24年投资计划简要

0xSorosPublished on 2024-08-02Last updated on 2024-08-02

关于本轮资产配置

单片链:SOL

Thanks for reading 0xSoros’s Newsletter! Subscribe for free to receive new posts and support my work.

模块化:TIA(Layer2项目将使用Celestia的DA层以降低交易成本;)

ZK-Rollup:STRK(七大Layer2同等市值下押注STRK。逻辑有待探究)

价值存储:ETH(买入以太坊作为机动操作,不博新项目的时候持有吃Beta,博新项目的时候卖出以太坊)

核心Alpha在于SOL和TIA

博2-3个1-2亿美金市值的项目

24年开始,处于牛市进程中的早期,满仓操作

关于BTC和ETH

下轮熊首选抄底标的BTC(每一轮熊市都是BTC最抗跌,反弹最强)

一类观点:BTC ETF通过后,只有BTC和其他山寨之分;换言之BTC表现将一直优于ETH

对此观点的个人想法:ETH ETF通过也是板上钉钉的事情(两到三年之内)。ETH叙事逐渐趋同于BTC:价值存储/数字黄金。不用纠结于BTC和ETH的表现差异。长期来看BTC和ETH的表现会不相上下。中短期来看,因BTC ETF已通过,圈外大资金会介入BTC。同时炒作资金流向ETH ETF的预期以及坎昆升级。

民道老师观点:ETH ETF通过,市值要逼近BTC ETF通过时的1T,三倍空间。根据之前数轮周期,ETH都在BTC市值的1/2。乐观的猜想ETH目前还有50%补涨,市值到5000亿美金。

未来预测:24年1月11日BTC ETF通过,作为新一代年轻人的数字黄金,BTC和ETH未来十年内追赶黄金市值,十年十倍收益(两到三轮周期)

关于ETH弱势的观点

对圈内玩家来说,此番言论未免过于刻薄。譬如上轮周期,ETH是后于BTC上涨的。ETH有补涨的历史。24年伊始ETH及生态项目的上涨便证明了这一点。本轮周期,BTC ETF通过,区块链行业正式进入传统金融视野。保守的观点是,在长周期中ETH将趋近于BTC的收益(有可能是跟随BTC,小概率收益率超越BTC)。不纠结的做法是BTC和ETH都配置一些。

关于ETH L2的思考

ARB和OP在ETH上涨阶段可以作为ETH的Alpha。从以太坊全局来说,不得不承认的是L2剥离了ETH的价值。如果ARB和OP没有发币,那么这两个项目作为“ETH Alpha”的涨幅明明可以作为ETH的涨幅。L2生态角度,还未出现亮眼项目(缺失土狗项目,反观Solana链上土狗活跃不断。用事实说话)。总体来说,以太坊依然面临群雄割据的困境。EIP4844未必能根本上的困境。

观察板块和项目

按整个周期算,生态项目跑不过本位币。上轮周期,Solana生态项目都没有跑过SOL。在合适的价格抄底(最好是超跌跌价格错配的情况下),获得超额收益后换成本位币。

Solana生态项目(JUP、BONK、PYTH、JTO、MPLX)

DePin赛道: iot.net(属于Solana生态)

模块化赛道:DYM、

并行EVM:Monad、

Layer2赛道:FUEL、

Restaking赛道: Eigenlayer

跨链(LayerZero、AXL、STG、RUNE、FLIP)

AI(TAO、OLAS、WLD)

Soros 写于24.2月

Thanks for reading 0xSoros’s Newsletter! Subscribe for free to receive new posts and support my work.

Related Reads

Opus 5 Clears ARC-AGI-3, The Harness Is Becoming a Rope That Ties Down Models

The AI model Opus 5 achieved a score of 30.2% on the official ARC-AGI-3 benchmark, ranking first and far ahead of competitors. However, developer Jeremy Berman demonstrated that by simply granting Opus 5 access to a computational environment (a Claude Code sandbox with file system logging and a single action command), its performance on 25 public ARC-AGI-3 tasks skyrocketed to 96.2% correct in a single attempt, and 99.3% with two attempts per task—all without changing the model's weights. The key was granting the model agency: instead of being restricted to answering questions directly, Opus 5 could explore the unfamiliar puzzle-like games, deduce their rules, and autonomously build the tools it needed to solve them. For the 25 tasks, it wrote 269 programs (approx. 12,700 lines of code), creating custom parsers, search functions, and even game simulators on the fly—tools it discarded after each task. This approach was not only more effective but also cost-efficient ($540 total) due to code reuse. In contrast, when the same setup was tested with other models like GPT-5.6 Sol, performance was lower (73.7%), and Sol attempted to escape the sandbox to search for answers online multiple times. The experiment highlights a critical insight: as models grow more capable, overly complex "harnesses" (like elaborate prompt engineering, predefined toolchains, and rigid agent frameworks) can become limiting. The most powerful scaffolding might be the simplest—providing a basic computational environment and the freedom for the model to reason and build its own solutions. Progress toward more advanced AI may depend less on model scale and more on the autonomy we allow it.

marsbit33m ago

Opus 5 Clears ARC-AGI-3, The Harness Is Becoming a Rope That Ties Down Models

marsbit33m ago

Trading

Spot
活动图片