UK Regulator Restricts Coinbase Ad for Downplaying Crypto Risks

TheNewsCryptoPublished on 2026-01-28Last updated on 2026-01-28

Abstract

The UK Advertising Standards Authority (ASA) has restricted a Coinbase advertising campaign for downplaying the risks of cryptocurrency investing and for presenting the exchange as a solution to the country's cost-of-living crisis. The 2-minute video ad, which used satirical musical scenes of citizens singing "everything is fine" amidst a collapsing city, was deemed irresponsible. The ASA stated that using humor to address serious financial concerns risked portraying high-risk crypto products as a simple solution. The ad, which was rejected by TV ad clearance body Clearcast, was widely circulated on posters in high-traffic areas like the London Underground. The regulator noted the ads lacked required risk warnings. Coinbase defended the campaign, stating it was intended to spark discussion about the financial system and was not meant to provide simplistic solutions or mislead viewers.

The advertising overseer of the United Kingdom has restricted a Coinbase campaign that reportedly dismissed the risks of crypto investing and advertised the exchange as a solution to the cost-of-living crisis of the country.

As per the U.K. Advertising Standards Authority, the advertisements were called irresponsible and dismissed the risks of cryptocurrency, as reported by The Guardian on January 28. Initially, a 2-minute ad was released by Coinbase in July 2025 in which the video featured satirical musical scenes of cheerful citizens.

The citizens were singing slogans such as “everything is fine, everything is grand” as their homes fell into collapse and underwent power outages as the city got messed up with overflowing bins and rats.

The video then concludes with a dramatic line, “If everything is fine, then do not change anything,” before turning out to the Coinbase logo.

No Evidence For Claim Became The Ground For Rejection

The advertising watchdog stated to the global advisory council of Coinbase that we thought that using humour to address serious financial concerns, with a cue to change, risked showing complex, high-risk financial products as a swift or obvious response to those concerns.

The advertisement has so far been discarded by Clearcast, the body which screens TV commercials in the country. The grounds provided for rejection were that it showed crypto as a potential solution to economic challenges, without having much evidence for the claim.

However, the ASA claimed that it was still circulated widely on different platforms, having three posters that were shown in high-traffic areas like the London Underground and rail stations.

Moreover, the claims also included not comprising any risk warnings, mainly given that the Financial Conduct Authority has ordered that crypto promotions must come with significant risk disclosures.

A spokesperson from Coinbase also came up defending the campaign and stated that the video was intended to evoke discussion regarding the state of financial condition in the country and the need to look for better futures. He also highlighted that the ad was not made to give simplistic solutions or mislead viewers.

Highlighted Crypto News Today:

Ethereum Prepares Mainnet Launch of ERC-8004 AI Agent Standard

TagsCoinbaseCryptoCryptocurrencyUK

Related Questions

QWhy did the UK Advertising Standards Authority restrict Coinbase's advertisement campaign?

AThe UK Advertising Standards Authority restricted the campaign because it dismissed the risks of cryptocurrency investing and was deemed irresponsible. It used humor to address serious financial concerns, which risked portraying complex, high-risk financial products as a quick and obvious solution.

QWhat was the main theme of the Coinbase advertisement that was restricted?

AThe advertisement featured satirical musical scenes of cheerful citizens singing 'everything is fine, everything is grand' while their surroundings collapsed with power outages, overflowing bins, and rats. It concluded with the line 'If everything is fine, then do not change anything' before showing the Coinbase logo.

QWhich body in the UK screens TV commercials and rejected the Coinbase ad?

AClearcast, the body responsible for screening TV commercials in the UK, rejected the Coinbase advertisement.

QWhat was one of the specific reasons provided for the rejection of the Coinbase ad?

AThe ad was rejected because it presented cryptocurrency as a potential solution to economic challenges without sufficient evidence to support that claim, and it lacked the required risk warnings mandated by the Financial Conduct Authority.

QHow did Coinbase defend its advertisement campaign?

AA Coinbase spokesperson stated that the video was intended to spark discussion about the country's financial condition and the need to seek better futures, emphasizing that it was not designed to provide simplistic solutions or mislead viewers.

Related Reads

Ethereum Repricing: From Rollup-Centric to the 'Security Settlement Layer'

Ethereum is undergoing a fundamental strategic shift, moving from a "Rollup-Centric" scaling vision to establishing itself as a global "Security Settlement Layer." This pivot, highlighted by Vitalik Buterin's recent reflections, acknowledges the slower-than-expected decentralization of Layer 2s (L2s) and the increasing throughput capacity of the Ethereum mainnet (L1) itself. The core change is a new "L1-first paradigm." L1 will focus on providing the highest levels of security, censorship resistance, and finality, while L2s evolve into a spectrum of networks offering differentiated services (e.g., privacy, AI). This redefines Ethereum's value proposition: its core asset is no longer just transaction throughput ("traffic") but its unparalleled "settlement sovereignty." This shift necessitates a complete recalibration of Ethereum's valuation framework. Traditional corporate models (like P/E ratios) are a category error, as Ethereum is a neutral infrastructure that often prioritizes lower fees and ecosystem growth over protocol revenue. A new model is proposed, weighting four value quadrants: 1. **Security Settlement Layer (45% weight):** ETH's value as a credibly neutral, global settlement base. Priced via validator economics and staking DCF models. 2. **Monetary Property (35%):** ETH's role as the native currency for on-chain finance (stablecoins, DeFi, RWA). Valued using a layered monetary demand model. 3. Platform/Network Effects (10%): Growth optionality from ecosystem expansion, measured by a trust-adjusted Metcalfe model. 4. Protocol Revenue (10%): A cash flow floor during bear markets, valued via P/S and fee yield models. An external "state adaptation" mechanism is suggested to dynamically adjust these weights based on macro conditions, market structure, and on-chain sentiment. Furthermore, the path towards institutionalization—through staking ETFs and using ETH for settlement—could create a "second curve" of demand, transforming ETH from a speculative asset into a yield-bearing, utility-based infrastructure asset. In conclusion, the current market downturn represents not a collapse in value but a "migration of the pricing anchor" towards Ethereum's core structural value as the world's premier security settlement layer.

marsbit7m ago

Ethereum Repricing: From Rollup-Centric to the 'Security Settlement Layer'

marsbit7m ago

Trading

Spot
Futures
活动图片