F2Pool’s Chun Wang Rejects BIP-444 Proposal as Debate Intensifies

TheCryptoTimesPublished on 2025-10-28Last updated on 2025-10-28

F2Pool co-founder Chun Wang has strongly opposed the new Bitcoin proposal known as BIP-444, calling it “a bad idea.” He said he won’t support any kind of soft fork, whether it’s meant to be temporary or permanent. His comments have stirred fresh debate in the Bitcoin community since the proposal aims to reduce spam on the network by making short-term technical changes. 

Wang, who attracted media attention earlier this year after becoming the first Bitcoiner to travel to space, criticized developers for “moving further in the wrong direction,” warning that short-term network fixes could harm Bitcoin’s long-term integrity. His remarks come as growing tensions surround the balance between innovation and decentralization within Bitcoin’s core development. 

Developers Clash Over BIP-444

Soon after Wang’s statement, Bitcoin Core developer Luke Dashjr responded sharply. “Users decide protocol changes, not miners. You going to repeat Bitmain’s 2017 mistakes?” he asked on X. His comment referenced Bitcoin’s 2017 SegWit2x fork battle that split the community.

Another developer, Timón of Philus, shared similar doubts. “Still haven’t read the proposal but, in principle, a temporary softfork doesn’t seem like a good idea to me,” he wrote. Luke later clarified his view, saying, “It’s not a good change. It’s a heavy handed restriction to protect Bitcoin while we come up with a good change.”

Industry Voices Join the Debate

Alex Thorn, head of research at Galaxy, described BIP-444 as “incredibly stupid” and even framed it as an “attack” on Bitcoin. Meanwhile, Bitcoin analyst James Check argued that the proposal is “highly defective” and “antithetical” to Bitcoin’s principles. “I don’t think anyone serious can read that BIP and come out believing that is a good result for Bitcoin,” he said.

Interestingly, the two key figures, Wang and Dashjr, have a long history of public interaction. In 2021, Wang donated 1 BTC to Dashjr after he posted about financial struggles. However, their relationship has since soured. Earlier this month, Dashjr accused F2Pool of compromising the Bitcoin network by potentially exposing users to illegal content, urging miners to move to pools like Foundry or Antpool.

The heated debate over BIP-444 highlights the growing division within the Bitcoin community. Some believe the change could protect the network, while others worry it might go against Bitcoin’s original goal of staying open and truly decentralized.

Also Read: American Bitcoin Purchases 1,414 BTC, increasing holdings to 3,865 BTC


Mobile Only ImageMobile Only Image

Trending Cryptos

Related Reads

Arca Chief Investment Officer: How Should Tokens Be Valued Once Protocols Start Earning Money?

Title: Arca CIO: How Should Tokens Be Valued When Protocols Start Making Money? Summary: For over a decade, Arca has argued that digital assets should be valued based on fundamentals and future cash flows, just like traditional investments. While tokens are not stocks, basic investment principles still apply. Many decentralized protocols (e.g., Hyperliquid, Aave) are now generating significant, real revenue with high margins. However, protocol revenue alone does not automatically translate to token value. Unlike equity holders who have a legal claim on company assets and future cash flows (via dividends, buybacks, or acquisitions), token holders often lack a clear, enforceable path to receive value from protocol profits. Therefore, the critical link between protocol economics and token economics is even more important. A credible mechanism must exist for value to eventually flow to token holders, with token buybacks being one clear, direct method. Capital allocation is now a key issue for profitable protocols. Like growing companies, protocols should reinvest profits when returns on investment are high. However, this reinvestment only delays value capture; it cannot replace it indefinitely. Investors must believe that eventually, surplus capital will be returned. For example, two protocols with identical revenues should not trade at the same valuation multiple if one has a credible buyback mechanism and the other does not. As the market increasingly accepts this valuation framework, a major opportunity exists. Protocols with strong fundamentals and value-capture mechanisms may see their valuation multiples expand significantly as the historical discount for token-based assets narrows. Crypto investment is finally maturing into fundamental analysis, focusing on revenue growth, margins, competitive advantages, reinvestment returns, and credible paths for profit distribution to token holders.

marsbit44m ago

Arca Chief Investment Officer: How Should Tokens Be Valued Once Protocols Start Earning Money?

marsbit44m ago

SEC Proposal a ‘Significant’ Step Forward From ‘Ill-Suited’ Crypto Rules: Commissioner Peirce

A U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) commissioner, Hester M. Peirce, has called a new SEC proposal a significant improvement over what she termed a "misfit" set of crypto rules. Peirce stated that a whole generation has struggled due to the SEC's insistence on applying unsuitable regulations to cryptocurrencies, but the new proposal moves toward "clear, sensible, and enforceable rules for crypto offerings." SEC Chairman Paul S. Atkins also welcomed the initiative, noting in a separate statement that the agency's previous enforcement-heavy approach had driven investment overseas, limiting investor protections domestically. The proposal, announced on Tuesday, outlines new rules aimed at creating a clear and purposeful framework for certain investment contracts involving crypto assets, designed to allow organizations to raise capital while protecting investors. This move comes shortly after the U.S. Senate failed to advance the comprehensive Digital Asset Market Clarity (CLARITY) Act. Atkins had previously stated the SEC was prepared to develop rules for digital assets if the Senate could not pass the CLARITY Act. Meanwhile, Galaxy Digital has lowered its estimated odds of the CLARITY Act passing by 2026 to just 10%, citing numerous unresolved policy questions and the Senate's limited time—only about two to three weeks after reconvening on September 14—to pass it.

cryptonews.ru1h ago

SEC Proposal a ‘Significant’ Step Forward From ‘Ill-Suited’ Crypto Rules: Commissioner Peirce

cryptonews.ru1h ago

Trading

Spot

Hot Articles

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of S (S) are presented below.

活动图片