Биткоин попытался преодолеть $85 тыс. Что с курсами криптовалют

cryptonews.ruPublished on 2025-01-14Last updated on 2025-04-14

Цена первой криптовалюты восстановилась после падения до минимума за 5 месяцев

Курс биткоина (BTC) вернулся к отметкам около $85 тыс. В прошедшие выходные цена первой криптовалюты несколько раз поднималась к $85,5 тыс. и опускалась к $83,3 тыс. На 10:50 мск BTC торгуется около $84,5 тыс., за прошедшие сутки курс монеты практически не изменился (-0,1%).

BTC/USD

84 618 +146 (0,17%)

ОКХ Apr 14 11:39:28

1д

3д

1м

3м

1г

5л

Неделю назад на фоне новостей о торговых пошлинах в США биткоин падал до минимума за 5 месяцев — $74,6 тыс. За прошедшие семь дней BTC восстановился, он подорожал на 13% и вернулся к отметкам, на которых находился в начале апреля.

rbc.group

Ethereum (ETH) торгуется на уровне около $1,62 тыс. Его цена за 24 часа также почти не изменилась, ведущий альткоин торговался около этих отметок и сутки назад. Максимальная цена ETH за прошедшие выходные — $1,65 тыс.

ETH/USD

1 636 +20,6 (1,28%)

ОКХ Apr 14 11:35:11

1д

3д

1м

3м

1г

5л

Другие криптовалюты из топ-10 по капитализации показали разнонаправленное движение. Сильнее всего подорожала монета Tron (TRX) — на 3,4% цена Solana (SOL) выросла на 2%. Подешевела больше других Cardano (ADA) — на 1,3%.

Общая капитализация крипторынка за последние сутки снизилась на 0,4%, до $2,68 трлн, по данным Coinmarketcap. Объем торгов составил $82 млрд.

Из топ-100 криптовалют по капитализации за прошедшие 24 часа наибольший рост показал Flare (FLR), его курс вырос на 15%. Наибольшее падение у Mantra (OM) — 90%. Вечером 13 апреля он рухнул с $6 до $0,40 за несколько часов, обвалив капитализацию проекта с $5,9 млрд до $400 млн. В команде Mantra заявили, что обвал вызван «безрассудными ликвидациями» на централизованных биржах.

Криптобиржи за последние 24 часа ликвидировали позиции 140 тыс. трейдеров на общую сумму $338 млн, по данным Coinglass. Больше всего было принудительно закрыто позиций в парах с биткоином — на $87 млн. На втором месте Mantra — $73 млн.

Индекс страха и жадности на крипторынке находится в зоне «страха». В воскресенье, 13 апреля, показатель приблизился к нейтральным значениям на отметке 45 баллов из 100, но 14 апреля опустился к 31 баллу. Это указывает на то, что участники рынка по-прежнему настроены на продажи криптовалют.

По мнению экспертов, основным фактором беспокойства для инвесторов остаются непредсказуемые действия президента США Дональда Трампа, поскольку своими решениями и высказываниями он может спровоцировать как ралли, так и обрушение рынков. Аналитики отмечают, что покупатели встретили сопротивление в районе $85 тыс. за биткоин, для продолжения восходящего движения этот уровень необходимо преодолеть.

ENS Founder Seeks to 'Seize Power' from DAO

On June 29th, the ENS community entered the on-chain voting phase for a proposal to renew the ENS DAO Security Council's veto power for two more years. Shortly after voting began, ENS founder Nick Johnson used his substantial ENS holdings to cast over 3.55 million votes against the proposal, swinging the outcome despite initial strong support. The Security Council was established in July 2024 with a 4/8 multisig veto power to protect the DAO's treasury (valued over $350 million) from malicious proposals during a period of low voter participation. Its powers were limited to vetoing only harmful proposals, not normal ones. Nick Johnson's opposition stems from broader concerns about ENS DAO's governance. In late 2025, he and others expressed frustration that the DAO had become mired in political gamesmanship, with capable contributors leaving and leadership falling to less experienced or misaligned parties. This context set the stage for a major restructuring proposal by ENS COO Katherine Wu on June 19th, titled "Next Era of ENS DAO: Empowering the ENS Foundation." The controversial proposal aims to transfer daily operations, treasury management, and long-term strategy to a restructured ENS Foundation with a professional board, while the DAO would retain core protocol governance powers. Critics, including original ENS constitution author Brantly Millegan, argue this effectively transfers treasury control from token holders to ENS Labs (the core development team), undermining the DAO's original decentralized design. Nick's massive "no" vote on the Security Council renewal is seen as the first move in this power struggle. He explained his vote was due to concerns about insufficient checks on the Council's power and the potential for its veto to be used politically. In response, Katherine Wu submitted a revised proposal with higher execution thresholds (5/8 instead of 4/8) and stricter limits. The push for change comes as ENS's annual revenue has declined significantly, from over $10 million in 2023 to under $2 million in 2025, increasing pressure to manage the treasury more effectively. Nick Johnson now faces the challenge of proving that a more structured foundation can steer ENS better than the current DAO model.

Foresight News2m ago

ENS Founder Seeks to 'Seize Power' from DAO

Foresight News2m ago

Zcash whale opens $8.1M long position: What’s next as ZEC struggles near $400?

Zcash (ZEC) is struggling to hold the $400 price level, currently trading around $399 after recent volatility. Despite this market weakness and a bearish technical structure, significant whale activity has emerged. A large whale deposited $10.12 million into HyperLiquid and opened an $8.1 million long position on ZEC. This aligns with a rising Long/Short Ratio, indicating growing trader optimism for price gains. However, ZEC remains below key moving averages, and momentum indicators suggest strong downside pressure. If whale demand fails to spark an upside, ZEC could fall toward $336. Conversely, if it triggers short liquidations, the price could hold $400 and rally toward $452.

ambcrypto14m ago

Zcash whale opens $8.1M long position: What’s next as ZEC struggles near $400?

ambcrypto14m ago

Predicting World Cup Knockout Matches: Why Are Different AI Models So Far Apart?

AI performance in predicting the 2026 FIFA World Cup knockout matches varied significantly, according to an analysis of models including ChatGPT, Grok, DeepSeek, Gemini, and Claude. The standout predictions came from DeepSeek and Gemini for the Netherlands vs. Morocco match. Gemini precisely forecasted a 1-1 draw and a penalty shootout win for Morocco, while DeepSeek correctly identified the high probability of a draw and Morocco's potential to advance via a defensive and counter-attacking strategy. Grok and Tongyi Qianwen (千问) demonstrated strength in predicting accurate scores for matches with clearer favorites. They correctly called the narrow 1-0 win for Canada over South Africa and Brazil's 2-1 victory over Japan, as well as Norway's 2-1 win over Ivory Coast. ChatGPT and Claude excelled more in match process analysis than in predicting exact scores or upsets. They frequently identified potential challenges for favorites, such as Japan's pressing against Brazil or DR Congo's defensive tactics against England, even when predicting the favorite's ultimate victory. A notable failure was the unanimous misjudgment of Germany vs. Paraguay. All models incorrectly favored Germany, underestimating Paraguay's ability to force a penalty shootout and cause an upset. In summary, Gemini and DeepSeek showed the most insight for high-stakes, unpredictable matches. Grok and Qianwen were reliable "score predictors" for less volatile games. ChatGPT and Claude were strong "analytical models," adept at outlining match dynamics but often hesitant to predict upsets.

Odaily星球日报31m ago

Predicting World Cup Knockout Matches: Why Are Different AI Models So Far Apart?

Odaily星球日报31m ago

VELVET stalls at $2—How deep could the current pullback go?

Velvet (VELVET) experienced a bullish push above the key $2.00 resistance on June 29, reaching a high of $2.17, fueled by partnership news with Aerodrome Finance. However, momentum has since slowed, with an 11.5% price correction in 24 hours and a 27.1% drop in trading volume. Technical analysis shows mixed signals. While the On-Balance Volume (OBV) indicates sustained buying pressure, the Chaikin Money Flow (CMF) has turned negative, signaling significant capital outflows and short-term distribution. The overall structure remains bearish on the 1-day chart, though the recent correction found support at the 20-day moving average. Market data suggests the current pullback represents controlled selling pressure rather than a full trend reversal. Key supports to watch are the $2.00 level and the 20-day moving average near $0.75. The risk-to-reward ratio for new long positions is currently unfavorable, but the steady spot Cumulative Volume Delta (CVD) and funding rate indicate underlying bullish strength. Traders may consider using a deeper pullback as a potential buying opportunity.

ambcrypto43m ago

VELVET stalls at $2—How deep could the current pullback go?

ambcrypto43m ago

Will There Be a Next Wave of Web3 Games? Veteran Player's Review: At the Peak of Hype, You Should at Least Sell Half

**Title: Is There Another Wave for Web3 Gaming? A Veteran Player's Review: When Hype Peaks, You Must Exit at Least Half** **Summary:** In an interview, veteran player "Earn Money Chicken" shares his journey and reflections on Web3 gaming. He transitioned from being a traditional in-game trader to a Web3 gamer, having profited from games like Mobox, StepN, and Seraph, but also experiencing significant losses. He defines himself primarily as a player, not an investor, attracted to Web3 games for the blend of earning potential, engaging gameplay, and the satisfaction of researching game mechanics. While he enjoys strategic "gambling" within games, he emphasizes it's not about zero-sum competition with other players. The interview explores the complex, often adversarial relationship between players, projects, and major investors (whales). The player's experience as a traditional game merchant helped develop his analytical mindset for spotting opportunities, but wasn't directly transferable. He identifies the core sources of profit in early Web3 gaming as **"era红利" (era-specific红利)** and strategic foresight, not just simple calculations. He warns that the biggest mistake ordinary players make is calculating their return-on-investment (ROI) period at peak hype, as asset and yield depreciation can trap them. Reflecting on his wins and losses, he now advocates for managing expectations. His most successful exit was from Seraph, where he sold at a relatively good time. The key problem with current Web3 games, he argues, is that most are not mature games first. A successful Web3 game must primarily be a **good, fun game** with a genuine player base willing to spend money for enjoyment, not just participants seeking profit. The blockchain element should solve problems within that context, not be the primary driver. While he believes the sector might see another speculative boom (possibly another strong "Ponzi" model attracting hype), a truly mature and sustainable Web3 game likely needs to come from a traditional major game studio. It would leverage a proven IP, mature content, a functional NFT trading system, and attract both traditional and crypto-native players, offering more normalized returns rather than extreme暴利. His final advice: Newcomers without prior experience should avoid the space now, as it's like searching for a diamond in the rough. For those remaining, the rule is: be brave when assets are low and overlooked, but **when everyone is talking about it (at peak hype), you must sell at least half your holdings.**

marsbit1h ago

Will There Be a Next Wave of Web3 Games? Veteran Player's Review: At the Peak of Hype, You Should at Least Sell Half

marsbit1h ago

Trading

Spot