April Fool's Joke? Drift Protocol Hacked for Over $280 Million, Potentially the Second Largest DeFi Heist in Solana Ecosystem

Odaily星球日报Published on 2026-04-02Last updated on 2026-04-02

Abstract

In a major security breach on April 1, Solana-based derivatives protocol Drift Protocol suffered an exploit resulting in over $280 million in losses, potentially making it the second-largest DeFi hack on Solana. The attack involved compromised admin keys, allowing the hacker to mint fake CVT tokens, manipulate oracles, and drain the treasury. The attacker executed 11 large transactions, transferring assets including 51.61 million USDC, 125,000 WSOL, and 164,000 cbBTC, before bridging funds to Ethereum to acquire nearly 20,000 ETH. Drift’s treasury plummeted from $309 million to $41 million within minutes. The protocol had recently updated to a 2/5 multi-signature wallet without a timelock, raising suspicions of insider involvement or private key leakage. Security firms like PeckShield pointed to admin key compromise as the likely cause rather than a smart contract bug. Following the incident, DRIFT token fell over 38%, and SOL dropped nearly 5%. Multiple projects integrated with Drift were affected, with several pausing deposits, withdrawals, or trading. The scale of the attack highlights ongoing vulnerabilities in DeFi, particularly around operational and key management security. Users are advised to avoid interacting with Drift until a full investigation is complete.

Original | Odaily Planet Daily (@OdailyChina)

Author | Wenser (@wenser 2010)

While the flames of conflict in the Middle East remain unextinguished, a security breach involving over $200 million has delivered another heavy blow to the crypto world.

On April 1st, April Fool's Day, Solana's leading derivatives protocol, Drift Protocol, played what might be the least funny 'joke' on everyone: just a week after updating to a multi-signature wallet requiring only 2/5 signatures without a timelock; a week later, over $280 million in JLP-related assets were shockingly stolen. It's hard not to speculate whether this was an inside job.

Latest news, Drift officially confirmed the active attack and has suspended all platform deposits and withdrawals; furthermore, a potentially affected project explicitly stated: "This is not an April Fool's joke."

A statement meant as a jest unveils what could be yet another heavy blow to the Solana DeFi ecosystem.

Drift Protocol Attack Process: 11 Transactions, Treasury Drained in an Instant

Preliminary investigation indicates the attack method involved hijacking administrator privileges and exploiting a multi-signature execution vulnerability.

SlowMist founder Cosmos posted: "A week ago, Drift migrated to a 2/5 multi-signature setup with no timelock (Odaily Planet Daily Note: meaning operations execute immediately) (including 1 old wallet address and 4 new signature wallet addresses). The attacker took over the admin permissions hours ago, minted CVT fake coins, manipulated the oracle, disabled relevant security mechanisms, and drained the pool's valuable assets."

On-chain information shows the attacker first purchased 41.72 million Jupiter liquidity tokens (JLP), worth approximately $155.6 million, then quickly transferred out large amounts of USDC and other tokens, bridged the funds to Ethereum, and purchased about 19,913 ETH, equivalent to roughly $42.6 million.

The entire process involved about 11 large transactions, including:

  • 51.61 million USDC, worth approximately $51.62 million;
  • 125,000 WSOL, worth approximately $10.45 million;
  • 164,000 cbBTC, worth approximately $11.29 million.
  • Hacker wallet address: HkGz4KmoZ7Zmk7HN6ndJ31 UJ1qZ2qgwQxgVqQwovpZES.

Within just a few minutes, Drift's total treasury assets plummeted from $309 million to $41 million.

Around 3 AM, Drift officially announced the attack and stated it is jointly responding with multiple security companies, cross-chain bridges, and exchanges.

Attack Cause: Official Conclusion Pending, Admin Private Key Leak Suspected as Main Reason

Currently, Drift has not officially announced the primary cause of this attack.

Security firm PeckShield assessed that the admin keys for Drift Protocol were most likely leaked or compromised, with the attacker gaining privileged access to manipulate the protocol treasury. This assessment characterizes the attack as a breach at the permission level, rather than a smart contract code vulnerability.

Other community messages suggest the attacker might have manipulated collateral parameters, artificially inflating the value of certain illiquid assets, then borrowing high-value tokens against them, ultimately siphoning the treasury funds. This path highly aligns with previous DeFi governance attack patterns. Currently, investigating bodies have not ruled out possibilities like smart contract vulnerabilities or oracle manipulation; the investigation is ongoing.

Notably, the Solana wallet used by the attacker was initially funded with just 1 SOL last week and had previously received a small test transfer of about $2.52 from the Drift treasury, indicating the attacker might have been lying in wait, completing permission verification before the main action. Additionally, funds for the address associated with the Drift attacker originated from Backpack, potentially leaving KYC-related clues.

Market Reaction: DRIFT Token Plunges 28%, SOL Briefly Under Pressure

Following the news of the Drift hack, the market panicked, with DRIFT and SOL quickly trending downward.

The native token of Drift Protocol, DRIFT, fell over 38% in 24 hours, currently trading at around $0.042, a cumulative drop of over 98% from its all-time high of $2.60 in November 2024. The price of SOL also fell under the impact of the news, currently dropping below $80, down nearly 5% in 24 hours, and temporarily quoted at $78.6.

Phantom wallet has proactively popped up risk warnings for users attempting to access the Drift protocol; Solana treasury listed company Forward Industries and DeFi Development Corp have also issued statements confirming their funds were not affected by this attack.

Largest DeFi Attack on Solana Ecosystem in 2026

According to a post by crypto KOL @lugeweb3, projects that suffered clear losses or significant impact from the Drift hack include:

  • @piggybank_fi: $106,000 stolen, team is injecting liquidity to cover user losses.
  • @DeFiCarrot: Boost and Turbo products unaffected, but overall impacted by the vulnerability, minting/redemption functions paused.
  • @uselulo: Traditional deposits may be affected (protected and enhanced deposits are safe).
  • @reflectmoney: All minting/redemption for USDC+ and USDT+ frozen.
  • @project0: Borrowing collateralized by Drift markets paused.
  • @ranger_finance: rgUSD deposits/withdrawals paused, $900,000 of $14.6 million TVL on Drift frozen.
  • @elementaldefi: SOL and Lend funds deposited on Drift frozen (USDC and ONYC funds safe).
  • @TradeNeutral: All Drift-related vaults (JLP, BTC/ETH/SOL super staking, Hyper JLP, etc., total TVL $3.6 million) potentially affected, deposits/withdrawals paused.
  • @xplaceapp: Deposits/withdrawals unavailable, credit mode and lending functions disabled.
  • @GetPyra: Funds affected, all card functions paused.
  • @ExponentFinance: USDC+ related transactions paused.
  • @fusewallet: Deposits paused.
  • @perena: Stablecoins unaffected, but redemptions paused; JLP Vault on Neutral Trade ($512,000 TVL) potentially affected.

Projects that have explicitly stated they are unaffected:

  • @JupiterExchange
  • @kamino
  • @UnitasLabs
  • @onrefinance
  • @solflare
  • @hylo_so
  • @MarinadeFinance
  • @synatraxyz
  • @solsticefi
  • @defidevcorp
  • @jito_sol
  • @MeteoraAG
  • @sanctumso
  • @wormhole

Based on scale estimates, this event could become one of the largest DeFi security incidents in the Solana ecosystem since the Wormhole bridge attack.

Prior to the Drift incident, its TVL was approximately $550 million; this attack directly resulted in losses of $285 million, ranking it the largest loss scale among all DeFi security incidents so far in 2026. Notably, DeFi attack losses in March totaled about $52 million, covering 20 major incidents. Now, this single Drift security event has pushed the half-year loss figure to a new magnitude.

Without a doubt, the Drift hack once again sounds that old-fashioned but perpetually relevant alarm bell for the DeFi industry—beyond code security, operational security is equally critical. If the cause is ultimately confirmed to be an admin private key leak, it will also reaffirm: No matter how perfect the code audit is, the human factor remains the weakest link in on-chain security.

Finally, Odaily Planet Daily reminds users: Before Drift releases a full investigation report and provides a clear solution, do not deposit funds into the protocol or interact with it.

Related Questions

QWhat was the total value of assets stolen in the Drift Protocol attack on Solana?

AOver 280 million USD worth of JLP-related assets were stolen.

QWhat is the suspected primary cause of the Drift Protocol security breach?

AThe attack is suspected to be primarily due to administrator key compromise or hijacking of management permissions, allowing the attacker to gain privileged access to the protocol's treasury.

QHow did the Drift Protocol attack affect the price of its native token DRIFT?

AThe price of the DRIFT token plummeted by over 38% within 24 hours following the attack.

QWhich security company suggested that the attack was due to a permissions breach rather than a smart contract bug?

APeckShield suggested that the attack was due to a compromise of administrator keys and privileged access, not a smart contract code vulnerability.

QWhat significant change did Drift Protocol make to its multi-signature setup just one week before the attack?

AOne week before the attack, Drift Protocol updated its multi-signature setup to require only 2 out of 5 signatures for authorization and removed the time-lock mechanism, allowing for immediate execution of transactions.

Related Reads

Not Speculation but a Necessity: The 4 Unique Values of Prediction Markets

Polymarket's recent $4 billion funding round and soaring valuation of $15 billion highlight the explosive growth of prediction markets, with trading volume reaching $25.7 billion in March 2026—a 10.6% monthly increase. This analysis argues that prediction markets serve critical non-speculative functions, positioning them as essential tools rather than mere gambling platforms. Prediction markets offer four unique values: entertainment consumption, insurance-like protection, risk hedging, and truth discovery. Firstly, they stimulate economic activity by engaging users in event-based betting, similar to the broader sports industry. Secondly, they act as a form of decentralized insurance, allowing users to hedge against specific, well-defined risks (e.g., weather events) transparently and without traditional overhead costs. Thirdly, institutions and individuals use these markets to hedge against geopolitical and commodity price risks, as demonstrated during the U.S.-Iran conflict and the launch of 24/7 commodity markets on platforms like Kalshi. Finally, prediction markets counter media bias by aggregating crowd-sourced information, often achieving 30% higher accuracy than surveys due to users' vested interests. Experts like Bitwise’s Jeff Park and SIG’s Jeff Yass emphasize the markets' role in risk transfer and financial innovation. As these platforms evolve, they are poised to become trillion-dollar markets, offering more reliable, decentralized mechanisms for information pricing and risk management.

marsbit2h ago

Not Speculation but a Necessity: The 4 Unique Values of Prediction Markets

marsbit2h ago

Trading

Spot
Futures

Hot Articles

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of S (S) are presented below.

活动图片