ETH Devs Set Tentative Dencun Launch Dates for Key Testnets

BlockworksPublished on 2024-01-03Last updated on 2024-01-15

Abstract

Ethereum developers set tentative dates to roll out the Dencun upgrade on multiple testnets, eyeing a Q1 2024 mainnet release.

Ethereum core developers have set tentative dates to roll out the Dencun upgrade on key testnets.

The move follows promising results observed during a Goerli shadow fork.

The upgrade introduces a feature that kicks off Ethereum’s danksharding roadmap.

After an extended period of delays, the once seemingly distant Ethereum Dencun upgrade now appears within reach. Doubling down on resolutions from a previous meeting, core Ethereum developers have now set tentative dates for the upgrade rollout on several key testnets, which signals increased conviction in an early 2024 mainnet release.

Ethereum Core Devs Propose Dates Goerli, Sepolia, and Holesky Forks

In a meeting on December 7, Ethereum developers had hinted at the possibility of rolling out the Dencun upgrade on Goerli, the soon-to-be-phased-out testnet for staking infrastructure and other protocol-level iterations, in January 2024, basing the projection on the outcome of a planned shadow fork.

In the most recent and final All Core Developers Execution (ACDE) call for 2023, held on Thursday, December 21, developers disclosed that the Goerli shadow fork had proceeded smoothly. This is according to Ethereum Foundation Protocol Support member Tim Beiko, who shared updates from the meeting in an X thread on Thursday.

“Post-Dencun the network was at 99% participation rate. With things stable, the teams started spamming the network with blobs, aiming for an average of 4 per blocks but the network stabilized around 3, as intended,” Beiko wrote.

Following the promising results of the shadow forks, Ethereum developers now seem more assured of their earlier estimations and have set tentative dates to start testing out the Dencun upgrade on Goerli, Sepolia (the main testnet for DApps, smart contract and EVM functionality), and Holesky (Ethereum’s largest testnet and Goerli’s replacement).As outlined by Beiko, in the absence of any unforeseen issues, developers agree that the update schedule for the testnets will be as follows:

  • January 17, 6:32 UTC for Goerli.
  • January 30, 22:51:12 UTC for Sepolia.
  • February 7, 11:34:24 UTC for Holesky.

The developer noted that the Ethereum mainnet would follow right after the testnet forks, strengthening the possibility of a Q1 2024 release.

The First Step in the Danksharding Roadmap

The most anticipated feature of the Dencun upgrade is EIP-4844, also known as proto-danksharding. The feature promises to make transactions on Layer 2 chains cheaper by introducing blobs to allow for faster and cheaper data processing and storage on the mainnet.

Proto-danksharding represents the first step in the danksharding roadmap, which intends to address Ethereum’s scalability concerns by splitting the network into small pieces (shards) that run in parallel.

Proto-danksharding was initially scheduled to go live with the Shapella upgrade in April 2023, only to be excluded due to technical difficulties and a desire not to delay staked ETH withdrawals. The Dencun upgrade itself was initially slated to go live in Q4 2023; however, in September 2023, developers warned that it could face delays.

On the Flipside

The outlined dates are subject to change should unforeseen challenges arise during testing.

The full danksharding vision is still years away.

Why This Matters

The tentative dates set by developers suggest that the Dencun upgrade will likely make it to the Ethereum mainnet in Q1 2024.

Trending Cryptos

Related Reads

Hackers Steal Nearly $17 Million in 40 Days as 'Zombie Contracts' Become Their ATMs

According to an analysis published by ZeroDrift on June 22, 2026, attackers have stolen approximately $16.9 million over 40 days from five deprecated but still operational smart contracts across various blockchains. The primary issue is not a specific vulnerability but the incomplete decommissioning of legacy contracts. These "zombie contracts" often retain economic value, operational permissions, and callable functions, making them prime targets long after teams cease active development. The most significant loss occurred at DxSale, where an old locker contract lost about $7.3 million due to a forgotten control path becoming accessible again. Other affected projects include TrustedVolumes (~$5.87M), Raydium's legacy AMM pool (~$1.34M), Aztec Connect (~$2.28M), and Huma Finance V1 pool (~$101k). These incidents involved diverse systems—RFQ settlement, credit pools, liquidity lockers, AMMs—demonstrating the widespread nature of the risk. The analysis highlights that automated tools are lowering the cost for attackers to systematically scan for these long-tail targets, which have public code and weaker monitoring. In contrast, defensive practices for contract retirement remain underdeveloped. While the DeFi industry has mature audit processes for new deployments, it lacks strict protocols for securely sunsetting old contracts, which only become truly "retired" after all funds, permissions, authorizations, and trust assumptions are removed.

marsbit10m ago

Hackers Steal Nearly $17 Million in 40 Days as 'Zombie Contracts' Become Their ATMs

marsbit10m ago

Valuation Rout of Old Titans: The Demise of a Generation's Asset Valuation Framework

"The Old Titans' Valuation Collapse: The Death of an Era's Valuation Framework" Between Alibaba's 2014 NYSE debut at $93.89 and its 2026 price of ~$95, twelve years have passed with zero price appreciation. This stagnation symbolizes a wholesale valuation reset for an entire generation of Chinese internet assets. Companies like Tencent, Pinduoduo, Meituan, Bilibili, and Kuaishou have seen catastrophic declines of 80-98% from their peaks. The core question arises: what framework now prices these companies, or has the framework itself expired? The valuation logic for Chinese internet stocks followed a clear "anchor-setting and anchor-removing" process. From 2014-2017, the dominant narrative was "US comparable discounting" – applying a growth premium and governance discount to US peers' multiples. This anchor loosened with the 2018 US-China trade war and the VIE structure risk, then was violently uprooted by the 2020-2021 regulatory crackdowns (Ant Group, Didi, anti-monopoly fines). The 2022 delisting panic and subsequent 2025-2026 geopolitical shocks (US military lists, AI espionage accusations) completed the demolition. The old "US对标打折" model is dead. However, this is not solely a China story. A structural mirror exists in US "old titan" stocks ("老登股"). In 2026, even Microsoft – with robust fundamentals – saw its PE compress from a 34x median to 22x, its worst performer status among the "Magnificent Seven" driven by a $190 billion annual AI capex crushing free cash flow. The core dilemma is universal: legacy platform giants, whether Alibaba or Microsoft, are spending colossal sums to chase an AI paradigm that may颠覆 their own high-margin, user/subscription-based business models. They have shifted from "companies defining the future" to "companies needing to prove they won't be淘汰ed by the future." This phenomenon of a dying valuation坐标系 has a historical precedent: post-1989 Japan. After its bubble burst, the "Japan premium" narrative ("most efficient manufacturing + perpetual growth") collapsed. A 25-year valuation vacuum ensued until Warren Buffett provided a new language in the 2010s: "low valuation + high dividend + governance reform." China's internet sector is now in a similar vacuum six years into its reset. While different from Japan's deflationary context, the parallel is clear: the old macro assumption of "deep integration with global capital" is falsified, but a new pricing framework is absent. Potential "new languages" for Chinese internet valuations are contradictory. AI transformation requires gutting profitable core businesses (e.g., Alibaba's ad-driven e-commerce) for an unproven consumption-based model, risking a Microsoft-like cash flow crunch. Alternatively, shareholder returns (buybacks/dividends) could build a floor, following Buffett's Japanese playbook, but current scales are insufficient to form a standalone anchor. The current state mirrors mid-1990s Japan: the old framework is dead, the new one unborn. The market waits in a vacuum for a重新定义ing force – a person, event, or proven business model shift – to answer "why buy." This may only be the middle phase of a prolonged re-rating.

marsbit17m ago

Valuation Rout of Old Titans: The Demise of a Generation's Asset Valuation Framework

marsbit17m ago

STRC Trading at Significant Discount, mNAV Falls Below Break-Even, Strategy's Valuation Logic Has Been Rewritten

Title: STRC Deeply Discounted, mNAV Falls Below Break-even, Strategy's Valuation Logic Redefined The recent volatility in MSTR and STRC highlights the need to reassess the core business model of Bitcoin reserve companies. These entities function more like leveraged, single-asset banks rather than software/tech firms. Consequently, they should be valued using banking metrics, not based on their total Bitcoin holdings. The key valuation metric is mNAV (market net asset value), akin to a price-to-book ratio. It compares the company's market capitalization to the equity value of its Bitcoin holdings after deducting all senior debt and preferred equity (like STRC). As of June 24, Strategy's mNAV was 1.10x. The focus should be on "net Bitcoin per share" (the Bitcoin claim per share after senior claims) and its growth rate, equivalent to a bank's book value and return on assets. Given STRC's 19% discount to its $100 par value (yielding 14.2%), issuing new MSTR equity at the current price to buy more Bitcoin is inefficient. It slightly dilutes the widely watched "total Bitcoin per share" metric while providing minimal improvement to the more critical "net Bitcoin per share." The article analyzes four potential uses for $1 billion in new equity: 1. **Buy Bitcoin:** Least effective. Improves net Bitcoin per share only marginally while diluting total Bitcoin per share. 2. **Repurchase STRC:** Most effective for balance sheet repair. The discount creates immediate value, increasing net Bitcoin per share by 1.0%, reducing debt burden, and lowering future dividend obligations. 3. **Boost Cash Reserves:** Dramatically improves the "cash coverage ratio" for STRC dividends from 9.8 months to 16.8 months, a crucial liquidity metric in a tightening funding environment. 4. **50/50 Split (STRC buyback & cash):** A balanced approach improving all key metrics. Strategy's own Q1 report indicates its internal break-even mNAV for profitable equity issuance to buy Bitcoin is 1.22x. With the current mNAV at 1.10x, such a move would be value-destructive. The core assumptions of its previous expansion model—issuing STRC at par and maintaining ample dividend coverage—have broken down. The recommended path is to use new capital to optimize core financial health: repurchasing discounted STRC and/or bolstering cash reserves. This would repair the balance sheet, signal liquidity strength, support STRC's price, lower its yield, and potentially reopen the par-value issuance channel. The current STRC discount represents a low-cost capital opportunity to restart this positive cycle. Bitcoin reserve companies must be evaluated as banks, focusing on book value, leverage, and liquidity resilience.

Foresight News18m ago

STRC Trading at Significant Discount, mNAV Falls Below Break-Even, Strategy's Valuation Logic Has Been Rewritten

Foresight News18m ago

Trading

Spot

Hot Articles

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of ETH (ETH) are presented below.

活动图片