$91M Ethereum Buy: Bitmine Immersion Bets Big On ETH Even As Market Volatility Persists

bitcoinistPublished on 2026-02-19Last updated on 2026-02-19

Abstract

Despite heightened bearish pressure and market volatility keeping Ethereum's price just below $2,000, Bitmine Immersion has made a significant $91 million investment in ETH, acquiring 45,759 tokens. This purchase increases their total holdings to 4.37 million ETH, representing approximately 3.6% of the entire circulating supply. Despite sitting on $8 billion in unrealized losses with a blended cost basis of $3,821 per ETH, the firm continues to accumulate rather than exercise caution. Over 3.04 million of their ETH is staked to generate yield while they wait for market conditions to improve. Their strategy mirrors a structural supply reduction, potentially shaping ETH market outlook. At the time of writing, ETH was trading near $1,998.

With shifting narratives and waning ETF flows, the Ethereum price remains under heightened bearish pressure, keeping it just slightly below the $2,000 level. While price has declined sharply, Bitmine Immersion does not seem to be swayed by the pullback as the company makes another big strategic bet on the leading altcoin.

Bitmine Doubles Down On Ethereum With A $91 Million Investment

Institutional sentiment and interest in Ethereum are starting to show signs of renewed strength, with the recent large purchases of the altcoin. At the heart of this underlying strength is Bitmine Immersion, a leading ETH treasury company, following its most recent significant ETH buy.

Amid this renewed bullish sentiment, a post published on the X platform by Milk Road, a macro expert and investor, shows that Bitmine is doubling down on its long-term future by acquiring another stack of ETH worth over $91 million. Even as market volatility continues to intensify, the treasury firm is still scooping up the altcoin at a massive rate, suggesting a strategic approach.

Milk Road highlighted that the purchase was made despite the firm sitting on $8 billion in unrealized losses. The broader sentiment may still be fragile, but Bitmine continues to choose accumulation over caution as indicated by its steady purchase last week, ramping up 45,759 ETH at roughly $1,989 per token within the period.

Bitmine steadily accumulating ETH | Source: Chart from Milk Road on X

Following its latest ETH purchase, Bitmine Immersion’s crypto holdings now boast a total of 4.37 million ETH. Interestingly, this figure represents approximately 3.6% of Ethereum’s entire circulating supply controlled by a single entity.

Considering ETH’s current price, the value of this massive stash is averaging down. Currently, the firm’s blended cost basis is sitting at the $3,821 level, which implies that a 90%+ bounce from the recent price levels is required to break even and flip the firm back into profit.

ETH Staking Now The Primary Means Of Generating Yield

In the meantime, their strategy remains on generating yield from their ETH staking while they wait, transforming a position that is now weak into useful capital. Over 3.04 million of their ETH is locked away in staking, which is the major long-term unlock.

Bitmine’s crypto holdings are not just made up of Ethereum. They also hold Bitcoin, $670 million in cash, and stakes in the Beast Industries run by the biggest and most popular YouTuber, Mr. Beast; a move that could see ETH get integrated into his new financial app.

Ethereum investors, especially retail holders, now have a publicly traded company with major skin in the game advocating for the altcoin’s success, and stress-testing whether Strategy’s MSTR model translates to ETH. With a single firm essentially locking up 3.6% of the supply with no plans to sell, this is known as a structural supply reduction that could play a role in shaping the market outlook.

At the time of writing, the price of ETH was trading at $1,998, demonstrating a nearly 2% rise over the past day. Within the same period, its trading volume has increased by more than 7%, according to CoinMarketCap’s data.

ETH trading at $2,004 on the 1D chart | Source: ETHUSDT on Tradingview.com

Related Questions

QDespite market volatility, how much did Bitmine Immersion invest in Ethereum purchase recently?

ABitmine Immersion invested $91 million in Ethereum recently.

QWhat percentage of Ethereum's entire circulating supply is controlled by Bitmine Immersion after its latest purchase?

ABitmine Immersion controls approximately 3.6% of Ethereum's entire circulating supply.

QWhat is Bitmine Immersion's blended cost basis for its Ethereum holdings, and how much of a price increase is needed to break even?

ABitmine Immersion's blended cost basis is $3,821 per ETH, and a 90%+ bounce from recent price levels is required to break even.

QHow much of Bitmine's Ethereum is locked in staking, and what is the purpose of this strategy?

AOver 3.04 million of Bitmine's ETH is locked in staking, which is their primary means of generating yield while waiting for the market to recover.

QBesides Ethereum, what other assets does Bitmine Immersion hold in its crypto holdings?

ABesides Ethereum, Bitmine Immersion also holds Bitcoin, $670 million in cash, and stakes in Beast Industries run by Mr. Beast.

Related Reads

Has the 'Digital Gold' Narrative for BTC Failed?

**Title: Has the "Digital Gold" Narrative for Bitcoin Failed?** The article argues that Bitcoin's "digital gold" narrative remains valid despite a recent sharp price decline (from a peak near $126k in Oct 2025 to briefly under $61k in Feb 2026). It presents a long-term investment framework based on three core points: **1. Viewing Bitcoin as an Asset:** Bitcoin is presented as a superior potential store of value compared to gold. Key arguments are its absolute scarcity (21 million cap), superior portability, and transparent auditability via its public ledger. While acknowledging its current use in early, volatile stages (~3-4% global adoption), the author draws parallels to the early, disruptive phases of the internet and e-commerce. **2. Understanding the Recent Downturn:** The current ~50% correction is framed as a predictable, consensus-driven cycle following its post-halving peak (the 2024 halving preceded the Oct 2025 high). A crucial factor is a historic "changing of hands": the influx of new institutional buyers via ETFs allowed early, low-cost holders (miners, OG believers) to take profits. The author notes that while severe, Bitcoin's historical drawdowns (e.g., 93% in 2011, 77% in 2021-22) have been progressively smaller, suggesting maturing holder structure and decreasing volatility over time. **3. The Long-Term Perspective:** The long-term thesis hinges on Bitcoin capturing a portion of gold's market value. With Bitcoin's market cap at ~$1.4 trillion (at $70k) versus gold's ~$20 trillion, significant upside potential exists if the "digital gold" narrative is partially realized. However, the author strongly cautions that short-term risks remain, the bottom is unpredictable, and high volatility is inherent. The real risk is not Bitcoin failing but poor personal position management (over-leverage, wrong capital) and a lack of deep understanding, which can force investors out during severe downturns. The conclusion uses Amazon's 95% crash post-2000 dot-com bubble and subsequent 42x recovery as an analogy. The ultimate question is not if Bitcoin's price will rise, but if an investor's strategy and conviction can withstand the volatility to see the long-term play out. The recent divergence (gold up, Bitcoin down) is posed not as a narrative failure, but as potential evidence of this ongoing, painful transition from a speculative asset to a mainstream allocation.

marsbit2h ago

Has the 'Digital Gold' Narrative for BTC Failed?

marsbit2h ago

Has BTC's 'Digital Gold' Narrative Failed?

The article discusses Bitcoin's "digital gold" narrative, its recent price drop, and long-term outlook through the perspective of "Jason". It argues the narrative is not a failure but that Bitcoin represents a superior, new asset class due to its fixed supply (21 million), portability, and auditability. The piece compares its current ~3-4% global adoption rate to early internet/e-commerce, suggesting significant growth potential. Regarding the 2025-2026 price decline (from ~$126k to briefly under $61k), the author views it as a predictable, consensus-driven sell-off within Bitcoin's ~4-year cycle post-halving, exacerbated by a major "handover" from early, low-cost holders to new institutional buyers via ETFs. A key observation is that historical peak-to-trough drawdowns have lessened over time (e.g., 93% in 2011 to ~50% in 2026), indicating maturing volatility as holder structure changes. For the long term, the author uses a simple framework: Bitcoin's total market cap (~$1.4T at $70k) is only about 7% of gold's (~$20T). Even capturing 30-50% of gold's value would imply substantial upside. However, the article strongly cautions against viewing this as investment advice, emphasizing extreme volatility and the critical importance of risk management, position sizing, and deep fundamental understanding to survive severe drawdowns. It concludes by drawing a parallel to Amazon's 95% crash in 2000 and subsequent 42x recovery, stressing that the key is surviving market cycles to realize long-term potential.

链捕手2h ago

Has BTC's 'Digital Gold' Narrative Failed?

链捕手2h ago

From Code to Cognition: A Ten-Thousand-Word Guide to the Evolution of the Robot Brain

"From Code to Cognition: The Evolution of Robot Brains" The journey of robotic intelligence has shifted dramatically from manually coded systems to AI-driven brains. For decades, robots relied on layered software stacks—perception, state estimation, planning, control—each handcrafted. While predictable, they lacked adaptability. The 2010s saw deep learning revolutionize perception (e.g., object detection) and control (via reinforcement learning), but learned skills remained narrow. The arrival of Large Language Models (LLMs) marked a turning point. LLMs acted as high-level planners, interpreting natural language instructions and generating sequences of actions for traditional robotic systems to execute. However, true integration came with Visual-Language-Action (VLA) models, which fused vision, language, and motion prediction into a single network. Pioneered by models like RT-2 and open-source projects like OpenVLA, VLAs enable robots to reason and act directly from visual input and commands. The most advanced humanoid robots now employ a "dual-brain" architecture: a slow-thinking, large VLA (System 2) for reasoning and planning, and a fast-reacting, small network (System 1) for high-frequency motion control, sometimes with an even lower-level System 0 for balance. This split balances cognition with the physics of real-time movement. Computation is split between onboard hardware (e.g., NVIDIA Jetson) for safety-critical control loops and cloud/edge servers for non-critical tasks like learning and interfaces. A crucial driver is the open-source ecosystem—models like GR00T and OpenVLA allow startups to build upon pre-trained brains and fine-tune them with their own data, accelerating development. Despite progress, current systems struggle with recovery from errors, sample inefficiency, and long-horizon tasks. This has spurred the rise of **World Models**—neural networks that predict the consequences of actions. By simulating possible futures before acting (like NVIDIA Cosmos or Meta V-JEPA), robots can plan, recover, and generalize better. This represents the next frontier: shifting intelligence from learned reactions to an internal model of physics and cause-and-effect. The field is rapidly evolving. While not yet at its "ChatGPT moment," the convergence of cheaper hardware, scalable simulation, and world models points toward robots that are increasingly capable, adaptive, and useful. The question is shifting from "what can robots do?" to "what *should* they do?"

marsbit3h ago

From Code to Cognition: A Ten-Thousand-Word Guide to the Evolution of the Robot Brain

marsbit3h ago

AI Bubble Is Bursting

The AI Bubble is Bursting: A Necessary Purge on the Path to Ubiquitous Intelligence Market volatility has reignited debates about an AI bubble, with figures like Ray Dalio pointing to high valuations. However, this parallels the dot-com bubble, which, despite its crash, laid the physical infrastructure for today's internet era. The current AI investment frenzy, with tech giants planning trillions in infrastructure spending far outstripping current AI application revenues, appears similarly imbalanced. This 'bubble' is seen as an inevitable phase for a disruptive technology, paying the "innovation tax." Critically, AI inference costs have plummeted over 99.7% since 2023, making intelligence nearly free at the margin. This hasn't reduced spending but has instead unlocked massive new demand, as seen in enterprise AI cloud expenditure tripling. This follows the Jevons Paradox: efficiency gains lead to greater total consumption. The market is now entering a cleansing phase, weeding out speculative ventures lacking real moats. The deeper shift is a move from capital expenditure (CapEx) on hardware to value creation in operational expenditure (OpEx) through AI applications that solve real industry problems. While infrastructure valuations are high, rapid earnings growth from widespread AI adoption across sectors—from manufacturing and finance to law and healthcare—may digest these valuations over time. Ultimately, this creative destruction will leave behind robust infrastructure and optimized models, cheaply powering an AI-augmented future for all industries, much as the internet became indispensable after its own bubble burst. The core productive potential remains undiminished.

链捕手3h ago

AI Bubble Is Bursting

链捕手3h ago

Trading

Spot
Futures

Hot Articles

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of ETH (ETH) are presented below.

活动图片