北京第一个元宇宙母基金要来了

巴比特2022-03-14 tarihinde yayınlandı2022-03-14 tarihinde güncellendi

Özet

一个科幻的世界正在徐徐降临。

如果没有意外,这也将是国内第一支元宇宙基金。
千呼万唤始出来,北京第一支元宇宙母基金要来了。
投资界—解码LP从北京市通州区金融办平台获悉,经区政府同意,印发《关于加快北京城市副中心元宇宙创新引领发展的若干措施》(简称《措施》)提,其中提出:鼓励发展早期和长期投资。依托通州产业引导基金,采用“母基金+直投”的方式联合其他社会资本,打造一支覆盖元宇宙产业的基金。
如果没有意外,这也将是国内第一支元宇宙基金。
北京第一支元宇宙母基金落地通州
我们先来看看政策具体内容。
根据《措施》,将给予元宇宙企业房租财政补贴。支持元宇宙企业及服务机构集聚,根据元宇宙企业房租补贴标准,对在元宇宙应用创新中心新注册并租赁自用办公场地的重点企业进行(50%,70%,100%)三档补贴,每家企业每年补贴面积不超过2000平方米,连续补贴不超过3年。
具体来看有几个要点:
(一)大力推进示范应用。加快元宇宙相关技术与各行业深度融合,促进产业转型升级,重点围绕文化、旅游、商业等领域,打造一批元宇宙示范应用项目,支持一批元宇宙应用场景建设。为北京城市副中心元宇宙相关企业提供北京环球度假区、张家湾古镇、大运河文化带、台湖演艺小镇等场景资源支持。
(二)全面优化产业布局。提升元宇宙产业空间承载能力,打造“1+N”的产业创新集聚区。在张家湾设计小镇创新中心,集聚高端创新要素,打造元宇宙应用创新中心;在文化旅游区、台湖演艺小镇、张家湾古镇、宋庄艺术区、运河商务区等区域,打造与应用场景高度融合、形成元宇宙示范的主题园区。支持企业面向京津冀特别是雄安地区、面向全国、面向全球延展研发链和产业链,不断扩大行业影响力。
(三)鼓励发展早期和长期投资。依托通州产业引导基金,采用“母基金+直投”的方式联合其他社会资本,打造一支覆盖元宇宙产业的基金,支持元宇宙初创项目和重大项目并延长支持周期,进一步完善服务体系,支撑产业生态建设。支持设立专注于早期和长期投资的元宇宙子基金。
这是VC/PE最为感兴趣的一点。有了母基金,VC/PE便可以申请出资成立专项的元宇宙子基金,将资金市场化投向众多元宇宙项目。同时通过母基金返投要求,VC/PE会尽量将所投元宇宙项目落户通州,形成产业集群。
元宇宙融资火爆,VC/PE来了
眼下,元宇宙正在席卷创投圈。
追溯起来,元宇宙最早由美国科幻作家尼尔·斯蒂文森提出。1992年,斯蒂文森曾在小说《雪崩》中这样描述元宇宙:戴上耳机和目镜,找到连接终端,就能够以虚拟分身的方式进入由计算机模拟、与真实世界平行的虚拟空间。
至今,元宇宙尚未有明确的官方定义。有人从字面意思定义Metaverse(元宇宙)是Meta(超越)+Verse(宇宙),一种超越现实的虚拟宇宙。
而元宇宙概念突然爆火,还要从游戏公司Roblox讲起。2004年成立以来,Roblox一直在努力打造一个类似元宇宙的游戏平台。去年3月,该公司正式登陆纽交所,上市当日,股价暴涨54%,市值超400亿美元(约合人民币2529亿元)。值得关注的是,全球各大科技巨头也在加足马力布局元宇宙赛道。
Facebook更名,直接把元宇宙的火爆程度推向高潮。去年10月,扎克伯格宣布取元宇宙Metaverse的前缀,将Facebook集团名字换成“Meta”。值得关注的是,几乎同一时间,英伟达也在进军元宇宙。
一时间,VC/PE闻风而动,一笔笔元宇宙相关融资诞生。据投资界不完全统计,2021年至今,有超过20家元宇宙公司获得融资,包括Biqverse、Oasis、都宝客、BUD、OrientaLab等等,背后出现了譬如红杉中国、高瓴创投、云锋基金、CPE源峰、基石资本、蓝驰创投、愉悦资本、洪泰基金等在内VC/PE,以及字节跳动、小米、百度等互联网大厂。
其中,最轰动的投资事件莫过于字节跳动收购VR创业公司Pico。去年8月末,Pico发出全员信称,公司被字节跳动收购,有爆料称此次收购价格或为50亿元人民币,这也是VR赛道国内近年来最大的一笔收购案。
此前VC圈曾流传一句话:虽然元宇宙还未出现统一的定义,但基本可以肯定的是,元宇宙就是数字世界的诗与远方,而AR/VR则是通向元宇宙的最佳入口。
曾有VC分析,过去几十年不变的趋势是,数字世界(程序和协议)与物理世界(人类和机器)之间,持续地交融并结成新的网络。这不是风口,而是一个长期的走向,因此无论是“虚拟世界”,“元宇宙”,还是“全真互联网“,都只是对这个趋势的一个注解的切面而已。
一个科幻的世界正在徐徐降临。

İlgili Okumalar

He Let GPT-5.6 Sol Run for 33 Hours Straight to Tackle Fermat's Last Theorem, Forcibly Terminated by the System

This article discusses a real-world experiment by expert Michael P. Frank to test if an AI, specifically GPT-5.6 Sol, could autonomously make progress on a major unsolved mathematical problem: finding a simpler proof for Fermat's Last Theorem. The AI was tasked with exploring specific mathematical pathways and maintaining rigorous notes over approximately 33 hours. However, the session was terminated by OpenAI's systems. The AI itself suggested two possible reasons for the stoppage: excessive resource consumption, or OpenAI having previously failed on similar problems and wishing to conserve computational resources. The AI reported its work primarily involved refining plausible ideas into precise, verifiable statements, most of which were subsequently disproven or excluded—effectively creating a map of dead ends rather than a proof. The incident sparked debate online. Some speculated that OpenAI might deliberately restrict public access to its most powerful models to maintain a competitive edge or avoid regulatory scrutiny, rather than allowing users to potentially solve landmark problems. OpenAI researcher Noam Brown countered this, arguing that a user solving a major problem would be tremendous publicity. Others offered technical explanations, suggesting the termination could be due to standard safety mechanisms preventing infinite loops, or even a known bug in the GPT-5.6 Sol version that disrupts long-running sessions. The story highlights the practical challenges, technical limits, and broader strategic questions surrounding the use of advanced AI for open-ended, high-stakes research.

marsbit7 dk önce

He Let GPT-5.6 Sol Run for 33 Hours Straight to Tackle Fermat's Last Theorem, Forcibly Terminated by the System

marsbit7 dk önce

Microsoft CEO Satya Nadella's Latest Warning: Betting Entirely on a Single AI Model Hands Over a Company's Lifeblood

Microsoft CEO Satya Nadella warns that companies relying solely on a single AI model could jeopardize their survival. He argues that over-dependence leads to "vendor lock-in," where businesses risk ceding control over their core data, memory, contextual history, and AI usage patterns. This dependence essentially outsources a company's critical thinking and operational know-how to an external provider. The deeper a company integrates with one AI system—feeding it prompts, internal data, and workflows—the more it reveals its unique business methods and competitive edge. This accumulated knowledge could become accessible to the AI supplier. Furthermore, switching providers becomes extremely costly and complex, as companies would need to rebuild their entire AI-augmented workflow, memory, and tool integrations from scratch. Nadella's solution is "decoupling." Companies should separate their proprietary data, memory, and control layer (or "harness") from the underlying AI models. By retaining metadata from every AI interaction, businesses can preserve their operational "brain" or institutional knowledge. This allows them to flexibly use different AI models (e.g., from OpenAI, Anthropic, Microsoft) for specific tasks without losing their accumulated expertise. The core idea: companies can rent the smartest models available, but they must keep their own "brain" and operational control firmly in-house.

marsbit57 dk önce

Microsoft CEO Satya Nadella's Latest Warning: Betting Entirely on a Single AI Model Hands Over a Company's Lifeblood

marsbit57 dk önce

İşlemler

Spot
活动图片