加密推特用户必读:11 条实操 「作弊码」,让你的账号从 0 起飞

深潮Pubblicato 2025-08-11Pubblicato ultima volta 2025-08-12

理解了内容推荐算法,你将更容易在加密推特世界杀出重围。

撰文:IcoBeast.eth

编译:Luffy,Foresight News

在每一个自然成长起来的账号背后,都有着对 X 平台(推特)内容推荐算法的深刻理解。我将公开分享一些 「经验教训」,这些内容帮助我在账户增长过程中取得了超乎寻常的成绩。

发布时间

发帖时间对互动量影响重大。我身处美国东部时区(EST ),且大部分受众也处于东部时区至太平洋时区(EST - PST )…… 所以我通常的发帖时段是上午 9 点到晚上 9 点,流量峰值大概出现在上午 10 点到下午 4 点。你需得自行尝试,依据你的受众群体以及你培养出的他们的浏览习惯,找出能获得最佳浏览量 / 互动量的时间。

发帖频率

这是个通用规则,但每小时发帖超过 1 条,会导致单条帖子的传播范围缩小,还会迫使算法在你的粉丝面前只能优先推荐其中某一条。经验之谈是,两条帖子间隔要超过 1 小时。

标记(@ )

永远别在一条帖子里 @超过 3 个账号 。这会彻底毁掉你的传播范围…… 尤其是如果被 @的账号后续没有互动的话。我发现,一般来说,除非被 @的账号在帖子发布后很快互动,否则在原帖里 @任何账号都会被算法降权。不过,随着你的账号做大,这个问题的影响会变小,但仍值得留意。我更倾向于在热门评论里 @相关账号。

外部链接

外部链接会严重影响传播。Nikita 和马斯克都多次表示,它们不会被降权,但实际情况是,人们点击链接后,在帖子上停留的时间就会减少。说实话,根据我的个人观察,我完全不相信 「不被降权」 这套说法,百分百认定外部链接会让帖子被算法降权。最佳做法是把推荐链接或其他外部链接放在热门评论里。

「查看更多」

基本上,如果你的推文文字超过平台默认的单帖最大字符数,时间线里显示的会是截断版内容,用户可点击 「查看更多」 展开。要是你的推文本身优质,或者开头够好,这会极大提升传播度 ,因为人们会点击展开。但要是你开头 140 个字符(大概 )写得很烂,那这招完全没用,没人会想点 「查看更多」。

排版空格

类似的逻辑,你会发现很多账号发帖时逐行分隔、留空白。这与其说是 「算法套路」,不如说是针对年轻用户注意力持续时间短的破解技巧。人们看到超过 3 行的大段文字,一般会直接略过。把帖子内容拆分排版,能增加读者花时间阅读的概率,从而让用户在帖子上停留更久,提升互动量,扩大算法推荐范围 。

配图

一张优质配图绝对能给帖子增光添彩。要是文字超过 10 行?那你大概率得放一张恰当的图片来吸引用户目光。如果图片上的内容有趣,实际上对互动量是有积极作用的。 因为这会迫使人们花更多时间试图读懂它,增加用户在帖子上的停留时长。但烂图、无意义的图会让人们更快划走。慎用。

开头(Hook )

在我看来,这一点不像有些 「大师」 说的那么关键。好的开头肯定有帮助,但并非帖子走红的必备条件。我用过很有效的例子:像 「过去 X 天里,我纯靠社交资本赚了 X 钱」 ,接着聊波卡或其他我做过内容、能带来收益的项目。要是换种开头方式,这些帖子很可能吸引不了那么多目光,人们就是想知道怎么通过发帖也赚到钱。

主题一致性

我还在摸索这个,但大体而言,受众会喜欢他们觉得舒适、熟悉的内容。这样的内容更容易理解,不需要人们太多的主动思考(是好是坏我不评价 )。对我来说,这意味着偶尔推出内容系列之类的,让来到我主页的人对帖子内容有明确预期。这也能培养粉丝忠诚度,一个好的系列内容,能在短时间内创造大量互动和关注。

引用推文

这是把双刃剑,用得好,能让你一飞冲天。要是你能引用一个高价值、高受众的账号推文,且你自己的帖子得到积极回应,那你就等着爆火吧。但要是你发了蠢东西,被对方账号屏蔽,那完犊子,是你自己把牌打烂了。用好引用推文,需要把握时机、具备场景意识,有不少门道。有人反馈说引用推文整体互动量和曝光量更低…… 我个人体验相反,但这可能和我的受众构成有关。

置顶帖

这大概是最被误解的点,主要因为最近刚更新了规则…… 以前的情况是,每隔超 24 小时,置顶帖才会获得一次算法推荐。最近更新到每 12 小时一次,根据 iOS 应用中的新消息通知,如果你在置顶上一篇帖子后 12 小时内尝试置顶某篇帖子,就会显示这条通知。一定要用好置顶帖 ,每次有人访问你的主页,都会看到它。而且现在 「为你推荐」里还专门有个 「你关注的人最近置顶」 的信息流,会更加突出置顶帖。大部分人都没好好利用置顶功能,这能成为你的竞争优势。

Letture associate

Three Years Later: Looking Back on My 2023 Predictions for ChatGPT

Looking Back After Three Years: Revisiting My 2023 Predictions on ChatGPT In March 2023, shortly after ChatGPT's debut and before GPT-4's release, I made over twenty predictions about AI's future based on limited information and intuition. Now, in May 2026, I revisited those forecasts using an AI-driven analysis with 41 Opus 4.8 agents to cross-reference them with the latest data. The assessment used symbols: ✅ Correct, 🟢 Mostly Correct, 🟡 Partially Correct, ❌ Incorrect. Overall, the directional judgments held up well, with only one major factual error regarding GPT-4's rumored parameter size (incorrectly cited as 100T). However, nuances and degrees of accuracy revealed more. **What Was Largely Correct:** Predictions about mechanisms and directions proved accurate. The rise of RAG (Retrieval-Augmented Generation) as the standard architecture for combating AI hallucination was confirmed, as was the transformative potential of LUI (Language User Interface) in creating a new industry layer atop GUIs. The emergence of "robot networks" (agent-to-agent communication protocols) and China's rapid catch-up in developing capable large models (closing the performance gap with top models to ~2.7%) were also on point. The analysis affirmed that LLMs lack consciousness and that the Turing Test merely measures perceived intelligence. **What Was Off Target:** Errors often involved specific numbers, over-optimistic timelines, or misjudged distributions. The prediction that value would primarily accrue to the application layer was half-right but missed NVIDIA's dominance as the profitable infrastructure layer. Forecasts about AI circumventing copyright issues and fostering a "global common ground" by averaging human viewpoints were incorrect; instead, major copyright settlements occurred and AI personalization is increasing. Estimates for model training costs ("$5-10 billion cap") were significantly off, underestimating frontier costs and overestimating replication costs. The notion that LLMs could never do complex math without tools was disproven by later models winning IMO gold. **Key Patterns from the Review:** 1. **Direction over precision:** Judgments about mechanisms and trends were more reliable than specific numbers or definitive statements. 2. **Timing bias:** There was a tendency to overestimate short-term speed but underestimate long-term magnitude and transformation. 3. **The distribution blind spot:** Aggregate-level correctness often masked uneven impacts (e.g., on young professionals' employment). 4. **The value of qualifiers:** Predictions framed with caution (e.g., "reportedly," "for now," "prototype in 2-3 years") aged better. 5. **Some debates continue:** Issues like the nature of "emergent abilities" or machine consciousness remain unresolved. This three-year review highlights that while seeing the big picture is crucial, humility regarding specifics, timelines, and disparate impacts is essential for future forecasting.

链捕手1 h fa

Three Years Later: Looking Back on My 2023 Predictions for ChatGPT

链捕手1 h fa

AI Bubble Warning: AI Investments Are Negative Returns for Most Tech Giants

The article issues a stark warning about a potential AI investment bubble. It notes that while the AI boom shares similarities with the TMT bubble of the late 1990s, its scale is vastly larger, currently driving 93% of U.S. GDP growth. Major hyperscale cloud providers like Microsoft, Alphabet, Amazon, Meta, and Oracle are planning to invest trillions in AI data centers over the coming years. However, calculations based on analyst projections for 2025-2030 reveal a concerning math problem: expected capital expenditure growth far outpaces projected revenue growth. Even under an extremely optimistic scenario of zero costs, the implied return on investment for most of these tech giants (except Amazon) is deeply negative. This suggests that the current trajectory could lead to one of history's largest shareholder value destruction events. The piece outlines two potential escapes: AI generating vastly more revenue than currently anticipated—a near-impossible task—or a significant cutback in the planned investment splurge. The latter scenario could trigger a domino effect, severely impacting the entire tech supply chain (from Nvidia to TSMC), potentially pushing the U.S. economy into recession, and causing a major stock market downturn. The author suggests upcoming high-profile IPOs by companies like OpenAI and Anthropic might represent a transfer of risk from early investors to public market participants. While the peak of the hype cycle might sustain investment through 2026, the fundamental financial dilemma remains unresolved, setting the stage for a potential market correction in 2027 or 2028, similar to the years following Alan Greenspan's "irrational exuberance" warning.

marsbit2 h fa

AI Bubble Warning: AI Investments Are Negative Returns for Most Tech Giants

marsbit2 h fa

From Tokens to Machine Labor: AI is Shifting from Tool to "Worker"

The article "From Token to Machine Labor: AI is Evolving from Tool to 'Worker'" argues that the business model for AI is shifting beyond simply selling computational resources (tokens, GPU hours) or model access. Instead, a new "machine labor market" is emerging, where the core economic transaction is the purchase of economically useful work directly performed by software. The central thesis is that AI pricing will evolve through four stages: 1) raw tokens, 2) standardized LLM capabilities (e.g., text generation), 3) industry-specific labor markets (e.g., legal review, radiology), and finally 4) a programmable results market where tasks like resolving a support ticket are bid on and priced based on outcome. In this future, buyers will care less about *which* model or GPU completes a task and more about whether the work meets specified standards for accuracy, latency, and cost. This transition reframes the impact of AI on human labor. Rather than simple replacement, it suggests a re-coordination where machines handle standardized, verifiable work, freeing humans for roles involving oversight, context management, responsibility, and final judgment. In some cases, this "last 1%" of human input becomes more valuable as it enables the other 99% to be automated. Furthermore, as AI reduces the cost of work, demand may expand, creating larger markets (e.g., 24/7 customer service) rather than just cheaper versions of existing ones. The article concludes that while infrastructure (GPUs, models, tokens) remains crucial upstream, the market is converging on a simpler, tradeable unit: machine labor that can be defined, measured, priced, and procured based on contractible specifications.

marsbit2 h fa

From Tokens to Machine Labor: AI is Shifting from Tool to "Worker"

marsbit2 h fa

Xiaomi MiMo's 99% Price Cut is Not Marketing! Luo Fuli Posts on X to Refute Critics

The price of Xiaomi's MiMo-V2.5 series API has been permanently reduced by up to 99%, specifically for the "Input (Cache Hit)" cost, which covers users re-reading historical context in long conversations. MiMo's head, Luo Fuli, published a detailed technical blog to clarify that this drastic price cut stems from genuine engineering breakthroughs, not a marketing stunt or a simple price war. The core of the achievement lies in six key engineering optimizations. First, the model architecture adopts a Hybrid Sliding Window Attention (SWA), reducing the memory footprint (KVCache) to 1/7th of a traditional model. Second, a dual-pool memory management system actually utilizes these savings, allowing a single GPU to handle over 5 times more concurrent users. Third, an upgraded prefix caching mechanism achieves a cache hit rate of 93-95% for repeated reads, meaning most such requests bypass GPU computation entirely. Fourth, a self-developed distributed cache (GCache) utilizes idle SSD space on existing GPU servers, eliminating additional storage costs. Fifth, an intelligent scheduling system (LLM-Router) efficiently routes requests to maximize cache reuse and performance. Sixth, Multi-Token Prediction (MTP) accelerates the model's text generation ("output") side. Together, these systemic optimizations dramatically lower the real computational cost per request, enabling the 99% price reduction for cached inputs while reportedly maintaining positive gross margins. Luo Fuli's disclosure aims to shift the narrative from "price war" to a demonstration of substantive AI engineering progress.

marsbit4 h fa

Xiaomi MiMo's 99% Price Cut is Not Marketing! Luo Fuli Posts on X to Refute Critics

marsbit4 h fa

$26 Billion: An 'All-Chinese Team' Backs the World's Highest-Valued AI Programming Company

Cognition AI, the company behind the AI programmer "Devin," has raised over $1 billion in new funding at a valuation of $26 billion, just eight months after reaching a $10.2 billion valuation. The round was led by Lux Capital, General Catalyst, and 8VC. Founded by three young Chinese entrepreneurs with strong competitive programming backgrounds, Cognition initially gained fame with Devin, marketed as the world's first AI software engineer capable of handling tasks from start to finish. While its early demos were impressive, real-world usage revealed reliability and cost-effectiveness issues, leading to a significant price cut for Devin in 2025. A pivotal moment came when Cognition acquired the assets of AI IDE company Windsurf after a failed acquisition by OpenAI. This move gave Cognition a crucial developer-facing tool, allowing it to pursue a two-pronged strategy: Devin for autonomous task execution and Windsurf for integrated, collaborative coding within an IDE. This shift helped the company move away from the controversial "AI replacement" narrative towards a model of augmenting human engineers, particularly for repetitive or maintenance tasks. This strategic pivot is backed by strong commercial metrics. The company reports a 10x increase in enterprise usage this year, with an annual revenue run-rate of $492 million and a 50% month-over-month growth in enterprise Devin usage over the past six months. Its client list now includes major corporations like Goldman Sachs and Mercedes-Benz, as well as government agencies like NASA and the U.S. Army. Investors are betting on Cognition becoming a foundational piece of next-generation software engineering infrastructure, positioning it at the center of a hybrid future where AI agents and human developers work in tandem.

marsbit4 h fa

$26 Billion: An 'All-Chinese Team' Backs the World's Highest-Valued AI Programming Company

marsbit4 h fa

Trading

Spot
Futures
活动图片