为 DeFi 监管做好准备:可移植 KYC 的作用

币界网Published on 2024-08-08Last updated on 2024-08-08

币界网报道:

作者:Thomas Gentle 来源:coindesk 翻译:善欧巴,

过去几年,全球加密货币监管格局迅速演变,监管规则制定的快速步伐不太可能在短期内放缓。立法者越来越多地将重点从中心化加密货币交易所转移到去中心化金融 (DeFi) 协议和应用程序 (dApps)。

欧盟通过 MICA 立法已经给 DeFI 公司带来压力,迫使它们开始对用户进行 KYC 审核,因为只有“真正去中心化”的项目才不受 MICA 监管,而实际上大多数 DeFi 应用程序都有组织或个人最终控制它们。此外,欧盟委员会的目标是在 2024 年底之前发布有关 DeFI 风险和建议的完整报告。在美国,SEC 已开始对全球最大的 DEX Uniswap 采取执法行动。

随着 DeFi 参与者数量的增加(如下图所示),监管机构对 DeFi 领域的关注度也越来越高。尽管未来立法的具体性质仍不确定,但可以肯定的是,反洗钱 (AML) 和了解你的客户 (KYC) 的基本原则将适用于 DeFi。

受监管机构通常遵循标准化的 KYC 框架来满足其监管要求:

  • 通过文件或非文件方式确认客户身份(客户识别程序/CIP)。

  • 通过扫描制裁、政治公众人物 (PEP)、负面媒体名单、客户职业、预期活动等来评估客户风险。

  • 持续监控后续是否被列入反洗钱监视名单、负面媒体名单、活动高峰等。

目前,每个个人开户的机构都会重复 KYC 流程的所有三个步骤。这要求个人多次提交相同的文件和信息。由于开设新银行账户并不是一件频繁的事情,因此客户通常不会强烈感受到重复 KYC 带来的不便。然而,在 DeFi 中,一个人每天可能会与 10 或 15 个协议进行交互。要求个人多次完成 KYC 会导致挫败感,并将 DeFi 变成传统金融系统的数字版本。

还有另一种选择:便携式 KYC。

DApp 现在拥有一个独特的机会来实现这一点,无论是在当前基本不受监管的环境中,还是在未来颁布 DeFi 特定的 AML/KYC 法规时。在无监管的环境中,公共区块链技术允许用户提交身份证明文件,根据 AML 监视名单筛选他们的姓名,扫描他们的链上活动以查找 AML 风险,并将每张支票的证明存储在他们的钱包中。然后,用户可以与获得许可的 dApp 进行交互,其智能合约可以过滤掉未通过 KYC 检查的用户。

这种方法对个人有利,因为他们不需要忍受反复提交文件的麻烦。它还为 dApp 带来了重大好处,确保它们不会冒违反制裁和洗钱规则的风险,同时节省合规人员和系统方面的资金,并抵御女巫攻击。

受 AML/KYC 法规约束的 DApp 可以使用便携式 KYC 来满足其监管义务的各个方面,类似于不受监管的 dApp。但是,受监管的 dApp 需要完全访问其客户的底层文档才能做出入职决策。虽然客户文档不能存储在公共区块链上,但受监管实体可以聘请服务提供商协助履行其 AML/KYC 义务。因此,便携式 KYC 服务提供商可以存储客户文档并将其传输给实体,使其能够决定是否让用户入职。

即将转向受监管的 DeFi 协议凸显了对创新合规解决方案的需求。便携式 KYC 提供了一种实用的方法来平衡用户便利性和监管要求,使 dApp 能够降低合规成本并降低风险。通过现在做好准备,DeFi 组织可以确保顺利过渡到更加受监管的未来,从而在生态系统中培养信任和韧性。

Related Reads

NVIDIA CPU Advances, China's RISC-V Responds: Semiconductor Deep Dive - Part Four

NVIDIA is set to launch its new Vera AI data center CPU in China as early as August, with high pricing. While this move offers a new option, it highlights China's continued dependence on foreign-controlled Arm architecture. In response, the Chinese semiconductor industry is increasingly turning to RISC-V as a strategic alternative for achieving high-performance computing autonomy. The article explores the concept of the "impossible triangle" in CPU development—balancing prosperity, control, and autonomy—and posits that RISC-V's open-source, modular nature offers a unique path to achieving all three. While RISC-V is already dominant in embedded systems, the focus is now shifting to data centers and AI workloads. China has become a global hotspot for RISC-V development, driven by AI-driven compute demand, supply chain concerns from export controls, cost benefits of open-source, and strong policy support. Multiple Chinese companies have reportedly crossed the key performance threshold of 15 SPECint per GHz, a benchmark for entering the high-performance CPU club. Progress extends beyond single-core benchmarks. Companies are developing complete computing subsystems, including commercial-grade coherent network-on-chip (NoC) technology and server processors with up to 40 cores that strictly adhere to the RVA23 standard to ensure software compatibility. Real-world applications are emerging in areas like video transcoding and edge AI. However, significant challenges remain. The RISC-V ecosystem faces fragmentation, immature toolchains and verification processes, and gaps in single-core performance and energy efficiency compared to mature x86 and Arm architectures. The formidable software moat, epitomized by NVIDIA's CUDA, is a long-term hurdle. In conclusion, while RISC-V cannot immediately replace offerings like NVIDIA's Vera, it represents a viable long-term path for China to develop a self-sufficient, high-performance CPU ecosystem. The journey is acknowledged to be long and arduous, requiring sustained effort to overcome technical and ecosystem challenges.

marsbit3h ago

NVIDIA CPU Advances, China's RISC-V Responds: Semiconductor Deep Dive - Part Four

marsbit3h ago

My Coding Betting Dashboard is Profiting, but Polymarket is Truly Not a Good Place for 'Arbitrage'

The author built a custom monitoring dashboard for Polymarket, a prediction market platform, and tested it with $1,600, achieving over 30% returns. However, the core argument is that Polymarket is not a good venue for traditional arbitrage. The dashboard has two main sections: a "Portfolio Dashboard" for tracking active positions with key metrics like total capital, P&L, and a risk-control module using a tier system (T1, T2, T3), and an "Opportunity Watchlist" for monitoring markets. The article details a critical structural trap in binary markets: a bet with a high perceived probability of success still carries a 100% loss risk if wrong. The author's T1/T2/T3 system is designed to manage this by limiting position sizes based on conviction and time horizon, emphasizing that high confidence should not equal high concentration. A key insight is the danger of "pseudo-diversification"—betting on different markets driven by the same underlying variable. The author concludes that Polymarket offers few true low-risk, arbitrage opportunities. It is instead a high-risk environment where wins can create a false sense of mastery, leading to large losses. The platform is better viewed as a training ground for honing judgment through disciplined, framework-driven betting rather than a reliable income source. The tools help transform intuition into structured, rule-based decisions to mitigate the risk of catastrophic errors.

marsbit6h ago

My Coding Betting Dashboard is Profiting, but Polymarket is Truly Not a Good Place for 'Arbitrage'

marsbit6h ago

WeChat AI Card Hands-On Guide: Has the AI Shopping Era Arrived?

**"WeChat AI Card" Practical Test Guide: Has the Era of AI Shopping Arrived?** WeChat has officially launched the "AI Exclusive Card," a feature integrated into its Workbuddy AI assistant. This card is designed to handle payments for AI-initiated purchases. Our hands-on test reveals it's not yet a tool for fully autonomous AI shopping, but rather a controlled payment layer for AI agents. The AI Card functions as an isolated sub-wallet within WeChat Pay. Users must bind the card and transfer funds into it from their main wallet. Crucially, every transaction requires explicit user confirmation via smartphone scan; AI cannot spend autonomously. Currently accessible through the Workbuddy agent, the card targets specific digital consumption scenarios: purchasing paid content (reports, data), calling paid APIs/tools, and subscribing to services. Its design prioritizes security and control by separating funds and mandating approval for each payment. We tested a real-world scenario: ordering bubble tea via Workbuddy using a "Meituan Life Assistant" skill. The process encountered multiple hurdles: high "skill" usage costs (exceeding daily free credits), and most importantly, while a payment was successfully initiated, the AI purchased an incorrect product (a mismatched group-buy coupon instead of the desired drink). This highlights the current limitation: the **AI Card only solves the payment step**. The broader challenge lies in the **AI agent's execution chain**—accurately understanding intent, navigating third-party platforms, selecting the right product, and ensuring proper fulfillment. The payment succeeded, but the purchase failed to meet the user's need. In conclusion, the WeChat AI Exclusive Card is a cautious, early-step experiment in AI commerce. It provides a secure, user-controlled payment method for agent interactions but is not yet capable of reliable, end-to-end complex purchases. For now, it's best used for low-value, low-risk digital services with careful user verification at each step. The vision of AI handling complete shopping tasks remains a work in progress.

marsbit9h ago

WeChat AI Card Hands-On Guide: Has the AI Shopping Era Arrived?

marsbit9h ago

Trading

Spot
Futures
活动图片