DOLA Price Manipulation Causes $240K LlamaLend Users Loss; Inverse Finance Unaffected

TheNewsCryptoОпубликовано 2026-03-02Обновлено 2026-03-02

Введение

A recent incident involving DOLA price manipulation resulted in approximately $240,000 in losses for users of LlamaLend, not Inverse Finance as initially reported. The attack, which occurred on March 2, involved an exploiter using a $30 million flash loan to manipulate the sDOLA balance, causing incorrect collateral valuations. This triggered the liquidation of 27 users' DOLA-backed positions on LlamaLend. Initial reports from security firms suggested Inverse Finance protocol was affected, but its team clarified that the incident was external and only involved the DOLA token. Further investigation confirmed that the exploit was due to a faulty oracle configuration in LlamaLend’s sDOLA–crvUSD pool, not a vulnerability in Inverse Finance’s contracts. The manipulation temporarily increased sDOLA’s price, leading to unexpected liquidations. This is not the first time Inverse Finance has been associated with oracle-related issues, though the protocol itself remained secure in this case.

A recent suspicious transaction caused around $2,40,000 in losses, initially reports suggested Inverse Finance users were affected, but the losses were due to an sDOLA price manipulation that triggered multiple liquidations.

The incident was first reported by BlockSec Phalcon in its X platform on March 2. As it said, “As it is unclear whether additional users may still be affected, we are withholding further technical details at this time. Please take immediate action if you are exposed.”

Then, after a few hours, CertiK Alert also confirmed the incident that an attacker exploited a around $30 million flash loan to manipulate the sDOLA balance on Inverse Finance, leading to incorrect collateral values. Which triggered the liquidation of 27 users’ DOLA-backed positions, allowing the exploiter to profit by about $240,000 in a single transaction.

After hours of reports from BlockSec Phalcon, in response, Founder and developer of Inverse Finance, Nour Haridy said, “False. Inverse Finance was NOT affected. It’s simply an incident in an external protocol that uses the DOLA token. Please correct this.”

In addition, YAM, a DeFi community of sharing insights, posted that this was not an attack against Inverse Finance, but an issue with LlamaLend. The attacker liquidated the majority of users who possessed sDOLA and borrowed crvUSD, temporarily adjusting the sDOLA pricing from about 1.188 to 1.358 per DOLA.

Also, mentioned, “We don’t understand yet how this actually liquidated users. It’s clearly unintentional behaviour, the value of your collateral going up should move you further away from liquidation, not closer.”

Later, BlockSec Phalcon said, “Correction: After further investigation and discussion with@InverseFinance, we confirm that its contract was not affected by the attack.” It was a user loss on LlamaLend due to a flash loan exploiting a faulty oracle configuration in the sDOLA–crvUSD pool.

With that, this is not the first time Inverse Finance has encountered issues with DOLA and its money-market platform, Frontier. In April 2022, Frontier was known as Anchor, and a hacker used a price oracle to steal $15.6 million. They increased the value of $INV tokens, allowing them to borrow against collateral while withdrawing ETH, WBTC, YFI, and DOLA.

TagsETHInverse Finance

Связанные с этим вопросы

QWhat was the initial incorrect claim about the incident, and who corrected it?

AThe initial incorrect claim was that Inverse Finance users were affected by the incident. Nour Haridy, the founder and developer of Inverse Finance, corrected this, stating it was an incident in an external protocol using the DOLA token.

QWhat was the actual source of the user losses, and which protocol was affected?

AThe actual source of the user losses was a price manipulation of sDOLA on the LlamaLend protocol, which triggered liquidations, not an issue with Inverse Finance's contracts.

QHow did the attacker manipulate the price of sDOLA, and what was the result?

AThe attacker used a flash loan of around $30 million to manipulate the sDOLA balance, which temporarily adjusted its price from about 1.188 to 1.358 per DOLA, leading to incorrect collateral values and triggering liquidations.

QWhat was the financial impact of this incident in terms of user losses and attacker profit?

AThe incident resulted in approximately $240,000 in losses for users, which was the amount the exploiter profited from in a single transaction.

QWhat was the historical context mentioned regarding Inverse Finance and similar issues?

AIn April 2022, Inverse Finance's platform (then called Anchor) suffered a $15.6 million exploit where a hacker manipulated a price oracle to inflate the value of INV tokens and borrow against collateral.

Похожее

Торговля

Спот
Фьючерсы
活动图片