Bessent sharply criticizes opponents of the CLARITY Act and demands immediate action from the Senate

cryptonews.ruPublished on 2026-07-31Last updated on 2026-07-31

Abstract

On July 30th, U.S. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent escalated the debate on cryptocurrency regulation, urging the Senate to vote immediately on the bipartisan CLARITY Act. He criticized Senate Democrats for prioritizing politics and delaying what he termed a landmark bill for American leadership. Bessent argued that Congress has an opportunity to establish a regulatory framework for digital assets rather than forcing the industry overseas. The Secretary defended the bill's consumer protections and anti-fraud measures, stating that it imposes compliance standards on digital asset intermediaries comparable to traditional finance. He also clarified provisions for non-custodial software developers. Bessent noted support from the Fraternal Order of Police after amendments addressed law enforcement concerns. Despite approval from Senate banking and agriculture committees, seven Democratic senators seek stricter provisions on ethics and consumer protection. Political pressure is mounting ahead of midterm elections, with crypto voters factoring policy into their choices. An updated 616-page bill merges committee proposals, establishing registration procedures, dividing oversight between the SEC and CFTC, and addressing stablecoins and bankruptcy. Bessent framed the vote as a decisive choice for U.S. competitiveness, concluding, "America will lead or it will not. It's that simple."

On July 30, Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent intensified the debate on cryptocurrency regulation in the United States, presenting the CLARITY Act as a bipartisan concept that has already cleared major legislative hurdles. He noted that the House of Representatives passed the bill over a year ago, followed by thousands of hours of bipartisan negotiations involving lawmakers and congressional staff, while the Senate Banking and Agriculture committees advanced their respective parts of the legislation.

According to Bessent, Senate Republicans have prepared a floor-ready draft that awaits consideration. Criticizing opposition from Democrats, Bessent wrote:

"It is disappointing — but unsurprising — that Senate Democrats are prioritizing politics ahead of an important victory for American leadership."

Turning to economic aspects, the Treasury Secretary stated that Congress has the opportunity to create a regulatory framework for digital assets, rather than allowing the industry to expand overseas. He expressed doubt that legislators have ever preferred to push a nascent industry out of the U.S. instead of regulating it, and warned that failing to pass the bill would undermine American leadership in the rapidly growing global market.

His criticism also targeted Democrats who questioned the proposal's provisions concerning consumer protection and anti-money laundering, arguing that several lawmakers have received millions of dollars in campaign funding from the cryptocurrency industry while opposing the negotiated framework.

Treasury Secretary Defends Consumer and Developer Protections

Rejecting claims that the bill falls short, Bessent argued that the CLARITY Act includes meaningful safeguards against fraud, consumer harm, and illicit financing. He stated that Titles II and III would significantly enhance regulatory and compliance obligations for digital asset intermediaries, subjecting them to standards comparable to those applied to traditional financial institutions.

The Treasury Secretary also defended the Blockchain Regulatory Certainty Act, stating that it simply codifies longstanding Treasury policy whereby developers of non-custodial software are not subject to registration requirements under the Bank Secrecy Act, as they never take custody of customer assets. He added that critics have misinterpreted this provision, despite its limited scope.

Bessent further pointed to support from the Fraternal Order of Police, noting that the organization previously opposed specific parts of the bill but now, after negotiations, endorses its revised version. He presented this support as evidence that law enforcement concerns have been addressed through amendments to the bill.

Senate Vote Faces Mounting Political Pressure

Seven Democratic senators continue to seek stricter provisions regarding ethics, consumer protection, conflicts of interest, market integrity, and illicit financing. Galaxy Research recently lowered its odds of the bill's passage from 50% to 30%, while U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) Chairman Paul Atkins expressed optimism that Congress will ultimately approve the bill and offered technical assistance throughout the process.

Political pressure is mounting as the Senate's schedule tightens ahead of the midterm elections. The organization Stand With Crypto plans to rate each senator's vote for its 3 million supporters, and polls indicate that nearly 70% of cryptocurrency owners consider digital asset policy when choosing candidates.

Calling for immediate action, Bessent wrote:

"The Senate should vote NOW on this landmark bill. The fact is that Democratic senators are afraid to advance the CLARITY Act because they fear Senator Warren and the 'anti-crypto army' she once promised to build."

Updated Bill Expands Federal Oversight of Cryptocurrencies

U.S. Senator Cynthia Lummis (R-Wyo.) published an updated version of the bill text on July 22, incorporating proposals from both the Senate Banking and Agriculture committees. This 616-page draft establishes registration procedures for digital asset businesses, allocates oversight functions between the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) and the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC), strengthens client asset protections, expands disclosure requirements, and addresses self-custody, stablecoins, software developers, and bankruptcy procedures.

On May 14, after months of negotiations, the U.S. Senate Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs approved the bill by a bipartisan vote of 15 to 9, sending the CLARITY Act to the full Senate for consideration.

In conclusion, Bessent framed the debate as a decisive choice for U.S. competitiveness, stating:

"America will either be a leader or not. It's that simple."

Referencing Bitcoin creator Satoshi Nakamoto, the Treasury Secretary added: "I believe Satoshi once best expressed this thought: 'If you don't believe me or don't get it, I don't have time to try to convince you, sorry.'"

Related Questions

QWhat is the CLARITY Act and what is its current legislative status according to Secretary Scott Bessent?

AThe CLARITY Act is proposed U.S. cryptocurrency regulation legislation. According to Secretary Scott Bessent, it is a bipartisan concept that has already passed key legislative hurdles. The House passed it over a year ago, and the Senate Banking and Agriculture Committees have advanced their respective parts of the bill. A version is now ready for a Senate vote.

QWhat is Scott Bessent's primary criticism of Senate Democrats regarding the CLARITY Act?

AScott Bessent criticizes Senate Democrats for prioritizing politics over what he calls an important victory for American leadership. He claims they fear advancing the bill due to opposition from Senator Elizabeth Warren and her promised 'anti-crypto army'.

QAccording to Bessent, what economic risk does the U.S. face if the CLARITY Act is not passed?

ABessent warns that failing to pass the CLARITY Act would push the growing digital assets industry overseas instead of regulating it in the U.S. He argues this would undermine American leadership in a rapidly growing global market.

QHow does Bessent defend the CLARITY Act against criticisms related to consumer protection and illicit finance?

ABessent argues the CLARITY Act contains strong safeguards against fraud, consumer harm, and illegal financing. He states that key sections would impose compliance obligations on digital asset intermediaries comparable to traditional financial institutions and clarifies that it codifies existing policy for non-custodial software developers.

QWhat key updates are included in the revised 616-page version of the bill released in July?

AThe revised 616-page version, released by Senator Cynthia Lummis, consolidates proposals from the Senate Banking and Agriculture committees. Key provisions include registration procedures for digital asset firms, oversight roles for the SEC and CFTC, enhanced consumer asset protections, expanded disclosure requirements, and rules for self-custody, stablecoins, software developers, and bankruptcy.

Related Reads

In Jinjiang, Fujian, a Storage Super Unicorn Lies Quiet

In Fujian's Jinjiang, a city known for sportswear, lies a quiet semiconductor giant: Fujian Jinhua Integrated Circuit Co. (JHICC). Once a promising domestic DRAM manufacturer alongside Yangtze Memory and ChangXin Memory Technologies (CXMT), its journey was derailed in 2018 when the U.S. placed it on an Entity List and filed criminal charges for alleged trade secret theft. This halted production for years. A turning point came in February 2024 when a U.S. federal court found JHICC not guilty. However, it had lost crucial time. While CXMT soared to become a top-valued A-share company in 2024, JHICC, with an estimated valuation of 80 billion RMB, was just restarting. Its current output is primarily customized DDR4 chips, not the advanced DDR5/HBM demanded for AI, but it still benefits from the broader memory chip upcycle. JHICC's story is tied to Chen Zhengkun, a veteran engineer who left Micron to lead the venture. Founded in 2016 with state-backed funding, JHICC partnered with Taiwan's UMC to develop DRAM technology. Rapid progress was cut short by the U.S. actions, which Micron initiated, partly due to its heavy reliance on the Chinese market. Post-sanctions, Chen's team worked to rebuild the production line with reduced reliance on U.S. technology. According to its records, JHICC achieved small-scale production and revenue growth under immense pressure. It now focuses on the stable "niche" DRAM market (e.g., TVs, routers) with a monthly capacity of ~40,000 wafers, aiming for 60,000 by 2026. It holds over 1,000 patents but remains on the Entity List. For Jinjiang, investing in JHICC was a bold industrial leap. The local government provided unwavering financial and logistical support during the crisis, helping the company survive. JHICC has become the anchor for a growing local semiconductor cluster. Though its scale lags behind domestic peers, JHICC's persistence symbolizes a hard-won foothold in a global market long dominated by Samsung, SK Hynix, and Micron. Having missed one boom, it seeks a place in the new AI-driven memory supercycle.

marsbit55m ago

In Jinjiang, Fujian, a Storage Super Unicorn Lies Quiet

marsbit55m ago

Trading

Spot
活动图片