Canada introduces stablecoin regulation framework in Federal budget: More inside

ambcryptoPubblicato 2025-11-05Pubblicato ultima volta 2025-11-06

Key Takeaways

How will the framework be funded?

The Bank of Canada will allocate $10 million over two years starting in 2026, plus $5 million annually from fees collected from regulated issuers.

Why does Canada see a need for stablecoin regulation now?

Stablecoins now make up about 30% of all crypto transactions, with global volumes surpassing $4 trillion, highlighting the need for stronger oversight.


Canada is taking a decisive step toward regulating digital finance.

As part of its 2025 Federal budget, the Canadian Department of Finance has proposed the country’s first national framework for fiat-backed stablecoins.

The plan, unveiled this week, would require all stablecoin issuers to hold sufficient asset reserves and establish clear redemption policies to protect users.

Canada’s Federal budget

Alongside financial safeguards, the proposal also introduces enhanced privacy and national security measures for digital transactions.

The budget noted, 

“The legislation will also include national security safeguards to support the integrity of the framework so that fiat-backed stablecoins are safe and secure for consumers and businesses to use.”

To support implementation, the Bank of Canada will allocate $10 million over two fiscal years starting in 2026, with an additional $5 million in annual operational costs funded by regulated issuers.

Stablecoins: The crypto showstopper

Needless to say, stablecoins have quickly become central to the global crypto economy. They now account for nearly 30% of all transactions and over $4 trillion in trading volume this year.

With over 90% pegged to the U.S. dollar, led by Tether [USDT] and Circle [USDC], Canada’s proposed framework arrives amid rising calls for stronger oversight to balance innovation with financial stability.

Additionally, Visa on-chain analytics data indicate a total transaction volume of nearly $$49.1 trillion, while Standard Chartered predicts that up to $1 trillion could shift from emerging market deposits into U.S. stablecoins by 2028. 

However, while the budget mentions “national security safeguards,” it provides few specifics on how they’ll be implemented.

Seeing this, experts are warning that even top stablecoins remain vulnerable to systemic shocks.

For instance, Chainalysis pointed to the TerraUSD collapse and major DeFi exploits in 2023 as proof of weak collateralization and smart contract security.

These events rippled across both DeFi and traditional markets, showing how fast instability can spread.

Therefore, as more banks adopt stablecoins, Chainalysis cautions that a major depegging or hack could trigger wider financial losses.

Was the GENIUS Act a catalyst or a blocker?

Canada’s proposed stablecoin framework also mirrors the U.S. GENIUS Act passed in mid-2025.

The GENIUS Act, backed by President Donald Trump, defined “payment stablecoins” and distinguished them from securities.

With the EU’s MiCA, Japan, and South Korea advancing similar rules, Canada joins a growing push for clarity.

But, while Canada moves toward embracing stablecoins under a regulated framework, not everyone shares the optimism.

The U.S. Bank Policy Institute (BPI) has recently renewed warnings about the potential risks of stablecoins and DeFi, citing recent market shocks like the $20 billion USDe depegging event as proof of their systemic threat.

BPI argues that leveraged yield farming and uninsured deposits could amplify liquidation risks, though critics claim banks are more concerned about losing deposits to higher-yield crypto products.

However, despite the skepticism, the stablecoin market continues to expand rapidly suggesting that, regulation or not, global adoption is already well underway.

Share

Letture associate

Google CEO Admits Lagging Behind in Coding

Google CEO Sundar Pichai acknowledged in a recent interview that Google's Gemini AI models are currently "lagging behind" in coding capabilities, particularly for complex, long-horizon tasks requiring advanced developer expertise. He noted the field is advancing at an "unprecedented" pace, where 30-60 days now brings changes equivalent to five years in the past. Pichai expressed that achieving Artificial General Intelligence (AGI) now seems closer than previously imagined due to rapid progress. While highlighting strengths in text, multimodal, and reasoning tasks, Pichai admitted competitors like Anthropic and OpenAI have focused more intently on coding. He emphasized Google's commitment to catching up, citing internal tools like Antigravity 2.0 and the newly released Gemini 3.5 Flash, which aims to address previous shortcomings. Regarding Google Search's AI-driven overhaul, Pichai stated changes will be gradual to align with user needs, not disrupt the core search experience or its advertising model. He addressed public AI anxiety as understandable, given the technology's potential to reshape jobs and society, but remained optimistic about AI augmenting human capabilities and creating new opportunities. Pichai stressed the need for broad societal dialogue and responsible development as AI approaches more advanced, potentially recursive self-improvement stages. He affirmed Google's long-term commitment to leading in AI while navigating its profound implications responsibly.

marsbit6 min fa

Google CEO Admits Lagging Behind in Coding

marsbit6 min fa

The Paradox of Automation: The Stronger the AI, the Busier Humans Become

The Paradox of Automation: The more powerful AI becomes, the more work humans have to do. This article, based on observations from AI-heavy company Every, argues that while AI agents automate tasks like coding, writing, and customer service, they don't eliminate human jobs. Instead, they transform work and create *more* demand for human expertise. AI commoditizes "yesterday's human capabilities" by cheaply generating code, text, and images from past data. This leads to an abundance of similar, generic outputs. Consequently, what becomes scarce and valuable is human judgment in the present moment: knowing *what* is worth doing, *why*, and *how* to do it well. The article identifies two collaboration models: "Agent employees" for delegated tasks and "human-AI collaboration" within tools like Claude Code for complex work. In both cases, humans are essential to set direction, judge quality, and maintain systems. As AI makes execution cheap, human roles shift from executors to designers, reviewers, and meaning-makers. The author addresses "benchmark anxiety" by explaining that AI excels within specific, human-defined problem "frames." As AI masters one frame (e.g., code rewriting), new, more complex frames emerge (e.g., deciding *when* to rewrite). This creates an ongoing cycle where AI chases the frames, but humans remain the "framers." Even with advanced AGI, this dynamic may persist as long as AI lacks true human-like agency and self-directed purpose. The core paradox holds: automation amplifies the need for the very human judgment it seems to replace.

marsbit1 h fa

The Paradox of Automation: The Stronger the AI, the Busier Humans Become

marsbit1 h fa

a16z: 7 Charts to Understand How Tokenization is Changing the Nature of Assets

"a16z: 7 Charts on How Tokenization is Changing the Nature of Assets" Tokenized Assets (or Real-World Assets - RWA) are transforming asset forms, liquidity, and financial system construction. The market recently surpassed $30 billion, stabilizing around $34 billion (excluding stablecoins), representing a tenfold increase in less than two years, driven by clearer regulations, mature institutional infrastructure, and increased financial institution adoption. The primary driver of recent growth is tokenized U.S. Treasury bonds. These offer investors efficient, flexible digital access to yield-bearing assets and improve institutional operations like settlement and collateral management. Other asset classes show varied growth: asset-backed credit leads, followed by niche financial assets (e.g., reinsurance, mining notes), while venture capital took longer to scale. Market segmentation shows high concentration. In commodities, tokenized gold dominates (~$5 billion), as its standardized, storable nature fits tokenization well. Bonds are the largest category ($15.2B), but only ~5% are used in DeFi protocols. Conversely, smaller niches like reinsurance tokens see high (~84%) on-chain utilization, highlighting a core industry divide: most current tokenized assets are merely digitized records for easier holding/transfer, lacking the "composability" (free combination/interaction) that is key to blockchain-native finance. The ecosystem is distributed across multiple blockchains, with Ethereum hosting over half the value ($15.7B), followed by BNB Chain, Solana, and others. Future market size predictions vary widely (e.g., $2-$30 trillion by 2030+), but all indicate massive potential from the current small base. Tokenized assets currently represent minuscule fractions of their global counterparts (e.g., 0.01% of global bonds). The current phase focuses on digitizing straightforward assets. The next challenge is to bring more complex financial components on-chain and deeply integrate tokenized assets into composable, internet-native financial infrastructure.

链捕手2 h fa

a16z: 7 Charts to Understand How Tokenization is Changing the Nature of Assets

链捕手2 h fa

a16z: How Tokenization is Transforming the Nature of Assets in 7 Charts

"Tokenized Assets: How Tokenization Changes the Nature of Assets" by a16z Crypto The market for tokenized assets, excluding stablecoins, has grown from under $3 billion two years ago to over $340 billion today. US Treasury bonds are the primary growth driver, allowing investors to hold yield-bearing assets digitally and enabling more efficient settlement. Other key sectors include private credit (growing fastest), commodities (dominated by gold), and niche financial assets. However, the market remains concentrated in tokenized US Treasuries and gold. A critical insight is that most tokenized assets currently lack "composability." While the total market is large, only a small fraction is actively used within DeFi protocols. For instance, only about 5% of tokenized bonds and a low percentage of tokenized gold are utilized on-chain. In contrast, assets like reinsurance and private credit tokens show much higher on-chain usage rates (84% and 33%, respectively). This highlights a divide: many tokenized assets are merely digital records on a blockchain without enabling new, programmable financial applications. The Pantera Capital Token Native Index indicates over 70% of tokenized assets have minimal on-chain native functionality. Ethereum remains the dominant blockchain for tokenized assets (over $150B), but the ecosystem is diversifying across chains like BNB Chain, Solana, and Stellar, based on factors like cost and compliance. Major institutions forecast massive future growth, with predictions for the tokenized asset market ranging from $2 trillion to over $30 trillion by the early 2030s. However, compared to the global financial system (e.g., ~$140T bonds, multi-trillion dollar gold market), tokenized assets currently represent a tiny fraction (0.01% or less). The conclusion is that while tokenization has begun by digitizing and streamlining settlement for simpler assets, the next phase involves bringing more complex financial instruments on-chain and deeply integrating them into composable, internet-native financial infrastructure.

Odaily星球日报2 h fa

a16z: How Tokenization is Transforming the Nature of Assets in 7 Charts

Odaily星球日报2 h fa

The Revived Codex, Carrying OpenAI's Hopes for IPO

This article analyzes the intense recent development of OpenAI's Codex, positioning it as a crucial component for OpenAI's impending IPO. Over the past two months, Codex has seen a rapid series of major updates focused on integrating into real enterprise workflows. Key new features include enhanced context capture (Appshots, file previews, built-in browser), long-running task execution ("Goal Mode"), remote operation (phone control, lock-screen access), and enterprise management tools (plugin sharing, access tokens, automated risk review). These updates aim to make Codex a comprehensive AI workbench that can "see the scene, push tasks, and manage risks." The author argues that while ChatGPT proves OpenAI's massive user base and API provides foundational revenue, Codex represents OpenAI's clearest path to demonstrating tangible, high-value commercial viability. It targets developers and engineering teams—a segment already accustomed to paying for efficiency gains in costly software development cycles. This is critical because, despite higher overall revenue, OpenAI's adjusted operating margins remain deeply negative, highlighting the challenge of outrunning immense compute costs. The pressure is amplified by competitor Anthropic's success with Claude Code, which has shown that a focused approach on high-value enterprise and developer workflows can lead to a path toward profitability. Codex's aggressive evolution is thus seen as OpenAI's strategic move to capture a similar enterprise-ready, revenue-generating narrative essential for its market debut. In essence, "ChatGPT proved OpenAI has users. Codex needs to prove OpenAI is a business that can make money."

marsbit3 h fa

The Revived Codex, Carrying OpenAI's Hopes for IPO

marsbit3 h fa

Trading

Spot
Futures
活动图片