Here Are the Best Crypto Wallets that Won’t Disappear from the App Store

BitcoinistPubblicato 2022-03-25Pubblicato ultima volta 2022-03-25

Introduzione

The long story short: Apple has always been skeptical about the blockchain realm, probably seeing it as a potential threat...

The long story short: Apple has always been skeptical about the blockchain realm, probably seeing it as a potential threat to the authority of the Big Tech companies. Now the tech giant has decided to pick faults in crypto wallet apps. The Trust Wallet iOS app has become “temporarily unavailable” for new installations and updates as the service put it in its recent tweet.
Where Did Trust Wallet Go Wrong?
Trust Wallet is a non-custodial crypto wallet with an in-built Web3 browser. It supports both Ethereum- and Bitcoin-based tokens and is quite popular with NFT collectors. The wallet also provides exchange services via third parties which have probably played a role of a red rag to Apple. As specified in the App Store Guidelines 3.1, only in-app purchases are allowed and cryptocurrency transactions can be facilitated only by the exchange itself. It would be logical to assume that other wallets using third-party exchange services may also fall victim to iOS outages. In fact, Trust Wallet is not the only one that got banned. Atomic Wallet also reported some problems with its iOS app several months ago, and it seems to be still unavailable.
Meanwhile, this occurrence is likely to dent trust in Trust Wallet. It’s such a sad wordplay. The service will look for a way out and settle on a compromise with Apple. Maybe, it will have to get rid of exchange services as such which will drive away from the users who need fiat-to-crypto exchanges in their wallets.
What Are the Alternatives?
To avoid an unpleasant surprise of a crypto wallet app being unavailable, it would be reasonable to use a service that offers comprehensive solutions. Therefore, you should choose a wallet that integrates an exchange platform that meets Apple’s requirements. Here are some of such wallets:
1.   NOW Wallet
NOW Wallet has been developed by ChangeNOW, an exchange and processing platform that has much to offer to its users. It is a great example of a comprehensive solution. The platform’s primary activity is exchange operations, but it also facilitates token airdrops, provides crypto loans, and gives access to full Nodes and blockbook Explorers. ChangeNOW clients can swap almost 400 cryptos and 60 fiat currencies.
NOW Wallet can be used on Android and iOS devices. It integrates storage and exchange functions, so its users can keep their private keys, swap tokens, or buy and sell crypto. Besides, the wallet is a good solution for keeping NFTs as it supports ERC-721 and ERC-1155 NFT token standards.
2.   Huobi Wallet
Huobi Global is one of the biggest cryptocurrency exchanges with its daily trade turnover of over $4 billion. It handles both crypto-to-crypto and fiat-to-crypto swaps while providing access to spot and futures markets. The choice of available assets includes 348 cryptocurrencies and 57 fiat currencies. The in-house wallet of Huobi is available as an Android and iOS app. It supports twenty wallet types including BTC, ETH, HECO, DOGE, and more. Also, the wallet functionalities allow for managing ERC721 NFTs.
3.   eToro Money Wallet
eToroX is a crypto exchange operated by eToro, a multi-asset investment platform. eToroX provides access to over 30 digital assets as well as 17 tokenized fiat and commodity stablecoins developed in-house by eToroX Labs. Besides exchange operations, eToroX offers API services and a credit program for spot trading.
eToro Money is a wallet for storing crypto assets and exchanging them to fiat money in one app. It can be used on Android and iOS devices. Wallets of three types are available: XRP, XLM, and ETH.
4.   Gemini Wallet
Gemini, a regulated cryptocurrency exchange, offers a secure wallet infrastructure that supports about 70 cryptocurrencies. All users’ funds are protected with the industry’s most advanced security and protection systems. Despite being a custodian wallet, the wallet offers theft protection backed by world-class underwriters. Among its drawbacks is its expensive fee structure and limited selection of supported cryptocurrencies.
5.   Gate.io’s Wallet
Wallet.io, another multi-currency crypto wallet owned by crypto exchange Gate.io. It supports hundreds of mainstream coins, such as all tokens on the EOS network, all ERC-20 tokens on the Ethereum network, all QRC-20 tokens on the QTUM network, and all NEP-5 tokens on the NEO network. Private keys are stored on the platform using high-intensity encryption, and neither the platform nor the user can access them. Non-custodial wallets, however, are widely considered a better option. There’s a popular saying in the crypto community: “Not your keys, not your coins.”
Bottom Line
Any disruption in the work of crypto software is like a wake-up call to its users. Security is a thorny issue as no one would want to lose control of their funds. For that reason, non-custodial crypto wallets can prove to be a preferable solution. Besides, the Trust Wallet case has demonstrated that the Big Tech companies may take on the role of harsh monopolists and roadblock smooth operation of apps justifying such moves with a break of their guidelines. Specifically, if you need to store and exchange your digital assets in one app, make sure both these services are provided by one developer. Throughout this article, we have presented five wallets that may serve as a viable alternative to the Trust Wallet iOS, which is currently unavailable in the App Store.

Letture associate

Bitcoin's 'Rally Ends,' Officially Entering the Later Stage of a Bear Market?

Bitcoin prices declined 13% this week, reversing the recent rebound and signaling a likely transition into the later stages of a bear market. Key on-chain metrics deteriorated, with the short-term holder cost basis falling below the Realized Price—a pattern last seen in early 2022, characteristic of bear market maturity. The rally to ~$82k proved to be a bear market bounce, as evidenced by the 90-day realized profit/loss ratio failing to sustain above the bullish threshold of 2. Daily realized losses surged to $1.35B, including significant selling from long-term holders who accumulated near cycle tops, indicating ongoing supply redistribution. Price was rejected almost precisely at the aggregate US spot ETF cost basis of ~$83k, turning that level into resistance and leaving the average ETF investor underwater again. Spot market selling pressure intensified, with the 7-day volume delta turning significantly negative to its weakest level since February. While a major long liquidation event cleared over $400M in leverage, spot demand has not yet stepped in to absorb the resulting supply. Options markets continue pricing in higher future volatility (elevated volatility risk premium) and maintain a skew toward put options, reflecting persistent demand for downside protection, though not yet panic. Overall, market structure remains fragile. Sustained recovery likely requires a reclaim of the ETF cost basis, a shift back to positive spot demand, and a slowdown in realized loss-taking. Until then, the market risks further downside or extended consolidation within the broader bear trend.

Foresight News19 min fa

Bitcoin's 'Rally Ends,' Officially Entering the Later Stage of a Bear Market?

Foresight News19 min fa

How Risky is the "Death Spiral" of MSTR and STRC?

Summary: This article explores the perceived "death spiral" risk between MicroStrategy (MSTR), its Bitcoin holdings, and its perpetual preferred stock (STRC), drawing comparisons to the LUNA-UST collapse. While both systems feature price anchors, high yields for holders, and potential feedback loops, their core mechanisms differ fundamentally. The MSTR-STRC structure relies on continuous financing to sustain its high dividend payouts, primarily through stock ATM offerings. A negative feedback cycle could occur: falling MSTR stock price makes raising equity capital harder, increasing pressure to sell Bitcoin, which undermines STRC confidence and further depresses MSTR. However, unlike LUNA-UST's automated, direct linkage, the MSTR-STRC loop is weaker and has brakes: STRC dividends can be deferred or rates lowered, and STRC holders have a $100/share liquidation preference in bankruptcy, providing a price floor. The company's sustainability hinges on its ability to continue financing. Its current ~$900 million USD reserves cover only about 6.3 months of its ~$1.71 billion annual interest/dividend burden. The next six months are critical, aligning with both the potential bottom in Bitcoin's four-year cycle and the depletion timeline of its reserves. While a LUNA-style catastrophic collapse is deemed highly unlikely due to structural differences, the key question is whether MicroStrategy can navigate this period through healthy deleveraging to restart its capital engine.

Foresight News37 min fa

How Risky is the "Death Spiral" of MSTR and STRC?

Foresight News37 min fa

How Much Debt Does Strategy Really Have? Is There a Risk of Implosion?

MicroStrategy's Debt Risk: A Turning Point in the "Never Sell" Strategy As of June 3, 2026, MicroStrategy holds 843,706 bitcoins (valued at ~$53.1B) but faces significant financial obligations. Its capital structure includes $6.75B in convertible notes and $15.48B in perpetual preferred stock (led by the $8.5B STRC series), creating an annual payout burden of ~$1.71B. With software revenue at only ~$500M, interest and dividend obligations far exceed operating income. A critical shift occurred in late May 2026 when the company sold 32 bitcoins for ~$2.5M to cover dividends, breaking CEO Michael Saylor's long-standing "never sell" pledge. This symbolic move triggered a sharp decline in both Bitcoin's price and MSTR stock, reflecting market fears about cash flow sustainability. The core of the strain is the STRC perpetual preferred stock, designed as a "permanent loan" with no maturity date but requiring high monthly dividends (currently 11.5%). Its business model relies on a three-part cycle: issuing new STRC shares, using proceeds to buy more Bitcoin and fund a USD reserve, and using that reserve to pay dividends. This cycle depends on continuous investor demand for STRC and Bitcoin's price appreciation. Analysis shows Bitcoin needs to appreciate at least 2.3% annually to cover the $1.71B in yearly obligations at current holdings. With Bitcoin price down ~22% from March 2026 highs, this pressure has intensified. The company's $900M USD reserve can only cover about 7 months of payments if STRC issuance stalls. Key risks are not immediate bankruptcy or forced Bitcoin liquidation (as BTC is not collateral), but rather: 1) The erosion of MSTR's premium to its Bitcoin holdings (mNAV), which would cripple its ability to raise cheap capital; 2) A vicious cycle where stagnant Bitcoin prices reduce STRC demand, draining the USD reserve and forcing BTC sales, further depressing prices. The period from February 2027 to September 2028 is a crucial test, with over $5.9B in convertible notes facing put options or maturity. In essence, MicroStrategy has evolved from a simple Bitcoin holder into a complex financial entity acting like a "private Bitcoin bank," leveraging its BTC holdings to create layered financial products. Its survival depends on maintaining Bitcoin's price trend, its stock premium, and market appetite for its preferred shares. The recent token sale marks not a betrayal of its Bitcoin thesis, but an admission that the leveraged strategy must eventually be paid for.

marsbit47 min fa

How Much Debt Does Strategy Really Have? Is There a Risk of Implosion?

marsbit47 min fa

Anthropic Cries Wolf: Is the AGI Threat Real, or Just an IPO Story?

Anthropic has published an article titled "When AI builds itself," discussing the emerging concept of "recursive self-improvement," where AI begins to actively participate in designing, training, testing, and optimizing its own subsequent versions. The company presents internal data showing that by May 2026, over 80% of code merged into its codebase was written by Claude, its AI model. Claude's capabilities have expanded to handling complex, open-ended engineering tasks, achieving a 76% success rate in such areas, and even contributing to research processes, such as optimizing code performance and conducting AI safety experiments. Anthropic outlines an evolution from human-driven development to AI-assisted workflows, culminating in the current stage where AI agents can autonomously write, run, and delegate code. The company cautions that the path toward a "closed loop," where AI continuously improves itself, is becoming visible. It calls for coordinated global mechanisms to potentially slow or pause frontier AI development to allow safety research and societal structures to catch up. However, the timing of this warning coincides with Anthropic's preparations for an IPO, framing the narrative not just as a safety concern but also as a demonstration of Claude's advanced capabilities and its integral role in accelerating Anthropic's own R&D—creating a potential "flywheel" effect for competitive advantage. This contrasts with OpenAI's recent, more policy-oriented discussion of the same risks, highlighting the competitive dynamics in the AI industry as companies position themselves in both the technological and regulatory landscape.

marsbit1 h fa

Anthropic Cries Wolf: Is the AGI Threat Real, or Just an IPO Story?

marsbit1 h fa

Trading

Spot
Futures
活动图片