以太坊核心开发者会议笔记:上海升级的最新进展

Odaily星球日报2023-01-12 tarihinde yayınlandı2023-01-12 tarihinde güncellendi

Özet

EOF 相关 EIP 被移除出上海升级。

上海升级的进展

”“

在上海升级方面,在圣诞节前已经上线了第一个开发者测试网,所有客户端组合都在上面运行,大家可以看看以太坊基金会 devops 的仪表盘。有些客户端组合出现了问题,但开发者们将尽快推出一个新的开发者测试网。

”“

此外,Geth 团队的 Marius@vdWijden 提出对 EIP 3860 (对 initcode 的大小设限并引入 gas 计量) 设计上的小修改 —— 纠正该 EIP 中一个令人困惑的错误模式,即违反 initcode 限制导致的是零地址错误而不是 OOG (gas 不足) 错误。这项提议得到开发者们的认同,即将错误模式改为 OOG 错误,然后终止或中止执行,而不是返回一个零地址,这样将减少在客户端实现中的混乱和漏洞。以上是客户端团队的意见,如果智能合约开发者强烈反对这个修改,可能就不修改了。

”“

EOF 相关 EIP 被移除出上海升级

”“

接下来,会议主要讨论 EOF 相关话题。

”“

Geth 团队的开发者@lightclients 给大家更新了 12 月进行的 EOF 小组会议的情况。(EOF 即 EVM 对象格式,它会为以太坊的代码环境引入一些变化。与之相关的 EIP 将更明确地区分智能合约的代码和数据,并使得 EVM 在未来更容易升级。) 简单来说,规范被敲定,并做了两个小型修改:删除 JUMPF 并使得数据 EOF 合约必须包含数据部分。

”“

在测试方面,Geth 团队的 @mhswende 已经开始对实现做模糊测试,在所有客户端上都发现了漏洞并修复了。现在的模糊测试主要针对在客户端上 EOF container/结构的实现,但不包括部署的 EOF 代码。以太坊基金会测试团队的 Mario Vega@elbuenmayini 补充道,由于 EOF 的复杂性,可能很难对错误情况写静态测试用例,因为实现可能会在遇到确切测试用例前先遇到另一个错误。

”“

在客户端团队方面,Geth 和 Besu 已经有完整实现并通过了大部分的测试。Nethermind 也已经有实现了,但不确定最好使用哪个测试套件。而 Erigon 将使用 Geth 的 EOF 实现。

”“

基于 EOF 的实现和测试情况,Vitalik 也表达了对仓促实现 EOF 的担忧,并发表了 EOF 提案:禁用 EOF 账户的代码自省 (code introspection)。

”“

Vitalik 在会议上阐述了这个提案背后的思考,以及解释为什么修改 EVM 通常比其他协议修改更困难。他指出,从以太坊中删除工作量证明比弃用操作码来得更容易。这是因为以太坊应用/合约依赖 EVM 的特定行为,因此修改必须向后兼容,否则将破坏已部署的合约。而协议其他方面的修改只需要每个人在特定时间进行更新,除此之外,不会破坏网络上的任何东西。

”“

这意味着,当我们改进 EVM,或引入新版本,例如 EOF,我们很可能需要永远与它们共存,因为我们不能弃用之前版本。理想情况下,我们想让 EVM 更简洁/简单,但如果我们只能在它上面添加东西而从不删除东西,这就会变得很难。删除东西最大的挑战之一是 EVM 中的代码自省。

”“

因此,Vitalik 的提案是在 EOF v1 中添加更多内容,这将极大地限制 EOF 合约中的代码自省,从而有可能使其在未来更容易升级。Ipsilon 团队的@alexberegszaszi 提到,EOF 提案的作者们其实之前有考虑过类似的功能,决定放弃是想保持 EOF v1 简单。他还提出一个替代方案,将 Vitalik 的提案纳入到 EOF v2。

”“

但是,对于这份在 EOF v1 基础上添加内容的提案,客户端团队担心整体的修改规模过大。@lightclients 也表示,基于目前 EOF 测试的进度,把它纳入上海升级可能会延迟大概一个月的时间。如果想要在二月初能上线主网测试网升级,EOF 的部分应该未能准备好。而且,这是一个很重要的决定,因为 EVM 的变更一旦部署了就不能修改。

”“

经过讨论,开发者们最后决定要再多花时间考虑 EOF 的问题,因此将其从上海升级移除,但会保持 EOF 上的工作。他们应该能够在坎昆升级中部署某个版本的 EOF 与 4844 。在这次会议上,开发者们没有对坎昆升级做出正式决定,并将在下次会议再讨论。

”“

那上海升级是否需要补充其他的 EIP 呢?经过讨论,开发者们决定不再添加其他 EIP,免得延迟上海升级。

”“

其他 EIP 的讨论

”“

随后,开发者们还讨论了 Nimbus 团队的 Etan Kissling 的提案:在 ExecutionPayloadHeader 的交易列表里添加十六进制树根。

”“

简单来说,现在执行层区块头和共识层执行负载头 (ExecutionPayloadHeader) 之间使用不同的序列化格式编码的字段。这两个字段编码格式不同给钱包和以太坊轻客户端构建带来额外的开销和复杂性。Kissling 提议向执行层添加 CL 的 SSZ 序列化格式,或共识层客户端采用多种方式支持执行层的 RLP 序列化格式。这个提案与上海升级中的提款相关,因此相对紧急。这个问题将在这周的共识层会议 (ACDC) 上再次讨论,即 1 月 12 日。

”“

会议最后还讨论了 EIP-5843 (EVM 模块化的算术扩展) 的和 EIP-5988 (添加 Poseidon 哈希函数预编译)。由于 EIP-5843 的作者未能与会,开发者们同意之后再对此 EIP 进行讨论。而 5988 由 StarkWare 提出,旨在在以太坊网络上提高运行零知识证明的效率。但这可能给以太坊的安全性带来未知后果。

İlgili Okumalar

The Rise of Prediction Markets: Why Is This Trillion-Dollar Industry Making U.S. Regulators 'Sit on Pins and Needles'?

The article, "The Rise of Prediction Markets: Why Is the Trillion-Dollar Trend Making US Regulators Uneasy?", explores the rapid growth of prediction markets and the regulatory pushback they face. It argues that platforms like Polymarket and Kalshi, where users trade contracts on real-world outcomes, create highly efficient information aggregates. Their monthly trading volume has surpassed $24 billion, with projections pointing toward a trillion-dollar annual market by 2030. A core example is the 2026 Iran conflict, where prediction market signals accurately foreshadowed the disruption of the Strait of Hormuz and an oil price spike hours before official announcements, outperforming traditional analysts. The piece contends US regulators' primary motivation is not public protection but self-preservation and control. It cites a court ruling against the CFTC, which found the agency's concerns over market manipulation "speculative" and lacking concrete evidence. At the state level, the driving force is framed as lost tax revenue from traditional gambling, not documented social harm. Citing economist Friedrich Hayek, the article concludes that prediction markets excel by crowdsourcing decentralized, "local knowledge" into a dynamic, continuous price signal, offering a real-time reality check against official narratives and static forecasts.

marsbit7 dk önce

The Rise of Prediction Markets: Why Is This Trillion-Dollar Industry Making U.S. Regulators 'Sit on Pins and Needles'?

marsbit7 dk önce

Claude Requires ID Verification and Facial Recognition? The Facial Recognition Requirement is an Old Story from Two Months Ago, and "Sharing Data with Police" is a Misinterpretation

Anthropic's updated privacy policy, effective July 8th, has sparked misinterpretations in Chinese social media, primarily concerning new identity verification and data sharing with law enforcement. A detailed comparison reveals these claims are largely unfounded. First, identity verification (including submitting government ID and a live selfie via third-party provider Persona) is not a new July policy. This mechanism was actually implemented in mid-April 2026 for certain high-use or flagged accounts, particularly Claude Max subscribers. The July update merely formally documents this existing practice in the policy text under a new "Verification Data" section. Second, the widespread claim that the new policy lowers the threshold for sharing user data with law enforcement is incorrect. Comparing the new text with the old version (dated September 28, 2025) shows no substantive tightening. While the new policy more clearly structures the conditions for disclosure—including having a "good-faith belief" it's necessary for legal compliance, preventing harm, fraud detection, or enforcing terms—the old policy already allowed Anthropic to disclose data based on its judgment for similar reasons (e.g., protecting safety, preventing fraud, or complying with law). The term "good-faith belief" acts as a limiting standard, not a lowered barrier. A 2025 court case where Anthropic resisted disclosing user data in a copyright lawsuit further demonstrates the complexity of such standards. The policy's actual substantial changes address data flows for Claude's Agent capabilities. New clauses clarify that when users connect third-party services or instruct Claude to perform multi-step tasks (reading files, sending messages), their inputs, outputs, and instructions are shared with those third parties, governed by the third parties' own policies. This update fills a compliance gap for Claude's evolving functionality beyond simple Q&A. Other additions include a "Research Participation Data" section and refined marketing legal bases. Anthropic reaffirms core commitments: not selling user data, keeping Claude ad-free, and allowing users to control if chats are used for model training. Overall, this update is primarily a compliance catch-up to existing product features, not a significant new privacy tightening. The heightened concern stems from conflating April's verification rollout, standard legal clauses, and the genuine new provisions regarding Agent tasks.

marsbit8 dk önce

Claude Requires ID Verification and Facial Recognition? The Facial Recognition Requirement is an Old Story from Two Months Ago, and "Sharing Data with Police" is a Misinterpretation

marsbit8 dk önce

The World Cup Has Only Just Begun, But AI Predictions Already Have Models Hailed as 'Godly' and Others Flipping Over

After only a few days of the World Cup, AI models are being widely used for match predictions, with mixed early results. These models analyze details like scores, upsets, red cards, and key players, offering users in prediction markets an extra layer of analysis beyond odds and news. Qwen gained early attention for its remarkably accurate calls on the opening day, correctly predicting Mexico's 2-0 win over South Africa and Korea's 2-1 victory over the Czech Republic, while also highlighting red card risks and match flow. Copilot had its own highlights, accurately forecasting the Mexico 2-0 result, the Korea 2-1 win, and a surprising 1-1 draw between Brazil and Morocco. However, it also misjudged several matches, like predicting a Swiss win that ended in a draw with Qatar and missing Australia's upset over Turkey. ChatGPT provided detailed pre-match analysis and correctly called the Mexico 2-0 score, explaining factors like home-field advantage. Yet, it struggled to anticipate upsets, often siding with the stronger team on paper, as seen in its missed calls for the Australia-Turkey and Japan-Netherlands matches. Social media tests pitted models like Gemini, Grok, and Claude against each other for the same games, revealing different predictive "scripts" even for the same fixture. Overall, while AI models like Qwen and Copilot have shown promising, high-profile successes in early matches, their consistency and ability to predict genuine upsets remain in question. As the tournament progresses, more data will be needed to determine which models offer the most reliable insights for prediction markets.

Odaily星球日报12 dk önce

The World Cup Has Only Just Begun, But AI Predictions Already Have Models Hailed as 'Godly' and Others Flipping Over

Odaily星球日报12 dk önce

The Unfinished Tale of Jueying, DaXiao Robotics Swiftly "Raises Funds"

Following a major fundraising round involving several prominent investment institutions, DaXiao Robotics, a company backed by SenseTime, has secured hundreds of millions of US dollars in financing for the first half of 2026. This move signals SenseTime's renewed and substantial bet on "Physical AI" through embodied intelligence, following the relative underperformance of its autonomous driving unit, Jueying. While Jueying achieved mass production partnerships in the smart vehicle sector, it failed to become a pivotal player in the high-level autonomous driving landscape, leading to its gradual independence from SenseTime's core financials. DaXiao Robotics now emerges as SenseTime's next major venture into the physical world. The new funding will focus on developing a "world model" and integrated hardware-software solutions for commercial applications like retail, security, and hospitality. This ambition is significantly more complex and capital-intensive than previous projects. A world model requires understanding spatial relationships, physics, and causality to guide robots in long-term tasks, demanding immense computational resources, data, and engineering. The article highlights several challenges. First, the massive funding, while substantial, may still be strained by the high costs of R&D, data collection, and commercial deployment. Second, SenseTime itself, despite narrowing losses, continues its high-investment growth model and cannot solely bankroll this new, expensive endeavor. Third, DaXiao Robotics, led by SenseTime co-founder Wang Xiaogang, carries the technical heritage and resources of its parent company but also potentially its organizational inertia. It operates in a field increasingly dominated by agile, young technical founders. Ultimately, DaXiao Robotics represents SenseTime's attempt to secure a leading industrial position in embodied intelligence—a goal its Jueying unit did not fully achieve in autonomous driving. The new venture starts with strong capital backing, but faces the critical task of rapidly transitioning from technological narrative to sustainable commercial delivery in an early-stage, costly, and highly competitive arena.

marsbit22 dk önce

The Unfinished Tale of Jueying, DaXiao Robotics Swiftly "Raises Funds"

marsbit22 dk önce

Crypto 2029: The Ultimate Forecast for the Four-Year Cycle of the Cryptocurrency Industry

Title: Crypto 2029: The Ultimate Four-Year Cycle Prediction for the Encryption Industry This article outlines a detailed, stage-by-stage prediction for the crypto industry from the present to 2029, focusing on tangible shifts rather than abstract theory. Key predictions include: **2026 Mid-Year:** The market shifts focus from traditional tokens to synthetic perpetual contracts for private company shares (e.g., SpaceX on Hyperliquid), which become primary price discovery tools for pre-IPO assets. Most altcoins languish as the market seeks assets with real underlying value. **2026 Year-End:** The "AI + crypto" narrative fades as the AI industry itself does not require crypto infrastructure, except for prediction markets betting on model performance. Concurrently, a quiet institutional adoption of asset tokenization (e.g., money market funds) begins under new regulations like the CLARITY Act, creating a dual economy. **2027:** Major public blockchain foundations pivot decisively to serve institutional clients with compliance tools and enterprise sales, while quietly building infrastructure for a future wave of accredited retail investors. Three sectors hit growth ceilings: private perpetual contracts (due to legal restrictions on marketing), stablecoins (due to political uncertainty ahead of the 2028 US election), and tokenized assets (due to cautious institutional scaling). **2028:** Speculative trading diminishes as market efficiency drains liquidity. A major liquidation cascade in synthetic perpetual contracts exposes the flaw of lacking a legally enforceable underlying asset. In response, regulations are revised to allow marketing of private security secondary sales to accredited investors. This creates a legal, direct market for private company equity, absorbing much of the demand previously met by synthetic derivatives. **2029:** A new bull market emerges, driven not by tokens but by tradable equity in innovative private companies (biotech, robotics, AI). Tokens without legally enforceable claims to real assets lose all liquidity. Successful blockchains become invisible settlement infrastructure. Stablecoins grow steadily at a policy-capped rate. Speculation becomes a niche. Core Questions Answered: 1. **Token Value:** Determined solely by legally enforceable claims to real-world assets. 2. **Tech Adoption:** Achieved through blockchain-based primary/secondary markets for private equity, not through forcing tokens onto tech firms. 3. **Crypto as Infrastructure:** The transition happens silently; the technology becomes a mundane, unseen utility like traditional settlement systems. The entire thesis hinges on one testable variable: by late 2028, whether accredited retail investors gain legal, direct access to private asset markets. If not, the core premise—that legal frameworks, not technology, are the main bottleneck—fails.

Foresight News29 dk önce

Crypto 2029: The Ultimate Forecast for the Four-Year Cycle of the Cryptocurrency Industry

Foresight News29 dk önce

İşlemler

Spot
Futures
活动图片