Отчет: мошенническая схема pig butchering стала популярнее в 2024 году

cryptonews.ruPublished on 2024-02-29Last updated on 2024-08-29

Эксперты Chainalysis опубликовали вторую часть отчета по киберпреступлениям в криптосфере за 2024 год.
Согласно ему, злоумышленники изменили вектор поведения, отказавшись от более сложных и продолжительных схем.
Теперь они отдают предпочтение целевым атакам, например, pig butchering.
Эта схема предполагает тщательную обработку жертвы с целью выманивания у нее средств.

В 2024 году злоумышленники переходят от более сложных и продолжительных мошеннических схем к простым, например, pig butchering. Об этом говорится в новом отчете экспертов Chainalysis.

Согласно ему, в период с 2020 по 2024 год продолжительность мошеннических схем существенно сократилась. Если в первом случае их средний «срок жизни» составлял 271 день, то во втором — 42 дня.

Изменение средней продолжительности мошеннических схем. Источник: отчет Chainalysis.

«Эта макротенденция согласуется с постепенным переходом мошенников от сложных схем Понци, которые забрасывают широкую сеть, к более целевым кампаниям, таким как pig butchering или “отравление адресов”, что отчасти обусловлено усилением мер по обеспечению соблюдения и внесением эмитентами стейблкоинов в черный список счетов злоумышленников», — считают эксперты.

В качестве примера такой схемы в организации привели KK Park. Это целый комплекс в Мьянме, сотрудники которого замешаны во многочисленных случаях интернет-мошенничества.

По данным Chainalysis, в 2024 году эта организация заработала $101,22 млн.

«Важно отметить, что мошенники из KK Park и подобных организаций крайне изобретательны, когда дело доходит до адаптации их тактики. Они часто покупают профили Facebook, Tinder и Match.com у китайских сервисов для использования в своих кампаниях», — отмечено в отчете.

Pig butchering — это мошенническая схема, при которой злоумышленник тщательно обрабатывает жертву, вступая с ней в общение.

Ярким примером такого подхода является описанный нами ранее случай из Китая. Учительница передала мошеннику $546 000 для реализации некоего «прибыльного биткоин-проекта». Она долго не могла поверить, что ее обманули.

Рост популярности схем pig butchering отметили также и в Федеральном бюро расследований (ФБР).

Aave just crossed $1M in swap revenue, but HERE’s what you’re missing

Aave is expanding beyond its core lending and deposit services, establishing new revenue streams. The launch of its Global Dollar Hub and increased user activity have driven momentum. Notably, Aave DAO's swap revenue has surpassed $1 million since the launch of "Aave Will Win," with Ethereum being the primary contributor. This provides a new income source alongside traditional lending fees, and future features like leverage tools could further boost this growth. On-chain activity surged around the V4 Global Dollar Hub launch, briefly pushing the AAVE token price from ~$72 to ~$95 before settling near $87. Importantly, user growth remained strong despite the price pullback, with new addresses reaching 1,806 on June 30th—far above typical daily levels—and active addresses peaking at 3,144. Technical indicators like an RSI of 58 and a positive CMF suggest some underlying market strength remains.

ambcrypto15m ago

Aave just crossed $1M in swap revenue, but HERE’s what you’re missing

ambcrypto15m ago

Securitize Goes Public, The True 'First RWA Stock' Has Arrived

Securitize (SECZ) debuted on the NYSE on July 2nd and simultaneously launched a tokenized version of its shares on Solana and Avalanche. This move, representing ~$295M in tokenized shares, is a significant step for the RWA narrative, shifting focus from private assets to public equities. Critically, this is a case of "issuer-led" tokenization, where Securitize itself aims for the tokens to represent the same underlying common stock, not a synthetic derivative. This provides a more credible sample for other public companies to evaluate. The model is not about permissionless trading. Access is restricted to eligible U.S. investors via Securitize's regulated platform, with full KYC/AML. Compliance is built into the product, leveraging its status as a registered broker-dealer and transfer agent. The blockchains act as an efficient execution layer for recording ownership and enabling programmable transfers (e.g., using Solana's Token-2022 for compliance rules), but within a hybrid, regulated framework. Key challenges remain: proving meaningful secondary liquidity, ensuring seamless execution of shareholder rights (voting, dividends), and, most importantly, attracting adoption from non-crypto-native public companies. If successful, SECZ could evolve from a proof-of-concept into early evidence of structural change in capital markets infrastructure.

marsbit45m ago

Securitize Goes Public, The True 'First RWA Stock' Has Arrived

marsbit45m ago

To Buy Discounted ETH, How to Choose Between Bitmine and SharpLink?

"Buying Discounted ETH: SharpLink vs. Bitmine" analyzes two major treasury companies during a period of low ETH prices. Both hold significant ETH positions at a loss: SharpLink (with ~886.7K ETH at an average cost of ~$3,609, unrealized loss >$1.7B) and Bitmine (with 5.7M ETH, ~4.7% of supply, cost ~$3,400, loss >$11B). Despite similar ETH price declines and inclusion in Russell indices, their market valuations differ markedly. SharpLink trades at a ~21% discount to its ETH net asset value (NAV), while Bitmine's discount is only ~6%. The article compares them across key dimensions: financing ability (Bitmine raised $19.2B aggressively vs. SharpLink's smaller, steady raises), stock liquidity (Bitmine is significantly more liquid), and narrative execution (both support Ethlabs; SharpLink plans RWA tokenization, yet to materialize). For short-term trading on an ETH rebound, Bitmine offers better liquidity and a smaller NAV discount. For long-term holding, SharpLink's deeper discount and simpler capital structure (vs. Bitmine's perpetual preferred shares) may offer more upside if ETH recovers, though it carries higher liquidity risk. The choice depends on the investor's risk preference between SharpLink's visible price/ liquidity weakness and Bitmine's hidden risks in its capital structure and past valuation premiums.

marsbit1h ago

To Buy Discounted ETH, How to Choose Between Bitmine and SharpLink?

marsbit1h ago

Racing with Robinhood, Is Lighter Playing a Big Game?

"Lighter, a perpetual and spot exchange founded in 2022 by Vladimir Novakovski, is making strategic moves. After raising $68 million in November 2025 from investors like Founders Fund and Ribbit Capital, the project has recently updated its tokenomics and deepened its partnership with Robinhood. Key updates include a shift to permanent token burns from protocol revenue, with the first burn scheduled post-Q2 2026, and a change in staking rewards to be funded from the ecosystem reserve instead of protocol revenue. In July, Lighter was designated as Robinhood's official perpetual contracts partner and integrated directly into the Robinhood Wallet, gaining access to its vast user base. The partnership includes a $11 million LIT rewards program for users. Furthermore, Lighter plans to launch options trading in Q3 2025 and is reportedly working with the CFTC towards becoming a compliant decentralized exchange in the US. The LIT token has a fixed supply of 1 billion, with significant portions allocated to the team and investors subject to a 1-year cliff followed by a 3-year linear vesting schedule, starting from the Token Generation Event in December 2025."

Foresight News1h ago

Racing with Robinhood, Is Lighter Playing a Big Game?

Foresight News1h ago

Buying Discounted ETH, Which One to Choose: Bitmine or SharpLink?

The article compares two major ETH treasury companies, SharpLink and Bitmine, for investors seeking indirect ETH exposure via stocks during a bear market. Both hold significant ETH at similar cost bases (~$3,609 and ~$3,400 respectively) and face comparable percentage losses (>50%). Key differences lie in scale, valuation, and financing. Bitmine holds 5.7M ETH (4.7% of supply) with a ~$76B market cap and trades at only a ~6% discount to its net asset value (NAV). It has superior liquidity, aggressive financing (raising $19.2B in 11 months), and inclusion in the Russell 1000 index. However, its structure includes perpetual preferred stock with dividend costs, and past investors paid significant premiums, adding an extra layer of valuation risk. SharpLink holds ~887k ETH, has a ~$10.2B market cap, and trades at a deeper ~21% discount to NAV. Its financing has been slower, relying on smaller offerings. It promotes an "institutional narrative" with ties to Ethereum co-founder Joe Lubin and RWA/tokenization plans, though these remain unimplemented. Its liquidity is lower, but its simpler capital structure means current investors aren't paying for past overvaluation. In summary: For tactical trading in a downturn, Bitmine offers better liquidity and tighter NAV pricing. For potential long-term upside if ETH recovers, SharpLink's deeper discount offers more theoretical repair room, though it faces execution risks. The choice depends on whether one prioritizes trading efficiency and scale (Bitmine) or a potentially larger discount and simpler structure (SharpLink).

链捕手1h ago

Buying Discounted ETH, Which One to Choose: Bitmine or SharpLink?

链捕手1h ago

Trading

Spot