Double Whammy: Yen's Wild Swings + Government Shutdown, Where's the Bottom for the Crypto Market?

Odaily星球日报Published on 2026-01-26Last updated on 2026-01-26

Abstract

"Crypto Market Plunge: Bitcoin, Ethereum, and Solana fell sharply, with BTC dropping to $86,090 and ETH to $2,786. The sell-off was driven by two major factors: a sharp appreciation of the Japanese Yen and rising fears of another U.S. government shutdown. The Yen’s surge, potentially due to coordinated intervention by Japan and the U.S., triggered unwinding of JPY carry trades, where investors borrowed cheap Yen to buy risk assets like crypto. This led to forced liquidations. Meanwhile, political tensions increased the probability of a U.S. government shutdown to 82%, stalling crucial crypto market structure legislation and adding regulatory uncertainty. In contrast, gold and silver hit all-time highs, highlighting a flight to traditional safe-haven assets. Analysts suggest key support levels for BTC include $80K, $74K, and $70K, with a break below $50K potentially sparking renewed 'Bitcoin is dead' narratives."

Original | Odaily Planet Daily (@OdailyChina)

Author | Ethan (@ethanzhang_web3)

"Black Monday" has struck again.

OKX market data shows that in the early hours of January 26th, BTC dropped from $88,945 to a low of $86,090, a maximum decline of 3.21%; ETH also fell from $2,942 to $2,786, a maximum drop of 5.3%; SOL dropped from $126.99 to $117.16, a maximum decline of 7.74%. As of the evening of the 26th, the market saw a slight rebound, with BTC temporarily reported at $88,200, ETH at $2,915, and SOL at $123.

In stark contrast to the gloom enveloping the crypto market, gold and silver prices have repeatedly hit new all-time highs recently. COMEX data shows that the international silver price reached a high of 109.560 dollars per ounce within 24 hours, with an intraday gain of 8.03%; international gold also strengthened simultaneously, rising to 5059.7 dollars per ounce, up 1.65% on the day. Additionally, the Japanese Yen showed strength in the foreign exchange market. Data shows that USD/JPY touched 154, hitting a new low since November of last year, with an intraday decline of 1.11%.

On social media, the phrase "Anything But Crypto" succinctly captures the frustration of crypto investors.

Trigger 1: Volatility in the Yen Forex Market

Today, the Japanese Yen experienced a wave of intense volatility in the foreign exchange market, with the USD/JPY rate sharply rising from 158.4 to 153.9 at one point, a gain of over 4 yen. Behind this move, the widespread market speculation is that Japan and the US may have begun joint intervention in the exchange rate, or at least engaged in "rate checking," a precursor to foreign exchange intervention.

The sharp volatility in the Yen's exchange rate did not come out of nowhere. As early as January 23rd, the USD/JPY rate in the Tokyo forex market saw a short-term significant appreciation.

The Federal Reserve's rare move to conduct "rate checking" is seen as a preparatory stage for FX intervention, signaling the US government's high level of concern regarding Yen depreciation. According to a Xinhua News Agency report, rate checking typically occurs in the preliminary stage of exchange rate intervention. It is an action where monetary authorities, through the central bank, ask banks about the current exchange rate and market conditions, representing a more direct market operation signal than verbal intervention.

In fact, since 1996, the US has only intervened in the foreign exchange market on three separate occasions, the last time being in 2011 after the Great East Japan Earthquake, when it sold Yen in conjunction with G7 countries to stabilize the market. Precisely because of this, the market interprets this sharp move in the Yen as a potential signal of joint intervention by Japan and the US, an emergency response likely aimed at the Yen's sharp decline. For the crypto market, this means market liquidity and risk sentiment could be significantly impacted, especially as global macroeconomic uncertainties intensify.

Why Would a Stronger Yen Worsen Bitcoin's Decline?

For a long time, Japan's low-interest-rate policy has attracted global investors to the carry trade of borrowing Yen and converting it into higher-yielding assets. This so-called "Yen carry trade" has been a major component of global market liquidity. Carry traders borrow low-interest Yen and convert it into US dollars or other high-yield assets to invest in risk assets like Bitcoin and stocks. However, when the Yen exchange rate appreciates sharply, carry traders typically face pressure from rising funding costs, forcing them to unwind their positions and sell Bitcoin to repay their debts.

Take August 2024 as an example. The Yen surged sharply due to the Bank of Japan's unexpected rate hike and market expectations for FX intervention. This triggered a collapse in carry trades, causing Bitcoin to plummet from $65,000 to $50,000 in just a few days.

Now, with the Yen's exchange rate sharply appreciating again, similar carry trades in the market may once again be forced to unwind, further exacerbating Bitcoin's price volatility.

Furthermore, those familiar with global financial markets know that the Yen is not just Japan's currency; it is also seen as a barometer of global economic risk. Whenever global market uncertainties intensify, funds often flow into the Yen as a "safe-haven currency." This phenomenon is particularly evident during periods of global economic crisis or financial turmoil. However, the Yen's exchange rate fluctuations reflect not only the health of the Japanese economy but also changes in global risk sentiment.

This is why frequent fluctuations in the Yen's exchange rate, especially when global macroeconomics face uncertainty, can directly impact the prices of risk assets like Bitcoin. When the Yen's exchange rate is volatile and intensifying, global market risk aversion heats up, risk assets (including Bitcoin) often experience corrections, while safe-haven assets like gold and silver may see gains. Particularly against the backdrop of potential joint FX intervention by the US and Japan, a short-term correction in Bitcoin's price has become an inevitable market reaction.

It is worth noting that the negative correlation between Bitcoin and the US Dollar Index (DXY) is particularly significant. When the US dollar strengthens, investors tend to shift funds into dollar-denominated assets, reducing demand for high-risk assets like Bitcoin, putting downward pressure on Bitcoin. Conversely, when the US dollar weakens, Bitcoin may find support for gains. If this intervention is successful and causes the USD/JPY rate to fall significantly, the US Dollar Index would be suppressed, providing upward momentum for Bitcoin, which is primarily dollar-denominated.

However, looking at it dialectically, while exchange rate intervention might push Bitcoin's price higher in the short term, if the intervention does not change the market's fundamentals, the price increase is often difficult to sustain. Past FX intervention events show that government intervention is only temporary; changes in market trends rely more on the fundamentals of the global economy.

Trigger 2: Increased Probability of US Government Shutdown, Crypto Market Structure Bill Potentially Stalled Again

Following another deadly law enforcement shooting in Minnesota, the risk of a US government shutdown has sharply increased. According to the latest data from Polymarket, market predictions for a government shutdown have surged to 82%.

This situation was triggered by a fatal shooting incident in Minneapolis on January 24th. Alex Pretti, a 37-year-old emergency room nurse, was killed during a confrontation with federal law enforcement officers. After the incident, federal and local law enforcement agencies provided conflicting accounts of what happened. The shooting itself sparked widespread public anger and quickly became a trigger for political gamesmanship.

Democratic leader Chuck Schumer clearly stated that if the controversy surrounding the Department of Homeland Security's (DHS) law enforcement actions is not resolved, the Democrats will do everything they can to block the progress of the budget bill. Since the Senate requires 60 votes to pass the bill, this political deadlock will directly impact government operations. It is worth noting that just two months after the last 43-day government shutdown, the government has once again fallen into a shutdown "deadlock."

This political impasse not only means the US government faces the threat of a shutdown but also delivers a direct blow to the regulatory process of the crypto industry. The review meeting for the crypto market structure bill, originally scheduled for January, had to be delayed due to controversy. However, the intensification of this political battle means the bill, which should have continued to advance, may once again be stuck in a stalemate.

Although consensus seems to have been largely reached on the "market structure" part of the crypto market, disputes surrounding issues like stablecoin yields, DeFi compliance, and the regulatory tools for tokenized securities under the SEC's purview present significant political obstacles to the bill's progress.

As Alex Thorn, Head of Research at Galaxy Digital, pointed out, this delay highlights deep-seated disagreements between Congress and the crypto industry on several key issues, particularly regarding stablecoin yield mechanisms and DeFi-related clauses. Alex Thorn further mentioned that within just 48 hours, over 100 amendments were submitted, with stakeholders continuously discovering new points of contention until the last moment, significantly increasing the difficulty of political coordination. For the crypto market, policy uncertainty exacerbates market volatility, and a government shutdown means unpredictable regulatory policies in the short term, filling investors with a sense of uncertainty and anxiety about the future.(Recommended reading:"CLARITY Review Suddenly Postponed, Why Are the Industry Divisions So Severe?")

Conclusion

In this macro game, gold has reasserted its market dominance with a "retro" stance. As the international gold price broke through $5,000 for the first time, the flow of safe-haven funds is already evident. Bitcoin, once hailed as "digital gold," has instead turned in a dismal performance during this systemic shock—for the first time since October 2023, long-term holders (LTH) are "cutting losses" and exiting the market on a large scale while in a loss-making state. This is not just a price collapse; it is a collapse of trust in Bitcoin's ability to withstand a real financial crisis. The market at this moment is choosing not innovation, but stable safe-haven assets, as evidenced by gold's surge.

All this reveals a harsh reality: in the shadow of a financial crisis, the market tends to choose "stability" over "narrative." Gold, as a safe-haven asset, has solidified its position as a harbor in the storm of sovereign credit crises, while Bitcoin's weakness exposes its still fragile foundation of trust within the mainstream financial system. The million-dollar bet on Polymarket—"Gold or ETH to $5,000 first"—has been settled. Gold's complete victory not only marks a decisive price breakthrough but also symbolizes a "return to traditional aesthetics" for the market.

Although traditional assets are regaining dominance, emerging assets are still groping in the fog for the market's true trust. However, market movements are not without opportunity. The crypto market, which has broken the "four-year cycle" rule, still harbors opportunities for buying the dip.

As Placeholder VC partner Chris Burniske said, from a buyer's perspective, BTC price levels worth watching include: around $80,000 (the November 2025 low, the阶段性低点 of this cycle); around $74,000 (the April 2025 low, formed during the tariff panic); around $70,000 (near the 2021 bull market high); around $58,000 (near the 200-week moving average); and $50,000 and below (the lower edge of the weekly range, possessing strong psychological significance; a break below could spark "Bitcoin is dead" discussions).

Related Questions

QWhat are the two main factors mentioned in the article that contributed to the recent sharp decline in the cryptocurrency market?

AThe two main factors are the sharp fluctuations in the Japanese Yen (JPY) exchange rate and the increased probability of another U.S. government shutdown.

QHow does a sharp appreciation of the Japanese Yen (JPY) negatively impact the price of Bitcoin, according to the article?

AA sharp JPY appreciation increases the funding pressure on 'Yen carry trade' investors, forcing them to unwind their positions and sell risk assets like Bitcoin to repay their low-interest Yen-denominated loans.

QWhat event significantly increased the probability of a U.S. government shutdown, as stated in the article?

AThe probability of a U.S. government shutdown increased significantly following a fatal shooting incident in Minneapolis involving federal law enforcement, which intensified political gridlock over a budget bill.

QWhat traditional asset reached a new all-time high price, contrasting with the crypto market's decline?

AGold reached a new all-time high, surpassing $5,000 per ounce, which was cited as a sign that investors were fleeing to traditional safe-haven assets.

QAccording to Chris Burniske, what are some key Bitcoin price levels that buyers should watch for potential opportunities?

AChris Burniske suggested watching key Bitcoin price levels around $80k (the recent low), $74k (a previous low from tariff fears), $70k (near the 2021 bull market high), $58k (near the 200-week moving average), and $50k or below (a strong psychological level).

Related Reads

From Shouting 150 Dollars to Liquidating HYPE in Just Three Days, How Much Credibility Does Arthur Hayes Have Left?

How much of Arthur Hayes's market credibility remains? Recently, the "godfather of crypto perpetual swaps" and BitMEX co-founder has faced public criticism, including accusations from on-chain investigator ZachXBT about creating exit liquidity for his followers. Starting last week, Hayes executed multiple sudden sell-offs. He had repeatedly publicly predicted the HYPE token would reach $150. After a $100,000 bet defending Hyperliquid on June 1st, he announced just three days later that he had completely sold his HYPE and NEAR holdings, successfully exiting near the peak. He also sold ZEC and WLD. His sale of WLD appeared to be a classic "pump and dump" maneuver. On June 3rd, he publicly set a $10 target for WLD, causing its price to surge over 35%. By June 6th, he announced he had sold his WLD, citing "anomalous" SpaceX pre-IPO price action, which triggered a sharp price drop. On June 9th, Hayes published a lengthy article explaining his actions, citing factors like rising energy costs and a potential AI bubble burst. Consequently, his family office, Maelstrom, now holds positions in US energy producers and only core crypto assets BTC and ETH, having sold AI-related stocks and non-core cryptocurrencies. This pattern is not new. In 2025, he similarly touted HYPE before selling it at what turned out to be a cycle peak, only to repurchase it at the next cycle's low. Similar scenarios played out with tokens like ETHFI and ENA. Long-term observers have developed a strategy: ignore Hayes's public statements but closely monitor his on-chain actions—be cautious following his buys, but decisively follow his sells. If he continues these tactics, especially as seen with the WLD case, his market credibility risks being permanently damaged. As Hayes himself admitted in his latest article, "I remain an unapologetic gambler."

marsbit16m ago

From Shouting 150 Dollars to Liquidating HYPE in Just Three Days, How Much Credibility Does Arthur Hayes Have Left?

marsbit16m ago

Fundraising is Like a Strange Dance: The 'Absurd Drama' of Silicon Valley Founders' Capital Raises

The article details a series of absurd and revealing anecdotes shared by Silicon Valley founders about their venture capital fundraising experiences, sparked by Greg Isenberg's story of pitching to a sleeping a16z partner. Founders describe surreal pitch meetings: one faced a barefoot, peanut-eating investor who offered triple the requested amount after 30 seconds; another performed a pitch in a VC's parked car; a founder discovered his audience understood no English beyond "yes." These stories highlight the often irrational and performative nature of fundraising. Beyond the absurdity, darker power imbalances are exposed. Stories include investors suggesting founders fire co-founders for their equity, blatant market misjudgments, disrespectful behavior from LPs, and discriminatory remarks. A debate also emerges around "Sequoia's" practice of splitting a round into two valuations. However, the thread isn't solely critical. Positive counter-narratives celebrate supportive VCs who offered crucial advice during crises, respected founders' timelines, and showed simple gestures of respect—like a partner personally fetching coffee before a major pitch. Ultimately, the collective sharing acts as a pressure release, illustrating that fundraising is a complex dance of power, trust, and sometimes sheer theater. It underscores that beyond capital, mutual respect and integrity remain the most enduring foundations of the founder-investor relationship.

marsbit29m ago

Fundraising is Like a Strange Dance: The 'Absurd Drama' of Silicon Valley Founders' Capital Raises

marsbit29m ago

Vitalik's Vision for the Next Evolution of On-Chain Finance: How to Reconstruct DeFi with an 'Options Mindset'?

Vitalik Buterin recently proposed a conceptual shift for DeFi: replacing traditional Collateralized Debt Positions (CDPs) and forced liquidations with an options-based mechanism. This aims to address key vulnerabilities in current DeFi lending. The traditional CDP model, foundational to protocols like MakerDAO and Aave, allows users to borrow against collateral but relies on real-time oracles and triggers sudden, mandatory liquidations during price volatility. This can cause cascading sell-offs, oracle manipulation risks, and significant MEV extraction, exacerbating market stress. Vitalik's alternative envisions splitting an asset like 1 ETH into two complementary components: one offering stable/index-like exposure and the other absorbing the opposite risk/reward. Instead of a hard liquidation threshold, a user's exposure to the target asset would gradually and smoothly deviate (following a near-quadratic curve) as the collateral price moves. The system would primarily depend on "slow oracles" for periodic settlement rather than instant price feeds. Key potential benefits include: the elimination of abrupt, forced liquidations; drastically reduced reliance on vulnerable real-time oracles; and inherent resistance to certain MEV exploits centered on liquidation auctions. The article posits that for Ethereum DeFi to maintain its relevance amid competition from faster, cheaper chains, it must compete on sophisticated financial engineering and robustness—not just transaction speed or yields. The core value proposition should shift towards offering users clearer, more manageable risk structures, greater autonomy, and resilience in extreme scenarios, moving DeFi from high-risk experimentation towards becoming reliable financial infrastructure.

marsbit1h ago

Vitalik's Vision for the Next Evolution of On-Chain Finance: How to Reconstruct DeFi with an 'Options Mindset'?

marsbit1h ago

Trading

Spot
Futures
活动图片