Fed Officials: The Current Choice Is Between Patience and Interest Rate Hikes; Inflation Is Top Economic Risk, AI Not Impactful Currently

marsbitPublished on 2026-06-05Last updated on 2026-06-05

Abstract

Fed officials sent hawkish signals on inflation and interest rates. Key officials emphasized that the central bank's current choice is between maintaining patience and considering rate hikes to combat stubbornly high inflation, which they identified as the top economic risk. Kansas City Fed President Jeffrey Schmid explicitly placed rate hikes on the table, while San Francisco Fed President Mary Daly stated policy is in a good place but the Fed is prepared to move in "either direction," cautioning that forward guidance could be misleading amid high uncertainty. Market pricing now reflects a significant chance of a rate increase this year. Regarding AI, officials noted it is currently neither raising nor lowering inflation and has not yet delivered widespread productivity gains at a macroeconomic level. While AI could become a disinflationary force over a five-to-ten-year horizon, it is not an immediate factor for near-term monetary policy decisions. The next FOMC meeting in June is widely expected to leave rates unchanged. Officials also observed that the labor market appears balanced and is showing signs of stabilizing.

Author: Li Dan

Source: Wall Street News

Federal Reserve officials made concentrated remarks on Thursday, April 4th, Eastern US time. Three regional Fed presidents sent relatively hawkish signals regarding the path of inflation and interest rates. They indicated that the core dilemma currently facing the Fed is choosing between maintaining patience by keeping rates steady or proactively raising interest rates to suppress persistently high inflation. One official explicitly stated that AI is currently neither pushing inflation higher nor lowering it, having limited impact on short-term monetary policy decisions.

Kansas City Fed President Jeffrey Schmid bluntly stated that inflation is the top risk facing the US economy and, for the first time publicly, included interest rate hikes in policy discussions, omitting any mention of rate cuts.

San Francisco Fed President Mary Daly noted that monetary policy is currently in a reasonable position, but economic uncertainty is too high, and providing forward guidance could potentially mislead markets. The Fed is prepared to "respond in both directions." Market interest rate futures indicate that investors now perceive the probability of a rate hike within the year as having risen to a relatively high level.

The Fed is scheduled to hold its next monetary policy meeting, the Federal Open Market Committee (FOMC) meeting, on June 16-17. This will be the first FOMC meeting chaired by the new Fed Chair, Kevin Warsh, and the market widely expects the policy rate to be held steady at that time.

Both Daly and Richmond Fed President Thomas Barkin, who also spoke on Thursday, have FOMC voting rights next year and in 2027, while Schmid is a voting member in the following year, 2028. Therefore, their statements are receiving significant market attention.

Schmid: Rate Hike Option is on the Table, Considering Whether Inflation is Temporary

Schmid was direct in his remarks at an economic forum in Oklahoma on Thursday, explicitly putting rate hikes on the table as an option.

He said: "The big question now is, do we remain patient? Our inflation numbers may have climbed to around 3.5%, no one likes that number. Is it temporary... or should we take action? Should we say, okay, it's time to raise rates 25 or 50 basis points and see if we can push it down?"

Schmid's comments reflect deepening concern within the Fed about the persistence of inflation. Previously, Fed officials generally believed that inflation driven by tariffs and oil prices would naturally subside over time, but this assessment is now facing challenges. According to Reuters, the Fed's policy rate has been held in the 3.5% to 3.75% range since last December, while inflation has remained above the 2% policy target for over five consecutive years.

Schmid made no mention of the possibility of rate cuts throughout his remarks. This stands in stark contrast to the stance at the beginning of the year when most officials considered rate cuts the baseline scenario. He emphasized that the 2% inflation target facilitates clear communication, and the Fed should not be ambiguous on this issue, "should not let that message become fuzzy."

Daly: Prepared to Respond in Both Directions, Forward Guidance Could Be Misleading

Speaking at the Bloomberg Tech Conference in San Francisco on Thursday, Daly said monetary policy is currently in a good place, but economic uncertainty is too high to provide clear guidance on the direction of interest rates.

She said: "We are prepared to respond in both directions on rates, no matter how the economy evolves. I think providing more forward guidance at this point could ultimately be misleading because we have to wait for the economic picture to evolve."

On inflation, Daly noted that the Fed's preferred inflation gauge rose 3.8% year-over-year in April, the largest increase since 2023. She attributed the main drivers of current inflation to tariffs, as well as rising energy and food prices following the outbreak of the Iran war—persistently rising oil prices have spread to prices of goods like fertilizer and equipment. Regarding the job market, she mentioned the current unemployment rate is 4.3%, with the labor market showing signs of stabilization.

Daly stated that as the economic situation develops, more officials are leaning towards the Fed making it clear that all options, including both rate cuts and hikes, are under consideration. According to federal funds futures contracts, investors currently see a higher likelihood of a rate hike within the year.

Daly: AI Could Lower Inflation in Five to Ten Years, No Widespread Productivity Boost Seen Currently

Addressing the widely discussed impact of AI on the economy, Daly stated that AI is currently neither a factor pushing inflation higher nor has it manifested widespread productivity gains at the macroeconomic data level.

She said, "We have not yet seen a widespread productivity boost," and the return on business investment in AI "remains to be realized," but business enthusiasm for the technology is "pretty strong."

According to reports, Daly believes that within a five-to-ten-year timeframe, AI has the potential to be a force lowering inflation. However, for monetary policy operating on a 12-month horizon, this AI effect is "not a pressing issue."

She also pointed out that currently, generative AI is primarily used to assist workers rather than replace them. Whether AI-driven productivity gains ultimately bring about deflationary effects depends crucially on timing.

Daly expressed optimism about AI, expecting 2027 to be a "litmus test" year for the AI industry.

Barkin: Job Market Balanced, No Signs of Labor Shortage Tension

Speaking after an event in Loudoun County, Virginia, on Thursday, Barkin said the U.S. labor market is currently in a balanced state, with no significant increase in overall labor demand.

He said, "I'm not seeing any change in the job market," noting signs of rising demand in technical occupations and healthcare, but overall, the job market is not tight.

Barkin stated that in conversations with employers, "I'm not hearing the kind of concerns I would call frothy, tight." This assessment aligns with Schmid's view that the overall economy is performing well and with Daly's mention of labor market stabilization, further supporting the Fed's current stance of holding steady and awaiting more data.

Related Questions

QWhat are the two main policy options facing the Federal Reserve according to the article?

AThe Federal Reserve is currently facing the core choice of either keeping patient and holding interest rates steady, or proactively raising interest rates to combat stubbornly high inflation.

QAccording to Kansas City Fed President Schmid, what is the number one risk to the U.S. economy?

AKansas City Fed President Jeffrey Schmid stated that inflation is the number one risk currently facing the U.S. economy.

QWhy does San Francisco Fed President Daly suggest that providing forward guidance might be misleading now?

ASan Francisco Fed President Mary Daly suggests that providing forward guidance on interest rates might be misleading because economic uncertainty is too high, and the Fed needs to wait for how the economic situation evolves.

QWhat is the article's view on AI's current impact on inflation and monetary policy?

AThe article, citing Fed officials, states that AI is currently neither pushing up nor lowering inflation, and it has not yet led to widespread productivity gains. Therefore, its effect is not an urgent issue for monetary policy decisions, which operate on a roughly 12-month cycle.

QWhat is the market's expectation for the upcoming FOMC meeting in June regarding the policy rate?

AThe market generally expects the Federal Reserve to keep the policy interest rate unchanged at the upcoming FOMC meeting in June.

Related Reads

Who Captures Value in Web 2.5?

Title: Who Captures Value in Web 2.5? Summary: For most of financial history, moving money was difficult and slow. Cryptocurrencies and stablecoins promised faster, cheaper transfers. However, their true potential is realized not by replacing traditional finance but by acting as an efficient, invisible settlement layer beneath it—a hybrid model called "Web 2.5." This fusion combines the regulation and familiar interfaces of traditional finance with the low-cost, programmable, always-on settlement of crypto. The critical question is: where does value accumulate in this new system? The answer lies in the coordination or "translation" layer that bridges the two financial worlds. History shows that the middleman connecting systems often captures immense value, as seen with Visa or SWIFT. This layer controls the flow of funds and can extract fees, collect float interest, and wield significant power (e.g., sanctions). Now, four main models are competing to become this dominant translation layer: protocols (like Chainlink), market utilities, banking cooperatives, and central bank clubs. For instance, Chainlink, in partnership with a consortium of banks, is piloting real-time FX settlement. SWIFT is building its own blockchain-based ledger layer. The Bank for International Settlements is testing tokenized central bank reserves. Ultimately, Web 2.5 is more promising than a purely decentralized utopia because it doesn't require abandoning existing systems. Instead, crypto becomes a commoditized, hidden infrastructure enabling faster, cheaper transactions within the traditional financial framework. The winning coordination layer will hold the power and capture the economic value in this new landscape.

链捕手3h ago

Who Captures Value in Web 2.5?

链捕手3h ago

Trading

Spot
活动图片