分析师发出警报:“以太坊正在消亡”,这可能是原因

币界网Published on 2024-08-08Last updated on 2024-08-08

币界网报道:
    以太坊在过去一周损失了24%的价值,与其他主要加密货币相比表现不佳。分析师Duo Nine表示,以太坊的可扩展性方法可能会降低其代币的价值和需求。

在市值排名前10位的加密货币中,以太坊[ETH]是截至发稿时表现最差的,与同行相比,该资产在过去一周的价值下跌了约24%。

这种下跌甚至延伸到该资产的前一天表现,下降了3.9%。

分析以太坊的衰落

Duo Nine是加密货币分析领域的一位受人尊敬的人物,他对以太坊目前的发展轨迹发出了警告,表明该平台可能正在“慢慢消亡”

Duo Nine表示,以太坊的表现不佳,尤其是与比特币和Solana相比,这引发了人们对其未来可行性的关键问题。

Duo Nine评论道:“当比特币和Solana的表现都优于以太坊时,你必须问自己一些严肃的问题。”他指出,以太坊的最大主义者和开发人员似乎对资产的潜力失去了信心,这一趋势令人不安。

这位分析师将以太坊的部分困境归因于他所说的“XLM诅咒”,即网络的效率和成本效益并没有转化为代币价值的增加。

他解释说,

“如果你的网络既快速又便宜,那么你的代币就没有理由大量使用。”

Arbitrum等第2层解决方案的引入大大降低了交易成本,虽然从技术角度来看是有益的,但可能对ETH的市场价格不利。

ETH作为天然气代币的需求减少可能会降低其相关性和价值。

此外,Duo Nine批评了以太坊的经济模式,该模式现在看到了通货膨胀的代币供应,据称是为了弥补仅通过交易费用无法满足的运营成本。

他认为,这增加了ETH价格的下行压力。

他表示:“对ETH的需求如此之低,以至于他们不得不再次凭空印制代币。”他指出,正通胀率是该资产的看跌信号。

他补充说,

“为什么会发生这种情况?因为Vitalik决定通过L2扩展ETH,并使其在费用方面变得极其便宜。但有一个问题。你看,ETH就像石油,现在每个人都在转向电动汽车。那么以太坊的意义是什么?作为一个网络,它会做得很好并蓬勃发展,但如果他们将ETH作为汽油代币进行扩展,它的价格就会崩溃。”

来自Solana和许多其他山寨币的竞争压力使以太坊的处境更加复杂。

专家质疑大幅降低费用是否是一个战略错误,因为保持足够的需求来支持降低的费用是具有挑战性的,最终可能会给以太坊的价格带来下行压力。

基本面表明了什么?

在更广泛的市场中,以太坊的指标呈现出喜忧参半的局面。

活动地址的数量波动很大。在上个月底激增至455k多个地址后,它在8月3日经历了更高的激增至467k,但现在已回落至429k,比8月5日的400000略有增加。

用户参与度的这种波动性表明,虽然网络仍然活跃,但用户的信心可能正在减弱。


阅读以太坊的[ETH]价格预测2024-25


在金融方面,以太坊的未平仓合约(代表尚未结算的期货和期权等未偿衍生品合约的总额)在短短一天内下跌了3.60%。

相反,表明这些合约总价值的未平仓合约量增长了3.96%,表明投资行为之间存在复杂的相互作用。

Trending Cryptos

Related Reads

NVIDIA CPU Advances, China's RISC-V Responds: Semiconductor Deep Dive - Part Four

NVIDIA is set to launch its new Vera AI data center CPU in China as early as August, with high pricing. While this move offers a new option, it highlights China's continued dependence on foreign-controlled Arm architecture. In response, the Chinese semiconductor industry is increasingly turning to RISC-V as a strategic alternative for achieving high-performance computing autonomy. The article explores the concept of the "impossible triangle" in CPU development—balancing prosperity, control, and autonomy—and posits that RISC-V's open-source, modular nature offers a unique path to achieving all three. While RISC-V is already dominant in embedded systems, the focus is now shifting to data centers and AI workloads. China has become a global hotspot for RISC-V development, driven by AI-driven compute demand, supply chain concerns from export controls, cost benefits of open-source, and strong policy support. Multiple Chinese companies have reportedly crossed the key performance threshold of 15 SPECint per GHz, a benchmark for entering the high-performance CPU club. Progress extends beyond single-core benchmarks. Companies are developing complete computing subsystems, including commercial-grade coherent network-on-chip (NoC) technology and server processors with up to 40 cores that strictly adhere to the RVA23 standard to ensure software compatibility. Real-world applications are emerging in areas like video transcoding and edge AI. However, significant challenges remain. The RISC-V ecosystem faces fragmentation, immature toolchains and verification processes, and gaps in single-core performance and energy efficiency compared to mature x86 and Arm architectures. The formidable software moat, epitomized by NVIDIA's CUDA, is a long-term hurdle. In conclusion, while RISC-V cannot immediately replace offerings like NVIDIA's Vera, it represents a viable long-term path for China to develop a self-sufficient, high-performance CPU ecosystem. The journey is acknowledged to be long and arduous, requiring sustained effort to overcome technical and ecosystem challenges.

marsbit2h ago

NVIDIA CPU Advances, China's RISC-V Responds: Semiconductor Deep Dive - Part Four

marsbit2h ago

My Coding Betting Dashboard is Profiting, but Polymarket is Truly Not a Good Place for 'Arbitrage'

The author built a custom monitoring dashboard for Polymarket, a prediction market platform, and tested it with $1,600, achieving over 30% returns. However, the core argument is that Polymarket is not a good venue for traditional arbitrage. The dashboard has two main sections: a "Portfolio Dashboard" for tracking active positions with key metrics like total capital, P&L, and a risk-control module using a tier system (T1, T2, T3), and an "Opportunity Watchlist" for monitoring markets. The article details a critical structural trap in binary markets: a bet with a high perceived probability of success still carries a 100% loss risk if wrong. The author's T1/T2/T3 system is designed to manage this by limiting position sizes based on conviction and time horizon, emphasizing that high confidence should not equal high concentration. A key insight is the danger of "pseudo-diversification"—betting on different markets driven by the same underlying variable. The author concludes that Polymarket offers few true low-risk, arbitrage opportunities. It is instead a high-risk environment where wins can create a false sense of mastery, leading to large losses. The platform is better viewed as a training ground for honing judgment through disciplined, framework-driven betting rather than a reliable income source. The tools help transform intuition into structured, rule-based decisions to mitigate the risk of catastrophic errors.

marsbit5h ago

My Coding Betting Dashboard is Profiting, but Polymarket is Truly Not a Good Place for 'Arbitrage'

marsbit5h ago

WeChat AI Card Hands-On Guide: Has the AI Shopping Era Arrived?

**"WeChat AI Card" Practical Test Guide: Has the Era of AI Shopping Arrived?** WeChat has officially launched the "AI Exclusive Card," a feature integrated into its Workbuddy AI assistant. This card is designed to handle payments for AI-initiated purchases. Our hands-on test reveals it's not yet a tool for fully autonomous AI shopping, but rather a controlled payment layer for AI agents. The AI Card functions as an isolated sub-wallet within WeChat Pay. Users must bind the card and transfer funds into it from their main wallet. Crucially, every transaction requires explicit user confirmation via smartphone scan; AI cannot spend autonomously. Currently accessible through the Workbuddy agent, the card targets specific digital consumption scenarios: purchasing paid content (reports, data), calling paid APIs/tools, and subscribing to services. Its design prioritizes security and control by separating funds and mandating approval for each payment. We tested a real-world scenario: ordering bubble tea via Workbuddy using a "Meituan Life Assistant" skill. The process encountered multiple hurdles: high "skill" usage costs (exceeding daily free credits), and most importantly, while a payment was successfully initiated, the AI purchased an incorrect product (a mismatched group-buy coupon instead of the desired drink). This highlights the current limitation: the **AI Card only solves the payment step**. The broader challenge lies in the **AI agent's execution chain**—accurately understanding intent, navigating third-party platforms, selecting the right product, and ensuring proper fulfillment. The payment succeeded, but the purchase failed to meet the user's need. In conclusion, the WeChat AI Exclusive Card is a cautious, early-step experiment in AI commerce. It provides a secure, user-controlled payment method for agent interactions but is not yet capable of reliable, end-to-end complex purchases. For now, it's best used for low-value, low-risk digital services with careful user verification at each step. The vision of AI handling complete shopping tasks remains a work in progress.

marsbit7h ago

WeChat AI Card Hands-On Guide: Has the AI Shopping Era Arrived?

marsbit7h ago

Trading

Spot
Futures

Hot Articles

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of ETH (ETH) are presented below.

活动图片