Раджив Кхемани: Нацбезопасность США зависит от децентрализации добычи биткоина

investing.ruPublished on 2024-10-06Last updated on 2024-10-06

Раджив Кхемани сказал, что вредоносные коды способны частично или полностью прекратить майнинг биткоина в определенных географических зонах, вызвав падение хешрейта криптовалюты:

«Всякий раз, когда у вас есть программное обеспечение или прошивка от иностранной организации, подключенные к вашей энергетической инфраструктуре (которой стал Биткоин), вы должны убедиться, что должным образом снижаете риски от использования такого ПО. В определенной степени национальная безопасность США зависит от децентрализации добычи биткоина».

По мнению бизнесмена, сторонняя прошивка майнингового оборудования в теории может быть применена для запуска «атаки 51%» на сеть Биткоина или компрометации энергетической инфраструктуры США. Если производство оборудования для майнинга будет находиться преимущественно на территории одной страны, ее правительство может ограничить экспорт продукции и оставить майнеров без доступа к технологии, считает инвестор.

Кемани заявил, что США следует проводить политику, поощряющую производство оборудования для добычи криптовалюты, чтобы одна страна не могла контролировать большую часть общей вычислительной мощности или поставок оборудования.

Ранее страховая компания Relm Insurance запустила первый на рынке страховой полис BTC BI, защищающий майнинговые компании от рисков простоя и поломки оборудования.

Читайте оригинальную статью на сайте Bits.media

Related Reads

Founder of Baixing.com: The Notion That Large Language Models Will Devour Everything, I Believe Half of It

Founder of Baixing.com: I Only Half-Believe the Saying “Large Language Models Will Devour Everything” Author: Wang Jianshuo, Founder of Baixing.com Many proclaim that large models are everything, but the author is skeptical. He argues that such sweeping claims often stem from a limited understanding of the future. Drawing parallels to past technologies like electricity and the internet—which were predicted to “devour everything” but didn’t—he suggests that large language models (LLMs) are better seen as a foundational base. Like electricity, this base is essential for modern development, but its real value emerges only when applied to specific scenarios through various “machines” or “tools” (e.g., Claude Code for programming, Claude Design for design). The author acknowledges that LLMs may indeed replace many existing software systems built on rigid rules, workflows, and forms (e.g., CRMs, SaaS tools), as these are precisely what LLMs excel at processing. However, he emphasizes that beyond software, elements like customer data, execution capabilities (e.g., booking a flight), trust, and physical-world interactions will not be “devoured.” Instead, he foresees that after streamlining existing software, LLMs will open up a larger space for innovative, next-generation applications. These new tools will likely feature fluid interfaces and rely less on fixed rules, unleashing greater creativity. The author cautions against short-sightedness, recalling how in 2004 many believed internet giants like Sina, Sohu, and NetEase would monopolize the market—only to be proven wrong by subsequent disruptions. In conclusion, while LLMs are a crucial foundation and a current focal point, the true mainstream of this wave lies in the diverse applications built atop them to solve concrete problems. The phrase “devour everything” is imprecise; the real opportunity lies in identifying and leveraging the areas where LLMs do bring transformative change.

marsbit2h ago

Founder of Baixing.com: The Notion That Large Language Models Will Devour Everything, I Believe Half of It

marsbit2h ago

Founder of Baixing.com: I Only Half Believe in the Notion that Large Language Models Devour Everything

The founder of Baixing Wang states that while large language models (LLMs) are an extremely important foundational technology—akin to electricity or the internet—he only "half believes" the notion that they will "consume everything." He argues that LLMs provide a base layer of intelligence, but real-world value and transformation come from integrating this intelligence into specific applications and devices designed for particular scenarios—like how electricity powers various appliances from washing machines to TVs. He agrees LLMs will likely consume or replace a significant portion of existing rule-based, workflow-driven software (e.g., many SaaS systems, CRMs), as these are precisely what LLMs excel at handling. However, numerous other elements—such as customer data, execution capabilities (e.g., booking a flight), trust, and physical-world interactions—will not be consumed. Wang emphasizes that after LLMs absorb certain software layers, they will open up a much larger space for innovation: new types of "streaming" software with less rigid interfaces, where fixed rules are managed by AI. This next wave of applications built on top of the stable LLM foundation is where the true mainstream opportunity lies. He cautions against the short-sightedness of declaring any technology as all-consuming, drawing parallels to past premature predictions about internet giants monopolizing the web. The key is to find opportunities within the areas LLMs do transform.

链捕手2h ago

Founder of Baixing.com: I Only Half Believe in the Notion that Large Language Models Devour Everything

链捕手2h ago

Trading

Spot
活动图片