SOL价格稳住，资金流向揭晓：谁是生态赢家？

比推Published on 2025-09-17Last updated on 2025-09-17

时隔 6 个多月，SOL 价格 终于重回 240 美元上方（昨日最高涨至近 250 美元，发文时回落 234 美元），而细数此次的上涨，原因主要有三：一是随着 SOL Strategies 等 DAT 财库储备公司阵营的日渐壮大，SOL 市场需求进一步扩大；二是经历了此前的价格低估，SOL 的持仓进一步集中；三是 PUMP 等 Solana 生态代币及 Meme 币短暂回暖，为 SOL 带来了新一轮的消耗场景。

Odaily 星球日报此前曾于 《ETH 单日暴涨近 12%，一般哪些山寨币会跟涨？》 一文中梳理“ ETH 跟涨概念代币”，2 个月后的今天来看，多个代币均有不同程度的上涨，胜率初步预估在 60%~70%左右（尤以 LINK 16.92-至高 28.86 美元、WLD 1.11-至高 2.21 美元、DOGE 0.21-至高 0.3 美元表现亮眼），基于同样的生态溢出效应，特于本文分享潜在上涨标的，供读者参考。注：以下内容不构成投资建议，一切请 DYOR。

Solana 生态基建代币：JUP、RAY、KMNO

尽管 DeFi 赛道发展相较以太坊生态稍显落寞，但 Solana 生态基础设施建设仍然存在一大批优秀项目。当然，产品优秀并不代表着项目代币价格表现同样优秀（如 Wormhole-W），但项目却是代币价格表现的基础支撑。

有鉴于此，Solana 生态基建中的重要组成部分——聚合平台 Jupiter（JUP）、DEX 平台 Raydium（RAY）、借贷平台 Kamino（KMNO）是主要的潜在待涨标的。

价格列表（截止 9 月 15 日撰稿时）如下——

  • KMNO： 0.067 美元；

  • JUP： 0.52 美元；

  • RAY： 3.3 美元。

Solana Meme 向代表币：PUMP、PENGU、BONK、TRUMP

作为率先开启 Meme 币热潮的区块链生态，Solana 网络的现象级 Meme 币数量无疑处于领先地位。但行业发展到 2025 年下半年，仍然活跃在场上的代表性 Meme 币并不算多，所以我们只挑选了较具有代表性的 3 个标的：

因“直播发币”模式迎来项目第二春的 Pump.fun（PUMP）；

主打“IP+实体+生态建设”的 Pudgy Penguins（PENGU）；

主打“社区型 Meme 币+发币平台”的 BONK（BONK）。

此外，考虑到美国总统特朗普在美联储降息发挥的关键作用，TRUMP 或具备一定时期内的短期炒作价值。

价格列表（截止 9 月 15 日撰稿时）如下——

  • PUMP： 0.0076 美元；

  • PENGU： 0.033 美元；

  • BONK： 0.000022 美元。

  • TURMP： 8.57 美元。

Solana 生态新兴赛道代币：HUMA、STONKS

得益于 Solana 生态的低成本运行环境，其一直都是新兴赛道的实验田。在 PayFi、美股代币化方面，Solana 生态项目中的 Huma Finance、MyStonks 均具备一定的长期看涨价值。

价格列表（截止 9 月 15 日撰稿时）如下——

  • HUMA： 0.0255 美元；

  • STONKS： 0.026 美元。

Solana 生态 DePIN 赛道代币：CUDIS、ROAM

DePIN 同样是 Solana 生态持续建设的赛道之一，尽管受限于行业叙事接受度、市场传播影响力等因素，相关项目仍然并未迎来大规模爆发，但仍然具备一定的短中期炒作价值。因此，我们特选择了 2 个具备一定代表性的项目——智能运动设备项目 Cudis（CUDIS）与虚拟漫游通信卡项目 Roam（ROAM）。

价格列表（截止 9 月 15 日撰稿时）如下——

  • CUDIS： 0.13 美元；

  • ROAM： 0.11 美元。

结语：Solana 生态仍未找到主线

除去以上代币以外，Solana 生态 DeFi 项目 Saros（SAROS-0.4 美元）、生态基建 Pyth Network（PYTH-0.16 美元）、预测市场相关项目 Polyfacts（POLYFACTS-0.0063 美元）均值得短中期内关注后续走势，但综合整体生态来看，Solana 网络仍未找到类似以太坊生态的 DeFi 生态主线。

结合 Solana 生态稳定币发行量突破 133 亿美元的历史新高等消息来看，或许 SOL 的代币新高仍需 Solana 财库上市公司的大力买入，以及 Solana 现货 ETF 等重大利好消息的刺激，而非和生态项目的相互成就。

Twitter：https://twitter.com/BitpushNewsCN

比推 TG 交流群：https://t.me/BitPushCommunity

比推 TG 订阅： https://t.me/bitpush

原文链接:https://www.panewslab.com/zh/articles/93c9157a-d4f4-40c2-a6b9-12008be7f539
说明: 比推所有文章只代表作者观点，不构成投资建议
相关新闻

Related Reads

When Futu Turns into a Matchmaking Corner: Overseas Identity Becomes the Hard Currency for the Middle Class

When Futu Becomes a Matchmaking Corner: Overseas Status as the New Hard Currency for China's Middle Class Following a severe penalty announcement from Chinese regulators on May 22nd targeting offshore brokerages like Futu, its app community unexpectedly transformed into an impromptu matchmaking platform. Users posted相亲 (matchmaking) requests, explicitly seeking partners with overseas residency or citizenship, revealing a stark new reality: for China's middle class, an overseas identity has become a crucial asset. The regulatory crackdown, which restricts mainland Chinese residents from opening new accounts to buy overseas securities like US stocks, has sharply escalated the value of a foreign passport or permanent residency. This status now acts as a gateway to global asset allocation—including US equities, offshore property, and foreign currency deposits—effectively becoming a new form of "hard currency." Its scarcity, non-transferability (except through marriage, inheritance, etc.), and role as a hedge against domestic uncertainty have driven its premium. The article traces the evolution of how China's middle class views overseas resources: from an investment for opportunity (2000s), to risk diversification (2010s), and now to a mandatory "insurance policy" for financial access. With the regulatory window closing for many, the demand is shifting towards securing such status for the next generation through international education. The surreal scene of high-performing investors posting dating resumes underscores a 2026 where financial talent can be secondary to the right passport.

marsbit25m ago

When Futu Turns into a Matchmaking Corner: Overseas Identity Becomes the Hard Currency for the Middle Class

marsbit25m ago

Understanding Bound in One Article: The "Multi-signature + Timelock" Escape Mechanism and the Off-Chain Matching Black Box

**Title**: Understanding Bound: The Escape Mechanism of "Multi-Sig + Time Lock" and the Off-Chain Matching Black Box **Summary**: Bound Exchange, evolved from the earlier radFi platform, introduces a novel approach to Bitcoin trading by combining self-custody security with exchange-like speed. Its core mechanism relies on a 2-of-2 multi-signature (multi-sig) address for user deposits. One private key is held by the user via a passkey, and the other is held by Bound. This setup requires both keys to sign any transaction, preventing Bound from unilaterally accessing user funds (non-custodial). To address the risk of Bound becoming unavailable, a 3-month timelock is integrated into the Bitcoin script. After this period, users can withdraw their assets with just their single signature, ensuring an escape hatch. For trading, Bound operates a concentrated liquidity AMM. However, as Bitcoin L1 lacks smart contracts, the AMM curve, liquidity management, and trade price calculations occur off-chain in Bound's backend database. On-chain Bitcoin transactions serve only as final settlement receipts for pre-determined amounts. This creates a centralization point: the critical sequence of trade execution—which determines the exact price along the curve for each order—is managed off-chain by Bound in a non-transparent "black box." While the 2-of-2 setup protects user本金 (principal), the pricing and ordering of trades introduce potential operational MEV risks, as the order processing is invisible and unverifiable on-chain. In practice, users can also connect external wallets (like Unisat) for fully self-custodied trading, but this requires manually signing every transaction. The platform currently supports deposits of BTC and Runes only.

marsbit30m ago

Understanding Bound in One Article: The "Multi-signature + Timelock" Escape Mechanism and the Off-Chain Matching Black Box

marsbit30m ago

Amid Internal and External Challenges, Is Ethereum's Neutral Route Still Viable?

"Ethereum is facing a dual crisis of market pressure and internal challenges. Its native token ETH is in a mid-term downtrend, with negative sentiment prevailing, weak price action, and significant outflows from ETFs. The ETH/BTC ratio has hit a ten-month low, and institutional holdings have shrunk. Concurrently, the Ethereum Foundation has seen a major exodus of core personnel following its commitment to a neutral, non-commercial development roadmap focused on censorship resistance, openness, privacy, and security (CROPS). This stance has sparked debate. Critics, including former members, argue that the ecosystem lacks a dedicated, well-funded entity to promote ETH's commercial value and compete with rival chains. Proposals suggest creating a new, independent body to drive adoption and token value, forming a dual-model with the Foundation. While some investors view the personnel changes as normal turnover and remain bullish on Ethereum's long-term fundamentals, the immediate path forward is unclear. Analysts believe Ethereum must execute its technical roadmap (like upcoming upgrades), clarify governance, and focus on high-value sectors like DeFi and tokenization to convert its technological edge into a compelling investment thesis. The current downturn tests whether its decentralized model can adapt to balance core principles with commercial competitiveness."

marsbit36m ago

Amid Internal and External Challenges, Is Ethereum's Neutral Route Still Viable?

marsbit36m ago

Technology Has No Barriers, 24/7 Trading is the Key to Hyperliquid's Success

The article argues that Hyperliquid's competitive edge lies not in technological superiority but in its 24/7 trading model, which fundamentally challenges traditional finance's fixed market hours. Based in Singapore with an 11-person team, Hyperliquid has generated significant revenue and trading volume. Its core advantage is the ability to facilitate trading continuously, including during weekends when major exchanges like the CME are closed. This was demonstrated when Hyperliquid listed a SpaceX pre-IPO perpetual contract on a Sunday, allowing the market to price the company hours before traditional institutions opened. This disruption has drawn regulatory scrutiny from traditional giants like CME and ICE, who cite risks like lack of KYC and market manipulation. However, the article suggests their concern stems from Hyperliquid eroding the "time monopoly" of established markets. The piece contrasts Hyperliquid's synthetic derivatives—pure price-betting contracts with no underlying asset or centralized issuer—with other models like PreStocks (dependent on real股权) and Ondo (licensed but targetable). Hyperliquid's code-based, decentralized structure makes it resilient to takedowns, even if founders face legal action. Ultimately, the author concludes that while it raises legitimate regulatory questions, Hyperliquid's "unforgeable" competitive barrier is the time advantage of non-stop trading, a feature legacy systems cannot replicate.

marsbit36m ago

Technology Has No Barriers, 24/7 Trading is the Key to Hyperliquid's Success

marsbit36m ago

New Information Laundering in Prediction Markets: How Secrets Blend into Investment Signals

"The New Information Laundering in Prediction Markets: How Secrets Infiltrate Investment Signals In late February 2026, nine linked anonymous wallets on Polymarket placed over 80 bets on specific details of a US-Iran war, winning over $2.4 million with a 98% win rate. This exemplifies 'information laundering'—a destructive flaw inherent to prediction markets. These markets function by aggregating trader supply and demand on an order book to set prices, which represent collective probability estimates. This makes them valuable real-time sentiment indicators for institutions. However, the system cannot distinguish between public information and stolen secrets. Confidential information enters one end, and 'clean' market prices—bearing no trace of their illicit origin—emerge from the other. For example, an insider knowing of an imminent strike can buy contracts at low odds, pushing the price up and disguising the secret as a savvy market signal, then profit massively when the event occurs. Analysts can sometimes uncover these schemes due to the blockchain's transparency, as seen with Bubblemaps. Paradoxically, this same transparency can inadvertently broadcast secrets to adversarial observers, providing them with low-cost intelligence. Current laws, like insider trading regulations focused on corporate information, fail to address this issue, especially concerning events like military actions with no 'issuer.' Jurisdictional challenges are amplified as platforms operate offshore, easily bypassing national bans with VPNs. Recent US congressional investigations and proposed bills aim to ban war betting and trading on non-public information by officials. The core issue is that information laundering is not a bug but a feature: a market that perfectly converts knowledge into price will inherently reward those with the best information, including those who obtained it illicitly. As prediction markets grow, potentially reaching hundreds of billions in volume, society must confront whether it can tolerate a machine that profitably transforms its most guarded secrets into public, tradable numbers."

链捕手44m ago

New Information Laundering in Prediction Markets: How Secrets Blend into Investment Signals

链捕手44m ago

Trading

Spot
Futures

Hot Articles

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of SOL (SOL) are presented below.

活动图片

Top Questions

Hot Categoriesright-arrow

Hot Tagsright-arrow