Hayes’ New Essay “Four, Seven” Expands Trump’s Fed Takeover

TheCryptoTimesPublished on 2025-09-23Last updated on 2025-09-23

Arthur Hayes, Co-Founder of BitMEX, has released a fiery new essay titled “Four, Seven” following his Korea Blockchain Week (KBW) speech, where he analyzed what he calls a looming Donald Trump-led takeover of the Federal Reserve. 

In his piece, Hayes linked U.S. President Trump’s political strategy with Buffalo Bill Bessent’s economic vision—one that seeks to reshape U.S. credit creation through yield curve control (YCC).

The 1940s blueprint: Yield curve control then vs. now

Hayes began by drawing parallels with World War II, when the Treasury subsumed the Fed between 1942 and 1951. Back then, the Fed capped Treasury bill yields at 0.675% and long bonds (10–25 years) at 2.5%, producing a steep yield curve.

By contrast, today’s curve is flatter, with both short-term and long-term rates higher than wartime levels. Hayes argued that a steep curve favors regional banks, enabling them to profitably lend to small and medium enterprises (SMEs), which account for nearly 46% of U.S. employment. Under current conditions, however, credit is channeled toward large corporations via debt markets, sidelining Main Street.

Bessent’s Vision: Credit Creation for SMEs

According to Hayes, Buffalo Bill Bessent wants to shift credit power from the Fed and Wall Street institutions to regional banks. He frames this as elevating “Main Street over Wall Street.” Hayes cheekily dubs it “QE for Poor People.”

A steep yield curve, Hayes argues, would revive SME lending, helping industries retool for what he suggests could be another cycle of U.S. military and industrial expansion, from “Baghdad to Caracas.” 

At the same time, fixing long-term yields would slash government interest costs, enabling unlimited Treasury issuance. The catch: the dollar would weaken, giving American exports an edge against China, Germany, and Japan.

How Trump could seize the Fed

The key obstacle, Hayes shared, is the Fed itself. To implement YCC, Trump would need loyalists on two boards:

  • The Federal Reserve Board of Governors (FBOG) controls the Interest on Reserve Balances (IORB) and discount window rates.
  • The Federal Open Market Committee (FOMC) controls the money printer, formally the System Open Market Account (SOMA).

Trump needs a four-seat majority on the FBOG, which would then allow him to influence FOMC membership through district bank presidents. With seven votes, he could control SOMA and lock in bond purchases.

Hayes pointed out that Trump is already halfway there. Governors Michelle Bowman and Christopher Waller dissented at the July 2025 FOMC meeting, siding with dovish policy. Adriana Kugler’s resignation, followed by the appointment of Stephen Miran, gave Trump a third ally. 

Hayes suggested that Governor Lisa Cook may be forced out over alleged mortgage irregularities, with the Department of Justice (DOJ) potentially pushing for an indictment. That would hand Trump his fourth vote.

The Fed politics at play

Once Trump commands the FBOG, Hayes argued, he can force the FOMC to comply by lowering IORB beneath Fed Funds, creating arbitrage opportunities for banks that would compel policy alignment. District Fed presidents up for re-election in 2025—from Cleveland, Minneapolis, Dallas, and Philadelphia—would also face pressure, since the FBOG must approve them.

By mid-2026, Hayes predicted Trump could cement control over both boards, setting the stage for a new “Treasury-Fed Accord” with full-blown money printing and yield curve control.

The Bitcoin Angle: $3.4 Million by 2028?

Hayes then shifts to the impact on markets. He estimates Treasury issuance of $15.32 trillion through 2028, with the Fed likely buying at least 50%. Add bank credit expansion, and he projects $15.229 trillion in new credit. 

Using COVID-era correlations, Hayes calculates Bitcoin could hit $3.4 million by 2028, though he tempers expectations, saying the real takeaway is directional: higher, much higher, than today’s $115,000.

Hayes’ Closing: “These Crackers Ain’t Playin’”

Framing this shift as another chapter in America’s historical pattern of drastic policy pivots under pressure, Hayes argues that Trump and Bessent are prepared to do whatever it takes to reindustrialize the U.S. For him, that means only one trade makes sense: being “long as f*** Bitcoin, shitcoins, gold bullion, and miners.”

Also Read: Bitcoin Will Break $200K, Four-Year Cycle Is Dead: Arthur Hayes


Mobile Only Image

Trending Cryptos

Related Reads

The Full Story of How Crypto Unicorn Blockstream Is Mired in Serious Fraud Allegations

This article details serious allegations of fraud against Bitcoin infrastructure company Blockstream, founded by Bitcoin pioneer Adam Back. In June 2024, investigative account NatInfoSec published a report accusing Blockstream's mining note (BMN) program of potentially operating a multi-billion dollar scheme with Ponzi-like characteristics. The core allegations focus on Blockstream Mining Notes (BMNs), which offer investors fixed annual yields up to approximately 20% from Bitcoin mining. NatInfoSec's investigation raises several key issues: 1. **Suspicious Hashrate & Payout Capacity**: The analysis suggests Blockstream would need 20-45 EH/s of mining power to cover its BMN obligations, but its public dashboard shows only around 15 EH/s. Furthermore, no verifiable public evidence (e.g., grid connection records, import data) was found to support the massive mining operation required. 2. **Questionable Payout Source**: The BMN contract allows Blockstream to use Bitcoin from *any source* (Substitute Performance BTC) to fulfill investor payouts, raising concerns that payouts may not come from actual mining revenue. 3. **High-Risk, Fixed Returns**: Offering ~20% fixed yields in the volatile, cyclical Bitcoin mining industry is viewed as highly unusual and requires clear explanation. 4. **Undisclosed Criminal Record of Key Figure**: Christopher William Cook, a key figure in Blockstream's mining operations and CEO of spin-off Exacore, was found to have a federal felony conviction for mail fraud in 2008, a fact not disclosed in BMN offering documents. His background was also allegedly embellished. 5. **Potential Contagion to BSTR SPAC**: Questions were raised about whether these liabilities and Cook's record should have been disclosed in the SEC filings for Bitcoin Standard Treasury Company (BSTR), a separate Adam Back-associated firm planning a SPAC merger. The crypto community is divided. BitMEX Research validated Cook's criminal record and expressed concern over the high yields but found other evidence lacking or misleading, noting the legal separation between BMN, Blockstream, and BSTR. Blockstream defenders, like Samson Mow, argue the mining is real. Critics, however, emphasize the lack of independent, verifiable proof of the mining operation's scale and the true source of investor payouts. The article concludes that BMN remains shrouded in key unanswered questions regarding its actual size, the verifiability of its underlying mining assets and payouts, the source of its high yields, and the full role and disclosure concerning Chris Cook. Blockstream had not issued a comprehensive response at the time of writing.

marsbit1h ago

The Full Story of How Crypto Unicorn Blockstream Is Mired in Serious Fraud Allegations

marsbit1h ago

The Full Story Behind Encryption Unicorn Blockstream's Deep Entanglement in Serious Fraud Allegations

This article details allegations of serious fraud surrounding the crypto company Blockstream, founded by Bitcoin pioneer Adam Back. Investigation account NatInfoSec accuses Blockstream of raising billions through its Blockstream Mining Note (BMN) products, which offer high fixed yields of up to 20% from purported mining revenue. The core allegations are: 1) Blockstream's public mining hash rate (15 EH/s) appears insufficient to cover the massive payout obligations from sold BMN notes, raising questions about the true source of investor payouts. 2) Key executive Christopher William Cook, central to the mining operations, has a prior federal conviction for mail fraud, a fact not disclosed to investors. Cook's background and lavish lifestyle are highlighted as red flags. 3) The structure allows payouts from any source of BTC, not necessarily mining revenue, which critics argue gives it Ponzi-like characteristics. The controversy also touches on Bitcoin Standard Treasury Company (BSTR), a related entity planning a SPAC上市. Critics question whether BMN's liabilities and Cook's record should be disclosed in BSTR's filings. BitMEX Research offered a tempered analysis, confirming Cook's criminal record is likely true and the high yields concerning, but found other claims like insufficient抵押证据 less substantiated. Community debate centers on the need for verifiable proof of Blockstream's mining output and revenue. The article concludes that while fraud is not proven, BMN presents significant, unresolved questions regarding its actual scale, the source of its high fixed returns, the verifiability of its mining operations and payouts, and the full disclosure of associated risks and personnel backgrounds. Blockstream has not yet issued a formal response.

链捕手2h ago

The Full Story Behind Encryption Unicorn Blockstream's Deep Entanglement in Serious Fraud Allegations

链捕手2h ago

Trading

Spot
Futures

Hot Articles

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of S (S) are presented below.

活动图片