Hausse de 73 % des prix et boom de 404 % du volume : Berachain (BERA) peut-il monter plus haut ?

TheNewsCryptoPublished on 2026-02-12Last updated on 2026-02-12

Abstract

Le prix de Berachain (BERA) a connu une hausse spectaculaire de 73,47% en 24 heures, défiant la tendance baissière générale du marché crypto. Il a franchi des niveaux de résistance clés, passant de 0,5082 $ à un plus haut de 1,50 $. Au moment de l'analyse, il se négociait autour de 0,9114 $, avec une capitalisation boursière de 190,08 millions de dollars et un volume d'échange journalier en hausse de 404%, atteignant 1 milliard de dollars. Les indicateurs techniques suggèrent un contrôle croissant des haussiers. Le MACD affiche un momentum haussier, bien que le RSI à 85,43 indique un territoire suracheté, signalant un risque de correction à court terme. Le CMF à 0,09 montre une légère pression de vente. Les prochains niveaux de résistance et de support à surveiller sont respectivement 0,9156 $ et 0,9072 $.

Au 12 février, les graphiques rouges et verts ont pris position sur le marché des crypto-monnaies. Le sentiment général reste accroché à une peur extrême, et les actifs numériques évoluent avec prudence. Pendant ce temps, le Bitcoin (BTC) et l'Ethereum (ETH) restent en zone baissière. Sur la fine ligne haussière, Berachain (BERA) a explosé de 73,47 % en valeur sur les dernières 24 heures.

BERA a testé et franchi de manière convaincante ses niveaux de résistance cruciaux entre 0,5092 $ et 1,40 $. En début de journée, il s'échangeait à la baisse, à 0,5082 $, et avec la soudaine rencontre haussière sur le marché de Berachain, cela a déclenché une hausse du prix pour atteindre un plus haut à 1,50 $. Le récent bond va-t-il perdre son élan, ou a-t-il assez de marge pour continuer à monter ?

Au moment de la rédaction, Berachain s'échange dans la zone des 0,9114 $, avec une capitalisation boursière de 190,08 millions de dollars. De plus, le volume quotidien d'échanges a grimpé en flèche de plus de 404 %, atteignant la barre du milliard de dollars. Selon les données de Coinglass, le marché a connu une liquidation de 13,51 millions de dollars de BERA pendant cet intervalle.

Les bulls actifs de Berachain pourraient pousser le prix vers la résistance de la fourchette des 0,9135 $. Sous une pression haussière continue, le golden cross pourrait se produire, envoyant le prix de l'actif au-dessus de 0,9156 $. En supposant que les bears fassent leur entrée, le prix du BERA pourrait chuter et trouver le support initial autour de 0,9093 $. Le death cross pourrait émerger alors que la correction à la baisse se renforce. Le prix se replierait en dessous de 0,9072 $.

Les graphiques de Berachain indiquent un contrôle haussier croissant

La ligne de convergence/divergence des moyennes mobiles (MACD) a franchi la ligne de signal, ce qui indique un momentum haussier. Comme les deux lignes sont positionnées au-dessus de la ligne zéro, la tendance générale de Berachain est positive, en territoire haussier, et elle est fortement orientée à la hausse.

L'indicateur Chaikin Money Flow (CMF) de BERA se trouve à 0,09, suggérant une légère pression de vente sur le marché. Les capitaux sortent de l'actif, ce n'est pas profondément négatif, et la pression baissière est modérée plutôt qu'extrême. S'il baisse davantage, cela confirmera une tendance baissière solide.

De plus, la fenêtre de trading de 4 heures montre que l'indice de force relative (RSI) quotidien de Berachain est à 85,43, impliquant qu'il se trouve en territoire fortement suracheté. Avec un momentum d'achat intense, un risque accru de repli ou de correction à court terme est présent. La valeur Bull Bear Power (BBP) reposant à 0,536 laisse entrevoir la domination des bulls. Les acheteurs poussent le prix du BERA au-dessus de la moyenne récente. Si ce niveau se maintient ou augmente, il soutiendra probablement le momentum haussier continu à court terme.

Actualités crypto mises à jour

Hoskinson confirme le lancement du mainnet de Midnight en mars

Trending Cryptos

CitreaCTR

wrapped stUSDTWSTUSDT

Velodrome FinanceVELODROME

BrevisBREV

ZRX（0X）ZRX

The Impossible Trilemma Is Basically a Pseudo-Problem

The article argues that the core limitation of blockchain technology is not the scalability trilemma, but its fundamental lack of privacy, which acts as a barrier to institutional capital. It defines blockchain as a slow, expensive, shared computer whose primary value is "permissionlessness" (no administrator) and verifiable trust. While this is ideal for native financial assets like stable币, which now process trillions, two critical flaws remain for mainstream adoption: regulatory legitimacy and a default transparency that leaks all financial activity. The author contends that transparency is not a feature but a tax, quantified through MEV extraction, making the public ledger unusable for serious institutions. However, modern cryptography, specifically zero-knowledge proofs, now offers a solution: "provable privacy." This allows users to prove compliance (e.g., solvency, KYC) without revealing underlying data. This fusion of privacy and auditability resolves the transparency-compliant privacy-compliance dichotomy, enabling a purely upgraded system where transactions are verified but not broadcasted. Closing these flaws is presented as the essential bridge to onboard the next wave of trillions in capital.

marsbit39m ago

The Impossible Trilemma Is Basically a Pseudo-Problem

marsbit39m ago

The "Impossible Triad" Is Fundamentally a Pseudo-Problem

The article argues that blockchain's fundamental limitation is not the scalability trilemma (decentralization, scalability, security), which has been largely solved, but the lack of **privacy** and, until recently, clear **legitimacy**. Blockchain is described as a slow, expensive, globally shared computer whose core value is censorship resistance and verifiability. While ideal for native digital assets like money (e.g., stablecoins), its default transparency acts as a **tax**, exposing all transactions and enabling MEV extraction, which deters serious institutional capital. Simultaneously, its permissionless nature created regulatory ambiguity. The piece contends that **privacy** is the missing critical feature. It rejects the false choice between total transparency and complete anonymity. Modern cryptography (like zero-knowledge proofs) enables **compliant privacy**: users can prove facts (solvency, KYC status, compliance) without revealing the underlying sensitive data (specific holdings, identities). This preserves auditability for regulators and eliminates the leak of financial information. With recent regulatory progress (e.g., the GENIUS Act) addressing legitimacy, adding default, provably compliant privacy becomes a pure upgrade. It transforms blockchain from a costly, public ledger into a confidential settlement layer, finally bridging the gap to mainstream institutional and individual adoption of on-chain finance.

链捕手40m ago

The "Impossible Triad" Is Fundamentally a Pseudo-Problem

链捕手40m ago

Optical Chips: Collective Capacity Expansion

The global optical chip industry is experiencing a massive wave of expansion driven by surging AI data center demand. Major players across the US, Japan, Europe, and China are aggressively investing to ramp up production capacity. In the US, Coherent is expanding its 6-inch Indium Phosphide (InP) semiconductor fab in Texas, supported by CHIPS Act funding and a $2 billion strategic investment from NVIDIA. Lumentum is building a new factory for InP optical devices, and Nokia is scaling its advanced photonic chip packaging and testing capabilities. NVIDIA's investments aim to secure future supply of critical lasers and optical interconnect products for AI infrastructure. Japan's JX Advanced Metals, a leading InP substrate supplier, plans a multi-billion yen investment to increase its capacity 7-10 times, strengthening its grip on the crucial upstream materials market. In Europe, IQE and Tower Semiconductor settled a patent dispute and signed a multi-year InP epitaxial wafer supply agreement, highlighting that next-generation silicon photonics platforms will integrate high-performance InP components. STMicroelectronics and Sivers Semiconductors are also expanding silicon photonics production and partnerships. China is rapidly building out its domestic supply chain. Dongshan Precision's subsidiary, Source Photonics, announced a $12 billion project to expand optical chip and module production. Companies like Sanan Optoelectronics and Yunnan Germanium are scaling up InP chip manufacturing and substrate production, moving towards vertical integration from materials to modules. While debate continues around the exact future architecture—whether CPO (Co-Packaged Optics), NPO, or pluggables will dominate—analysts like Morgan Stanley argue the underlying driver is unchangeable: the explosive growth in bandwidth demand. This will inevitably increase the volume of optical engines, lasers, and related content per GPU, regardless of the final technical path. The competition for "more light" in the AI era has intensified into a global, full-chain capacity race.

marsbit2h ago

Optical Chips: Collective Capacity Expansion

marsbit2h ago

Stablecoins Finally Find Real Yield: An In-Depth Look at On-Chain Reinsurance Re | A Conversation with Re Founder Karan Saroya

Stablecoin Real Yield Found: A Deep Dive into On-Chain Reinsurance with Re's Karan Saroya As stablecoin supply exceeds $170 billion, the search for sustainable, non-speculative yield intensifies. Re, an on-chain reinsurance platform, provides an answer: connecting stablecoin capital to the trillion-dollar traditional reinsurance market. Re operates as a regulated reinsurer, accepting stablecoin deposits as collateral to back US insurance companies. These insurers pay premiums, generating yield that flows back to on-chain depositors. Currently supporting 35 insurers and underwriting $500 million, Re projects scaling to over $1 billion soon. Key insights from a Bankless podcast with founder Karan Saroya and investor Avichal of Electric Capital: 1. **Uncorrelated, Real-World Yield:** Re offers stablecoin holders access to reinsurance returns (targeting 12-14%+), an asset class entirely separate from crypto or equity markets. 2. **Operational Efficiency via Smart Contracts:** Re replaces traditional, labor-intensive capital fundraising with smart contracts, allowing a ~12-person team to compete with industry giants. 3. **Regulatory Leverage:** For every $1 of collateral, regulations allow backing $5-7 in written premiums. This leverage amplifies returns from the underlying risk-free rate. 4. **DeFi Integration:** Depositors receive receipt tokens, which can be used in protocols like Morpho for "looping," potentially pushing yields to 18-20%+. 5. **The "DeFi Mullet" Model:** A compliant front-end (regulated reinsurer) paired with a decentralized back-end (smart contracts, DeFi capital markets). 6. **RE Governance Token:** Modeled on Lloyd's of London, the token governs the central capital pool's allocation, counterparty acceptance, and parameters. 7. **Real Economic Impact:** Capital funds real-world productivity (factories, clinics, businesses) via insurance, moving beyond crypto's internal loops. The discussion highlights a pivotal moment: DeFi's supply-side infrastructure is now met by real demand for productive yield, potentially kickstarting a flywheel where vast on-chain stablecoin capital seeks these real-world returns.

链捕手4h ago

Stablecoins Finally Find Real Yield: An In-Depth Look at On-Chain Reinsurance Re | A Conversation with Re Founder Karan Saroya

链捕手4h ago

1996 or 1999? Walsh's First Test is 'How to View AI'

"1996 or 1999? Wall's First Big Test Is 'How to View AI'" Federal Reserve Chairman Wall's initial challenge is not whether to raise or cut rates, but a more fundamental judgment: what kind of boom is the current AI boom? This will determine the Fed's policy path and define his legacy. Economics is split between two opposing views, according to reporter Nick Timiraos. One sees imminent productivity gains that will increase supply and cool inflation, allowing the Fed to hold steady. The other argues that while productivity benefits are distant, demand shocks are here now, and waiting for data confirmation risks missing the intervention window, forcing sharper rate hikes later. Wall has signaled a leaning toward the first view, echoing 1996-era Alan Greenspan, who embraced strong, productivity-driven growth without fear of inflation. However, Wall faces a different macro environment than Greenspan did, with tariff pressures, expanding fiscal deficits, and diminishing globalization benefits, which could force more significant inflation pressures even if AI benefits materialize. Wall's logic, expressed before taking office, is that AI-driven productivity gains won't show in official data for years. If the Fed waits for confirmation, it might mistakenly tighten policy and choke off the very growth that could suppress inflation. This argues for using forward-looking narratives over lagging data. Chicago Fed President Austan Goolsbee presents a key counter-argument. He distinguishes between expected and unexpected productivity booms. A widely anticipated boom, like the current AI wave, can cause people to spend future wealth gains in advance, overheating the economy before productivity actually rises, thus requiring preemptive rate hikes. He cites rising costs for AI data centers as evidence of such overheating. Fed Governor Christopher Waller offers a rebuttal to Goolsbee, noting the "expected spending" mechanism only works if people can borrow against future income, which many households cannot do due to borrowing constraints. Wall also faces a paradox related to his desire to reduce the Fed's use of "forward guidance" (pre-announcing policy moves). This practice was established in 1999 when Greenspan began signaling hikes to avoid market shocks. If the economy follows a less optimistic path, Wall may be forced to choose between using the guidance he wants to abolish or risking market volatility by staying silent. The ultimate question defining Wall's first major test remains: Is this 1996 or 1999?

marsbit5h ago

1996 or 1999? Walsh's First Test is 'How to View AI'

marsbit5h ago

Trading

Spot

Futures

Hot Articles

How to Buy BERA

Welcome to HTX.com! We've made purchasing Berachain (BERA) simple and convenient. Follow our step-by-step guide to embark on your crypto journey.Step 1: Create Your HTX AccountUse your email or phone number to sign up for a free account on HTX. Experience a hassle-free registration journey and unlock all features.Get My AccountStep 2: Go to Buy Crypto and Choose Your Payment MethodCredit/Debit Card: Use your Visa or Mastercard to buy Berachain (BERA) instantly.Balance: Use funds from your HTX account balance to trade seamlessly.Third Parties: We've added popular payment methods such as Google Pay and Apple Pay to enhance convenience.P2P: Trade directly with other users on HTX.Over-the-Counter (OTC): We offer tailor-made services and competitive exchange rates for traders.Step 3: Store Your Berachain (BERA)After purchasing your Berachain (BERA), store it in your HTX account. Alternatively, you can send it elsewhere via blockchain transfer or use it to trade other cryptocurrencies.Step 4: Trade Berachain (BERA)Easily trade Berachain (BERA) on HTX's spot market. Simply access your account, select your trading pair, execute your trades, and monitor in real-time. We offer a user-friendly experience for both beginners and seasoned traders.

4.2k Total ViewsPublished 2025.02.07Updated 2026.06.02

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of BERA (BERA) are presented below.