UK tests stablecoins in regulatory sandbox while proposing limits on user holdings

ambcryptoPublished on 2026-02-25Last updated on 2026-02-25

Abstract

UK regulators are advancing a dual approach to stablecoin regulation, combining live testing within the Financial Conduct Authority’s sandbox with proposed limits on user holdings. The sandbox includes firms like Revolut and Monee Financial Technologies, trialing applications in payments, settlement, and crypto trading under strict supervision. Concurrently, the Bank of England has proposed temporary caps—£20,000 per stablecoin for individuals and £10 million for businesses—to mitigate systemic risks such as bank deposit flight. This cautious "test and contain" strategy aims to foster innovation in pound-denominated stablecoins while preventing rapid scaling until the market matures. The UK’s approach reflects the minor global role of non-dollar stablecoins and focuses on ensuring safe integration into the existing financial system.

UK regulators have begun live testing of stablecoin use cases under a controlled sandbox programme. This comes even as policymakers move to impose limits on the amount of stablecoin users can hold domestically.

The parallel initiatives underscore a cautious regulatory approach: encouraging experimentation with pound-denominated stablecoins while putting guardrails in place to prevent them from becoming systemically significant too quickly.

FCA sandbox moves stablecoin testing into live trials

The testing is taking place under a sandbox run by the Financial Conduct Authority, which allows firms to trial new financial products under regulatory supervision.

The sandbox includes a small group of participants assessing potential applications such as payments, wholesale settlement, and crypto trading. Revolut, Monee Financial Technologies, ReStabilise, and VVTX would be part of the testing.

Work is expected to begin this quarter, with testing conducted in tightly controlled conditions rather than through public rollouts.

Notably, the trials do not include major high-street banks, reflecting the continued caution among large UK lenders toward issuing or distributing stablecoins.

Proposed holding caps signal prudence

Running alongside the sandbox is a separate proposal from the Bank of England to cap the amount of stablecoins that UK users can hold, at least during the early phase of adoption.

Under the proposal, individuals would face limits on holdings of a given systemic stablecoin. At the same time, businesses would be subject to higher thresholds.

Individuals will be allowed up to about £20,000 per coin, while companies will be allowed up to about £10 million per coin.

The measures are intended as temporary safeguards to mitigate risks such as deposit flight from traditional banks and rapid outflows during periods of stress.

The caps would apply only to stablecoins deemed systemic and are designed to be revisited as the market matures.

UK takes a “test and contain” approach

Taken together, the sandbox and holding-limit proposals reflect a regulatory strategy that prioritises learning and containment over rapid scale.

While regulators acknowledge that stablecoins could improve efficiency in areas like payments and settlement, they remain wary of their potential to blur the line between bank deposits and crypto-based instruments.

The Bank of England has previously encouraged banks to focus on tokenised deposits rather than issuing stablecoins directly.

Pound stablecoins remain marginal globally

The UK’s measured stance also reflects the limited global footprint of non-dollar stablecoins.

Industry data shows that pound- and euro-denominated stablecoins account for a fraction of global circulation, with dollar-pegged tokens continuing to dominate volumes.

Against that backdrop, the sandbox is less about accelerating mass adoption and more about determining whether sterling stablecoins can operate safely within the existing financial system.


Final Summary

  • The UK is allowing stablecoin testing to proceed, but only within tightly controlled regulatory boundaries.
  • Proposed holding limits suggest policymakers want to manage systemic risk before stablecoins reach meaningful scale.

Related Questions

QWhat is the purpose of the UK's regulatory sandbox for stablecoins?

AThe purpose is to allow firms to trial new financial products, including stablecoin use cases for payments, wholesale settlement, and crypto trading, under the supervision of the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) in a controlled environment.

QWhich companies are mentioned as participants in the FCA's stablecoin sandbox testing?

AThe participants mentioned are Revolut, Monee Financial Technologies, ReStabilise, and VVTX.

QWhat are the proposed holding limits for stablecoins in the UK according to the Bank of England?

AIndividuals would be allowed to hold up to about £20,000 per systemic stablecoin, while companies would be allowed up to about £10 million per coin.

QWhy are UK regulators proposing limits on stablecoin holdings?

AThe limits are proposed as temporary safeguards to mitigate risks such as deposit flight from traditional banks and rapid outflows during periods of stress, managing systemic risk before stablecoins reach a significant scale.

QWhat does the UK's regulatory approach to stablecoins prioritize, according to the article?

AThe regulatory strategy prioritizes learning and containment over rapid scale, encouraging experimentation with pound-denominated stablecoins while implementing guardrails to prevent them from becoming systemically significant too quickly.

Related Reads

Meta: Can Afford Trillion-Dollar Computing Power, But Can't Keep Key People

Meta's AI Ambition: A $135 Billion Bet on Chips, But Losing Key Talent In July 2025, Meta recruited top AI infrastructure engineer Ruoming Pang from Apple with a compensation package worth over $200 million. However, just seven months later, he left for OpenAI, forfeiting much of his unvested equity. This high-profile departure is part of a broader trend of key talent leaving Meta's AI division, including Chief AI Scientist Yann LeCun and other senior figures. The exodus is largely attributed to the fallout from the Llama 4 model's release in April 2025. The model was later revealed to have been benchmarked unethically, using different model versions to optimize scores on different tests, severely damaging trust within the developer community. This scandal led CEO Mark Zuckerberg to lose confidence in the team, resulting in a major reorganization. He appointed 28-year-old Scale AI CEO Alexandr Wang as Chief AI Officer, who now oversees the new Meta Superintelligent Lab (MSL). The planned flagship model, Llama 4 Behemoth, was indefinitely delayed. Compounding these software issues, Meta also canceled its most advanced in-house AI training chip project, a critical part of its plan to reduce reliance on Nvidia. This failure has triggered a panic-buying spree. In February 2026, Meta announced a capital expenditure budget of $115-$135 billion, nearly double the previous year's. Within ten days, it signed massive, multi-year chip deals: a multi-billion dollar agreement with Nvidia for Blackwell and Vera Rubin GPUs, a $60-$100 billion deal with AMD for MI450 GPUs (which included warrants for a 10% stake), and a multi-billion dollar deal to rent Google's TPU chips. This strategy of acquiring immense, diverse hardware from three different architectures (CUDA, ROCm, XLA/JAX) creates immense engineering complexity. Ironically, Meta is spending hundreds of billions on the world's most complex hardware while losing the rare engineers, like Pang, capable of building the cross-platform frameworks needed to make it all work. Zuckerberg's gamble mirrors his all-in bet on the metaverse: see a trend, spend heavily, reorganize frequently. The difference is that AI is a more tangible opportunity, and Meta's core advertising business generates massive cash flow to fund it. However, the article concludes that money can buy chips and算力, but it cannot guarantee the retention of top talent or the development of a winning model. If Meta's next model, codenamed "Avocado," fails to compete with GPT-5 and Gemini 3 Ultra, its massive expenditure will have only built expensive data centers full of underutilized hardware. The AI race is won by those who can build transformative models, not just those who can write the biggest checks.

marsbit1h ago

Meta: Can Afford Trillion-Dollar Computing Power, But Can't Keep Key People

marsbit1h ago

Trading

Spot
Futures
活动图片