Token Unlocks报告:2023加密项目解锁会有何影响?

PanewsPubblicato 2023-01-25Pubblicato ultima volta 2023-01-25

Introduzione

2023年注定会是非常“有趣”的一年,因为许多在2021年获得融资的项目可能需要通过兑现其代币来支持运营。

近日,加密分析公司TokenUnlocks发布《2022年度报告》,其中回顾了2022年加密货币行业并对2023年的市场进行了分析展望,PANews将部分内容编译如下。

“”

2022年加密货币市场回顾

”“

据CoinGecko统计数据显示,2022年全球加密货币市值大幅下降,从2021年的2.3万亿美元暴跌至仅8270亿美元,跌幅高达64%。作为市值最大的两个加密货币——BTC和ETH过去一年也呈现出大幅下跌的态势,跌幅分别达到64%和67%。究其原因,还要归结于2022年发生的几个大事件:

”“

首先,Terra生态系统崩盘,该事件导致几家大型加密公司破产;

”“

其次,加密货币交易所FTX在2022年第4季度迎来了破产闹剧;

”“

最后,也是最容易被忽视的一点就是一些项目代币迎来到期解锁,由于解锁后投资者们开始转移代币,结果引发了市场流动性激增。

”“

CoinGecko从2022年7月4日到2022年12月31日期间对143种协议进行了跟踪研究,包括DeFi、区块链、DAO、元宇宙、CEX、NFT、基础设施者7个主要项目类别,这些项目的总市值已经超过230亿美元,这一数字仅仅只是2023年初8720亿美元加密货币总市值的2.6%。

接下来,让我们再来看看代币解锁的情况。

”“

2022年初,我们跟踪了38个代币,其总锁定价值约为1425.1亿美元(注:仅仅是已分配代币,不包括质押、流动性挖矿、抵押等),令人大跌眼镜的是,2023年初这一数字已跌至146.6亿美元,这意味着代币锁定价值已下跌了89.7%。 究其原因,主要有两点:

”“

1、代币价格急剧下跌

”“

2、2022年发行的代币数量过多

2022年之间解锁的38 个代币总估值约为954亿美元(按照截止到2021年12月31日的价格计算),而在2022 年期间解锁的代币价值为235亿美元。这意味着,仅在2022年一年内解锁的代币价值占到了之前所有年份解锁代币总价值的24.6%。当我们将锁定价值的逐年下降值与2022年解锁价值进行比较时,又发现了另一个有趣的现象:

”“

代币锁定价值的下降值为:1425亿美元–147亿美元= 1278亿美元,而解锁价值为235亿美元。

”“

想象一下,假如投资者在全年的解锁日期卖出所有头寸,那么他们平均获得的价值可能只有235美元/1278美元,即原本锁定价值的18.4%,而另外71.6%可能已经被公共市场所吸收。当然,这只是一个粗略的估计,实际上收益率还会涉及到当时的流动性、宏观效应、代币收益等其他各种因素。

不仅如此,我们还重点追踪了两种解锁机制,分别是:

”“

1、悬崖解锁(cliffunlock)

”“

2、线性解锁(linearunlock)

”“

下表列出了2022年悬崖解锁与线性解锁价值的对比。数据显示,悬崖解锁的代币价值占比约为61%(144亿美元/235美元),线性解锁的代币价值占比约为39%。与此同时,我们还可以看到,2022年解锁代币的总价值达到235亿美元,且上半年的解锁价值要比下半年高出两倍之多。

价格影响

”“

对于投资者而言,随着越来越多的代币从智能合约或钱包中解锁并在市场上流通,如果需求量保持不变,那么不难预料,这些代币价格将会下跌。

”“

下图是对收集到的数据进行分析后的一些发现:其中x轴表示解锁前后的天数,负值表示解锁之前,正值表示解锁之后,y轴表示与解锁当天价格相比变化的百分比。正如趋势图展示的那样,随着解锁日期的临近,价格通常会下跌15%,而一旦解锁完成又将趋于平缓。值得注意的是,该分析参考了比特币价格,因此相对较为准确。

从上图中可以看出,与解锁前几天相比,代币价格在解锁日往往会下跌,因此我们想找出在解锁前30天、15天和7天做空时损失头寸的概率。

研究数据表明,代币价值损失5%的概率为27%,损失10%的概率为 20%,损失30%的概率为6%(需要注意的是,该分析考虑了比特币在短期内的价格行为)。

”“

2023年度展望

”“

报告还对2023年的加密市场进行预测,包括使用剩余市值和FDV对排名前300的加密项目进行代币解锁预测,以了解未来几年内的潜在解锁价值。为简单起见,该分析选取了2022年12月31日300个头部代币(固定供应)的统计数据,并且排除了无限量供应的代币。

总体而言,总供应量固定的代币中已有82.1%的代币在市场上流通,而剩余的解锁代币价值约为1021亿美元。

”“

接下来,我们再看下剩余锁仓百分比(未来会在市场上进行流通),下面图表显示,96个加密项目锁定了不到总供应量25%的代币价值,其中有15个项目包含了超过75%的非流动性代币。平均而言,一个加密项目约有38.6%的总供应量需要解锁。最后一张图列出了预测剩余锁定价值最高的前15个项目,其中XRP位居榜首,代币价值高达180亿美元。

对于加密行业,2023年注定会是非常“有趣”的一年,因为许多在2021年获得融资的项目可能需要通过兑现其代币来支持运营。尽管大多数用户可能会选择离场,协议产生的收入也可能会直线下降,但相信随着越来越多分析数据的公布,加密行业的透明度在与日俱增,参与者也能够因此更深入地了解到每个项目的代币分配方式,并通过代币经济学和协议设计获得激励。

”“

相信在新的一年中,整个加密行业都能充满信心地继续前进,创造新的奇迹。

Letture associate

Bitcoin's 'Rally Ends,' Officially Entering the Later Stage of a Bear Market?

Bitcoin prices declined 13% this week, reversing the recent rebound and signaling a likely transition into the later stages of a bear market. Key on-chain metrics deteriorated, with the short-term holder cost basis falling below the Realized Price—a pattern last seen in early 2022, characteristic of bear market maturity. The rally to ~$82k proved to be a bear market bounce, as evidenced by the 90-day realized profit/loss ratio failing to sustain above the bullish threshold of 2. Daily realized losses surged to $1.35B, including significant selling from long-term holders who accumulated near cycle tops, indicating ongoing supply redistribution. Price was rejected almost precisely at the aggregate US spot ETF cost basis of ~$83k, turning that level into resistance and leaving the average ETF investor underwater again. Spot market selling pressure intensified, with the 7-day volume delta turning significantly negative to its weakest level since February. While a major long liquidation event cleared over $400M in leverage, spot demand has not yet stepped in to absorb the resulting supply. Options markets continue pricing in higher future volatility (elevated volatility risk premium) and maintain a skew toward put options, reflecting persistent demand for downside protection, though not yet panic. Overall, market structure remains fragile. Sustained recovery likely requires a reclaim of the ETF cost basis, a shift back to positive spot demand, and a slowdown in realized loss-taking. Until then, the market risks further downside or extended consolidation within the broader bear trend.

Foresight News19 min fa

Bitcoin's 'Rally Ends,' Officially Entering the Later Stage of a Bear Market?

Foresight News19 min fa

How Risky is the "Death Spiral" of MSTR and STRC?

Summary: This article explores the perceived "death spiral" risk between MicroStrategy (MSTR), its Bitcoin holdings, and its perpetual preferred stock (STRC), drawing comparisons to the LUNA-UST collapse. While both systems feature price anchors, high yields for holders, and potential feedback loops, their core mechanisms differ fundamentally. The MSTR-STRC structure relies on continuous financing to sustain its high dividend payouts, primarily through stock ATM offerings. A negative feedback cycle could occur: falling MSTR stock price makes raising equity capital harder, increasing pressure to sell Bitcoin, which undermines STRC confidence and further depresses MSTR. However, unlike LUNA-UST's automated, direct linkage, the MSTR-STRC loop is weaker and has brakes: STRC dividends can be deferred or rates lowered, and STRC holders have a $100/share liquidation preference in bankruptcy, providing a price floor. The company's sustainability hinges on its ability to continue financing. Its current ~$900 million USD reserves cover only about 6.3 months of its ~$1.71 billion annual interest/dividend burden. The next six months are critical, aligning with both the potential bottom in Bitcoin's four-year cycle and the depletion timeline of its reserves. While a LUNA-style catastrophic collapse is deemed highly unlikely due to structural differences, the key question is whether MicroStrategy can navigate this period through healthy deleveraging to restart its capital engine.

Foresight News37 min fa

How Risky is the "Death Spiral" of MSTR and STRC?

Foresight News37 min fa

How Much Debt Does Strategy Really Have? Is There a Risk of Implosion?

MicroStrategy's Debt Risk: A Turning Point in the "Never Sell" Strategy As of June 3, 2026, MicroStrategy holds 843,706 bitcoins (valued at ~$53.1B) but faces significant financial obligations. Its capital structure includes $6.75B in convertible notes and $15.48B in perpetual preferred stock (led by the $8.5B STRC series), creating an annual payout burden of ~$1.71B. With software revenue at only ~$500M, interest and dividend obligations far exceed operating income. A critical shift occurred in late May 2026 when the company sold 32 bitcoins for ~$2.5M to cover dividends, breaking CEO Michael Saylor's long-standing "never sell" pledge. This symbolic move triggered a sharp decline in both Bitcoin's price and MSTR stock, reflecting market fears about cash flow sustainability. The core of the strain is the STRC perpetual preferred stock, designed as a "permanent loan" with no maturity date but requiring high monthly dividends (currently 11.5%). Its business model relies on a three-part cycle: issuing new STRC shares, using proceeds to buy more Bitcoin and fund a USD reserve, and using that reserve to pay dividends. This cycle depends on continuous investor demand for STRC and Bitcoin's price appreciation. Analysis shows Bitcoin needs to appreciate at least 2.3% annually to cover the $1.71B in yearly obligations at current holdings. With Bitcoin price down ~22% from March 2026 highs, this pressure has intensified. The company's $900M USD reserve can only cover about 7 months of payments if STRC issuance stalls. Key risks are not immediate bankruptcy or forced Bitcoin liquidation (as BTC is not collateral), but rather: 1) The erosion of MSTR's premium to its Bitcoin holdings (mNAV), which would cripple its ability to raise cheap capital; 2) A vicious cycle where stagnant Bitcoin prices reduce STRC demand, draining the USD reserve and forcing BTC sales, further depressing prices. The period from February 2027 to September 2028 is a crucial test, with over $5.9B in convertible notes facing put options or maturity. In essence, MicroStrategy has evolved from a simple Bitcoin holder into a complex financial entity acting like a "private Bitcoin bank," leveraging its BTC holdings to create layered financial products. Its survival depends on maintaining Bitcoin's price trend, its stock premium, and market appetite for its preferred shares. The recent token sale marks not a betrayal of its Bitcoin thesis, but an admission that the leveraged strategy must eventually be paid for.

marsbit48 min fa

How Much Debt Does Strategy Really Have? Is There a Risk of Implosion?

marsbit48 min fa

Anthropic Cries Wolf: Is the AGI Threat Real, or Just an IPO Story?

Anthropic has published an article titled "When AI builds itself," discussing the emerging concept of "recursive self-improvement," where AI begins to actively participate in designing, training, testing, and optimizing its own subsequent versions. The company presents internal data showing that by May 2026, over 80% of code merged into its codebase was written by Claude, its AI model. Claude's capabilities have expanded to handling complex, open-ended engineering tasks, achieving a 76% success rate in such areas, and even contributing to research processes, such as optimizing code performance and conducting AI safety experiments. Anthropic outlines an evolution from human-driven development to AI-assisted workflows, culminating in the current stage where AI agents can autonomously write, run, and delegate code. The company cautions that the path toward a "closed loop," where AI continuously improves itself, is becoming visible. It calls for coordinated global mechanisms to potentially slow or pause frontier AI development to allow safety research and societal structures to catch up. However, the timing of this warning coincides with Anthropic's preparations for an IPO, framing the narrative not just as a safety concern but also as a demonstration of Claude's advanced capabilities and its integral role in accelerating Anthropic's own R&D—creating a potential "flywheel" effect for competitive advantage. This contrasts with OpenAI's recent, more policy-oriented discussion of the same risks, highlighting the competitive dynamics in the AI industry as companies position themselves in both the technological and regulatory landscape.

marsbit1 h fa

Anthropic Cries Wolf: Is the AGI Threat Real, or Just an IPO Story?

marsbit1 h fa

Trading

Spot
Futures
活动图片