Tensions Escalate in the Strait of Hormuz, Bitcoin Sells Off as Safe-Haven Asset, Plunging to $61.7K

marsbitPublished on 2026-07-14Last updated on 2026-07-14

Abstract

Bitcoin's price fell sharply on Monday, July 13, dropping approximately 4% to around $61,700, as heightened geopolitical tensions in the Strait of Hormuz triggered a broader shift toward safe-haven assets across global financial markets. Analysts attributed the decline to a confluence of factors: escalating U.S.-Iran tensions fueled risk-off sentiment, reignited inflation concerns, and dampened expectations for near-term Federal Reserve rate cuts. This macro-driven sell-off coincided with a slowdown in institutional ETF inflows and a wave of liquidations for leveraged long positions following Bitcoin's failure to break key resistance levels. Despite the pullback, several market observers characterized the move as a typical, healthy correction within a longer-term bullish cycle, noting that the underlying structural trajectory for Bitcoin remains intact. Attention now turns to upcoming U.S. Consumer Price Index data, which will provide further direction on inflation and monetary policy, key factors influencing risk assets like Bitcoin.

Written by: Forbes

Compiled by: AididiaoJP, Foresight News

On Monday, July 13, Bitcoin prices experienced a notable pullback as global financial markets collectively shifted into risk-off mode due to the latest geopolitical tensions in the Strait of Hormuz. This event, intertwined with other macro factors, exerted significant downward pressure on the price of this digital asset, swiftly cooling market sentiment.

According to real-time data from Coinbase on the TradingView platform, the price of the world's most valuable cryptocurrency once fell to around $61,700. Earlier in the session, Bitcoin had briefly approached a high near $64,400 but ultimately pared gains and turned negative, ending the day down approximately 4%.

This volatility also echoed the broader stock market performance: major U.S. equity benchmarks such as the S&P 500 and the Dow Jones Industrial Average similarly declined on the day, indicating a weakening of overall investor risk appetite.

Multiple market analysts pointed out in interviews that this Bitcoin price adjustment was not an isolated event but a direct reflection of changes in the global macro environment. In emailed comments, Roy Kashi, Co-founder and CEO of Falconedge, analyzed: "The recent weakness in Bitcoin primarily stems from the broad risk-off sentiment prevalent in global markets."

He further explained that escalating tensions between the U.S. and Iran have not only pushed up international oil prices but also reignited market concerns about inflation while diminishing expectations for near-term interest rate cuts by the Federal Reserve. In this context, investors tend to reduce exposure to risk assets, including Bitcoin, seeking safer havens instead.

Tal Fromchenko, Founder and CEO of Leveraged, expressed similar views and added more specific triggers. He stated: "The price drop to around $62K is mainly influenced by escalating tensions between the US and Iran in the Strait of Hormuz, triggering a broader sell-off in risk assets.

Simultaneously, institutional inflows via ETFs have slowed, and after Bitcoin failed to break through key resistance levels on Friday, it triggered a large number of forced liquidations of leveraged long positions." Nevertheless, Fromchenko maintained an optimistic outlook, emphasizing: "This is just a typical macro-driven shakeout within a healthy multi-year market cycle. Bitcoin's overall structural growth trajectory remains intact, and the long-term upward trend is unchanged."

Himanshu Sahay, Co-founder and CTO of the Arch crypto lending platform, offered an interpretation from the perspectives of market psychology and liquidity. He noted in an email: "I believe this decline is not triggered by a single event, but more likely the result of the market's combined reaction to macro sentiment, position sizing, and liquidity conditions—factors that can change rapidly in a short period."

Sahay advised investors not to overinterpret short-term volatility, pointing out that Bitcoin has historically experienced sharp price movements during periods of high volatility. Future direction will still depend on the evolution of macroeconomic conditions and the gradual rebuilding of investor confidence.

Saeed Al-Marri, CEO of Ethra Invest, focused his attention on technical aspects and upcoming key data. He analyzed: "From a technical perspective, what we are seeing now looks more like a wave of liquidations rather than a loss of confidence in Bitcoin. When a large number of traders are leveraged long—meaning they borrow money to bet on price increases—any price drop can reach loss thresholds, forcing exchanges to automatically liquidate these positions."

He specifically mentioned that long positions are currently being liquidated at six times the rate of short positions (6 to 1), which clearly indicates that it is primarily bullish bets being cleared out, not a large-scale investor exit from Bitcoin.

Al-Marri further emphasized the macro-level influence: "The bigger driver lies in the upcoming U.S. Consumer Price Index data, i.e., inflation figures, to be released this Wednesday. If the data comes in higher than expected, it would further delay hopes for Fed rate cuts. A higher interest rate environment makes relatively safe assets like bonds and cash appear more attractive, thereby putting pressure on volatile assets like Bitcoin."

He concluded: "The real core story right now is not a structural breakdown in Bitcoin itself, but that the entire market is holding its breath, waiting for the guidance that will come from the key CPI number."

Overall, this Bitcoin price retracement reflects the immediate impact of geopolitical uncertainty on global risk appetite. However, analysts from multiple institutions agree that this falls within the scope of normal market adjustment and does not alter the fundamental nature of Bitcoin as a long-term growth asset. While paying attention to short-term fluctuations, investors also need to closely track this week's U.S. inflation data and further developments in the geopolitical situation to better grasp subsequent market directions.

Related Questions

QWhat is the main reason for Bitcoin's recent price drop according to most analysts in the article?

AThe main reason for Bitcoin's recent price drop is a broad global shift towards safe-haven assets driven by escalating geopolitical tensions in the Strait of Hormuz between the US and Iran, which has sparked a widespread risk-off sentiment.

QHow did the US stock market perform on the day Bitcoin price fell significantly?

AOn the day Bitcoin price fell significantly, major US stock market benchmarks like the S&P 500 and the Dow Jones Industrial Average also moved lower, reflecting a general decrease in investor risk appetite.

QAccording to Tal Fromchenko, what specific factor triggered a large wave of forced liquidations for leveraged long positions in Bitcoin?

AAccording to Tal Fromchenko, the forced liquidations were triggered after Bitcoin failed to break through a key resistance level on Friday, following the price decline caused by the heightened tensions in the Strait of Hormuz.

QWhat key economic data point does Saeed Al-Marri highlight as a major driver for Bitcoin's price movement in the coming days?

ASaeed Al-Marri highlights the upcoming US Consumer Price Index (CPI) inflation data release as a major driver. If the data comes in higher than expected, it could further delay hopes for Federal Reserve rate cuts, putting pressure on volatile assets like Bitcoin.

QWhat is the overall consensus among the cited analysts regarding the long-term trend for Bitcoin despite the recent sell-off?

AThe overall consensus among the cited analysts is that the recent sell-off is a typical macro-driven shakeout within a healthy multi-year market cycle. They believe the fundamental long-term upward growth trajectory for Bitcoin remains intact and unchanged.

Related Reads

Vitalik Updates Ethereum Roadmap: From Merge to 'Lean Refactoring', with STARK, AI, and Privacy Reshaping the Technical Foundation

Vitalik Buterin has updated Ethereum's long-term roadmap, outlining a major shift from the post-Merge evolution toward a "Lean Ethereum" vision. The update builds on the 2023 framework but reorders priorities and introduces new concepts. Key continuations include improving consensus (single-slot finality), scaling data availability (larger blobs), simplifying light client verification with SNARKs/STARKs, and protocol simplification. Major adjustments involve significantly prioritizing quantum resistance due to heightened perceived threats, while deprioritizing items like VDFs and some EVM improvements. Technical replacements are planned, such as moving from Verkle trees to a unified Binary Tree and eventually PBTs, and rethinking state management with "New State Types." Notable new additions are: 1. Making **privacy a top-tier priority**, aiming to build it natively into the protocol. 2. **Radical scaling under post-quantum conditions**, using techniques like leanSPHINCS signatures and zkzk frames. 3. **Protocol "Lean-ification" and formal verification**, leveraging modern AI tools to make full formal verification feasible. 4. Exploring **Blob and Gas futures** for future capacity. 5. Developing **Native Rollups**, deeply integrating rollup capabilities into the protocol. 6. **Reimagining the EVM's future**, potentially exposing a simpler, modern instruction set (e.g., leanISA or RISC-V), with EVM becoming a compatibility layer. The core philosophy shifts toward specializing mechanisms for high-load activities (transfers, swaps, privacy) to gain scalability, rather than attempting to infinitely scale all activities. It also elevates **recursive STARKs and AI-assisted formal verification** as foundational infrastructure. In summary, Ethereum is embarking on a systemic "third-generation" redesign—Lean Ethereum—involving replacements or rewrites of major components. The goal is to achieve a quantum-safe, privacy-first, secure, decentralized, and highly scalable network while maintaining a lean and verifiable protocol.

marsbit23m ago

Vitalik Updates Ethereum Roadmap: From Merge to 'Lean Refactoring', with STARK, AI, and Privacy Reshaping the Technical Foundation

marsbit23m ago

China Monopolizes the Humanoid Market: The U.S. Is Forced to Defend Itself

China's Humanoid Robot Market Domination and US Response According to a report by Smart Analytics Global (SAG), Chinese manufacturers supplied over 97% of the global humanoid robot shipments (approximately 19,100 units) in the first half of 2026, a 272% year-on-year increase. Shanghai-based AGIBOT led with a 44% market share, followed by Unitree Robotics with 31%. Together, these two firms accounted for about 75% of global shipments. China itself represented over 85% of global demand for these devices, with industrial and commercial applications now comprising more than 70% of shipments. Key factors driving China's leadership include strong state support, abundant funding, expanding production capacity, IPO waves for developers, and a vast manufacturing ecosystem for rapid testing and deployment. Furthermore, over 90% of key components for humanoid robots are now sourced domestically. In response, the US Federal Communications Commission (FCC) banned federal agencies and subsidy recipients from purchasing or using foreign "advanced robotic devices," including humanoid and quadruped robots, citing national security concerns in July 2026. SAG forecasts global shipments to approach 60,000 units for full-year 2026, with industry revenue around $1.6 billion, projecting 500,000 units by 2030. The analysis notes potential challenges for Chinese expansion, such as reputational risks from alleged ties to China's defense sector and the precedent of trade disputes seen in solar panels and batteries, potentially triggered by the current low average robot price.

cryptonews.ru42m ago

China Monopolizes the Humanoid Market: The U.S. Is Forced to Defend Itself

cryptonews.ru42m ago

What's New in Ethereum's Roadmap: Privacy, Quantum Security, Native Rollup?

On August 10, 2024, Ethereum co-founder Vitalik Buterin revealed an updated technical roadmap, highlighting significant changes in priorities and new focus areas. Key new additions include: - **Strong Privacy Protection**: Elevated to a top-tier protocol concern. Proposals like EIP-8250 (keyed nonces for concurrency), EIP-8272 (recent roots for verification), and EIP-8182 (shared protocol-level privacy pools) aim to enable private transfers of ETH and ERC-20s, moving toward default private accounts. - **Quantum Resilience**: Priority increased. The plan addresses risks to ECDSA/BLS signatures, KZG commitments, and ZK systems, exploring solutions like leanSPHINCS signatures, STARK proofs (considered quantum-resistant), and streamlined verification processes. A full L1 upgrade is tentatively targeted for ~2029. - **Native Rollups**: A novel concept where rollups could reuse Ethereum's core validation infrastructure via a new EXECUTE precompile (EIP-8079 draft). This aims to reduce custom code and enhance security for certain L2s, while specialized chains will continue to exist. - **Protocol Simplification & Formal Verification**: Leveraging AI tools to make full-protocol formal verification feasible, aiming for more rigorous and machine-verifiable specifications. Other notable shifts: - State storage is evolving from Verkle trees to a Partitioned Binary Tree (PBT, EIP-8347 draft). - Some 2023 items like VDFs and certain EVM improvements were deprioritized. - Long-term discussions include blob/gas futures and non-EVM instruction sets (e.g., RISC-V). The "Strawmap" outlines potential upgrades through ~2029 but is a directional guide, not a firm timeline. Key milestones to watch include the Glamsterdam (Q4 2026) and Hegotá (2027) forks. Many proposals remain in draft or research phases.

marsbit1h ago

What's New in Ethereum's Roadmap: Privacy, Quantum Security, Native Rollup?

marsbit1h ago

Hyperliquid Trading Volume Soars, So Why Are Profits Falling?

Hyperliquid, a leading decentralized perpetuals trading platform, has seen its open interest surge to a record high above $11 billion, capturing roughly 9% of the global market share. Trading volume remains robust, nearing $178 billion over 30 days, driven largely by the explosive growth of third-party markets offering tokenized real-world assets (RWAs) like stocks and commodities. Despite this growth, the platform's protocol revenue has declined for four consecutive quarters, falling 43% from its Q3 2025 peak of $357 million to approximately $202 million in Q2 2026. This divergence is primarily attributed to the HIP-3 governance proposal, which allows external developers to launch their own markets and keep up to half of the generated fees. These third-party markets now account for nearly 50% of total volume. Consequently, the share of revenue redistributed to developers, market makers, and the treasury has tripled from 6% to 18% in a year. This directly reduces the funds allocated to the platform's buyback-and-burn mechanism for its native HYPE token, weakening a key price support. HYPE's price has fallen 28% from its all-time high. The platform's growth is also heavily concentrated, with a single entity, Trade.xyz, responsible for over 90% of HIP-3 open interest, introducing systemic risk. Additionally, the ecosystem lacks diversity beyond HYPE, faces ongoing token unlocks adding sell pressure, and is encountering increased regulatory scrutiny and new competition from platforms like Robinhood Chain. While still a major revenue generator in crypto, Hyperliquid's model of sharing fees to fuel expansion is currently compressing its own earnings and token economics.

marsbit1h ago

Hyperliquid Trading Volume Soars, So Why Are Profits Falling?

marsbit1h ago

Trading

Spot
活动图片