【惊险】ETH守不住?空头瞄准3500美元关口

Cointelegraph中文Published on 2025-09-11Last updated on 2025-09-11

Abstract

以太坊(ETH)价格陷入区间震荡,多项指标显示其短期内可能进一步回调。

关键要点:

以太坊空头情绪持续升温,价格维持区间震荡。

现货交易量下滑显示需求疲软,ETH价格变得更加脆弱。

若关键支撑失守,ETH价格或跌至3500美元。

以太坊(ETH)近两周持续在4200-4500美元区间震荡,现货与机构需求均有所减弱,部分交易员因此转为看空,认为ETH价格可能在任何反弹前先跌至3500美元。

市场情绪转向负面

据Santiment数据,比特币(BTC)近期跌破109000美元,叠加以太坊价格波动,市场情绪发生转变,“卖出”声音增强。

该市场情报公司在周二X平台表示:“交易者的态度已发生转变,愈发看空。预计比特币将回落至10万美元以下,以太坊将回落至3500美元以下。”

相关图表显示,自8月底以太坊创下4950美元历史新高以来,“卖出”“看空”等关键词激增。

但Santiment指出,市场走势常常与大众预期相反,这可能暗示“理想买入时机”。

以太坊交易者退场

据Glassnode数据显示,ETH成交量从8月22日的185亿美元降至9月8日的26亿美元,降幅达到85%。

现货成交量下滑反映投资者参与度下降,交易员信心减弱。

虽然累计成交量差(CVD)略有回升,卖压有所缓解,但该指标仍远低于8月底水平。

低现货成交量和负的成交量差表明ETH需求疲软,ETH价格变得更加脆弱。不过,若CVD企稳,多头或能重获主动。

据Cointelegraph报道,机构投资者同样趋于观望。以太坊现货ETF连续六个交易日净流出超过10.4亿美元,进一步加剧了卖压。

ETH价格下跌空间有多大?

Cointelegraph Markets Pro和TradingView数据显示,ETH价格目前正回测日线级别对称三角形下轨4280美元。

若日线收盘跌破该三角形,可能吸引更多空头推动价格下探至3600美元,较当前水平下跌16%。

MN Capital创始人Michael van de Poppe表示,ETH价格可能先跌至3500-3800美元需求区间,然后再反弹。

“ETH再跌一波,触及绿色区域,然后只会上涨。这将是我的理想情景。”

分析师Ted Pillows发现3600美元至4000美元之间存在大量流动性集群,并表示以太坊可能会先下跌以收集这些流动性,然后反转。

“看起来在反转之前可能会发生下扫低流动性。”

据Cointelegraph报道,如果4000美元支撑失守,3745美元也值得关注,作为潜在反弹区域。

Related Reads

DeFi Has Reached Its Most Dangerous Moment: The Real Vulnerabilities Are Not in the Code

DeFi in Peril: The Real Vulnerability Isn't in the Code April 2026 marked a paradigm shift in DeFi security, with over $625 million lost across 30 incidents—the worst month in crypto history by event count. Crucially, none of the major exploits (Drift Protocol: $285M, KelpDAO: $292M, Wasabi Protocol: $4.5M) resulted from smart contract vulnerabilities. Instead, failures occurred in the operational "plumbing": social engineering to compromise multi-signature councils, a single-point-of-failure 1-of-1 bridge validator, and stolen admin private keys. These events expose a fundamental misalignment: the industry's security model has long focused on code audits, while the actual attack surface has shifted to privileged access points and off-chain infrastructure. The article introduces the term "OpenFi" to describe this reality: permissionless, on-chain, yet operationally dependent on trusted third parties (admins, validators, oracles) at key junctures. The KelpDAO exploit vividly demonstrated asymmetric "contagion risk." A configuration error in a smaller protocol triggered a panic, causing approximately $13.2 billion in outflows from larger, unaffected protocols like Aave within 48 hours, as users fled uncertain collateral. The core dilemma is the double-edged sword of centralization. Operational levers like emergency councils (e.g., Arbitrum freezing stolen funds post-KelpDAO) enable crisis response but also create catastrophic attack surfaces if compromised (e.g., Drift). The path forward demands radical honesty: protocols must clearly disclose their trust assumptions, operational levers, and failure modes. The industry must treat operational security (key management, configurations, incident response) with the same rigor as code security. Survival depends on building systems whose risks can be understood, priced, and insured, moving beyond the outdated "code is law" mantra to a mature model of disclosed and managed trust.

链捕手1h ago

DeFi Has Reached Its Most Dangerous Moment: The Real Vulnerabilities Are Not in the Code

链捕手1h ago

Vitalik's Article Emphasizes Ethereum Must Be 'Amazing', But Foundation Is Not the Center

Vitalik Buterin has published a lengthy response to recent community criticism directed at the Ethereum Foundation (EF). Acknowledging a sense of "unease," he addresses concerns about the EF's strategic direction, its perceived disconnect from ETH's price performance, and calls for its reduced central role. Vitalik rejects the notion that the EF should be the central governing body of Ethereum, framing it instead as one "node with a clear mandate" among many within the ecosystem. He highlights the EF's limited ETH holdings (≈0.16% of supply) compared to other blockchain foundations and states it will no longer sell significant amounts of ETH. Its future focus will be on long-term, critical projects that align with Ethereum's core values of censorship-resistance and decentralization, which might not otherwise happen. A core argument is that Ethereum must be "amazing," but not by merely chasing higher transaction speeds at the cost of decentralization. He proposes focusing on the "CROPS" dimensions: creating a Cryptographically provable, Reliable, Open, Private, and Secure network. This includes pursuing goals like a formally verifiable, bug-free Ethereum client and minimizing protocol-level reliance on intermediaries. The article concludes by noting that while Vitalik clarifies the EF's refocused role, he does not directly address community suggestions for creating a new organization explicitly aligned with ETH's economic interests. This "alignment gap" is presented as a key challenge for Ethereum's future.

链捕手1h ago

Vitalik's Article Emphasizes Ethereum Must Be 'Amazing', But Foundation Is Not the Center

链捕手1h ago

Galxe: How a Quest Platform Evolved into Web3's Growth Infrastructure

Galxe, once perceived as a simple Web3 quest platform, has evolved into a core growth infrastructure within the Web3 ecosystem. It addresses a fundamental Web3 growth dilemma: the lack of a mature, systematic user acquisition and retention system akin to Web2's advertising and analytics platforms. While users complete quests (social tasks, on-chain interactions) for rewards, Galxe's true innovation lies in transforming these fragmented, one-off actions into lasting, verifiable identity credentials. This process of *behavioral assetization* creates a persistent record of a user's activities across projects and chains. For users, their wallet accumulates a valuable history that can unlock future access and rewards, fostering a "profile-building" mentality. For projects, Galxe provides a pre-screened user pool with rich behavioral data, enabling targeted outreach to users based on their specific on-chain history and community engagement. Galxe employs a gamefied growth path, guiding users from low-friction social tasks into deeper, valuable on-chain interactions through a structured progression of quests. This solves the incentive-behavior mismatch common in Web3, filtering users by their willingness to engage. Beyond quests, products like Passport (identity verification) and Starboard (community analytics) position Galxe as a comprehensive growth operating system. The platform's defensible advantage is its self-reinforcing data and network flywheel: more projects attract more users, enriching behavioral data; richer data enables better user targeting, attracting more projects. Ultimately, Galxe is shifting Web3's growth logic from short-term "reward-driven" traffic towards a long-term "identity-driven" relationship model, where a user's accumulated on-chain履历 becomes a core asset.

marsbit1h ago

Galxe: How a Quest Platform Evolved into Web3's Growth Infrastructure

marsbit1h ago

Trading

Spot
Futures

Hot Articles

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of ETH (ETH) are presented below.

活动图片