UK's Digital Pound Approach Should Help Manage Privacy Concerns, Experts Say

CoinDeskPolicyPublicado em 2024-01-30Última atualização em 2024-01-31

Resumo

The Bank of England's recent consultation saw 50,000 responses, many welcoming the digital pound's design but sharing concerns about privacy.

  • The U.K. released its results from its digital pound consultation on Thursday, and privacy was a key worry.
  • The idea to tackle privacy concerns by having a platform model and releasing legislation should help, experts told CoinDesk.

The U.K.'s approach to handling privacy concerns posed by a digital pound should help quench concerns, according to interviews with a wide range of crypto industry legal and technical insiders.

The highly anticipated U.K. consultation on a digital pound closed in June last year, and the Bank of England (BoE) – alongside the government's finance arm, the Treasury – released the results from it on Thursday. Many of the 50,000 responses welcomed the proposed digital pound design, but chief among the concerns raised was privacy.

Several experts that CoinDesk spoke with agreed that the government's approach to tackling these concerns could be effective.

Advertisement
Advertisement

"It has recognized privacy concerns at every stage," Jannah Patchay, executive director and policy lead at the Digital Pound Foundation, said in an interview, praising the "really good job" the government did to keep this point in mind.

Platform Model

Respondents strongly agreed with the proposal that neither the bank nor the government should have access to personal data but were concerned this would not be enforced, the consultation response said.

"On the face of it, the Bank of England's 'platform model' is an elegant solution to the privacy problem," Richard Gendal Brown, chief technology officer at R3, said in a statement.

Private firms – instead of the government – would have direct and commercial relationships with customers, the consultation response said.

The BoE's platform model would mean that the central bank only provides the core infrastructure and ledger for a digital pound while private firms would act as wallet providers. The private platforms would require the identity information of wallet account holders to comply with anti-money laundering regulations.

Laws

The government has said it's taking a cautious approach, and a decision on a digital pound could be made in 2025 or 2026. Before a digital pound is launched, Parliament would have to put through legislation that is meant to protect people's privacy.

Advertisement
Advertisement

"Their commitment to enshrining individual privacy and control in law should reassure the public," Varun Paul, senior director for central bank digital currency and financial market Infrastructure at Fireblocks, said in a statement.

Some industry lobbying groups are initially supportive of the government's approach.

"We welcome the Bank of England’s and HM Treasury’s response to the digital pound consultation, and we are pleased to see that primary legislation would guarantee users’ privacy and control of a digital pound," a spokesperson from CryptoUK said in a statement.

However, it is not yet clear what the government's legislation to safeguard people's privacy will actually look like. Plus, the digital pound is still in its design phase, meaning nothing is set in stone, said Louise Abbott, a partner at Keystone Law.

"We would like to see much more detail from the government and the Bank of England on this important subject, including a clearer plan of action and timeline around the next steps for a digital pound," CryptoUK said.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Before a final stamp is made on a digital pound's future, the government has committed to consulting more with the public.

"It's not enough that the solution be technically correct and private-by-design; the key is ensuring that the population also believes that this is the case,” Brown said, adding that the design of a digital pound needs to keep personally identifiable data well away from the core ledger.

"The goal should be ‘we can’t access your data’, rather than simply ‘we promise we won’t access your data’,” Brown said.

Edited by Jesse Hamilton.

Leituras Relacionadas

Foundation Steps Back, Ethlabs Steps Forward: Ethereum Undergoes Its Largest Restructuring in History

On June 23rd, the Ethereum ecosystem witnessed two major shifts, signaling a significant governance realignment. First, former Ethereum Foundation researchers established Ethlabs, a new independent non-profit. Backed by major ETH holders like Bitmine and SharpLink, Ethlabs aims to address practical needs for institutional adoption, including faster settlement, native asset issuance, cross-chain transactions, and mainnet scaling. Secondly, the Ethereum Foundation announced a major restructuring, laying off 54 employees (20% of its staff) to become a leaner entity focused on protocol governance and maintenance rather than being the primary builder. This move represents a pivotal correction. Criticisms had mounted over the Foundation's perceived slowness, lack of clear strategy, and over-reliance on Vitalik Buterin's influence. Ethlabs emerges as a more execution-oriented, "industrialized" layer focused on market adoption—bridging the gap between research and real-world use. Notably, Vitalik Buterin is absent from its list of supporters, interpreted as an intentional step to avoid excessive personal endorsement and allow the organization to build independent credibility. The Ethereum Foundation's downsizing and redefinition mark a retreat from its former central coordinating role. It now aims to share the "privilege of stewarding Ethereum" with other emerging groups like Ethlabs, the Ethereum Applications Guild, and The Ethereum Economic Zone. Analysts frame this dual shift as the Foundation ensuring Ethereum remains "correct" (credibly neutral), while Ethlabs must prove it remains "effective" (competitive and attractive for capital and adoption). This addresses community "shareholder-like anxiety" about ETH's market performance. While risks exist—such as concerns over shifting from Foundation centrality to large-holder influence—the consensus is that the greater risk for Ethereum was inaction, caught between technical idealism and organizational inertia. These steps aim to create a more multi-stakeholder, execution-driven future for the network.

链捕手Há 5h

Foundation Steps Back, Ethlabs Steps Forward: Ethereum Undergoes Its Largest Restructuring in History

链捕手Há 5h

Second Half of U.S. Crypto Policy: The Clarity Act Aims for 60 Votes, CFTC's "One-Person Commission" Becomes Biggest Variable

In a pivotal year for US crypto policy, the "CLARITY Act" is advancing in the Senate but faces a high hurdle, needing 60 votes to pass. Key challenges include bridging partisan divides on ethics and swaying undecided Republican senators within a tight legislative calendar of only about 40 working days. The policy "second half" involves intense negotiations on a broader framework for Web3 and DeFi, including crypto tax reforms and the Blockchain Regulatory Certainty Act. A significant uncertainty is the understaffed CFTC, operating with four commissioner vacancies, which complicates regulatory clarity. Meanwhile, the departure of key "crypto champions"—SEC Commissioner Hester Peirce and Senator Cynthia Lummis—will impact ongoing policy efforts. Industry experts are cautiously optimistic but realistic. Sara K. Weed notes that while progress is being made, CLARITY is unlikely to pass this Congress, pushing agencies like the SEC and CFTC to provide more guidance. Sulolit Mukherjee suggests meaningful crypto tax legislation is more likely to be attached to larger must-pass bills. Rashan Colbert discusses the jurisdictional debate over prediction markets, emphasizing the need for a regulatory framework that fosters their development as financial tools rather than treating them broadly as gambling. The clock is ticking, but opportunities remain for substantive progress through continued bipartisan dialogue and pragmatic efforts.

marsbitHá 8h

Second Half of U.S. Crypto Policy: The Clarity Act Aims for 60 Votes, CFTC's "One-Person Commission" Becomes Biggest Variable

marsbitHá 8h

Research Report Analysis: Morgan Stanley Details SanDisk SNDK, The Truth About Cloud Data Center Pricing Power and AI Inference Benefits

Morgan Stanley raised its price target for SanDisk (SNDK) from $1100 to $1750 on June 22, maintaining an Overweight rating. The upgrade is driven by AI inference demand reshaping the NAND market, particularly for KV Cache and context window storage in cloud data centers. These cloud clients exhibit price inelasticity and sign long-term contracts, granting SanDisk significant pricing power. SanDisk's New Business Model (NBM) agreements, covering over one-third of FY27 bit shipments with 3-5 year terms and fixed price/price collar structures, are crucial. They are projected to sustain gross margins around 80% even at floor prices, providing a buffer against cyclical downturns. Morgan Stanley forecasts gross margins to surge from 30.3% in FY25 to 86.7% in FY27e. With NAND supply expected to remain tight into 2026/2027 and cloud/data centers becoming the largest end-market, SanDisk holds supply-side pricing power. The company targets 15-19% bit growth via technology transitions, not capacity expansion. Revenue is projected to grow ~6.6x from FY25 to FY27, with EPS rising from $2.74 to $14.73, driven by high-margin cloud business. Key upside catalysts include faster enterprise SSD adoption and edge AI growth. Downside risks involve slower industry growth, competitor capex increases, market share loss, and competition from Chinese players like YMTC. The investment thesis rests on AI-driven structural demand, NBM's margin protection, and sustained supply tightness. The $1750 target implies ~28x FY27e P/E.

marsbitHá 9h

Research Report Analysis: Morgan Stanley Details SanDisk SNDK, The Truth About Cloud Data Center Pricing Power and AI Inference Benefits

marsbitHá 9h

Trading

Spot
Futuros
活动图片