Inside South Korea’s crypto shock: Upbit announces 99% cold-storage security overhaul

ambcryptoPublished on 2025-12-10Last updated on 2025-12-10

Abstract

South Korea's largest cryptocurrency exchange, Upbit, is increasing its cold storage ratio to 99% following a recent multi-million dollar hack involving Solana-based tokens. This aggressive security overhaul far exceeds the country's 80% legal requirement and places Upbit ahead of most major exchanges globally. The move coincides with regulatory pressure, as South Korean authorities are considering imposing "bank-level" liability standards that would force exchanges to compensate users for losses from hacks, even without direct fault. Additionally, lawmakers are pushing to finalize a stablecoin regulatory framework by a December deadline, with a potential parliamentary review in early 2026.

South Korea’s biggest exchange Upbit raised its cold-storage ratio to 99% in response to its recent multimillion-dollar Solana breach.

This move comes days after news that regulators are weighing new “bank-level” liability standards for exchanges.

A new security era

According to operator Dunamu, Upbit is moving nearly all customer assets into cold storage after last month’s Solana-related breach. This is one of the most aggressive crypto security moves ever.

The exchange currently keeps over 98% of funds offline, and now plans to push that figure to 99% by cutting hot-wallet exposure to under 1%.

This in response to hackers draining multiple Solana-based tokens in under an hour in late-November.

The move also places Upbit far above Korea’s legal requirement of 80% cold-wallet storage and ahead of most major global exchanges like Coinbase, OKX and MEXC.

A push for bank-level accountability

AMBCrypto previously reported that South Korean regulators are considering stricter liability rules for crypto exchanges in the wake of Upbit’s breach.

The Financial Services Commission is reviewing a framework that would require platforms to compensate users for losses caused by hacks or system failures. This is even in cases where the exchange is not directly at fault.

This standard would be a big improvement in consumer protection for digital assets. This is how banks and e-payment firms have worked so far.

Pressure for stablecoin rules

Lawmakers are also reportedly racing to finalize the country’s long-awaited stablecoin framework.

They have apparently pressed financial regulators to submit a draft bill by the 10th of December, warning that parliament will move ahead without them if the deadline is missed.

The ruling party expects the proposal to be taken up during the National Assembly’s January 2026 extraordinary session.

Regulators clarified that no final decision has been made on whether banks will participate in issuing a won-backed stablecoin.

However, they confirmed that the topic was discussed in a meeting earlier this week. Both sides agreed that the bill must now be prepared as quickly as possible.


Final Thoughts

  • South Korea’s Upbit cold-storage is a new, security-first turn for the country’s crypto market.
  • With looming bank-level liability rules and stablecoin regulation, exchanges are under pressure.

Related Reads

Strategy Takes a Hardline Stance Against MSCI: What's in the 12-Page Open Letter of Defense?

In October 2024, MSCI proposed excluding companies with over 50% of their assets in digital assets from its global investable market indices, directly threatening Digital Asset Treasury (DAT) companies like MicroStrategy. Analysts warned this could trigger up to $8.8 billion in outflows, with MicroStrategy alone facing $2.8 billion in passive selling pressure. In response, MicroStrategy submitted a 12-page public letter to MSCI, strongly opposing the proposal as "misleading and destructive." The company argued that digital assets represent a revolutionary financial technology, comparable to historic infrastructure investments like oil or telecommunications. It emphasized that DATs are operational businesses with active revenue models, not passive funds, and criticized the 50% threshold as arbitrary, discriminatory, and impractical due to Bitcoin's volatility. MicroStrategy also accused MSCI of violating index neutrality and contradicting the U.S. government's pro-digital asset strategy. The company demanded MSCI withdraw the proposal or extend the consultation period. It is not alone—over 300 entities, including Strive and Bitcoin for Corporations, have joined opposition efforts, suggesting alternative indices instead of exclusion. The outcome, expected by January 2026, will significantly impact the integration of digital asset companies into traditional financial markets.

marsbit37m ago

Strategy Takes a Hardline Stance Against MSCI: What's in the 12-Page Open Letter of Defense?

marsbit37m ago

Trading

Spot
Futures
活动图片