Bitwise首席投资官:Crypto沦为逆向投资,三个逻辑看懂当前市场

marsbitPublished on 2026-06-03Last updated on 2026-06-03

原文作者:Matt Hougan,Bitwise 首席投资官

原文编译:Chopper,Foresight News

在以往的备忘录中,我通常聚焦市场最核心的一件大事,但眼下行业变量繁杂,很难只围绕单一逻辑展开,本文从三个维度解读盘面。

1)加密资产变成逆向投资选择

当前加密市场行情惨淡。比特币年内跌幅 21%,以太坊、Solana、XRP 等主流币种跌幅更深,分别大跌 33%、37%、31%。加密 ETF 持续遭遇资金净流出,现货成交量跌至多年低位。

行情走弱的关键原因是,加密早已不再是资本市场的当红风口。人工智能概念股、机器人企业、SpaceX 等标的风光无限,纳斯达克 100 指数年内涨幅高达 43%,资金自然无心留恋加密赛道。

在 AI 板块虹吸全市场资金的环境下,加密行业正经历阵痛转型:从顺应趋势的热门题材,转变为逆向布局标的。

这是影响行业走向的关键转折。顺趋势投资跟随市场热度顺水推舟,行情上涨时体验极佳;逆向投资却是漫长煎熬,考验投资者耐心、长线思维与基本面研判能力,收益兑现也断断续续。

这也解释了为何当下加密资金愈发看重项目营收,Hyperliquid 等具备扎实基本面的协议备受青睐。市场并未放弃加密赛道,但在逆向投资逻辑下,资金抛弃情绪炒作,转向基本面强劲的标的。

加密行业不会消亡,只是市场奖励的投资者与项目类型彻底改变。看懂这一点,才能在下一轮牛市把握盈利机会。

2)市场静待监管落地,但 CLARITY 法案大概率难产

加密行情疲软的第二大诱因,是 CLARITY 法案带来的巨大监管不确定性。

该法案是美国加密领域核心框架法案,正在国会推进落地,旨在搭建全美统一的加密监管规则。 尽管法案近期在参议院闯过一道关卡,但预测市场 Polymarket 数据显示,其年内落地获批概率仅 55%。而我个人观点更为悲观:近期对接的华盛顿业内人士给出预判,民主党阵营认为落地概率仅 5%,共和党预估在 30%。无论概率是 5%、30% 还是 50%,法案落地绝非板上钉钉。

不确定性让机构资金持续观望。站在大型机构投资者视角,二选一的抉择:

  • 布局 AI 股票,股价接连刷新历史新高;
  • 配置加密资产,但未来两个月法案落地存在近五成利空风险。

后者很难获得资金青睐。

由此判断,在监管尘埃落定前,头部加密币种很难走出持续性牛市。相较法案最终通过或夭折的结果,消除不确定性这件事本身更为关键。 法案落地,加密迎来上涨;法案夭折,行业也能慢慢消化利空;唯独悬而未决的拉锯阶段,市场难以走强。

3)资金转向新一代基本面标的

本轮熊市和过往加密寒冬截然不同:以往熊市资金集体避险涌向比特币,山寨币全线溃败;但这一轮,资金不再扎堆避险资产,转而布局体量偏小、基本面靠谱的新兴标的。

2026 年 5 月各大加密币种月度收益数据: 盘面最值得关注的不是遍地下跌,而是逆势走强的标的。比特币、以太坊、Solana 同步走弱,但 Hyperliquid 单月大涨 72%、Zcash 涨幅 50%、XLM 上涨 44%。这些均非超级大盘币种,凭借自身独特基本面逻辑收获资金追捧。

这正是前文所说 「逆向投资逻辑」 的具象体现:当加密告别趋势炒作,基本面成为定价核心,资金切换已然落地。

同时,局部标的逆势盈利,也预示本轮熊市已步入中后期。深度熊市阶段全市场普跌,当一批标的依靠真实基本面走出独立上涨行情,意味着市场周期即将切换。

总结

实话实说,短期内市场仍将承压。CLARITY 法案审批拉锯延续,SpaceX 即将 IPO、Anthropic 递交招股书,AI 题材持续霸占财经头条。 当下加仓加密资产大概率体验不佳,但逆向投资的精髓本就是在无人关注的领域布局,逆势做出反直觉的决策。

如今的加密市场正是如此,耐心与定力是制胜关键。锚定基本面与价值挖掘优质标的,长期回报将十分可观。

Related Reads

7 Months After the Collapse of Huiwang, Southeast Asia's Escrow Platforms Undergo a Major Reshuffle

Following the collapse of Huione Pay—dubbed the "Alipay of Southeast Asia"—seven months ago, the region's underground financial guarantee platform sector is undergoing a significant reshuffle. This power vacuum has been swiftly filled by emerging platforms such as XinBi, Tiger/Navigator, JinBei (renamed JinBo), Dali/Tiancheng, and FullyLight. These platforms, operating largely via Telegram and offering services like escrow for illicit transactions, have absorbed the vast user base and markets left behind by Huione. While positioning themselves as "trust intermediaries," their primary clientele consists of networks involved in online scams, money laundering, illegal gambling, and even human trafficking. For instance, the Tiger/Navigator platform explicitly provides "escrow" services for kidnapping-for-ransom operations ("强押车交易"). Data underscores the immense scale: Huione alone processed over $103 billion in cryptocurrency payments and facilitated over $31 billion through its escrow market before its downfall, linking it to Cambodia's notorious Prince Group. Since its collapse, competitors have seen explosive growth. For example, the XinBi platform has accumulated over $1.6 billion in total USDT revenue, while platforms like NewPay, OkPay (under Dali), and FullyLight Wallet collectively processed over $4.8 billion in USDT in a single year. This ecosystem thrives in regions like Cambodia and Myanmar, where regulatory gaps allow these platforms to act as critical financial infrastructure for sprawling cybercrime industries, from scam compounds to online casinos. The article concludes that the moniker "Southeast Asian Alipay" is a misnomer, obscuring the platforms' fundamental role in enabling serious criminal enterprises rather than representing legitimate financial innovation.

Odaily星球日报41m ago

7 Months After the Collapse of Huiwang, Southeast Asia's Escrow Platforms Undergo a Major Reshuffle

Odaily星球日报41m ago

The Changing Landscape: What Are Crypto VCs Experiencing?

Title: The Shifting Landscape of Crypto Venture Capital The era of dedicated crypto venture capital funds is undergoing a significant transformation. Once essential for navigating the sector's complexity and high risk, these specialized funds are now facing an identity crisis as the market matures. This shift mirrors historical patterns in other specialized investment classes like cleantech and SPACs, where initial information advantages dissipate as technologies become mainstream and integrated into existing industry frameworks. The article argues that crypto is reaching a critical inflection point, transitioning from a "building phase" to an "integration phase." Major players like Stripe, BlackRock, and Visa now engage with crypto not for its novel mechanics but as a foundational financial infrastructure. Their needs—regulatory compliance, banking partnerships, distribution channels—align with traditional fintech, a domain easily understood by large, generalist funds like Sequoia and Founders Fund. This evolution creates a "barbell effect" within the VC landscape. On one end are massive, diversified platforms that can incorporate crypto as one vertical among many. On the other are small, nimble funds focused on niche, experimental projects. The middle ground—medium-sized dedicated crypto funds—is being squeezed out. Their typical fund size makes it impossible to generate sufficient returns solely from early-stage crypto bets, yet they cannot compete with giants for later-stage deals. Consequently, leading crypto-native firms like Paradigm and Framework Ventures are expanding into AI, robotics, and other sectors, driven partly by LP pressure for better returns amid a broader VC DPI crisis. Others, like Dragonfly and a16z, have narrowed their crypto focus predominantly to financial infrastructure like stablecoins, reframing the sector's core narrative. For crypto entrepreneurs, this consolidation presents challenges. While generalist funds offer larger checks and broader resources, crypto projects now compete fiercely with AI for attention and capital within these firms. Furthermore, the long-term, non-commercial foundational work that built the ecosystem—funded by dedicated crypto VCs—is less likely to attract generalist capital focused on direct returns. The conclusion is that "crypto investor" as a standalone category is becoming obsolete, akin to "internet investor." Crypto is becoming a baseline infrastructure layer. The future will see a barbell structure: large-scale growth financing handled by generalist funds, while pioneering, speculative projects are funded by small, specialized vehicles. The dedicated crypto funds of the 2017-2021 boom, which incubated core infrastructure, are giving way to this new, bifurcated reality.

Foresight News58m ago

The Changing Landscape: What Are Crypto VCs Experiencing?

Foresight News58m ago

As Consensus Accelerates, What Are Young Investors Betting On?

Title: As Consensus Forms Faster, What Are Young Investors Betting On? In the rapid evolution of tech investment, a new generation of young investors is navigating a landscape where AI, robotics, commercial aerospace, and quantum computing are advancing simultaneously. Traditional investment logic based on financial models is giving way to a need for deep technical understanding and the ability to act before industry consensus forms. An analysis of trends from the "WAIC FUTURE TECH" list of young investment leaders reveals key shifts in focus. The first major trend is the movement of AI from the digital screen into the physical world. Investment is shifting from large language models and chatbots towards embodied AI, robotics, AI hardware, and edge computing. While demonstrations generate excitement, the real challenge lies in achieving scalable, reliable, and cost-effective delivery in complex real-world environments like factories and logistics. Success depends not just on algorithms but on the integration of sensors, actuators, and control systems. Second, the competitive focus for large models is moving beyond raw capability toward building an "intelligence flywheel." The goal is to create self-reinforcing systems where user interaction generates data, improving the model, which in turn enhances the user experience and attracts more engagement. Companies that successfully embed AI into workflows to create these closed-loop systems can build lasting value that isn't easily erased by the next model upgrade. Third, facing a potential bottleneck in high-quality human-generated data, investors are looking at new underlying technologies. Reinforcement learning and self-play, as demonstrated by AlphaGo Zero, offer paths for AI to generate its own experience. Scientific foundation models, which aim to build general AI capabilities for fields like life sciences and materials discovery, represent a non-consensus direction that could unlock new frontiers of knowledge and data. Finally, in deep-tech areas like quantum computing, commercial aerospace, and space-based infrastructure, patient capital is essential. These fields have long, uncertain development and validation cycles involving complex engineering, supply chains, and regulations. Investment here requires a long-term view, focusing on foundational team capabilities and the eventual emergence of market demand, even if commercial returns are distant. Collectively, these trends illustrate how young investors are adapting to a new era. They are learning to make earlier, technically-informed judgments, balance hype with real-world viability, and provide the patient capital needed to build the deep-tech foundations of the future.

marsbit1h ago

As Consensus Accelerates, What Are Young Investors Betting On?

marsbit1h ago

Trading

Spot
活动图片