After Stepping Down as Mayor of New York, He Turned to Selling Cryptocurrency

marsbitPublished on 2026-01-13Last updated on 2026-01-13

Written by: Nicholas Fandos, Debra Kamin

Compiled by: Chopper, Foresight News

Two weeks ago, Eric Adams held one of the most powerful positions in the U.S. government system; today, he stands under the neon billboards of Times Square, peddling a New York City-themed cryptocurrency.

For anyone else, such a shift in identity might be embarrassing, but the former mayor of New York was all smiles, enthusiastically discussing the advantages of blockchain technology and promising not to profit from it for the time being.

"I've missed you all so much, ladies and gentlemen," he said to a group of reporters, before shifting gears to criticize his successor's "major mistakes," talk about business opportunities in foreign capitals, and admit that his experience in municipal services like garbage collection has now become monetizable "expert capital."

This was his first public appearance since leaving office on January 1st, but it ended abruptly because he had to catch a flight. He was headed first to Dallas, then to Senegal, claiming more opportunities awaited him there.

The 65-year-old Adams is one of the most unconventional mayors in New York City's history: from a working-class background, a former police officer, yet federally indicted for his pursuit of a luxurious lifestyle. All signs suggest that his post-mayoral career will continue this "unconventional" approach.

In just the past two weeks, he has met with a Saudi prince in Dubai, visited the President of the Democratic Republic of the Congo, and repeatedly attacked his successor, Zohran Mamdani, for overturning some of the pro-Israel policies he implemented during his term. This move breaks the unwritten tradition of former mayors showing respect to their successors.

Details of Adams's various business dealings remain shrouded in mystery, including his partnership in the cryptocurrency project. But his post-mayoral core agenda is becoming increasingly clear: restoring his personal reputation, criticizing his successor, and repaying the massive debts incurred from legal battles. The priority among these three, however, remains unclear.

"I won't be looking for a nine-to-five salaried job," Adams said. "I only work for myself."

Adams is not the only one planning his post-office livelihood while targeting Mamdani. Former New York Governor Andrew Cuomo is finalizing a deal to host a weekly show on the conservative talk radio station WABC, where he was a frequent guest during his unsuccessful campaign.

According to the New York Post, the show will provide Cuomo with a platform to promote his centrist Democratic political views, and he will likely use it to criticize Mamdani, whom he has previously called an "extreme left radical."

The station's owner, Republican billionaire John Catsimatidis, said he does not plan to pay Cuomo, but merely wants to help him after his electoral defeat. The broadcast time has not yet been finalized. "We feel sorry for what happened to him, and we love New York deeply," Catsimatidis said. "He wants to maintain public visibility and stay connected with New Yorkers."

But so far, Adams's post-mayoral performance has undoubtedly been more eye-catching.

Just hours after attending Mamdani's inauguration, he boarded an Emirates flight to Dubai with his long-time partner, Tracey Collins. Besides the Saudi prince, he was also photographed meeting with several wealthy Israeli and Uzbek businessmen.

Numerous current and former political figures attended Zohran Mamdani's mayoral inauguration, Adams among them

He had dinner with real estate agent and reality TV star Eleonora Srugo and posted a photo on social media with Amir Marashi, an Iranian-born New York gynecologist and women's health advocate specializing in procedures like vaginal rejuvenation.

Meanwhile, Adams kept a close eye on developments in New York City. He frequently posted on social media to express dissatisfaction with Mamdani's policies: for example, Mamdani's reversal of the city's previously adopted expanded definition of anti-Semitism and his criticism of some of Mamdani's appointments.

"Everyone needs a grace period, but hate allows no one any grace," Adams said at Monday's event.

Mamdani, at another event, declined to respond to Adams's criticism.

Adams's interest in cryptocurrency is not new. During his mayoral term, he chose to receive his first paycheck in cryptocurrency; he is close friends with cryptocurrency billionaire Brock Pierce, who, along with other crypto industry figures, funded his campaign last fall before he dropped his re-election bid.

Having made "supporting Israel and combating anti-Semitism" a core part of his administration, Adams also packaged this new token as a public welfare project, claiming its proceeds would be used to fight anti-Semitism, anti-Americanism, and "teaching children to embrace blockchain technology."

The token's official website states that its total issuance will be 1 billion tokens. Adams said he would donate the proceeds from some of these tokens to non-profit organizations dedicated to the aforementioned causes and stated that he would not receive a salary or any compensation, at least initially.

"NYC Token is a new generation cryptocurrency inspired by the relentless energy and innovative spirit of New York City," the project's website reads. "Leveraging cutting-edge blockchain technology, we are building a decentralized financial ecosystem with ambitions matching those of this city."

Despite this, Adams seemed struggling at times when describing the project's details. At Monday's event and in an interview with Fox News, he repeatedly misnamed the new product as "New York City Coin."

Adams's image is prominently featured on the token's website, which invites visitors to "Buy Now," but as of Monday evening, all purchase links on the site were non-functional.

The former mayor said he is also exploring other business areas, including plans to be advanced during his trip to Africa this week.

"I realize that many services New York City has, even garbage collection, are hard to find in many parts of the world," Adams said. "I plan to provide such help to other cities and countries."

All these actions raise questions about whether Adams will continue to reside in New York in the future. He had previously stated that he hoped to retire in a city overseas rather than return to his home in Bedford-Stuyvesant, Brooklyn.

But two people familiar with the matter revealed that the former mayor plans to keep New York City as his base and intends to rent an apartment in Manhattan, preferably with a view. Adams himself tried to dispel doubts at Monday's event. "I'm not going anywhere," he said.

Related Reads

Different Choices After the Plunge: Institutions Buy the Dip, Traders Shift to US Stocks

Title: Diverging Strategies After the Crash: Institutions Buying the Dip, Traders Shifting to US Stocks Following a sharp decline where Bitcoin briefly fell below $60,000 on June 6th, market sentiment remains "extreme fear" despite a partial recovery. This has led to varied responses from major market participants. Several institutional figures and analysts present a cautiously optimistic long-term view for Bitcoin. Glassnode's co-founder identifies $46k-$54k as a probable key bottom range based on historical on-chain models, while a Standard Chartered executive suggests the bottom is nearly formed. Strive's CEO points to Bitcoin touching its 200-week moving average as a historically reliable buy signal. Analysts highlight metrics like MVRV ratio and the "Power Law" model indicating Bitcoin is in an extremely undervalued zone. Conversely, some traders are exiting the crypto space. One trader cited a more attractive risk/reward profile and deeper research opportunities in US stocks, particularly with AI-related equities outperforming and capital rotating away from crypto. This shift is partly attributed to perceived ongoing risks, including those related to Strategy's Bitcoin sales. Market prediction data suggests a high probability (72%) of Bitcoin falling below $55,000, but lower odds for a deeper crash below $35k-$40k. The overall picture is one of division: institutions and long-term analysts see a accumulating opportunity, while some active traders are seeking alpha elsewhere amidst the volatility and shifting capital flows.

marsbit42m ago

Different Choices After the Plunge: Institutions Buy the Dip, Traders Shift to US Stocks

marsbit42m ago

Tech Stocks in the Midst of Deleveraging: Rather Than Rushing to Buy the Dip, Wait for the Macro Environment to Stabilize First

"Technology Stocks in Deleveraging Phase: Wait for Macro Stability Before Buying the Dip" The current sell-off in tech/AI stocks is primarily driven by macro headwinds, not a breakdown in AI fundamentals. After a parabolic rise, the market faced a perfect storm: an overcrowded trade, a massive SpaceX IPO draining liquidity, pre-CPI/PPI/FOMC hedging, and strong jobs data renewing "higher-for-longer" rate fears. This triggered a concentrated deleveraging in hot tech names. Key historical context: Unlike the December 2023 sell-off focused on AI capex returns, the current correction centers on the "denominator" – rising concerns over rates, inflation, the Fed, geopolitics, and liquidity. Leading memory stocks like Micron have seen ~20% pullbacks, significant but not yet at panic levels seen in March. The intense selling wave may be largely over, but a quick V-shaped recovery is unlikely. The market will likely churn in high volatility, awaiting clarity. The immediate catalyst needed for a sustainable reversal is a "stop-bleeding" signal from macro conditions. This doesn't require a major positive shock (like the April Iran ceasefire), but simply a halt to further deterioration: CPI not surprising hotter, Treasury yields stabilizing, the Fed not turning more hawkish, and post-SpaceX IPO liquidity easing. Once macro pressure plateaus, the intact AI investment thesis – centered on persistent compute/memory shortages and accelerating commercialization – can quickly regain market focus. The strategy is clear: prioritize monitoring macro stabilization over rushing to bottom-fish individual AI stories. Patience is key.

marsbit49m ago

Tech Stocks in the Midst of Deleveraging: Rather Than Rushing to Buy the Dip, Wait for the Macro Environment to Stabilize First

marsbit49m ago

South Korean Stocks Plunge, Global Funds Liquidate: Has the Semiconductor Fundamentals Really Changed?

South Korean stocks experienced their sharpest decline of the year, with the KOSPI index plunging nearly 9% on Monday, triggering a market circuit breaker. Leading semiconductor firms Samsung Electronics and SK Hynix were heavily sold off, raising questions about whether the AI-driven bull market has reached an inflection point. This sell-off was largely triggered by a significant drop in the U.S. semiconductor sector late last week. Concurrently, NVIDIA CEO Jensen Huang visited Seoul over the weekend, meeting with top executives from SK Group, Samsung, LG, and NAVER. He announced a new multi-year partnership with SK Hynix to co-develop next-generation memory products for AI data centers. Huang emphasized that AI infrastructure build-out remains in its early stages, creating a stark contrast between market panic and ongoing, strengthened industry collaboration. The article argues that South Korea has become one of the most sensitive markets for global AI-related capital flows, functioning like a large AI memory ETF due to the heavy weighting of its chipmakers. The current market turmoil reflects a shift in investor focus: from simply betting on overall AI growth to scrutinizing which companies will actually capture the profits from that growth. This "profit pool reassessment" phase is causing high volatility based on supply chain news and earnings guidance. Ultimately, the direction of the Korean market will be determined by external factors—NVIDIA's orders, HBM supply-demand dynamics, and capital expenditures from cloud service providers—rather than domestic conditions. The disconnect between sharp price corrections and continued strong signals from the industry core leaves the market at a crossroads, awaiting clearer data on the durability of AI infrastructure demand.

marsbit1h ago

South Korean Stocks Plunge, Global Funds Liquidate: Has the Semiconductor Fundamentals Really Changed?

marsbit1h ago

Trump in Talks with AI Companies Over Profit Sharing, A Narrative Pressure of Industrial Revolution Scale Begins

In recent AI market discussions, a new dimension beyond growth and profits has emerged: the question of how the immense wealth potentially generated by AI should be shared with the wider public. Triggered by reports of White House officials discussing "voluntary equity transfers" with top AI firms, similar to models like Alaska's Permanent Fund, the conversation focuses on public wealth funds. OpenAI's own whitepaper proposes such funds, allowing households without direct tech stock ownership to benefit from AI gains. More radical proposals, like Bernie Sanders' call for high public equity stakes and board seats, represent an extreme end of the spectrum. Currently, these are early-stage policy probes, not enacted laws. OpenAI's initiative is seen as an attempt to secure "social license" for its future expansion, mitigating risks of public backlash, stricter regulation, or anti-trust actions as AI's economic impact grows. The core market implication is the introduction of a "policy discount" to AI valuations, particularly for private model companies like OpenAI, Anthropic, and xAI. Investors must now consider not just future earnings but also what portion might be allocated to public mechanisms. The impact varies greatly based on the mechanism. A small, voluntary transfer of non-voting economic rights (e.g., 5%) acts as a quantifiable long-term cost. Government acquisition of economic rights via warrants tied to support differs from direct equity with governance power. The most disruptive scenario would be forced high-percentage public ownership affecting control and innovation incentives. Key signals to watch include whether other AI companies follow suit, if the White House formalizes proposals, related disclosures in future IPO documents, and any market price reactions. For now, this represents a shift from pricing pure AI growth to pricing its potential distribution. A manageable, voluntary economic share is akin to an insurance cost for societal acceptance, while a forced shift toward control and governance would fundamentally alter valuation logic.

marsbit1h ago

Trump in Talks with AI Companies Over Profit Sharing, A Narrative Pressure of Industrial Revolution Scale Begins

marsbit1h ago

From Record Highs to a Two-Week Low: Why Did AI Concept Stocks Suddenly Pull Back?

From Record Highs to Two-Week Lows: Why Did AI Stocks Suddenly Pull Back? U.S. stock indices, led by the tech-heavy Nasdaq 100, fell sharply to two-week lows. This marked a reversal from earlier in the week when AI infrastructure and semiconductor stocks had propelled major indices to record highs. Investors are rotating out of these previously high-flying tech sectors into other areas. The sell-off was driven by profit-taking and concerns that the AI rally had become overextended, exacerbated by chipmaker Broadcom's sales outlook falling short of lofty market expectations. The decline accelerated following a stronger-than-expected U.S. May nonfarm payrolls report, which showed 172,000 jobs added versus an estimated 88,000. This data sparked a jump in bond yields, with the 10-year Treasury yield rising to 4.553%, as it reinforced market speculation that the Federal Reserve's next move could be a rate hike rather than a cut. Globally, equities also declined, with European and Asian markets falling. Within the U.S. market, chip and AI-related stocks like Super Micro Computer and Arm Holdings led the losses, dropping over 7%. Cryptocurrency-linked stocks and mining shares also fell sharply amid drops in Bitcoin and commodity prices. While the overall Q1 earnings season remained solid, with 83% of S&P 500 companies beating estimates, the weakness was concentrated in tech. Excluding the tech sector, Q1 earnings growth was around 3%, the weakest in two years.

marsbit1h ago

From Record Highs to a Two-Week Low: Why Did AI Concept Stocks Suddenly Pull Back?

marsbit1h ago

Trading

Spot
Futures
活动图片