Crypto Outperforming Stocks: How Digital Assets Are Withstanding Macroeconomic Pressure

cryptonews.ruОпубліковано о 2026-07-27Востаннє оновлено о 2026-07-27

Анотація

Crypto Outperforms Stocks Amid Macro Pressure Trading firm QCP Capital's report analyzes the divergent performance of crypto and stock markets ahead of the July 29 FOMC meeting. While major US stock indexes showed mixed results, with tech weakness pressuring the Nasdaq, crypto assets like Bitcoin (up ~11.6% in July) and Ethereum (up ~24.6%) have outperformed despite a challenging macro backdrop, including rising Treasury yields and risk-off sentiment. Key focus points include the upcoming Fed decision and commentary from Chair Kevin Warsh, which could signal the regulator's stance on inflation and growth. Spot Bitcoin and Ethereum ETFs saw a net outflow of ~$311 million on July 24, ending a seven-day inflow streak, highlighting shifting institutional sentiment. Option market data reveals increased demand for downside protection, indicating caution, though constructive long-term positioning remains. Implied volatility for Ethereum trades at a premium to Bitcoin, and perpetual funding rates stay positive. The week's key events are the FOMC decision, Treasury yield movements, ETF flow trends, and US regulatory developments like the CLARITY Act. The market balances crypto's resilience against growing option market caution, with the Fed's decision poised to tip the scales. Analysis compares the current Fed pause to historical rate-cutting cycles, questioning whether crypto's strength can persist if monetary policy tightening persists.

Trading firm QCP Capital has released its latest market report, analyzing the dynamics of the stock and cryptocurrency markets ahead of the upcoming Federal Reserve meeting.

Trading on Friday, July 24th, on U.S. exchanges concluded with mixed results. The S&P 500 edged up 0.05% to 7,412 points, while the Nasdaq Composite lost 0.64%, dropping to 24,976 points — pressure on the index came from weakness in major technology companies. The Dow Jones Industrial Average, in contrast, gained 0.46%, closing at 51,947 points. The subdued Friday session continued the heavier trading from Thursday, when disappointing earnings reports from several tech giants dampened broader market sentiment.

Analysts at QCP Capital pay particular attention to the debt market. The yield on the 10-year U.S. Treasury note fell to approximately 4.67% on Friday — earlier in the week, it had reached its highest level since January 2025. The retreat in yields was partly facilitated by a drop in oil prices. The U.S. Dollar Index (DXY) remained stable, hovering around the 101.4 mark.

As QCP notes, market focus is now shifting to the Federal Open Market Committee (FOMC) meeting on Wednesday, July 29th. Most market participants still anticipate the federal funds rate will remain unchanged. However, investors will be closely watching the accompanying statement and comments from Fed Chairman Kevin Warsh — these could provide clues about how the regulator assesses the current dynamics of inflation and economic growth.

Crypto Market Holding Up Better Than Stocks

According to the QCP Capital report, digital assets have generally outperformed the stock market in July, despite the more complex macroeconomic backdrop. Since the beginning of the month, Bitcoin has risen approximately 11.6%, and Ethereum has gained 24.6%, even as rising Treasury yields and waves of risk aversion have periodically pressured markets overall.

1-month BTC/USD chart. Source: Bitstamp

Meanwhile, capital flows into spot ETFs weakened at the end of last week. According to QCP, U.S. spot Bitcoin and Ethereum ETFs recorded a combined net outflow of approximately $311 million on July 24th, interrupting a seven-day streak of capital inflows. While weekly flows have repeatedly reversed throughout the year, ETF dynamics remain a key indicator of institutional interest and overall market sentiment.

Market participants are also focused on the fate of the CLARITY Act bill — its further progress continues to be closely monitored by the crypto community due to its potential implications for the U.S. regulatory framework.

Positioning in the Options Market

A separate section of the QCP Capital report is dedicated to the options market, where a cautious mood persists. Recent data points to increased demand for downside protection — a reaction to the broader deterioration in market sentiment that has partially offset the improvement in short-term risk-reversal indicators observed earlier in July.

A risk-reversal is an options strategy that shows how traders assess the probability of an asset's price rising relative to the probability of it falling. It works by comparing the price of call options (giving the right to buy an asset at a certain price) and put options (giving the right to sell an asset at a certain price) with the same expiration date. If put options are more expensive, it means market participants are willing to pay more for protection against a price decline, indicating cautious or pessimistic sentiment. If calls are more expensive, the market is pricing in greater upside potential.

The advantage of this indicator is that it provides insight into the balance of fears and hopes among market participants without the need to directly analyze spot prices. The disadvantage is that a risk-reversal only reflects current market expectations and can change quickly with new data, so it is not suitable as a standalone signal for decision-making.

According to QCP, implied volatility on the front-end of the curve for Ethereum continues to trade at a premium to the comparable metric for Bitcoin. At the same time, funding rates in the perpetual futures market remain positive, despite weaker spot price dynamics. Collectively, these indicators, as noted by QCP, suggest that overall market positioning remains constructive, although participants continue to hedge against short-term macroeconomic uncertainty.

What to Watch This Week

The calendar for this week is packed with macroeconomic events that could influence sentiment across several asset classes. QCP highlights the following key points:

  • July 29th — FOMC rate decision and press conference by Fed Chairman Warsh

  • U.S. Treasury yields — investors will continue to watch movements across the entire yield curve after its rise at the long end last week

  • ETF capital flows — whether last week's outflow becomes a temporary phenomenon or develops into a more sustained trend

  • Digital asset regulation in the U.S. — the market continues to monitor the fate of the CLARITY Act bill and its review schedule

The market is currently balancing two opposing signals — the resilience of the crypto market and growing caution in the options market. The outcome of the Fed meeting on Wednesday could tip these scales in either direction.

AI Opinion

Analysis shows that the current Fed pause in the easing cycle is not the first time the market has tried to guess what the regulator will do next. Researchers at PANews compare the rate-cutting cycle that began in September 2024 to three historical scenarios — the "preemptive" cycle of 1995, the "rescue" cycle of 2007, and the "panic" cycle of 2020, each of which impacted risk assets like Bitcoin differently. After several cuts in 2024-2025, the Fed shifted to holding rates steady in 2026, and the current caution in the options market is largely a reaction to this pause, not to a new wave of easing.

The macroeconomic link between Treasury yields and the value of digital assets is not limited to the current episode — the industry has long demonstrated an inverse correlation between interest rates and capital flowing into risky instruments. The situation with the CLARITY Act adds a separate layer of uncertainty that is not purely about monetary policy. Will the crypto market remain resilient if the Fed pause extends into the fall, or will macro-caution ultimately prevail over institutional demand?

end-content

Пов'язані питання

QAccording to the QCP Capital report, how have digital assets like Bitcoin and Ethereum performed compared to the stock market in July, and what was their approximate growth?

AAccording to the QCP Capital report, digital assets have generally outperformed the stock market in July despite a complex macroeconomic background. Specifically, since the beginning of the month, Bitcoin has risen by approximately 11.6%, and Ethereum by 24.6%.

QWhat are the key events highlighted by QCP Capital that investors should watch this week, particularly related to monetary policy and regulation?

AThe key events highlighted by QCP Capital for the week are: 1) The FOMC's interest rate decision and press conference by Fed Chair Kevin Warsh on July 29. 2) The movement of US Treasury yields. 3) Capital flows into spot Bitcoin and Ethereum ETFs. 4) Progress on the CLARITY Act regarding US digital asset regulation.

QWhat do the data from the options market, such as the demand for downside protection and the elevated front-end implied volatility for Ethereum, indicate about trader sentiment according to QCP?

AThe data from the options market, including increased demand for downside protection and elevated front-end implied volatility for Ethereum compared to Bitcoin, indicate that while overall market positioning remains constructive, participants are cautious and are hedging against short-term macroeconomic uncertainty.

QWhat is the significance of the CLARITY Act as mentioned in the article, and why is the crypto community closely monitoring it?

AThe CLARITY Act is a legislative bill that the crypto community is closely monitoring due to its potential significant consequences for the US regulatory framework governing digital assets. Its progress is a key source of uncertainty beyond just monetary policy.

QBased on the AI opinion section, with which historical interest rate cut cycles does PANews compare the Fed's current cycle that began in September 2024?

AAccording to the AI opinion section, researchers at PANews compare the current Fed rate cut cycle that began in September 2024 to three historical scenarios: the 'preventive' cut of 1995, the 'rescue' cut of 2007, and the 'panic' cut of 2020.

Пов'язані матеріали

Miners Advised Not to Buy GPUs for AI and to Focus on Infrastructure

A founder at an energy investment forum advises bitcoin miners not to purchase GPUs for AI themselves, but to instead focus on infrastructure like power and data center space. Mike Alfred of Alpine Fox stated that while AI infrastructure demand is a long-term, 20-30 year trend, it presents a key choice for miners. The first, riskier model involves owning and operating GPUs, which requires financing expensive hardware that quickly becomes obsolete. The second, more conservative model is akin to real estate: providing colocation services where clients bring their own servers, and the miner sells space, power, cooling, and water. Alfred noted this model is easier to finance. Most existing bitcoin mining sites are difficult and expensive to convert for AI, as AI data centers require far higher construction costs, redundant fiber connections, backup power, complex cooling, and near 100% uptime. A hybrid model, where mining acts as a flexible load to use excess power during AI data center construction or from generation facilities, was discussed. However, participants concluded this is only viable with very cheap power; otherwise, developers are better off focusing solely on AI. Miners are increasingly being evaluated for their available power capacity and project portfolios rather than just bitcoin output. Panelists also warned of risks in the AI sector, predicting at least one major default or contract breach among AI tenants, lenders, or landlords before bitcoin's next halving in 2028.

cryptonews.ru3 хв тому

Miners Advised Not to Buy GPUs for AI and to Focus on Infrastructure

cryptonews.ru3 хв тому

Millisecond 'Pay-to-Cut': How Did Hyperliquid's Priority Fee Turn into a Multi-Million Dollar Business?

"Millisecond 'Paid Queue-Jumping': How Hyperliquid's Priority Fee Became a Multi-Million Dollar Annual Business" In traditional finance, high-frequency trading firms spend millions on infrastructure for millisecond advantages. Hyperliquid has translated this race onto the blockchain with its "Priority Fee" system, creating an open economic game for speed. This system auctions two types of priority: **Gossip Priority** for faster data feeds (via a Dutch auction every 3 minutes), and **Order Priority** for front-of-queue trade execution (users bid a fee for lower latency). This converts a hardware race into a transparent, market-priced mechanism. Since launch, this feature has generated over $5M in protocol revenue. Projected annualized buybacks from this income exceed $30M, accounting for ~7% of total protocol revenue. The demand stems from large traders and market makers on Hyperliquid, for whom milliseconds can mean the difference between profit/loss or avoiding liquidation. Market makers pay these fees as "protection" to ensure their orders execute first, which in turn improves liquidity for all users. Crucially, Hyperliquid internalizes Maximum Extractable Value (MEV) that typically leaks to external validators or searchers, creating a new revenue stream beyond trading fees. The mechanism also strengthens HYPE's tokenomics. While 97% of trading fees fund secondary market buybacks (via the Assistance Fund), Priority Fees are **directly burned**, adding a second deflationary engine. Furthermore, fees for order priority are deducted from users' undelegated HYPE balances, encouraging large traders to hold and lock up tokens, reducing circulating supply. However, a key challenge remains: balancing the speed needs of institutional players with fair market access for retail users, as those who cannot pay high fees may suffer worse slippage during volatility. In summary, Hyperliquid's Priority Fee is a novel model that monetizes latency, captures MEV for the protocol, and enhances its native token's value through burning and lock-ups.

marsbit8 хв тому

Millisecond 'Pay-to-Cut': How Did Hyperliquid's Priority Fee Turn into a Multi-Million Dollar Business?

marsbit8 хв тому

The Truth Behind Digital Banking: The Fragile Ecosystem Supporting 1.46 Billion Users

The article "The Truth About Digital Banks: The Fragile Ecosystem Behind 1.46 Billion Users" provides a data-driven analysis of the digital banking sector based on a verified list of 368 active neobanks as of July 2026. While these platforms collectively serve 1.46 billion users, with Asia (817 million users) and institutions like WeBank and Nubank dominating the landscape, the sector faces significant structural vulnerabilities. A key finding is that only 127 of the 368 neobanks hold full banking licenses. The majority operate atop third-party infrastructure providers like Banking-as-a-Service (BaaS) platforms, creating systemic risk where the failure of a single provider, as seen in past cases like Wirecard and Synapse, can jeopardize multiple consumer brands. Furthermore, the industry experiences a steady, quiet stream of failures, mergers, and shutdowns that often go unreported. The analysis also examines the adoption of artificial intelligence (AI), finding only 67 platforms (18%) have deployed AI at scale, with many innovators based in emerging markets like Nigeria and the Philippines. The infrastructure layer is highly concentrated, with 106 providers supporting the entire ecosystem of 368 consumer-facing brands. The article concludes with three predictions: the unlicensed gap will close through acquisitions or exits; an AI credit model is likely to fail in the next economic downturn; and a nascent but significant trend is the emergence of financial services designed for AI agents rather than humans.

marsbit23 хв тому

The Truth Behind Digital Banking: The Fragile Ecosystem Supporting 1.46 Billion Users

marsbit23 хв тому

Digital Asset Trading Platform Uphold Cuts 17% of Global Workforce Amid 'Crypto Winter'

Cryptocurrency trading platform Uphold has laid off approximately 17% of its global workforce, affecting 85 full-time employees and contractors. The cuts are part of a strategic shift to reallocate resources towards its rapidly growing corporate services business, as retail cryptocurrency trading activity has declined amid the ongoing market downturn. CEO Simon McLaughlin stated the company is restructuring after years of significant growth and remains confident in the long-term prospects of digital assets and blockchain technology. Founded in 2015, Uphold offers trading and custody services for cryptocurrencies, fiat, stocks, and precious metals. It has recently expanded to provide infrastructure for banks, fintech firms, and broker-dealers to integrate crypto services. The layoffs occur against a backdrop of a prolonged crypto market slump, with total market capitalization falling to around $2.1 trillion by Q2 2024. Factors include weakened trading volumes, reduced retail participation, interest rate hikes, geopolitical uncertainty, and net outflows from U.S. spot Bitcoin ETFs. Uphold clarified it is not shutting down its UK operations or any international offices. The company highlighted strong growth in its corporate platform and announced plans to evolve its consumer app into a broader blockchain-based financial assistant by 2026, offering U.S. stocks, tokenized securities, lending, credit cards, and DeFi yield opportunities.

cryptonews.ru23 хв тому

Digital Asset Trading Platform Uphold Cuts 17% of Global Workforce Amid 'Crypto Winter'

cryptonews.ru23 хв тому

Торгівля

Спот
活动图片