This Bitcoin price fractal from 2018 could trap bulls, sink BTC price to $25K — analyst

CointelegraphPublished on 2022-02-15Last updated on 2022-02-16

Abstract

The eerie fractal risks sending Bitcoin's price to $25,000 despite its sharp recovery in the previous weeks.

A recent price recovery in the Bitcoin (BTC) market risks getting erased due to an eerie fractal from 2018.

Bitcoin price cycle similarities

First spotted by CryptoBullet, an independent market analyst, the fractal shows Bitcoin recreating an inverse head-and-shoulders (IH&S) pattern that preceded its price decline toward $3,100 later in December 2018. As a result, anticipations that BTC's price will undergo similar declines in 2022 might grow.

That is primarily because of the strikingly similar price trends between the pric downtrends in 2018 and 2021-2022. For instance, Bitcoin formed two higher highs in April and May 2018 around $10,000 before plunging below $6,000 in July while constructing the IH&S pattern.

BTC/USD daily price chart featuring IH&S fractal from 2018. Source: TradingView

Interestingly, in October 2021-February 2022, Bitcoin underwent an identical price trajectory, forming two higher highs — near $65,000 in April and $69,000 in November. Later, the price corrected to below $33,000 in early February while forming another IH&S pattern.

With IH&S being a bullish reversal pattern, BTC now awaits a breakout move towards or above $50,000. A similar technical setup shared by market analyst Lark Davis projects Bitcoin above $60,000.

2018 BTC price fractal risks trapping bulls

But a climb to $50,000 — or even $60,000 — may not absolve Bitcoin from its prevailing bearish bias. If the 2018 fractal repeats itself religiously in 2022, BTC's likelihood of falling toward $25,000 appears higher, as explained in the chart below.

BTC/USD weekly price chart. Source: TradingView

Notably, the 2018 price action saw Bitcoin breaking out to the upside after its IH&S formation, reaching almost $10,000.

In doing so, BTC's price briefly reclaimed its 50-week exponential moving average (50-week EMA; the red wave) as support, only to break below it later. As it did, the price further declined towards the 200-week EMA (the blue wave) near $3,000, where it bottomed out in December 2018.

Applying the same fractal to the ongoing price action, Bitcoin might end up closing above its 50-week EMA, eventually hitting levels in the $50,000-$60,000 range. Nonetheless, it will move back below the red wave, and extend its decline towards the 200-week EMA, which sits near $25,000.

The negative outlook aligns with what Ari Rudd, an independent market analyst, shared in a Twitter thread on Feb. 14.

As Cointelegraph covered, the chartist cited Logarithmic Fractal Growth and moving average ribbon supports, suggesting that BTC's price might fall to the $24,000-$27,000 range in the coming months.

Not another 2018?

On the brighter side, Bitcoin has been treading ahead against more optimistic fundamentals than in 2018. Notably, BTC's price has rallied from under $4,000 in March 2020 to as high as $69,000 in November 2021, amid an increase in retail and institutional adoption led by macroeconomic risks such as higher inflation.

A November 2021 opinion editorial penned by Bloomberg Opinion’s John Authers points out that headline inflation, the consumer price index (CPI), rose roughly 28% in the past ten years. But denominating the same gauge in Bitcoin returned 99.99% deflation. But the mathematics came with a warning.

"If you put all your life savings into bitcoin a decade ago, well done. Should you do that now? Perhaps not," wrote Authers, adding:

"Over the last 10 years, bitcoin has delivered a lot of deflation, including 76% in the last 12 months alone, but also a couple of terrifying episodes when annual inflation ran at more than 200%."

Interestingly, the "terrifying episodes" occurred during the bearish cycles of 2015 and 2018.

Related Reads

AI is Killing 'Poor People's Entertainment'

AI Is Eliminating 'Entertainment for the Poor' This article discusses the rising cost of video gaming, arguing that AI is making digital entertainment increasingly expensive. It follows the example of a frugal gamer who, accustomed to waiting for discounts and buying second-hand games, now faces a new reality. Video game consoles like the PS5 Pro and Switch 2 are increasing in price post-launch, breaking the traditional pattern of降价 over time. Game prices are also rising, with major titles like GTA 6 launching at $80. Furthermore, the industry is moving towards eliminating physical media, exemplified by Sony's plan to stop PS disc production by 2028. This shift blocks the二手 market, a key cost-saving avenue for players. Even Valve's anticipated affordable Steam Machine launched with a high price and disappointing specs. Manufacturers cite inflation, supply chain issues, and rising development costs, but a core driver is the AI boom. AI data centers now consume semiconductor and memory resources once prioritized for consumer electronics like game consoles. This competition from a more profitable sector drives up hardware costs. Additionally, developing modern AAA games with massive teams over many years is astronomically expensive, pushing publishers towards digital-only distribution and subscription models to secure recurring revenue. The article suggests this trend extends beyond gaming. Video streaming, music platforms, cloud storage, and AI tools are increasingly locked behind complex subscription tiers. While AI promises future benefits, it is currently making digital entertainment and services more costly. The era of progressively cheaper, accessible online entertainment is ending, forcing consumers to pay more upfront for future technological promises.

marsbit24m ago

AI is Killing 'Poor People's Entertainment'

marsbit24m ago

The Demise of the Trillion-HKD ETF Myth: SK Hynix Plummets, Hong Kong Switches from 'Double Leverage' to 'Flexible Leverage', South Korea Restricts Leveraged ETF Investments

South Korea's AI-driven bull market has taken a sharp downturn, severely impacting SK Hynix's stock and prompting regulatory tightening in both Hong Kong and South Korea on single-stock leveraged products. The CSOP SK Hynix Daily Leveraged (2x) ETF, once the world's largest single-stock leveraged ETF with over HKD 130 billion in assets, saw its value plummet by over 80% as SK Hynix shares fell nearly 46% from their June peak, erasing more than HKD 100 billion. In response, Hong Kong's Securities and Futures Commission (SFC) revised its regulatory framework. Starting August 3rd, fixed 2x leverage for single-stock leveraged and inverse products will shift to a dynamic "flexible leverage" mechanism, where daily leverage can vary up to a maximum of 2x. This aims to balance market development with investor protection but has sparked debate about changes to the products' core features and potential reduced appeal for risk-seeking investors. Simultaneously, South Korean authorities announced plans to further restrict single-stock leveraged ETFs following two consecutive days of market circuit breakers. Proposed measures include capping individual investors' allocations to such products at 20% of their total financial investment assets, increasing trading costs, and enhancing suitability requirements. The Finance Minister publicly apologized, acknowledging insufficient initial risk assessment. Analysts note that while the long-term fundamentals for South Korean semiconductor firms like SK Hynix remain solid, short-term market volatility is heightened due to concentrated leveraged bets and shifting global risk sentiment. The regulatory moves in both markets signal a clear shift from encouraging innovation towards prioritizing risk control, reminding investors of the amplified risks inherent in leveraged products.

marsbit30m ago

The Demise of the Trillion-HKD ETF Myth: SK Hynix Plummets, Hong Kong Switches from 'Double Leverage' to 'Flexible Leverage', South Korea Restricts Leveraged ETF Investments

marsbit30m ago

After the Privatization of the Internet, Silicon Valley Begins Privatizing Human Civilization

"The Privatization of Human Civilization" The article critiques how AI companies like Anthropic are systematically acquiring and digitizing millions of books—sometimes by destroying physical copies—to build proprietary training datasets for models like Claude. While a lawsuit resulted in a settlement, the author argues the deeper issue transcends copyright: it is about the privatization and centralized control of human knowledge and civilization. This process coincides with a powerful Silicon Valley ideology, exemplified by Marc Andreessen's "Techno-Optimist Manifesto" and movements like e/acc (Effective Accelerationism). This worldview frames technological growth and speed as inherently moral, portraying caution, regulation, and public dissent as obstacles to progress. It often envisions intelligence itself, rather than human well-being, as the ultimate goal, potentially sidelining present human concerns. Figures like Peter Thiel and Curtis Yarvin express skepticism towards democratic processes as too slow, suggesting more centralized, founder-led governance is efficient. This logic extends to AI, where a small team within a company defines the model's "constitution"—its rules, values, and definitions of truth and safety—effectively governing how millions understand the world. Thus, the scanned books symbolize a new form of control. Knowledge isn't erased but is ingested into private, opaque systems. The original, decentralized, and contestable nature of books and public knowledge is replaced by a curated, company-controlled output. The public's access to their own cultural heritage becomes mediated by corporate AI, which remembers civilization only in the form its creators dictate. This is not book-burning but a subtler, potentially more complete privatization of human memory and understanding.

marsbit39m ago

After the Privatization of the Internet, Silicon Valley Begins Privatizing Human Civilization

marsbit39m ago

Trading

Spot
活动图片