Global liquidity is surging towards record highs in 2026, reaching around $123-130 trillion.
This boost was primarily due to China’s accelerating M2 expansion. However, Bitcoin [BTC] continues to lag behind gold and silver.
The divergence does not imply weakness but a potential delay in Bitcoin’s liquidity response.
Macro conditions became stable, and risk appetite began to recover gradually as liquidity was restored. But first the capital was going into traditional hedges.
Gold gained close to 70%, and silver gained approximately 150%. In contrast, Bitcoin underperformed, falling by about 6–7%, but this is not indicative of poor performance.
Traditionally, higher-beta holdings experience more aggressive repricing after these stages. Investors persist in demonstrating patience and optimism.
In the short term, reactions can remain subdued. However, in the long run, increased liquidity has been a constant booster in crypto upside.
China’s M2 quietly supports Bitcoin’s upside
Between 2024 and 2025, the M2 in China steadily increased from approximately 45 trillion to 48 trillion, with annualized growth controlled at 8–8.5% until December 2025.
This rate indicated stability rather than growth due to stimulus. In 2026, M2 reached approximately 49 trillion, continuing the same structural trend.
The price of Bitcoin improved during this period, although there was a weakening in the connection.
Post mid-2025, the price action was more independent based on the risk appetite and market positioning than on the immediate liquidity feeds.
In simpler terms, M2 is a long-term tailwind and macro environment, whereas short-term Bitcoin dynamics indicate a divergence rather than liquidity transmission.
ETF flow volatility shapes Bitcoin’s short-term price action
According to CoinGlass data, spot flows became determinedly positive in mid-2025, and recurring green spikes of over 300 million dollars aligned with the trend of Bitcoin price towards the $120,000 — $130,000 zone.
With increases in inflows, the trend moves upwards and volatility contracts. However, momentum faded in late 2025.
Red bars were reinforced, some daily outflows were above 800 million, and one was close to 1.2 billion, as Bitcoin fell drastically to below $100,000.
The flows remained volatile until January 2026. The net monthly movement was close to $1.2 billion, but red days prevailed.
All this together, market sentiment remains volatile. Bitcoin benefits from a structural liquidity tailwind over cycles, yet short-term price action responds primarily to shifts in risk appetite and institutional positioning.
Final Thoughts
- Global liquidity and China’s steady M2 growth provide a durable long-term tailwind for Bitcoin, even as capital initially rotates into traditional hedges.
- Short-term Bitcoin price action has decoupled from immediate liquidity flows since mid-2025, with risk appetite, positioning, and ETF flow volatility dominating market behavior.
