Bitwise: Crypto Becomes a Contrarian Investment, Three Logics to Understand the Current Market

marsbitPublished on 2026-06-04Last updated on 2026-06-04

Abstract

**Summary** Matt Hougan, Bitwise's CIO, analyzes the current crypto market through three key lenses, arguing it has shifted from a momentum-driven to a contrarian investment. **1) Crypto Becomes a Contrarian Play:** The market is weak, with major assets like Bitcoin and Ethereum down significantly. Capital has moved to hot sectors like AI, leaving crypto as an "unloved" asset class. This transforms crypto investing from trend-following to a test of patience and fundamental analysis. Investors now favor projects with solid fundamentals (e.g., Hyperliquid) over speculative ones. **2) Regulatory Overhang:** The uncertain fate of the U.S. CLARITY Act, a major crypto regulatory framework, is a key headwind. With its passage in 2024 seen as far from guaranteed (estimates range from 30-55%), institutional capital remains on the sidelines, choosing less risky alternatives like AI stocks. The market needs clarity—whether the bill passes or fails—more than any specific outcome to move decisively. **3) Capital Rotates to New Fundamentals:** This cycle differs from past bear markets where money fled to Bitcoin. Now, capital seeks smaller assets with strong use cases. While major cryptos fell in May 2024, tokens like Hyperliquid (+72%), Zcash (+50%), and XLM (+44%) rallied on their specific fundamentals. This rotation confirms the new contrarian, fundamentals-driven logic and signals the bear market may be in its later stages. **Conclusion:** Short-term pressure persists due to regul...

Original Author: Matt Hougan, Bitwise Chief Investment Officer

Original Compilation: Chopper, Foresight News

In previous memos, I usually focused on the single most important event in the market. However, the current industry variables are complex, making it difficult to center on just one logic. This article interprets the market from three dimensions.

1) Crypto Assets Become a Contrarian Investment Choice

The current crypto market is performing poorly. Bitcoin has fallen 21% year-to-date, and mainstream assets like Ethereum, Solana, and XRP have suffered deeper declines, plummeting 33%, 37%, and 31% respectively. Crypto ETFs continue to experience net outflows, and spot trading volumes have dropped to multi-year lows.

The key reason for the weak performance is that crypto is no longer the hot trend in capital markets. Concepts like artificial intelligence stocks, robotics companies, and SpaceX are in the spotlight, with the Nasdaq 100 Index surging 43% year-to-date. Naturally, capital has little interest in lingering in the crypto sector.

In an environment where the AI sector is siphoning off capital from the entire market, the crypto industry is undergoing a painful transformation: shifting from a momentum-driven hot topic to a contrarian investment target.

This is a crucial turning point affecting the industry's direction. Momentum investing rides market trends, offering excellent experiences during uptrends; contrarian investing, however, is a long and arduous test of investor patience, long-term thinking, and fundamental analysis, with returns realized intermittently.

This also explains why crypto capital increasingly values project revenue, with protocols boasting solid fundamentals like Hyperliquid being highly favored. The market has not abandoned the crypto track, but under the contrarian investment logic, capital is ditching speculative hype and turning towards assets with strong fundamentals.

The crypto industry will not vanish; only the types of investors and projects rewarded by the market have fundamentally changed. Understanding this point is key to seizing profit opportunities in the next bull market.

2) Market Awaits Regulatory Clarity, but the CLARITY Act is Likely Stalled

The second major factor contributing to the weak crypto market is the significant regulatory uncertainty brought by the CLARITY Act.

This act is a core framework bill for the crypto sector in the United States, currently progressing through Congress to establish unified national crypto regulations. Although the bill recently cleared a hurdle in the Senate, prediction market Polymarket data shows only a 55% probability of it being approved and enacted this year. My personal view is more pessimistic: recent consultations with industry insiders in Washington suggest Republicans estimate around 30%. Whether the probability is 5%, 30%, or 50%, the bill's passage is far from guaranteed.

This uncertainty keeps institutional capital on the sidelines. From the perspective of large institutional investors, it's a binary choice:

· Invest in AI stocks, whose prices are continuously hitting new all-time highs;

· Allocate to crypto assets, but face a nearly 50% downside risk if the bill fails in the next two months.

The latter is difficult to attract capital.

Therefore, it is judged that until regulatory clarity is achieved, major crypto assets are unlikely to sustain a bull run. Compared to the final outcome of the bill passing or failing, eliminating the uncertainty itself is more critical. If the bill passes, crypto rallies; if it fails, the industry can gradually digest the negative news; it is only the protracted tug-of-war stage of uncertainty that makes it hard for the market to strengthen.

3) Capital Shifts Towards New Generation Fundamental Assets

This bear market is fundamentally different from past crypto winters: in previous downturns, capital collectively sought refuge in Bitcoin, causing altcoins to collapse across the board; but this time, capital is not piling into safe-haven assets. Instead, it is flowing into smaller-cap, fundamentally sound emerging assets.

Looking at the monthly return data for major crypto assets in May 2026: the most notable aspect of the market is not the widespread decline, but the assets performing strongly against the trend. While Bitcoin, Ethereum, and Solana weakened simultaneously, Hyperliquid surged 72% monthly, Zcash gained 50%, and XLM rose 44%. These are not super large-cap assets; they garnered capital favor based on their own unique fundamental logic.

This is a concrete manifestation of the aforementioned "contrarian investment logic": as crypto moves away from momentum speculation, fundamentals become the core of pricing, and the capital rotation has already materialized.

Simultaneously, the fact that some assets are profiting against the trend also indicates this bear market is entering its mid-to-late stages. In deep bear markets, the entire market declines uniformly. When a batch of assets begins to chart independent upward trajectories based on genuine fundamentals, it signals an impending shift in the market cycle.

Summary

To be honest, the market will likely remain under pressure in the short term. The CLARITY Act approval tug-of-war continues, SpaceX is nearing its IPO, Anthropic has filed its prospectus, and AI themes continue to dominate financial headlines. Adding to crypto positions now will probably be an unpleasant experience, but the essence of contrarian investing is precisely to build positions in neglected areas and make counter-intuitive decisions against the trend.

This is exactly the case with today's crypto market. Patience and conviction are the keys to success. Anchoring on fundamentals and value to discover quality assets will yield substantial long-term returns.

Related Questions

QWhat are the three main reasons or dimensions according to Matt Hougan, the CIO of Bitwise, that explain the current weak performance of the cryptocurrency market?

A1) Cryptocurrency assets have turned into a contrarian investment choice as capital has flowed away from crypto to hot trends like AI. 2) The market is waiting for regulatory clarity, with the CLARITY Act creating significant uncertainty and making institutional investors hesitant. 3) Investment capital is shifting towards a new generation of fundamentally sound projects rather than simply fleeing to Bitcoin.

QWhy does the author believe the crypto market has become a 'contrarian investment'?

AThe author believes crypto has become a contrarian investment because it is no longer the popular, trend-following asset class. Capital is now heavily concentrated in hot sectors like artificial intelligence stocks, drawing funds away from crypto. Investing in crypto now requires patience, long-term thinking, and fundamental analysis rather than riding a wave of hype.

QWhat is the CLARITY Act and how does its uncertainty affect the crypto market according to the article?

AThe CLARITY Act is a key regulatory framework bill for cryptocurrencies in the U.S. that aims to establish unified national rules. According to the article, the uncertainty surrounding whether it will pass or fail is a major factor keeping institutional investors on the sidelines. The market struggles during this prolonged period of ambiguity more than it would if the outcome were simply a clear 'yes' or 'no'.

QHow is the current bear market different from previous ones in terms of where capital is flowing?

AIn previous bear markets, capital typically fled to the perceived safety of Bitcoin, causing altcoins to collapse. In the current cycle, capital is not simply flocking to Bitcoin but is instead selectively moving into smaller projects with strong fundamentals, such as Hyperliquid, Zcash, and XLM, which have posted significant gains.

QWhat does the author suggest is the key to success for investors in the current crypto market environment?

AThe author suggests that patience and conviction are the keys to success. Investors should focus on fundamental analysis and seek out undervalued, high-quality projects in this contrarian environment, as this approach will likely yield substantial long-term returns.

Related Reads

Podcast Notes | Conversation with GSR Asset Management Head: To Determine if This Crypto Rally is Real, Just Watch the Lending Rates on Aave

Podcast Summary: Dialogue with GSR's Head of Asset Management: To Determine if This Crypto Rally is Real, Just Check Lending Rates on Aave Andy Baehr, Managing Director of Asset Management at GSR, discusses the current crypto market, characterizing it as stuck in a state of "ambivalence" with short-lived, unsustainable rallies. He outlines a simple framework: the market moves between "ambivalence" and "conviction" (sustained upward momentum). Currently, every rally resembles a single-stage rocket booster that quickly fizzles out. Baehr identifies three key signals to watch: 1) DeFi lending rates, 2) the potential passage of the CLARITY Act, and 3) the market forming a consensus on the "Fed hawkish peak." He emphasizes that the most immediate indicator for the sustainability of the recent CPI-triggered rally is the USDC borrowing rate on Aave, currently around 3.75%—close to U.S. Treasury yields. The absence of a credit spread indicates low leverage demand and a lack of market energy. He explains that a healthy, sustained rally requires layered buying pressure. Last year's rally progressed from an ETH short squeeze to crypto-native trader influx and finally to ETF inflows. Currently, this structure is missing. Other potential structural buyers like Digital Asset Treasury (DAT) companies are absent, and ETF flows have proven transient. Baehr notes that while small-cap crypto tokens outperformed large caps in Q2—a potential sign of capitation in major assets—capital is also flowing to more exciting opportunities like AI stocks and tech IPOs, leaving crypto sidelined. Regarding DeFi, he highlights that platforms like Aave provide a clear, real-time signal of leverage demand through their supply/demand-driven interest rates. A significant, sustained rate increase would signal genuine market conviction. He also observes the quiet emergence of fixed-income-like products and vaults in DeFi. On regulation, the probability of the CLARITY Act passing before the August 7th deadline has dropped linearly from 75% to below 40% on Polymarket. Baehr suggests its passage would be treated as a bullish surprise, a potent driver for price movement. However, political hurdles, including ethical clause debates and disclosures about the First Family's crypto profits, remain significant obstacles. Ultimately, the market awaits clarity on the Fed's terminal rate under Chair Warsh. Until the "Fed Solstice"—the point where the market collectively understands the peak of hawkish policy—sustained conviction will be difficult to achieve.

marsbit3m ago

Podcast Notes | Conversation with GSR Asset Management Head: To Determine if This Crypto Rally is Real, Just Watch the Lending Rates on Aave

marsbit3m ago

7 Months After the Collapse of Huiwang, Southeast Asia's Escrow Platforms Undergo a Major Reshuffle

Following the collapse of Huione Pay—dubbed the "Alipay of Southeast Asia"—seven months ago, the region's underground financial guarantee platform sector is undergoing a significant reshuffle. This power vacuum has been swiftly filled by emerging platforms such as XinBi, Tiger/Navigator, JinBei (renamed JinBo), Dali/Tiancheng, and FullyLight. These platforms, operating largely via Telegram and offering services like escrow for illicit transactions, have absorbed the vast user base and markets left behind by Huione. While positioning themselves as "trust intermediaries," their primary clientele consists of networks involved in online scams, money laundering, illegal gambling, and even human trafficking. For instance, the Tiger/Navigator platform explicitly provides "escrow" services for kidnapping-for-ransom operations ("强押车交易"). Data underscores the immense scale: Huione alone processed over $103 billion in cryptocurrency payments and facilitated over $31 billion through its escrow market before its downfall, linking it to Cambodia's notorious Prince Group. Since its collapse, competitors have seen explosive growth. For example, the XinBi platform has accumulated over $1.6 billion in total USDT revenue, while platforms like NewPay, OkPay (under Dali), and FullyLight Wallet collectively processed over $4.8 billion in USDT in a single year. This ecosystem thrives in regions like Cambodia and Myanmar, where regulatory gaps allow these platforms to act as critical financial infrastructure for sprawling cybercrime industries, from scam compounds to online casinos. The article concludes that the moniker "Southeast Asian Alipay" is a misnomer, obscuring the platforms' fundamental role in enabling serious criminal enterprises rather than representing legitimate financial innovation.

Odaily星球日报1h ago

7 Months After the Collapse of Huiwang, Southeast Asia's Escrow Platforms Undergo a Major Reshuffle

Odaily星球日报1h ago

The Changing Landscape: What Are Crypto VCs Experiencing?

Title: The Shifting Landscape of Crypto Venture Capital The era of dedicated crypto venture capital funds is undergoing a significant transformation. Once essential for navigating the sector's complexity and high risk, these specialized funds are now facing an identity crisis as the market matures. This shift mirrors historical patterns in other specialized investment classes like cleantech and SPACs, where initial information advantages dissipate as technologies become mainstream and integrated into existing industry frameworks. The article argues that crypto is reaching a critical inflection point, transitioning from a "building phase" to an "integration phase." Major players like Stripe, BlackRock, and Visa now engage with crypto not for its novel mechanics but as a foundational financial infrastructure. Their needs—regulatory compliance, banking partnerships, distribution channels—align with traditional fintech, a domain easily understood by large, generalist funds like Sequoia and Founders Fund. This evolution creates a "barbell effect" within the VC landscape. On one end are massive, diversified platforms that can incorporate crypto as one vertical among many. On the other are small, nimble funds focused on niche, experimental projects. The middle ground—medium-sized dedicated crypto funds—is being squeezed out. Their typical fund size makes it impossible to generate sufficient returns solely from early-stage crypto bets, yet they cannot compete with giants for later-stage deals. Consequently, leading crypto-native firms like Paradigm and Framework Ventures are expanding into AI, robotics, and other sectors, driven partly by LP pressure for better returns amid a broader VC DPI crisis. Others, like Dragonfly and a16z, have narrowed their crypto focus predominantly to financial infrastructure like stablecoins, reframing the sector's core narrative. For crypto entrepreneurs, this consolidation presents challenges. While generalist funds offer larger checks and broader resources, crypto projects now compete fiercely with AI for attention and capital within these firms. Furthermore, the long-term, non-commercial foundational work that built the ecosystem—funded by dedicated crypto VCs—is less likely to attract generalist capital focused on direct returns. The conclusion is that "crypto investor" as a standalone category is becoming obsolete, akin to "internet investor." Crypto is becoming a baseline infrastructure layer. The future will see a barbell structure: large-scale growth financing handled by generalist funds, while pioneering, speculative projects are funded by small, specialized vehicles. The dedicated crypto funds of the 2017-2021 boom, which incubated core infrastructure, are giving way to this new, bifurcated reality.

Foresight News1h ago

The Changing Landscape: What Are Crypto VCs Experiencing?

Foresight News1h ago

Trading

Spot
活动图片