infrastructure—a fusion of AI autonomy and crypto smart contracts—forming intelligent financial assets to power the future A2A economy. 6. **AI-Native as a Paradigm Shift:** Adopting AI is not akin to "Internet+". It requires AI-Native thinking—designing systems based on first principles, the shortest energy-value path, and maximum efficiency. This abstract, counter-intuitive logic poses a significant, ongoing challenge for all practitioners, as effective, generalized upgrade methodologies will be slow to emerge in this rapidly evolving landscape.

链捕手40m ago



链捕手40m ago

From 'The Big Short' to San Francisco: The Revelry and Dizziness Within the AI Bubble

From "The Big Short" to San Francisco: The Frenzy and Dizziness in the AI Bubble The article captures the intense, frenetic atmosphere in San Francisco, the epicenter of the current AI boom. Drawing a parallel to the "smell of money" from *The Big Short*, the author observes a city gripped by a singular status game centered entirely on AI and technology. This manifests in a palpable, caffeine-fueled anxiety ("people are shaking"), rampant comparison using vanity metrics like funding rounds, and pervasive "Big Bubble Behavior." The piece explores the city's stark contrasts: its dystopian streets versus beautiful vistas, and the disconnect between the doomsday concerns of some AI researchers and the optimistic, growth-focused "GTM" teams. It critiques the obsession with "math genius" founders as the new ticket to outsized returns, akin to scouting sports prodigies. Referencing economic historian Carlota Perez's "frenzy phase" and Karl Polanyi's "double movement," the author frames the boom as a period where financial speculation detaches from fundamentals, with society potentially becoming subordinate to a new economic force driven by "geniuses in data centers." Ultimately, while acknowledging the unprecedented wealth creation and party-like energy, the article concludes with cautionary advice: when the music is playing, you should dance, but don't get drunk. The core reminder is to stay grounded, avoid distorted judgment, and maintain perspective amidst the euphoria.

marsbit42m ago



marsbit42m ago

Is AI Creating a New Class of 'Information Poor'?

AI is generating a new kind of "information poverty." The core issue isn't that AI denies answers to the poor; it's that it provides abundant, cheap, and plausible-sounding answers to everyone. This availability shifts the true scarcity from obtaining answers to possessing the **judgment to evaluate them** and the access to turn them into real-world opportunities. New information poverty thus describes those who have AI tools and outputs, but lack the complementary skills, authorization, and contextual experience to critically assess and act on them. Research reveals a multi-layered divide: access to AI is stratified by income and platform design (e.g., premium vs. free, embedded tools). In workplaces, usage heavily favors higher-paid, more experienced, or formally trained employees, with AI often automating entry-level tasks that were traditional stepping stones. Crucially, the heaviest users are often mid-career professionals whose existing expertise allows them to effectively judge and leverage AI outputs, while novices risk over-relying on them without building judgment. While controlled experiments show AI can significantly boost low-skilled workers' performance, real-world adoption and benefit are constrained by unequal social and organizational structures. Historically, general-purpose technologies first reward those with existing complementary capital. AI, by affecting judgment-based work, may accelerate and deepen this initial inequality gap, even if it narrows over decades. The danger lies in the illusion of competence it creates, potentially stunting the very critical thinking needed in an era where judgment is paramount.

marsbit1h ago



marsbit1h ago

Jensen Huang 'Saves' South Korean Stock Market: Locks In SK Hynix Memory, Chip Shortage to Continue

On June 5th, South Korea's stock market experienced a sharp decline, with major chipmakers like Samsung and SK Hynix dropping nearly 10%. Amidst the turmoil, NVIDIA CEO Jensen Huang's visit to Seoul played a dramatic role in boosting market sentiment. Following a dinner meeting with SK Group Chairman Chey Tae-won and SK Hynix CEO Kwak Noh-Jung, Huang confirmed that NVIDIA's new Vera CPU will utilize SK Hynix DRAM. The companies announced a multi-year technical partnership to co-develop next-generation memory for NVIDIA's AI infrastructure, covering products from data centers to personal AI and robotics. This collaboration extends beyond memory supply. SK Hynix is integrating NVIDIA's AI and Omniverse platform into its own semiconductor design and manufacturing processes, including computational lithography and creating digital twins of its fabrication plants for autonomous operation. While strengthening ties with SK Hynix, NVIDIA is diversifying its supply chain for the upcoming HBM4 memory, with Samsung, SK Hynix, and Micron all certified as suppliers for its Vera Rubin platform. Despite this, Huang warned that the global chip shortage, driven by relentless demand from AI factory construction, is expected to persist for several years across the entire supply chain. His visit underscores NVIDIA's systematic effort to deepen integration with South Korea's broader tech industry.

marsbit2h ago



marsbit2h ago

Nasdaq Plunges 4.2% in a Single Day: Does "Black Friday" Burst the U.S. Stock Market Bubble?

The Nasdaq plunged 4.18% on June 5, 2026, its worst single-day drop in over a year, as a much stronger-than-expected US jobs report triggered fears of economic overheating and delayed Federal Reserve interest rate cuts. The selloff, centered on high-valuation tech and AI stocks like Nvidia and Broadcom, spread across major indices. The article examines whether this signals a market top. The strong May non-farm payrolls data, nearly double expectations, pushed bond yields higher, directly hurting rate-sensitive tech stocks. This exposed vulnerabilities in the crowded AI trade, where valuations had soared on narratives of infinite growth, despite emerging signs of slowing order momentum and corporate AI monetization challenges. Prior to the drop, market indicators flashed warning signs: historically high valuations (e.g., Shiller CAPE ratio near 39.5), extreme bullish sentiment, and high levels of leverage. Technical charts showed key support levels being breached. Wall Street is divided on the outlook. Bears, citing risks of "stagflation" and AI bubble comparisons to the dot-com era, warn of a potential significant correction. Bulls view the drop as a healthy correction within a bull market, underpinned by a strong economy and expected corporate earnings growth of around 7% in 2026. The immediate future hinges on upcoming key events: the May CPI inflation data and the mid-June FOMC meeting. Their outcomes will critically shape market expectations for the Fed's rate path. The article concludes that conditions for a major market top are aligning, marking a fragile transition from narrative-driven gains to a phase demanding validation from macroeconomic data and corporate fundamentals. Caution is advised.

marsbit2h ago



marsbit2h ago

Trading

Spot

Futures