Storj申请破产，探索代币持有者的股权化路径

cointelegraphPubblicato 2026-07-27Pubblicato ultima volta 2026-07-27

Introduzione

去中心化云存储提供商Storj Labs已申请第11章破产保护。公司表示计划在重组历史债务期间保持网络正常运行，并探索为STORJ代币持有者提供所有权转换路径。Storj称其负债主要源于旧有战略，单靠业务增长难以解决。网络运营和代币功能目前未受影响，代币价格在公告后未出现显著波动。管理层计划提出一项机制，允许代币持有者参与重组后公司的股权分配，但具体资格认定、参与方式（如是否需代币快照或锁仓）及股权分配比例尚未披露。任何方案均需遵循破产清偿顺序并获得法院批准。 Storj是加密货币领域运营时间最长的去中心化基础设施项目之一，始于2014年。此次破产申请与近期多家加密公司寻求第11章保护的情况同步，例如Movement Labs和Poolin；而BitMEX和BitMart则选择了有序关闭而非破产。

去中心化云存储提供商Storj Labs已根据《破产法》第11章申请破产保护。该公司表示，计划在重组历史遗留债务的同时保持其网络运行，并为STORJ代币持有者探索一条所有权路径。

周日，Storj表示已向美国西弗吉尼亚州北区破产法院提交了自愿破产申请。该公司表示，在法院监督下，其日常运营和客户服务将在破产程序期间继续进行，而其母公司Inveniam将继续支持该业务。

此次重组可能成为一个不同寻常的测试，即实用型代币持有者是否能够参与一家破产重组公司的所有权。

在一封致社区用户的公开信中，Storj表示，其负债大部分源于当前战略实施之前，且数额巨大，无法仅通过业务增长来解决。信中称，网络仍正常运营，其代币的实用性保持不变。

根据CoinGecko的数据，消息公布后，STORJ代币价格未出现显著即时反应，撰稿时交易价格约为0.072美元。

Storj探索代币持有者的股权化路径

Storj表示，管理层打算提出一项机制，允许代币持有者参与重组后公司的股权分配。

然而，Storj尚未披露将如何确定代币持有者的资格、参与机制是否会涉及代币快照或锁仓、或者可能分配多少股权。该公司承认，任何计划都必须遵循破产清偿优先级并获得法院批准。

Cointelegraph已联系Storj寻求置评，但在发稿前未收到回复。

Storj是加密行业历史最悠久的去中心化基础设施项目之一。该项目始于2014年，最初是一个开源的点对点云存储项目，旨在让用户从其他网络参与者处租赁存储空间，而非依赖中心化提供商。

相关阅读：BitMEX在宣布关闭之日面临623 BTC诉讼

Storj提交破产申请的同月，至少还有另外两家加密公司也寻求了第11章保护。

Movement Labs在经历数月与其MOVE代币相关的动荡后，于7月15日根据第11章子章V申请破产；比特币矿池Poolin则于7月22日提交申请，寻求法院监督下出售其位于德克萨斯州的两处矿场。

同样在7月，BitMEX宣布在运营11年后将关闭，而BitMart表示将于8月26日停止交易，并于2027年1月31日完全终止运营。这两家交易所均未宣布申请破产，而是选择了有序关闭清算。

杂志报道：CLARITY希望渐消，BitMEX因诉讼临近而关闭：Hodler文摘

Crypto di tendenza

CitreaCTR

wrapped stUSDTWSTUSDT

Velodrome FinanceVELODROME

BrevisBREV

ZRX（0X）ZRX

PancakeSwapCAKE

Domande pertinenti

QStorj Labs申请了哪种破产保护，并在此期间计划维持什么？

AStorj Labs自愿申请了美国《破产法》第11章破产保护。公司计划在重组历史债务期间，继续保持其去中心化云存储网络的正常运行和客户服务。

QStorj的破产重组可能成为什么领域的特殊测试案例？

A这可能成为一次不寻常的测试，检验功能型代币（utility-token）持有者是否有机会成为一家破产重组后公司的股东，从而参与到公司所有权中。

Q根据文章，Storj提出让代币持有者参与公司股权的方案目前存在哪些未明确的细节？

A目前尚未明确披露的关键细节包括：代币持有者的资格如何确定、参与机制是采取代币快照还是锁仓方式，以及将分配多少比例的股权给代币持有者。

Q文章中提到，Storj申请破产的同一月份还有哪两家加密公司也寻求了破产保护？

A在同一月份（7月），Movement Labs（与其MOVE代币相关的动荡有关）和比特币矿池Poolin（为其寻求法院监督下出售两处德州矿场）也分别申请了破产保护。

Q文章在结尾提到了哪两家交易所没有申请破产，而是选择有序关闭？

A文章提到BitMEX交易所和BitMart交易所没有宣布破产申请，而是选择了有序关闭业务。BitMEX在7月宣布将关闭，BitMart则计划在2027年1月31日完全停止运营。

Letture associate

Microsoft CEO Satya Nadella's Latest Warning: Betting Entirely on a Single AI Model Hands Over a Company's Lifeblood

Microsoft CEO Satya Nadella warns that companies relying solely on a single AI model could jeopardize their survival. He argues that over-dependence leads to "vendor lock-in," where businesses risk ceding control over their core data, memory, contextual history, and AI usage patterns. This dependence essentially outsources a company's critical thinking and operational know-how to an external provider. The deeper a company integrates with one AI system—feeding it prompts, internal data, and workflows—the more it reveals its unique business methods and competitive edge. This accumulated knowledge could become accessible to the AI supplier. Furthermore, switching providers becomes extremely costly and complex, as companies would need to rebuild their entire AI-augmented workflow, memory, and tool integrations from scratch. Nadella's solution is "decoupling." Companies should separate their proprietary data, memory, and control layer (or "harness") from the underlying AI models. By retaining metadata from every AI interaction, businesses can preserve their operational "brain" or institutional knowledge. This allows them to flexibly use different AI models (e.g., from OpenAI, Anthropic, Microsoft) for specific tasks without losing their accumulated expertise. The core idea: companies can rent the smartest models available, but they must keep their own "brain" and operational control firmly in-house.

marsbit35 min fa

Microsoft CEO Satya Nadella's Latest Warning: Betting Entirely on a Single AI Model Hands Over a Company's Lifeblood

marsbit35 min fa

KOSPI Index Halts Trading Due to Eighth Price Limit Up Circuit Breaker Trigger of 2026

The South Korean KOSPI index has triggered a market-wide trading halt for the eighth time in 2026, falling another 8% and losing over 28% in the past month. This latest plunge is driven by a severe sell-off in semiconductor and AI-related stocks. Key contributors include a sharp decline in shares of SK Hynix (down 50% from its June high) and heavyweights like Samsung, which comprises 50% of the index. The drop followed a sector-wide weakness triggered by the IPO of Changxin Memory Technology and falling US chip stocks like Nvidia (-4.4%). Analysts point to massive AI financing deals (like Nvidia's $250B support for OpenAI) raising debt cost concerns and questioning AI scalability viability. The article notes Bitcoin's correlation with AI stocks has weakened, but KOSPI's volatility could redirect some liquidity to crypto markets. Blockchain-based exchanges are exploring KOSPI-linked perpetual futures to allow speculation on further declines or a short squeeze, as traditional altcoin trading in South Korea diminishes amid the index's dramatic swings.

cryptonews.ru36 min fa

KOSPI Index Halts Trading Due to Eighth Price Limit Up Circuit Breaker Trigger of 2026

cryptonews.ru36 min fa

Miners Advised Not to Buy GPUs for AI and to Focus on Infrastructure

A founder at an energy investment forum advises bitcoin miners not to purchase GPUs for AI themselves, but to instead focus on infrastructure like power and data center space. Mike Alfred of Alpine Fox stated that while AI infrastructure demand is a long-term, 20-30 year trend, it presents a key choice for miners. The first, riskier model involves owning and operating GPUs, which requires financing expensive hardware that quickly becomes obsolete. The second, more conservative model is akin to real estate: providing colocation services where clients bring their own servers, and the miner sells space, power, cooling, and water. Alfred noted this model is easier to finance. Most existing bitcoin mining sites are difficult and expensive to convert for AI, as AI data centers require far higher construction costs, redundant fiber connections, backup power, complex cooling, and near 100% uptime. A hybrid model, where mining acts as a flexible load to use excess power during AI data center construction or from generation facilities, was discussed. However, participants concluded this is only viable with very cheap power; otherwise, developers are better off focusing solely on AI. Miners are increasingly being evaluated for their available power capacity and project portfolios rather than just bitcoin output. Panelists also warned of risks in the AI sector, predicting at least one major default or contract breach among AI tenants, lenders, or landlords before bitcoin's next halving in 2028.

cryptonews.ru45 min fa

Miners Advised Not to Buy GPUs for AI and to Focus on Infrastructure

cryptonews.ru45 min fa

Millisecond 'Pay-to-Cut': How Did Hyperliquid's Priority Fee Turn into a Multi-Million Dollar Business?

"Millisecond 'Paid Queue-Jumping': How Hyperliquid's Priority Fee Became a Multi-Million Dollar Annual Business" In traditional finance, high-frequency trading firms spend millions on infrastructure for millisecond advantages. Hyperliquid has translated this race onto the blockchain with its "Priority Fee" system, creating an open economic game for speed. This system auctions two types of priority: **Gossip Priority** for faster data feeds (via a Dutch auction every 3 minutes), and **Order Priority** for front-of-queue trade execution (users bid a fee for lower latency). This converts a hardware race into a transparent, market-priced mechanism. Since launch, this feature has generated over $5M in protocol revenue. Projected annualized buybacks from this income exceed $30M, accounting for ~7% of total protocol revenue. The demand stems from large traders and market makers on Hyperliquid, for whom milliseconds can mean the difference between profit/loss or avoiding liquidation. Market makers pay these fees as "protection" to ensure their orders execute first, which in turn improves liquidity for all users. Crucially, Hyperliquid internalizes Maximum Extractable Value (MEV) that typically leaks to external validators or searchers, creating a new revenue stream beyond trading fees. The mechanism also strengthens HYPE's tokenomics. While 97% of trading fees fund secondary market buybacks (via the Assistance Fund), Priority Fees are **directly burned**, adding a second deflationary engine. Furthermore, fees for order priority are deducted from users' undelegated HYPE balances, encouraging large traders to hold and lock up tokens, reducing circulating supply. However, a key challenge remains: balancing the speed needs of institutional players with fair market access for retail users, as those who cannot pay high fees may suffer worse slippage during volatility. In summary, Hyperliquid's Priority Fee is a novel model that monetizes latency, captures MEV for the protocol, and enhances its native token's value through burning and lock-ups.

marsbit50 min fa

Millisecond 'Pay-to-Cut': How Did Hyperliquid's Priority Fee Turn into a Multi-Million Dollar Business?

marsbit50 min fa

Jito Seizes User Traffic with JTX, Why Is It Still Undervalued by the Market?

Jito, a Solana infrastructure provider, has launched a new product called JTX, which is shifting its business model from being a price-taker on Solana block space to becoming a price-setter for user transaction flow. Despite this strategic shift aimed at capturing and monetizing user traffic, the market continues to undervalue its native token, JTO. Analysts present a valuation case for JTO, arguing the market still prices it as backend infrastructure. Their base case scenario assumes JTX captures 15% of Solana DEX volume by Q2 2027, generating significant annualized revenue. Applying a conservative 30x P/S multiple to this revenue implies a JTO price of $1.18, representing ~57% upside from current levels (~$0.75). A probability-weighted target, including bullish (40% probability, 25% market share) and bearish (10% probability, 5% share) scenarios, points to a target of $2.75, suggesting ~267% potential upside. The thesis hinges on JTX's early positive performance data and its potential to benefit from the expected growth of on-chain trading, particularly from tokenized stocks and real-world assets. Furthermore, an estimated 80% of JTX's net revenue is slated for JTO buybacks, creating a potential value-accrual flywheel. The report concludes that Jito's transformation via JTX is not yet reflected in its valuation.

marsbit1 h fa

Jito Seizes User Traffic with JTX, Why Is It Still Undervalued by the Market?

marsbit1 h fa

Trading

Spot

Articoli Popolari

Come comprare STORJ

Benvenuto in HTX.com! Abbiamo reso l'acquisto di STORJ (STORJ) semplice e conveniente. Segui la nostra guida passo passo per intraprendere il tuo viaggio nel mondo delle criptovalute.Step 1: Crea il tuo Account HTXUsa la tua email o numero di telefono per registrarti il tuo account gratuito su HTX. Vivi un'esperienza facile e sblocca tutte le funzionalità,Crea il mio accountStep 2: Vai in Acquista crypto e seleziona il tuo metodo di pagamentoCarta di credito/debito: utilizza la tua Visa o Mastercard per acquistare immediatamente STORJSTORJ.Bilancio: Usa i fondi dal bilancio del tuo account HTX per fare trading senza problemi.Terze parti: abbiamo aggiunto metodi di pagamento molto utilizzati come Google Pay e Apple Pay per maggiore comodità.P2P: Fai trading direttamente con altri utenti HTX.Over-the-Counter (OTC): Offriamo servizi su misura e tassi di cambio competitivi per i trader.Step 3: Conserva STORJ (STORJ)Dopo aver acquistato STORJ (STORJ), conserva nel tuo account HTX. In alternativa, puoi inviare tramite trasferimento blockchain o scambiare per altre criptovalute.Step 4: Scambia STORJ (STORJ)Scambia facilmente STORJ (STORJ) nel mercato spot di HTX. Accedi al tuo account, seleziona la tua coppia di trading, esegui le tue operazioni e monitora in tempo reale. Offriamo un'esperienza user-friendly sia per chi ha appena iniziato che per i trader più esperti.

172 Totale visualizzazioniPubblicato il 2024.12.12Aggiornato il 2026.06.02

Discussioni

Benvenuto nella Community HTX. Qui puoi rimanere informato sugli ultimi sviluppi della piattaforma e accedere ad approfondimenti esperti sul mercato. Le opinioni degli utenti sul prezzo di STORJ STORJ sono presentate come di seguito.