Bitcoin ETFs See $88M Inflows, Ending Three-Day Outflow Streak

TheNewsCryptoPublished on 2026-02-21Last updated on 2026-02-21

Abstract

Bitcoin ETFs recorded $88.04 million in net inflows on February 20, ending a three-day outflow streak that totaled $403.90 million. BlackRock's IBIT led with $64.46 million, followed by Fidelity's FBTC with $23.59 million. All other major Bitcoin ETFs, including Grayscale's GBTC, showed no flows. Bitcoin traded below $70,000 with minimal movement after hitting a session low of $66,452. Total net assets stood at $85.31 billion, while cumulative net inflows reached $54.01 billion. The prior three days saw significant outflows, with the largest single-day withdrawal of $165.76 million on February 19. Weekly outflows for the period ending February 20 were $315.86 million, part of a four-week outflow trend totaling around $2.48 billion.

Bitcoin ETFs listed $88.04 million in net inflows yesterday, breaking a three-day outflow streak that swept $403.90 million. The leading ETF became BlackRock’s IBIT with $64.46 million, followed by Fidelity’s FBTC, which captivated $23.59 million.

The rest of the funds showed no flows. Bitcoin traded below the $70,000 mark, having very little 24-hour movement after going to a low of $66,452 in the session. The overall net assets attained $85.31 billion, while cumulative total net inflow sat at $54.01 billion.

ETFs witnessed three consecutive days of redemptions, starting from February 17, after which it went for reversal on February 20. The biggest single-day withdrawal was recorded on February 19, being at $165.76 million.

A day before, on February 18, it stood at $133.27 million of outflows, and on February 17, it was $104.87 million. The selling pressure slipped total net assets from $87.04 billion on February 13 to $85.31 billion on February 20.

The One Which Showed No Movement

A lot of Bitcoin ETFs products posted no activity on February 20, and just IBIT and FBTC posted flows. The one which showed no movement included GBTC of Greyscale and mini BTC trust with BITB of Bitwise, Ark & 21Shares’ ARKB, VanEck’s HODL, Invesco’s BTCO, Valkyrie’s BRRR, Franklin’s EZBC, WisdomTree’s BTCW and Hashdex’s DEFI.

The cumulative net inflows of BlackRock’s IBIT remain at $61.30, and Fidelity’s FBTC has $10.96 billion in total inflows. The week that concluded on February 20 listed $315.86 million in net outflows. Last week’s outflow stood at $359.91, and a week prior saw $318.07 million in outflows.

Late January listed the biggest weekly redemptions. The consecutive four-week outflow from January 23 to February 20 is estimated to be around $2.48 billion. Weekly trading volume attained $11.91 billion for the duration concluding February 20, down from $18.91 billion the last week.

Highlighted Crypto News Today:

Uniswap CEO Warns of Scam Ads After $370M January Crypto Losses

TagsBitcoinBTC ETFETF

Related Questions

QWhat was the total net inflow for Bitcoin ETFs on the day that ended the three-day outflow streak?

AThe total net inflow for Bitcoin ETFs was $88.04 million on the day that ended the three-day outflow streak.

QWhich two Bitcoin ETFs were the only ones to post flows on February 20, and what were their respective inflows?

ABlackRock's IBIT posted an inflow of $64.46 million and Fidelity's FBTC posted an inflow of $23.59 million on February 20.

QWhat was the total amount of outflows during the three-day streak that preceded the inflow day?

AThe three-day outflow streak totaled $403.90 million in redemptions.

QWhat was the overall net assets of the Bitcoin ETFs as of February 20?

AThe overall net assets of the Bitcoin ETFs were $85.31 billion as of February 20.

QWhat is the cumulative total net inflow for all ETFs mentioned in the article?

AThe cumulative total net inflow for all ETFs mentioned in the article is $54.01 billion.

Related Reads

Don't Just Focus on Trading Volume, Learn to Understand the 'True and False Prosperity' of Perpetual Contracts

Title: Look Beyond Trading Volume: Understanding the Real Growth of Perpetual Contracts Perpetual contracts (perps) have become a dominant force in crypto trading, with their volume now accounting for about 75% of decentralized exchange activity, up from 44% in February 2025. This surge occurred even as the total crypto market cap fell nearly 40% between August 2025 and February 2026, indicating a shift towards derivatives for speculation and hedging during volatility. However, volume alone can be misleading. It may reflect high-frequency, incentive-driven activity rather than meaningful capital deployment. A more nuanced view comes from combining volume with Open Interest (OI)—the total value of outstanding contracts. While cumulative perps volume doubled in the past six months to $14 trillion (exceeding the previous four years' total), OI grew by about 50%, from $13B to ~$18B before settling at $13B. The OI/Volume ratio, a measure of capital efficiency, rose from 0.33x to 0.49x over the past year. This growth wasn’t linear: it peaked at ~0.72x from June to mid-October 2025, then dropped to ~0.38x after a major liquidation event in October wiped out $19B in leveraged positions. At the platform level, Hyperliquid leads in capital efficiency with an OI/7-day volume ratio over 45% and a take rate of 3.2 bps, effectively converting trading activity into sustained positions and fee revenue. Aster follows with a 34% ratio but a lower take rate of 1.6 bps, prioritizing capital retention over revenue. edgeX and Lighter both show 21% efficiency, with edgeX matching Hyperliquid’s take rate. The key insight is that true growth in perps markets is signaled not just by volume but by rising OI/Volume ratio, reflecting patient capital and confidence in these platforms. Sustainable success will come from optimizing conviction and value capture, not just incentivized trading volume.

marsbit32m ago

Don't Just Focus on Trading Volume, Learn to Understand the 'True and False Prosperity' of Perpetual Contracts

marsbit32m ago

Trading

Spot
Futures

Hot Articles

What is $BITCOIN

DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN): A Comprehensive Analysis Introduction to DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) is a blockchain-based project operating on the Solana network, which aims to combine the characteristics of traditional precious metals with the innovation of decentralized technologies. While it shares a name with Bitcoin, often referred to as “digital gold” due to its perception as a store of value, DIGITAL GOLD is a separate token designed to create a unique ecosystem within the Web3 landscape. Its goal is to position itself as a viable alternative digital asset, although specifics regarding its applications and functionalities are still developing. What is DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN)? DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) is a cryptocurrency token explicitly designed for use on the Solana blockchain. In contrast to Bitcoin, which provides a widely recognized value storage role, this token appears to focus on broader applications and characteristics. Notable aspects include: Blockchain Infrastructure: The token is built on the Solana blockchain, known for its capacity to handle high-speed and low-cost transactions. Supply Dynamics: DIGITAL GOLD has a maximum supply capped at 100 quadrillion tokens (100P $BITCOIN), although details regarding its circulating supply are currently undisclosed. Utility: While precise functionalities are not explicitly outlined, there are indications that the token could be utilized for various applications, potentially involving decentralized applications (dApps) or asset tokenization strategies. Who is the Creator of DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN)? At present, the identity of the creators and development team behind DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) remains unknown. This situation is typical among many innovative projects within the blockchain space, particularly those aligning with decentralized finance and meme coin phenomena. While such anonymity may foster a community-driven culture, it intensifies concerns about governance and accountability. Who are the Investors of DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN)? The available information indicates that DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) does not have any known institutional backers or prominent venture capital investments. The project seems to operate on a peer-to-peer model focused on community support and adoption rather than traditional funding routes. Its activity and liquidity are primarily situated on decentralized exchanges (DEXs), such as PumpSwap, rather than established centralized trading platforms, further highlighting its grassroots approach. How DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) Works The operational mechanics of DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) can be elaborated on based on its blockchain design and network attributes: Consensus Mechanism: By leveraging Solana’s unique proof-of-history (PoH) combined with a proof-of-stake (PoS) model, the project ensures efficient transaction validation contributing to the network's high performance. Tokenomics: While specific deflationary mechanisms have not been extensively detailed, the vast maximum token supply implies that it may cater to microtransactions or niche use cases that are still to be defined. Interoperability: There exists the potential for integration with Solana’s broader ecosystem, including various decentralized finance (DeFi) platforms. However, the details regarding specific integrations remain unspecified. Timeline of Key Events Here is a timeline that highlights significant milestones concerning DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN): 2023: The initial deployment of the token occurs on the Solana blockchain, marked by its contract address. 2024: DIGITAL GOLD gains visibility as it becomes available for trading on decentralized exchanges like PumpSwap, allowing users to trade it against SOL. 2025: The project witnesses sporadic trading activity and potential interest in community-led engagements, although no noteworthy partnerships or technical advancements have been documented as of yet. Critical Analysis Strengths Scalability: The underlying Solana infrastructure supports high transaction volumes, which could enhance the utility of $BITCOIN in various transaction scenarios. Accessibility: The potential low trading price per token could attract retail investors, facilitating wider participation due to fractional ownership opportunities. Risks Lack of Transparency: The absence of publicly known backers, developers, or an audit process may yield skepticism regarding the project's sustainability and trustworthiness. Market Volatility: The trading activity is heavily reliant on speculative behavior, which can result in significant price volatility and uncertainty for investors. Conclusion DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) emerges as an intriguing yet ambiguous project within the rapidly evolving Solana ecosystem. While it attempts to leverage the “digital gold” narrative, its departure from Bitcoin's established role as a store of value underscores the need for a clearer differentiation of its intended utility and governance structure. Future acceptance and adoption will likely depend on addressing the current opacity and defining its operational and economic strategies more explicitly. Note: This report encompasses synthesised information available as of October 2023, and developments may have transpired beyond the research period.

363 Total ViewsPublished 2025.05.13Updated 2025.05.13

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of BTC (BTC) are presented below.

活动图片