BendDAO拥抱BTC生态,能否老树开花?

Odaily星球日报Published on 2023-12-29Last updated on 2023-12-29

Abstract

与其说是主动求变,不如说是被市场大势裹挟。

原创 | Odaily星球日报

作者 | 0xAyA

BendDAO拥抱BTC生态,能否老树开花?

终于,BendDAO 也开始发铭文了——这个此前专注于 NFTFi 领域,致力于为蓝筹提供更多流动性的协议,最终也还是逃不过 BTC 生态和铭文滚滚而来的浪潮。早在两周前,BendDAO 就表示,团队计划提出解决方案来拥抱比特币 NFT 生态系统,新的解决方案将允许比特币 NFT 和 BendDAO 之间的无缝交互,并支持 WBTC 流动性池作为可借贷资产。

而后 BendDAO 宣布将连接 BRC 20 和 ERC 20 流动性,并即将推出 BendDAO BRC-20 ,为比特币生态提供借贷和跨链桥服务。就在昨天,官方正式宣布将推出 BRC-20 代币 BDIN,将向借款人、贷款人、质押者和 veBEND 持有者提供优先权益。

BendDAO拥抱BTC生态,能否老树开花?

BRC 20 是在比特币网络上发行同质化代币的格式标准,它是通过利用 Ordinal 协议将铭文设置为 JSON 数据格式来配置代币合约、铸造和转移代币,我们可以将其理解为是一种变异的序数 NFT,NFT 上铭文刻录的是图片,BRC 20 上标识的铭文都是统一的 JSON 格式的文本数据(文本)。在 BRC 20 中,铭文亦是 BRC 20 代币的记账账本,可用于追踪每一次代币的变动。ERC 20 则是基于 EVM 依赖智能合约的代币,而由于 BTC 缺乏智能合约支持,所以在 BRC 20 上面发行的代币功能较少。

虽然两者同为代币标准,但 ERC 20 与 BRC 20 本质上来说较少有相通之处。BendDAO 提供跨链桥服务,毫无疑问将大大减少两者之间的隔阂,而这种跨链支持也能够提升两个最重要的生态系统之间的流动性,无论是提高资产的利用率,还是对未来比特币生态的整体发展,都具有潜在的重要意义。

BendDAO 并不是第一次做这种增强流动性的布局——早在以太坊 NFT 叙事方兴未艾之时,BendDAO 就将目光瞄向了整个生态里最重要的一块蛋糕,即蓝筹 NFT 市场。通过“点对池”设计以及双向挖矿激励,BendDAO 很快就吸引了对资金效率极为敏感的蓝筹 NFT Holder 们,至此一个又一个 BAYC 被放入质押池中。

然而 BendDAO 本身的设计以及市场接连不断的暴雷事件,使得清算事件接二连三的发生,尽管项目方在 8 月份的清算事件过后很快调整了清算机制, 将清算阈值由 90% 逐步降低至 70% ,拍卖周期由 48 小时调整为 4 小时,取消“首次投标要高于地板价 95% ”的限制等。但依然还是无法避免流动性危机的产生。

BendDAO拥抱BTC生态,能否老树开花?

随着市场对 NFT 的狂热逐渐消退,蓝筹 NFT 在这一年也陷入了阴跌困局中,头部项目的地板价离最高点纷纷腰斩一半有余,原本人声鼎沸的 NFTFi 叙事也变得鲜少有人问津。

BendDAO 此次的尝试,与其说是主动求变,更不如说是被市场大势所趋带动下的一种无奈之举——铭文和 Launchpad 热潮之下,HOOK,LEVER 等项目纷纷转型,而 BendDAO 也选择了这条路,他们此次的尝试能否成功?时间会给出答案。

Related Reads

The Fate of Digital Banks: No Fancy App Can Outshine a Banking License

The Fate of Digital Banks: A Flashy App is No Match for a Banking License The article argues that despite attracting billions of users with fee-free checking accounts and sleek apps, most "neobanks" struggle to be profitable because their core business—transaction fees—is inherently low-margin. The real profit engine of banking is lending (credit), which generates interest income. However, many early neobanks operated without their own banking licenses, which restricted their ability to lend at scale. Examples like Nubank, Revolut, and Chime illustrate the point. While they gained users with free accounts, their eventual profitability came from rolling out credit products. The piece highlights systemic risks for neobanks that rely on third-party infrastructure, citing the Synapse bankruptcy, which froze user funds and revealed the fragility of such models. The solution, according to the author, is obtaining a formal banking license, like the U.S. OCC's national trust charter. This provides regulatory backing, allows direct custody of funds, and eliminates dependency on intermediary partners. The trend is now evident in the crypto sector, where companies like Kraken, SoFi, and others are actively pursuing such licenses. The article concludes that while technology changes, the fundamental business logic of banking—profiting from lending—remains constant. Successful digital banks ultimately conform to this old model, just with better interfaces and fairer terms.

Foresight News4m ago

The Fate of Digital Banks: No Fancy App Can Outshine a Banking License

Foresight News4m ago

In the Name of Charity, For the Benefit of the Family: How the Trump Family Turns Philanthropy into Profit?

Charity for Profit: How the Trump Family Turned Philanthropy into Personal Gain Amid a recent controversy over misleading claims about his cryptocurrency company American Bitcoin, Eric Trump invoked his children's cancer charity as evidence of his good intentions. While his Curetivity foundation (formerly the Eric Trump Foundation) has donated over $25 million to St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, an investigation reveals a pattern of self-dealing and opaque practices that benefited the Trump family business. Internal documents show that from 2011 to 2016, over $500,000 from the charity was funneled back to Trump-owned properties for event costs, transactions often omitted from tax filings. This created clear conflicts of interest, with figures like former club manager and current White House aide Dan Scavino involved on both sides. Public claims of "one of the lowest expense ratios" were contradicted by records showing significant spending on entertainment, auctions, and transportation. Facing scrutiny in 2017, Eric Trump distanced himself from the board and rebranded the foundation. After a state investigation shifted focus to compliance rather than enforcement, he returned as the public face. Fundraising events, now less transparent, continue at Trump venues. Estimates suggest these events have directed over $1 million to the Trump Organization over two decades. The same playbook of optimistic claims and obscured financial realities is now evident in Eric Trump's role at American Bitcoin. He promoted it as a highly profitable venture with low mining costs, but reports indicate most Bitcoin was purchased with funds from constant stock issuance, not mined, with actual costs far higher than claimed. While the company's stock has crashed nearly 90% from its peak, Eric Trump's personal stake remains valuable. The recurring pattern involves aggressive public defense, legal maneuvering to bury records, making minimal changes to satisfy regulators, and eventually repackaging the venture to regain trust, often successfully.

marsbit13m ago

In the Name of Charity, For the Benefit of the Family: How the Trump Family Turns Philanthropy into Profit?

marsbit13m ago

Bernstein Report: Agentic AI Will Transform CPU from Supporting Role to Leading Role, Bullish on Hygon Information

Bernstein research report: Agentic AI will turn CPUs from supporting players to leading roles, bullish on Hygon Information. Analysts led by David Dai argue that AI is transitioning from the chatbot era to the agentic AI era. Unlike simple query-response models, agentic AI involves complex workflows including retrieval, planning, tool calling, and multi-step reasoning. This shift dramatically increases the demand for CPU compute to orchestrate these tasks, manage memory, and prevent expensive GPU idling. The report forecasts that the GPU-to-CPU ratio in inference clusters will reverse from 8:1 in 2025 to 1:1 by 2029. In agentic AI workloads, CPUs could account for 50% of the compute, on par with GPUs. Consequently, the server CPU Total Addressable Market (TAM) is projected to surge from $37 billion in 2025 to $223 billion by 2030, representing a 6x expansion. Arm is identified as a key beneficiary due to its superior performance-per-watt and a strategic shift from IP licensing to designing its own chips, targeting $15 billion in chip revenue by 2030. Bernstein raises Arm's price target to $500. For x86 vendors, the report is Overweight on AMD (target $600) and Hygon Information (target CNY 450), citing leadership and strong growth in the Chinese market respectively. Intel's target is raised to $100, reflecting upgraded earnings assumptions. The analysis acknowledges significant supply-side risks, questioning whether foundry and memory capacity can support such rapid CPU growth. The optimistic demand forecast also heavily relies on Nvidia's guidance for over $1 trillion in annual AI infrastructure spend by 2027.

marsbit21m ago

Bernstein Report: Agentic AI Will Transform CPU from Supporting Role to Leading Role, Bullish on Hygon Information

marsbit21m ago

Will UNI Reach $100 in Four Years? Can Standard Chartered's Prediction Come True?

TL;DR: Standard Chartered Bank predicts UNI token will reach $100 by 2030, based on the growth of tokenized assets fueling demand for open DeFi liquidity and Uniswap's potential to capture fees from that trading. However, institutional tokenized products like BlackRock's BUIDL fund show that strict access controls and permissioned systems remain major barriers. Standard Chartered's $100 price target for Uniswap's (UNI) governance token by 2030 projects massive growth from current levels. The bank's thesis hinges on tokenized real-world assets (RWA) reaching trillions in value and a significant portion flowing into open, decentralized markets for trading and liquidity, rather than remaining in closed, permissioned systems. Uniswap's position as a leading decentralized exchange (DEX) infrastructure could allow it to capture a major share of this future trading activity. A key challenge is whether tokenized assets like bonds, funds, and stocks will trade openly on DEXs or be restricted to controlled, institutional platforms. The case of BlackRock's BUIDL fund exemplifies this tension: while it uses Uniswap's technology for settlements, trading is strictly limited to pre-approved, whitelisted institutional participants. This hybrid model provides DeFi efficiency but maintains traditional access barriers. For UNI to achieve such a high valuation, Uniswap must not only see increased trading volume from tokenized assets but also implement effective value-capture mechanisms for token holders. Recent governance proposals aim to direct protocol fees to UNI stakers, creating a clearer link between platform usage and token value. Ultimately, the realization of Standard Chartered's prediction depends on the future structure of the tokenized asset market. If open liquidity pools and reduced restrictions prevail, Uniswap's role could expand far beyond crypto-native trading. If permissioned, walled-garden systems dominate, its growth from institutional tokenization may be limited. The prediction itself signals growing institutional recognition of DeFi's potential role in the future of finance.

marsbit29m ago

Will UNI Reach $100 in Four Years? Can Standard Chartered's Prediction Come True?

marsbit29m ago

Trading

Spot
Futures
活动图片