South Korea's Financial Regulations Chief to Meet SEC Chairman Gensler Next Month: Report

CoinDeskPolicy2023-12-19 tarihinde yayınlandı2023-12-20 tarihinde güncellendi

Özet

The two aim to strengthen cooperation on crypto regulations before South Korea's new crypto laws go into effect next year.

South Korea's chief financial regulator plans to meet with U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) Chairman Gary Gensler in Washington D.C. next month, Korean news outlet ChosunBiz reported Wednesday.

Financial Supervisory Service Governor Lee Bok-hyeon and Gensler will discuss crypto regulations, an increasingly critical area of focus for Korean regulators. The visit will mark the first meeting between the two.

10

"We are coordinating specific schedules and agendas with the aim of strengthening cooperation between the two agencies,” the FSS said, according to ChosunBiz.

Advertisement
Advertisement

South Korea developed digital asset legislation this year to beef up consumer protections for crypto investors. The legislation will go into effect in July 2024. Roughly a quarter of adults aged 18 to 60 invested in crypto during a six-month period, making the country one of the largest markets for cryptocurrency trading, KuCoin data shows.

South Korea's crypto traders were burned by rampant fraud in the digital assets space, prompting the country's regulators to aim at reining in the largely underregulated space. In 2022, South Korean crypto entrepreneur Do Kwon's Terra-Luna ecosystem collapsed, precipitating a $40 billion crypto market crash.

Edited by Sheldon Reback.

İlgili Okumalar

Why Is No One Buying DeFi Insurance?

"Why DeFi Insurance Remains Unpurchased" explores the paradox of decentralized finance insurance. While DeFi insurance promises automatic, unbiased payouts via smart contracts—eliminating traditional insurers' denial practices—it struggles to attract users. The core issue is economic viability. Premiums are prohibitively high relative to the yields from DeFi protocols. For example, insuring a deposit on Aave or Maple Finance can consume most or even all of the annual yield, leaving returns comparable to or worse than traditional savings. Only the safest protocols, like MakerDAO, offer affordable premiums. Furthermore, the DeFi insurance model is structurally fragile. Unlike traditional insurance where risks are uncorrelated, DeFi risks are highly interconnected (e.g., oracle failures, bridge hacks). A single major exploit can simultaneously threaten multiple protocols, potentially bankrupting the entire insurance pool, which holds only millions against billions in total value locked. The governance model also creates a conflict of interest. In platforms like Nexus Mutual, token holders who vote on claims risk their own capital if payouts are approved, incentivizing denials. Consequently, the market is tiny and shrinking. Nexus Mutual dominates with $81.56 million in assets, but the industry lacks the capacity to cover a catastrophic event like the $292M Kelp DAO hack. Other providers have dwindled or shut down. The article concludes that DeFi insurance faces a "tragedy of the commons": its stability requires widespread adoption, but individual users have no incentive to pay for it, as premiums destroy their yields. Current solutions involve preventative measures like bug bounties and seeking external capital from traditional reinsurance, acknowledging that on-chain capital alone is insufficient to cover on-chain risks.

marsbit2 saat önce

Why Is No One Buying DeFi Insurance?

marsbit2 saat önce

İşlemler

Spot
活动图片