Tether 推出美国合规稳定币 USAT,与 Circle 一较高下?

深潮Published on 2025-09-14Last updated on 2025-09-15

USAT 预计于 2025 年底前正式上线,初期对美国居民、企业和机构用户开放。

撰文:1912212.eth,Foresight News

9 月 12 日,Tether 宣布推出全新稳定币 USAT,这是一款专为美国市场设计的、完全合规的美元支持稳定币。同时宣布任命 Bo Hines 为未来美国 Tether USAT 的首席执行官。

加密货币领域,Tether 的 USDT 市值已超过 1700 亿美元,广泛用于交易、跨境支付和 DeFi 应用。Tether2024 年全年盈利超过 130 亿美元,2025 年上半年总盈利约 57 亿美元,其中 Q2 单季度净盈利创纪录 49 亿美元,主要来自美国国债收益率和储备增值。

据 defiLlama 数据显示,截止 9 月 14 日,稳定币总市值约为 2892.34 亿美元,其中 USDT 占比为 58.96%,占据市场主导地位。

然而,随着美国监管环境的日益严格,Tether 面临着合规压力。Tether 推出全新稳定币 USAT,被视为进军美国本土市场的战略性举措。

Tether 的这一决定并非突发奇想,而是对全球监管趋势的回应。自 2022 年以来,美国证券交易委员会(SEC)和商品期货交易委员会(CFTC)等机构加强了对稳定币的监管力度。USDT 作为一种非美国本土发行产品,曾多次卷入争议,包括储备金透明度和反洗钱合规问题。Tether 总部位于英属维尔京群岛,虽然其稳定币在全球流通,但在美国的使用受到限制,部分交易所和机构不愿直接支持非合规资产。推出 USAT 的目的,正是为了填补这一空白,提供一款符合美国法律框架的稳定币选项。 USAT 将以 1:1 的比例锚定美元,由 Tether 的储备金支持,包括现金、美国国债等高流动性资产。

USAT 的核心亮点在于其「美国合规」属性。根据 Tether 的官方声明,该稳定币将由一家新成立的美国子公司发行和管理,预计在 2025 年底前正式上线,初期针对美国居民、企业和机构用户开放。 与 USDT 不同,USAT 将严格遵守《银行保密法》(BSA)和反洗钱(AML)规定,支持 KYC 验证。

此外,USAT 官网发布重要提示称,USAT 并非法定货币,且不会由美国政府发行、支持、批准或担保。USAT 不受美国联邦存款保险公司(FDIC)、证券投资者保护公司(SIPC)或任何其他政府机构的保险保障。

值得一提的是,Tether 任命 Bo Hines 担任新业务的 CEO,Bo Hines 是一位政治和商业领域的资深人士,曾担任前总统唐纳德·特朗普的顾问,并在 2022 年竞选北卡罗来纳州国会席位。他以保守派立场著称,尤其在加密货币监管和创新政策上持积极态度。

Hines 的加入被视为 Tether 拉拢美国政界影响力的信号。Hines 透露公司新的美国总部将设在北卡罗来纳州夏洛特。

从市场影响来看,USAT 的推出可能会重塑美国稳定币格局。目前,USDT 在全球交易量中占据主导,但在美国本土,Circle 发行的 USDC 凭借其合规优势已领先一步。USDC 的市值约为 731 亿美元,主要服务于美国机构,如 Visa 和 Mastercard 已将其集成到支付系统中。

USAT 的出现将直接挑战 USDC 的地位,尤其是在企业级应用上。Tether 声称 USAT 将支持更低的交易费用和更高的流动性,适合用于供应链金融、房地产交易和跨境汇款。例如,一家美国出口商可以使用 USAT 即时结算海外订单,避免传统银行的高手续费和延迟。这在当前全球经济不确定性加剧的背景下,具有显著吸引力。

Related Reads

τ Scaling: Huawei's New Growth Engine Designed for the Post-Moore Era

**Tau Scaling: Huawei's New Growth Engine for the Post-Moore Era** For 60 years, progress in semiconductors was driven by Moore's Law – making transistors smaller, denser, and cheaper. This path has now stalled due to plummeting returns below 7nm, astronomical lithography costs, and rising per-transistor expenses. After six years and testing 381 production chips, Huawei’s semiconductor team proposes a fundamental shift: **stop competing on size, start competing on time**. This is the core of their "τ (Tau) Scaling" theory. It treats *time* as the key optimization metric, compressing characteristic delays (τ) across all levels – from transistor switching (picoseconds) to data center tasks (seconds), spanning 12 orders of magnitude. **What is τ Scaling?** It holistically minimizes delay/time constants (τ) across four layers: transistors (switching speed), circuits (signal delay), chips (compute/memory access), and systems (end-to-end communication). The goal is to align optimization from process and circuit design to architecture and systems using this unified metric. **Mobile Application: LogicFolding** Without advancing the process node, this technique vertically stacks chips using ultra-precision hybrid bonding, distributing critical paths across layers ("stacking floors"). Results include a 55% transistor density increase, 41% better energy efficiency, over 40% higher SRAM frequency, and a roadmap targeting 4GHz by 2029. **AI Data Center Application: Full-Link Latency Compression** With 80% of AI cluster energy and 70% cost spent on data movement, the focus is slashing communication time. Key innovations include: 1. **Unified Bus:** Cuts multi-layer protocols, reducing remote access latency from microseconds to ~100 nanoseconds – 500x faster. 2. **Hi-ONE Optical Interconnect:** Replaces copper with fiber, enabling 8Tb/s per module and scaling distances from 1m to 100m for 10,000-chip clusters. 3. **3D Folding:** Solves the "interface bottleneck" of 2.5D packaging by vertically integrating memory, power, and optical I/O alongside compute, predicting over 100x integration density gain by 2035. **Re-fusion of Logic and Memory** The AI era, where data movement is more critical than computation, demands tight 3D integration of logic and memory, shifting industry influence towards memory and advanced packaging. **Remaining Challenges** include adapting EDA tools for 3D design, optimizing wafer-to-wafer process variation and vertical interconnect losses, and establishing new energy efficiency and benchmarking standards. **Conclusion:** The era of scaling physical dimensions is over. The era of scaling time has begun. By leveraging 3D stacking, system architecture, and interconnect optimization—rather than solely chasing advanced lithography—performance and efficiency can continue to advance. This is poised to be the semiconductor industry's core roadmap for the next decade.

marsbit8m ago

τ Scaling: Huawei's New Growth Engine Designed for the Post-Moore Era

marsbit8m ago

NodeStrategy: The First Ordinals DAT Project, Bringing the Strategy Treasury Narrative to NFTs

**Summary: The Fundamental Flaws of NodeStrategy, the 'First Ordinals DAT'** NodeStrategy presents itself as the first Ordinals Digital Asset Treasury (DAT) on Bitcoin. Its model mirrors MicroStrategy's treasury narrative but for NFTs, specifically targeting the NodeMonkes collection (not officially affiliated). The project's core mechanism is a four-step flywheel: a 10% fee on all trades (90% to treasury, 10% to radFi/Bound marketplace) is used to buy NodeMonkes. These NFTs are then listed for sale on Satflow, with 100% of the sale proceeds used to buy back and burn the project's token, NODESTRAT, aiming to create a perpetual value cycle. However, the design contains critical, self-defeating flaws: 1. **Platform Lock-In:** As a Bitcoin Rune, NODESTRAT lacks smart contract functionality and cannot natively enforce the 10% fee. The fee can only be collected on the radFi/Bound marketplace itself. This makes the entire flywheel dependent on a single platform. If liquidity moves elsewhere, fee revenue drops to zero, halting the mechanism. 2. **Self-Suffocating Economics:** The 10% fee acts both as the flywheel's fuel and a major drag on demand. A buy/sell roundtrip incurs a 20% cost, creating a massive hurdle for traders. This strangles the very trading volume needed to generate fees. 3. **Ineffective Value Support:** The flywheel is starved. Low daily volume (~$9K) generates minimal fees for NFT purchases. The NFT "ladder" sales are slow and unpredictable (only 39 total sold), meaning buybacks are infrequent. While 30.77% of the supply has been burned, this supply reduction cannot lift price without corresponding demand, which is suppressed by the high transaction tax. 4. **Meaningless NAV:** The Net Asset Value (NAV), currently at a 0.46x discount to market cap, is merely a marketing figure. There is no redemption mechanism for token holders to claim the underlying NodeMonkes assets. Price is set by market liquidity flows, not by this theoretical backing. In essence, NodeStrategy's design forces its revenue source (trading fees) to simultaneously cripple the demand and liquidity required for its own success, trapping the project in a stagnant state.

marsbit15m ago

NodeStrategy: The First Ordinals DAT Project, Bringing the Strategy Treasury Narrative to NFTs

marsbit15m ago

Agentic Design Patterns: A Book That Made Me Re-Understand "What Is an Agent, Really?"

"Agentic Design Patterns" is a 2025 book by Antonio Gullí, a Google engineering director, which offers a systematic framework for AI Agent development through 21 design patterns. A core contribution is the "Four Levels of Agency": Level 0 (bare LLMs) are not true agents. Level 1 agents actively decide when and how to use tools. Level 2 agents engage in strategic planning, context engineering (curating and filtering information), and self-reflection. Level 3 involves multi-agent collaboration with defined communication topologies. The book introduces **Context Engineering** as a superset of prompt engineering, managing four layers of information for the agent: system prompts, external data, implicit context (user history, environment), and feedback loops for automated optimization. A key pattern is **Reflection (Producer-Critic)**, where two distinct agents with different prompts collaborate iteratively—one produces output, the other critiques it—until quality is satisfactory or a max iteration limit is reached. For **Memory**, a three-layer model is proposed: Session (ephemeral conversation context), State (temporary task data), and Memory (persistent, long-term storage). Regarding **Multi-Agent Systems**, the book advises against unnecessary complexity, recommending simple topologies like Supervisor or Peer-to-Peer based on task needs. It emphasizes perfecting a single Level 2 agent before moving to multi-agent setups. The author concludes with three actionable takeaways: 1) Add a Critic agent to existing workflows, 2) Practice Context Engineering beyond simple prompts, and 3) Avoid premature multi-agent complexity; first master a robust single agent. The book provides a practical map, codifying common challenges like reflection, memory, and coordination into reusable patterns, saving developers from reinventing foundational solutions.

链捕手1h ago

Agentic Design Patterns: A Book That Made Me Re-Understand "What Is an Agent, Really?"

链捕手1h ago

An AI Read SpaceX's Prospectus and Wrote This Investment Memo in 12 Minutes

An AI agent autonomously analyzed SpaceX's 226MB S-1 filing, purchased real-time market data on-chain for $1.87, and generated a comprehensive investment memo in 12 minutes. The memo concludes a "Hold" recommendation. Bull Thesis: SpaceX holds a near-monopoly in commercial launch (80% of global orbital mass since 2023), operates the profitable Starlink business (10.3M subscribers, $7.2B adj. EBITDA), and is vertically integrated from rockets to AI via the xAI acquisition. Starlink alone is a standout, high-margin business. Bear Thesis: The AI division is a massive cash burn ($6.4B operating loss on $3.2B revenue in 2025). True debt obligations approach ~$42B, not the headline $29B, due to bridge loans and X-related debt. Significant contingent liabilities exist, including a potential $10B fee from a Cursor option agreement. The company faces concentrated counterparty risk (e.g., a $45B Anthropic contract), slowing revenue growth, and complex governance as a controlled company with four share classes. Valuation anchors Starlink's standalone value at ~$84B (applying Iridium's 7.4x sales multiple), suggesting the current ~$500B+ IPO target prices in immense future execution risk for Starship and AI. Key risks include Starship delays, accelerating AI losses, and underwriter conflicts (the IPO's lead banks are also lenders on the $20B bridge loan it aims to refinance). Investment triggers: upgrade to "Overweight" if priced ≤$350B and Starship meets milestones; downgrade to "Pass" if priced >$510B or key risks materialize.

marsbit1h ago

An AI Read SpaceX's Prospectus and Wrote This Investment Memo in 12 Minutes

marsbit1h ago

Trading

Spot
Futures
活动图片