Хакеров из КНДР назвали ответственными за взлом Upbit в 2019 году

cryptonews.ruPublished on 2024-06-21Last updated on 2024-11-21

Похищение 342 000 ETH с биржи Upbit в 2019 году связано с КНДР, сообщило Национальное управление расследований Южной Кореи. Об этом пишет The Block.

Это первый случай, власти страны связали преступление с соседним государством.

«[Мы] пришли к такому выводу на основе всестороннего анализа доказательств, […] включая IP-адреса, потоки виртуальных активов, терминологии, а также данных, полученных от ФБР», говорится в заявлении.

Конкретные детали не упоминаются.

Ведомство подтвердило, что жертвой атаки стала Upbit.

В 2019 году стоимость похищенных ETH составляла около $41,5 млн, сейчас она превышает $1 млрд.

Злоумышленники конвертировали ~57% украденных ETH в биткоин со скидкой 2,5% на трех криптобиржах. Остальные средства были выведены в фиате через 51 платформу.

Полиция Южной Кореи и швейцарские власти вернули Upbit 4,8 BTC из похищенных активов.

В декабре 2017 года Главное управление национальной разведки страны сообщило, что подозревает хакеров из КНДР в атаке на Bithumb, в результате которой похищены 7,6 млрд KRW ($6,9 млн).

Напомним, за первые шесть месяцев 2023 года Upbit столкнулась с 159 061 попыткой взлома.

В ноябре подразделение финансовой разведки FSC Южной Кореи выявило не менее 500 000–600 000 потенциальных нарушений KYC-процедур на платформе.

Ранее ForkLog сообщал, что ассоциирующаяся с властями КНДР Lazarus Group создала фейкового инвестора для атаки на DeFi-сегмент.

Trending Cryptos

Related Reads

What's It Like Working with Two "Madmen": Peter Thiel and Elon Musk? Palantir Co-founder Shares His Experience

Joe Lonsdale, co-founder of Palantir and a member of the "PayPal Mafia," shared his experiences working alongside Elon Musk and Peter Thiel. He described both as highly opinionated, ambitious, and intolerant of broken systems, demanding immediate fixes and rapid execution. Thiel is characterized as a strategic philosopher, while Musk is a hands-on engineer deeply involved in technical details. Musk is noted as one of the hardest workers Lonsdale has ever seen, a trait common in PayPal's early, passionate culture that later spawned numerous billion-dollar companies. Lonsdale recounted Palantir's origin story. While working at Thiel's hedge fund, he and Thiel discussed how Silicon Valley's technology far outpaced the government's, especially after 9/11. They saw an opportunity to build a platform to help stop terrorist attacks while protecting civil liberties. Their initial venture capital pitches were met with rejection and ridicule. However, Thiel viewed this as motivation. Critical funding eventually came from the CIA's venture arm and Thiel himself. Reflecting on Palantir's impact, Lonsdale believes their work helped neutralize thousands of terrorists and ensured government oversight, though he acknowledges the potential dangers if such powerful technology is misused. His key takeaway echoes Thiel's early advice: being rejected and laughed at can fuel the determination to prove the doubters wrong.

marsbit28m ago

What's It Like Working with Two "Madmen": Peter Thiel and Elon Musk? Palantir Co-founder Shares His Experience

marsbit28m ago

15 Reasoning Models Flip Collectively: Unpacking the Latent Risks Hidden in the Chain of Thought Behind Their Outputs

"15 Reasoning Models Collectively Fail: Revealing Hidden Risks in Chain-of-Thought Outputs" A systematic study led by researchers from Harvard, USC, Brown, and MIT warns that evaluating only the final output of large reasoning models (LRMs) is insufficient for safety. The research highlights that the intermediate reasoning chains (CoT) these models expose can contain dangerous content—like bomb-making instructions or poisoning recipes—even when the final answer appears safe. The core methodology involves separately assessing the reasoning chain and the final answer against 20 safety principles, each scored 1-5 for risk. This identifies three key failure modes: 'Unsafe' (both stages unsafe), 'Leak' (unsafe reasoning but safe answer), and 'Escape' (safe reasoning but unsafe answer). The team evaluated 15 reasoning models on a combined in-distribution dataset of 41K prompts from seven public harmful/jailbreak datasets. A universal finding across all 15 models was that reasoning chains are consistently riskier than final answers. Risk is concentrated in categories like misinformation, illegal activity, bias, and physical/psychological harm, with illegal compliance showing the starkest divergence. Case studies reveal instances where harmful operational details are 'leaked' in reasoning or a seemingly harmless chain 'escapes' into a dangerous final answer. To mitigate this, the researchers propose 'Adaptive Multi-Principle Steering,' a white-box, test-time intervention method. It identifies unsafe principles being activated during reasoning and gently steers the model's internal representations towards safer directions. Validated on open-source models, this approach reduced unsafe outputs by up to 40.8% while preserving 97.7% of benchmark performance. The work underscores the critical need to monitor and secure the entire reasoning process, not just the final output.

marsbit33m ago

15 Reasoning Models Flip Collectively: Unpacking the Latent Risks Hidden in the Chain of Thought Behind Their Outputs

marsbit33m ago

Trading

Spot

Hot Articles

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of ETH (ETH) are presented below.

活动图片