随着美国加息经济增长放缓,比特币和以太坊持平

Crypto VPubblicato 2023-04-28Pubblicato ultima volta 2023-05-04

Introduzione

市场还将关注将于周五公布的美国个人消费支出指数,美联储将利用该指数评估其加息政策对经济的有效性。央行将于 5 月 3 日宣布下一次加息。

尽管美国经济在第一季度录得低于预期的 1.1% 年化增长,但由于加息对 GDP 构成压力且经济衰退的威胁减弱,股市仍飙升。

消息传出后,比特币 (BTC) 一度跌至 28,748 美元,随后反弹至 28,934.06 美元。以太坊 (ETH) 从 1,883 美元跌至 1,869.53 美元,随后升至 1,883.40 美元。

随着衰退对美国经济的威胁下降,股市飙升

美国主要股市对该消息反应积极,道琼斯指数上涨 0.3%,标准普尔 500 指数上涨 0.6%,纳斯达克综合指数上涨 0.9%。

受正面财报消息的提振,Meta 的股价上涨了约 14%,而在收市后发布财报电话会议的亚马逊当天上涨了 3%。

由于交易员采取鸽派立场,预计到 2023 年底将降息三次,市场普遍预测 GDP 将增长 2.2%。GDP 也较上一季度的 2.6% 大幅下降。

本周早些时候,分析师 Noelle Acheson 指出,10 年 1 月的收益率曲线没有倒转。倒曲线是衰退指标。

尽管消息传出后比特币交易基本持平,但 K33 Research 表示,在一系列国际银行假期期间,比特币将在未来几周与美国股市相吻合。

BTC 关联美国股票BTC-30 天相关性 |资料来源: K33 研究

自 2022 年 10 月以来,衡量美元兑其他主要货币强弱程度的美元指数已下跌 12%。

除非出现特定于加密货币的市场事件,否则 2022 年美元走强有时与比特币价格下跌相关。 8月美联储宣布进一步加息后,美元指数上涨,而比特币下跌11%。

在GDP数据公布前, BTC与美元的90天相关性为-0.7%。在此之前,美元指数自 10 月以来下跌了 12%。

这种关系表明,在 GDP 结果之后美元的任何进一步下跌都可能使比特币受益。

美联储预测还会加息两次

市场还将关注将于周五公布的美国个人消费支出指数,美联储将利用该指数评估其加息政策对经济的有效性。央行将于 5 月 3 日宣布下一次加息。

周四,美联储主席杰罗姆·鲍威尔 (Jerome Powell) 向冒充乌克兰总统泽伦斯基 (Volodymyr Zelensky) 的恶作剧者建议再两次加息25 个基点。

他说经济衰退“几乎与非常缓慢的增长一样可能”。

“我们需要一段放缓的增长期,这样经济才能降温,劳动力市场才能降温,工资才能降温。这就是通货膨胀下降的方式。这是我们知道降低通货膨胀的唯一方法。这可能会很痛苦,但我们不知道有什么不痛不痒的方法可以降低通胀。”

来源:Zerohedge

CME 目标利率CME FedWatch 目标利率预测 |资料来源:芝商所

CME FedWatch 工具对此表示赞同,认为即将到来的 25 个基点加息的可能性为 87.4%

Letture associate

Take a Calm Look at Domestic Lithography Machines: 5 Units Delivered, How Far Are We from Challenging ASML?

This article analyzes recent news about China's domestic DUV lithography machines, advising a measured perspective. A state-backed enterprise plans to deliver about 5 immersion DUV systems this year, with a 2027 target of 20 units, aimed at 28nm processes. While this marks a step from R&D into initial customer validation, the author cautions against over-optimism. The piece clarifies this is DUV, not EUV technology. DUV is crucial but cannot economically solve challenges for advanced nodes like 5nm or below, where EUV is key. The 5-unit volume is minimal compared to ASML's annual output of over 130 such machines. The author highlights unverified claims regarding specs like 90% yield and warns against conflating this news with unconfirmed reports about Shanghai Micro Electronics' production. China's EUV efforts, while progressing with a prototype, remain in early testing, facing significant hurdles in core components like high-precision optics. The analogy of a "DeepSeek moment" is deemed misleading, as lithography involves slow, iterative precision engineering, not rapid software-like breakthroughs. Current progress represents establishing a potential second supply source and gaining vital engineering experience rather than an imminent industry disruption. For investors, the key indicators to watch are formal customer acceptance, stable operational performance, repeat orders, and growth in production volume and component localization. The conclusion is that this is a positive but early-stage development, far from altering the global competitive landscape.

marsbit50 min fa

Take a Calm Look at Domestic Lithography Machines: 5 Units Delivered, How Far Are We from Challenging ASML?

marsbit50 min fa

The 800x Golden Dog, "Gacha" Saves NFT Trading

Title: 800x Golden Dog: How 'Gacha' Mechanics Are Rescuing NFT Trading In the past month, the on-chain TCG (Trading Card Game) narrative, centered around "gacha" or loot box mechanics, has emerged as a major crypto-native revenue generator, second only to platforms like Hyperliquid and pump.fun. Recently, this trend hit Ethereum with Fake World Assets (FWA). Within just over a week, FWA generated approximately $1.3 million in revenue, ranking 15th in the past week's crypto app earnings. Its token, $FWA, surged from an initial market cap of ~$47,550 to a peak of ~$38.8 million—an 800x gain. Meanwhile, Collector Cards' token $CARDS declined significantly from its previous highs. FWA, developed by the team behind "PunkStrategy," operates as an NFT gacha system with a built-in token flywheel. Users deposit NFTs paired with ETH as liquidity into pools. Each deposit creates a personal pool; more ETH deposited lowers the chance of the NFT being "won" in a draw. Players spend ETH to "draw" (gacha). If they get an undesirable NFT, they can instantly sell it back to the original depositor at an 85% discount, generating income for the depositor. A 1% fee is taken on each draw and on depositor earnings when an NFT is kept. The key to FWA's momentum is its token $FWA. It cannot be bought directly externally. The primary way to acquire it is by playing the gacha and choosing to receive $FWA (instead of ETH) when selling back an unwanted NFT. This mechanism creates constant buy pressure for $FWA as players engage, especially during its price ascent. Early participants who held $FWA benefited massively from subsequent inflows. This contrasts with projects like Collector Cards, which, despite strong revenues, suffer from perceived low token utility beyond buybacks. In conclusion, while FWA's flywheel design—linking speculative token gains directly to NFT trading activity—has driven rapid growth, its sustainability is questionable. The model relies heavily on continuous $FWA price appreciation to offset the inherent negative expectancy of each draw. When price momentum stalls, activity will likely decline. The case highlights that in crypto markets, pure profitability narratives can be fleeting; understanding the relationship between attention, token buy pressure, and sustainable mechanics is crucial to avoid speculative pitfalls.

marsbit1 h fa

The 800x Golden Dog, "Gacha" Saves NFT Trading

marsbit1 h fa

The Quantum Computing Threat Approaches, Cryptocurrency May Be Exposed to Risks Before Banks

Quantum computing poses a significant threat to all cryptographic systems, including banks and governments, but decentralized cryptocurrencies with public ledgers like Bitcoin are likely the first practical target. Experts warn that a cryptographically relevant quantum computer (CRQC), capable of running Shor's algorithm to break the elliptic curve cryptography securing most crypto wallets, could emerge around 2029. Recent research shows the required quantum resources for such attacks are shrinking dramatically, potentially enabling key extraction in minutes. The core vulnerability for cryptocurrencies is not the cryptography itself—post-quantum standards are being developed—but the slow, decentralized governance required to implement upgrades. Unlike centralized banks that can swiftly transition, Bitcoin needs near-unanimous consensus among its global network, a historically difficult process as seen in past upgrades. Estimates suggest migrating all vulnerable Bitcoin funds could take at least 76 days of dedicated network time, and it must be completed before a CRQC exists to prevent "now-or-never" attacks on exposed keys. The threat is not binary; it begins when a quantum computer can decrypt data before it loses value, not necessarily in real-time. A significant portion of Bitcoin (estimated at millions of coins) already has public keys permanently exposed on-chain, making them vulnerable to eventual "static attacks." While technical solutions exist, the race is against time for decentralized networks to coordinate a defensive transition, serving as an early warning for the broader financial system.

marsbit1 h fa

The Quantum Computing Threat Approaches, Cryptocurrency May Be Exposed to Risks Before Banks

marsbit1 h fa

Trading

Spot
活动图片