Fed Officials: The Current Choice Is Between Patience and Interest Rate Hikes; Inflation Is Top Economic Risk, AI Not Impactful Currently

marsbitPublished on 2026-06-05Last updated on 2026-06-05

Abstract

Fed officials sent hawkish signals on inflation and interest rates. Key officials emphasized that the central bank's current choice is between maintaining patience and considering rate hikes to combat stubbornly high inflation, which they identified as the top economic risk. Kansas City Fed President Jeffrey Schmid explicitly placed rate hikes on the table, while San Francisco Fed President Mary Daly stated policy is in a good place but the Fed is prepared to move in "either direction," cautioning that forward guidance could be misleading amid high uncertainty. Market pricing now reflects a significant chance of a rate increase this year. Regarding AI, officials noted it is currently neither raising nor lowering inflation and has not yet delivered widespread productivity gains at a macroeconomic level. While AI could become a disinflationary force over a five-to-ten-year horizon, it is not an immediate factor for near-term monetary policy decisions. The next FOMC meeting in June is widely expected to leave rates unchanged. Officials also observed that the labor market appears balanced and is showing signs of stabilizing.

Author: Li Dan

Source: Wall Street News

Federal Reserve officials made concentrated remarks on Thursday, April 4th, Eastern US time. Three regional Fed presidents sent relatively hawkish signals regarding the path of inflation and interest rates. They indicated that the core dilemma currently facing the Fed is choosing between maintaining patience by keeping rates steady or proactively raising interest rates to suppress persistently high inflation. One official explicitly stated that AI is currently neither pushing inflation higher nor lowering it, having limited impact on short-term monetary policy decisions.

Kansas City Fed President Jeffrey Schmid bluntly stated that inflation is the top risk facing the US economy and, for the first time publicly, included interest rate hikes in policy discussions, omitting any mention of rate cuts.

San Francisco Fed President Mary Daly noted that monetary policy is currently in a reasonable position, but economic uncertainty is too high, and providing forward guidance could potentially mislead markets. The Fed is prepared to "respond in both directions." Market interest rate futures indicate that investors now perceive the probability of a rate hike within the year as having risen to a relatively high level.

The Fed is scheduled to hold its next monetary policy meeting, the Federal Open Market Committee (FOMC) meeting, on June 16-17. This will be the first FOMC meeting chaired by the new Fed Chair, Kevin Warsh, and the market widely expects the policy rate to be held steady at that time.

Both Daly and Richmond Fed President Thomas Barkin, who also spoke on Thursday, have FOMC voting rights next year and in 2027, while Schmid is a voting member in the following year, 2028. Therefore, their statements are receiving significant market attention.

Schmid: Rate Hike Option is on the Table, Considering Whether Inflation is Temporary

Schmid was direct in his remarks at an economic forum in Oklahoma on Thursday, explicitly putting rate hikes on the table as an option.

He said: "The big question now is, do we remain patient? Our inflation numbers may have climbed to around 3.5%, no one likes that number. Is it temporary... or should we take action? Should we say, okay, it's time to raise rates 25 or 50 basis points and see if we can push it down?"

Schmid's comments reflect deepening concern within the Fed about the persistence of inflation. Previously, Fed officials generally believed that inflation driven by tariffs and oil prices would naturally subside over time, but this assessment is now facing challenges. According to Reuters, the Fed's policy rate has been held in the 3.5% to 3.75% range since last December, while inflation has remained above the 2% policy target for over five consecutive years.

Schmid made no mention of the possibility of rate cuts throughout his remarks. This stands in stark contrast to the stance at the beginning of the year when most officials considered rate cuts the baseline scenario. He emphasized that the 2% inflation target facilitates clear communication, and the Fed should not be ambiguous on this issue, "should not let that message become fuzzy."

Daly: Prepared to Respond in Both Directions, Forward Guidance Could Be Misleading

Speaking at the Bloomberg Tech Conference in San Francisco on Thursday, Daly said monetary policy is currently in a good place, but economic uncertainty is too high to provide clear guidance on the direction of interest rates.

She said: "We are prepared to respond in both directions on rates, no matter how the economy evolves. I think providing more forward guidance at this point could ultimately be misleading because we have to wait for the economic picture to evolve."

On inflation, Daly noted that the Fed's preferred inflation gauge rose 3.8% year-over-year in April, the largest increase since 2023. She attributed the main drivers of current inflation to tariffs, as well as rising energy and food prices following the outbreak of the Iran war—persistently rising oil prices have spread to prices of goods like fertilizer and equipment. Regarding the job market, she mentioned the current unemployment rate is 4.3%, with the labor market showing signs of stabilization.

Daly stated that as the economic situation develops, more officials are leaning towards the Fed making it clear that all options, including both rate cuts and hikes, are under consideration. According to federal funds futures contracts, investors currently see a higher likelihood of a rate hike within the year.

Daly: AI Could Lower Inflation in Five to Ten Years, No Widespread Productivity Boost Seen Currently

Addressing the widely discussed impact of AI on the economy, Daly stated that AI is currently neither a factor pushing inflation higher nor has it manifested widespread productivity gains at the macroeconomic data level.

She said, "We have not yet seen a widespread productivity boost," and the return on business investment in AI "remains to be realized," but business enthusiasm for the technology is "pretty strong."

According to reports, Daly believes that within a five-to-ten-year timeframe, AI has the potential to be a force lowering inflation. However, for monetary policy operating on a 12-month horizon, this AI effect is "not a pressing issue."

She also pointed out that currently, generative AI is primarily used to assist workers rather than replace them. Whether AI-driven productivity gains ultimately bring about deflationary effects depends crucially on timing.

Daly expressed optimism about AI, expecting 2027 to be a "litmus test" year for the AI industry.

Barkin: Job Market Balanced, No Signs of Labor Shortage Tension

Speaking after an event in Loudoun County, Virginia, on Thursday, Barkin said the U.S. labor market is currently in a balanced state, with no significant increase in overall labor demand.

He said, "I'm not seeing any change in the job market," noting signs of rising demand in technical occupations and healthcare, but overall, the job market is not tight.

Barkin stated that in conversations with employers, "I'm not hearing the kind of concerns I would call frothy, tight." This assessment aligns with Schmid's view that the overall economy is performing well and with Daly's mention of labor market stabilization, further supporting the Fed's current stance of holding steady and awaiting more data.

Related Questions

QWhat are the two main policy options facing the Federal Reserve according to the article?

AThe Federal Reserve is currently facing the core choice of either keeping patient and holding interest rates steady, or proactively raising interest rates to combat stubbornly high inflation.

QAccording to Kansas City Fed President Schmid, what is the number one risk to the U.S. economy?

AKansas City Fed President Jeffrey Schmid stated that inflation is the number one risk currently facing the U.S. economy.

QWhy does San Francisco Fed President Daly suggest that providing forward guidance might be misleading now?

ASan Francisco Fed President Mary Daly suggests that providing forward guidance on interest rates might be misleading because economic uncertainty is too high, and the Fed needs to wait for how the economic situation evolves.

QWhat is the article's view on AI's current impact on inflation and monetary policy?

AThe article, citing Fed officials, states that AI is currently neither pushing up nor lowering inflation, and it has not yet led to widespread productivity gains. Therefore, its effect is not an urgent issue for monetary policy decisions, which operate on a roughly 12-month cycle.

QWhat is the market's expectation for the upcoming FOMC meeting in June regarding the policy rate?

AThe market generally expects the Federal Reserve to keep the policy interest rate unchanged at the upcoming FOMC meeting in June.

Related Reads

Trump's 'Bitcoin Retirement Plan' Hits Roadblock: Democrats Claim It Endangers American Workers' Pensions?

Democratic Senators Bernie Sanders (I-VT) and Elizabeth Warren (D-MA), along with Rep. Bobby Scott (D-VA), are urging the Labor Department to repeal a proposed rule that would open U.S. retirement savings accounts, like 401(k) plans, to investments in Bitcoin and other cryptocurrencies. In a letter to Acting Labor Secretary Keith Sonderling, they argue the rule would endanger workers' financial futures and contradicts long-standing legal precedents under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA). The rule, stemming from a Trump executive order, would shift the legal standard for plan fiduciaries. Instead of requiring them to prove they conducted due diligence on volatile assets, it would presume prudence if they followed a specified process. The lawmakers warn this exposes the $14.2 trillion in 401(k) savings to highly volatile and less-regulated assets, citing FINRA warnings on crypto's risks and FBI data on massive crypto scam losses. The letter also alleges a conflict of interest, noting that President Trump's adult children manage the family's crypto business, which has raised billions. They claim the rule could allow the Trump family to profit at the expense of workers and retirees. Consumer advocates echo concerns that it could turn retirement savings into a lifeline for a risky industry. The Trump administration defends the rule as expanding worker choice, with officials stating it ends the department "picking winners and losers" and requires fiduciaries to follow a prudent process.

foresightnews_api3m ago

Trump's 'Bitcoin Retirement Plan' Hits Roadblock: Democrats Claim It Endangers American Workers' Pensions?

foresightnews_api3m ago

Rules Change Mid-Game, Polymarket’s Billion-Dollar Bitcoin Prediction Market Mired in Settlement Controversy

A nearly $150 million prediction market contract on Polymarket is in turmoil after the platform refused to settle in favor of traders who correctly predicted that MicroStrategy (now Strategy) would sell Bitcoin. The core dispute revolves around a sale of 32 BTC, which occurred between May 26-31 but was officially disclosed in an SEC 8-K filing on June 1. The original contract stated it would resolve to "Yes" if Strategy sold any Bitcoin before May 31, 11:59 PM ET, using public disclosures and on-chain data as proof. After the filing on June 1, traders who saw the disclosure rushed to buy "Yes" contracts, believing it was conclusive evidence. However, Polymarket's operators later added a rule that the disclosure itself must occur by the deadline, not just the transaction, invalidating the filing as proof. This retroactive rule change has sparked accusations of market manipulation, leaving traders like "willo2," who invested $527,000, facing total losses. The controversy highlights a deeper structural flaw in Polymarket's decentralized settlement system, which relies on UMA's optimistic oracle. Disputed resolutions are ultimately decided by a vote among UMA token holders, a mechanism critics say is vulnerable to manipulation by large holders ("whales") who can vote in their own financial interest rather than on objective facts. Data suggests a high concentration of voting power and significant overlap between voters and Polymarket traders. The dispute emerges as prediction markets like Polymarket and Kalshi are experiencing massive growth and seeking mainstream financial legitimacy, having recently secured regulatory approval from the U.S. CFTC. However, the incident underscores the unresolved tension between decentralized, token-vote-based settlement and the need for transparent, rules-based outcomes in high-stakes financial contracts.

foresightnews_api6m ago

Rules Change Mid-Game, Polymarket’s Billion-Dollar Bitcoin Prediction Market Mired in Settlement Controversy

foresightnews_api6m ago

Ethereum Foundation Researcher: Quantum Day Is Approaching, Plans to Complete Quantum-Resistant Migration by 2029

Ethereum Foundation researcher Justin Drake discusses the implications of a recent quantum computing breakthrough by Google’s quantum AI team, which demonstrated a 10x efficiency improvement in Shor’s algorithm against the secp256k1 elliptic curve used in Bitcoin and Ethereum. Notably, Google kept key algorithmic details confidential, using zero-knowledge proofs to verify the result without disclosure—a first in academia. Shortly after, the core optimization was independently reproduced, and an open-source competition (ecdsa.fail) emerged, further improving the algorithm by 8.4%. Meanwhile, startup Oratomic published research suggesting that neutral-atom quantum architectures could break secp256k1 with only 10,000 physical qubits, accelerating the timeline for "Q-Day"—the day quantum computers can break widely used cryptography. Drake estimates a 50% probability of Q-Day by 2032 and a 10% chance by 2030, contrasting with the U.S. government’s more conservative 2035 forecast. He warns against panic but stresses timely migration to post-quantum cryptography. Ethereum plans to complete its migration by 2029, covering consensus, data, and execution layers with hash-based systems. The Foundation is also developing leanVM, a formally verifiable zkVM, and has launched two $1 million initiatives to advance SNARK-friendly cryptography.

foresightnews_api6m ago

Ethereum Foundation Researcher: Quantum Day Is Approaching, Plans to Complete Quantum-Resistant Migration by 2029

foresightnews_api6m ago

Trading

Spot
Futures
活动图片