【研报精选】上海升级临近,LSD再次兴起

MirrorPublished on 2023-03-05Last updated on 2023-03-03

Abstract

SSV是不可避免的,希望你从中获得一些价值。

随着上海的升级换代即将到来,LSD再次兴起。其中一个项目,是一个捡拾和铲除的游戏引起了我的注意,而且它远不止于此。以下是我为什么相信$SSV能从众多项目中脱颖而出,并拥有巨大的上升空间的原因。

TL;DR

- $SSV提供去中心化的L0质押基础设施

- DVT是ETH路线图中的关键部分;$SSV具有先发优势

- LSD将利用$SSV的技术优势

- 代币有真正的价值积累

- 通过收费/赠款的动态变化可以实现飞轮效应

- 5000万美元的生态基金

目录:

1.$SSV和DVT的解释

2.投资理论与代币经济学

3.$SSV和L2之间的区别

4.估值和结论

$SSV和DVT的解释

$SSV正在开发分布式验证器技术[DVT],其目标是进一步分散ETH的安全层并使其更具弹性。DVT是Vitalik路线图上的一个关键组成部分。甚至ETH基金会本身也委托$SSV来处理这个具有里程碑意义部分。

DVT

用简单的话解释。

- 它允许一个验证器在一个以上的节点或机器上运行

- 由个人/操作者运行的节点可以作为一个单一的验证器一起运行。

- 每个节点持有完整验证器密钥的一个密钥份额[完整的密钥从不在一个地方]

我们得到了关于DVT的入门知识,但是是什么让它改变了游戏规则?为了确定这一点,我们首先要了解单节点验证器的主要问题:它们造成了单点故障。

单节点验证器的缺点:

- 如果电脑/机器死了,验证器就会脱机

- 设置备份节点会带来许多问题,例如节点的错误配置会导致砍价。

- 热键可能被破坏

- 股权和客户中心化

等等

DVT[节点集群]的优势:

- 即使一些节点离线,也不会影响性能,因为验证器仍在运作

- 由于不需要主动-被动节点备份,减少了削权风险

- 降低硬件成本;可以在较少的机器上运行更多的节点

- 需要削减保险更少

- 使得普通人更容易获得ETH押注;可以运行多个节点来验证

简而言之:

DVT提高了弹性,降低了削减风险,并使以太坊进一步去中心化。它还消除了单点故障方面的问题。

投资理论与代币经济学

我们已经有了$SSV的2个令人信服的论据:

- 第一个实现DVT,被定位为ETH的安全层 => 先发优势

- 每一个使用DVT的验证者,ETH网络都会变得更加分散和安全 => 大量的使用案例

Tokenomics。

一个项目可能会取得巨大的成功并被频繁使用,而代币却趋于零,这主要是由于缺乏价值累积/使用案例。通常情况下,根本不需要代币,其也没有真正的效用。

$SSV在这方面的表现如何?该代币主要有两个用途:

1. 治理

SSV持有者可以提交/投票于有助于塑造DAO的提案。这本身就是最低限度的效用,而且治理代币通常表现不佳。幸运的是,第2种情况是相当重要的......

2. $SSV网络上的支付工具。

$SSV是质押者向运营商支付的通用货币,用于代表他们运行节点和验证器。质押者也为使用网络支付$SSV费用;这些费用流入DAO,用于进一步的生态系统发展。

在我看来,第二部分尤其具有相当大的飞轮潜力:

DVT的使用加速了ETH的去中心化 为DAO提供了更多的费用 更多的项目将获得资金,在SSV的基础上建立/使用DVT来建立他们的应用程序 DVT的使用增加 产生更多的费用...

谈到资金问题;下面是几个获得资助并已在$SSV之上构建的高知名度项目,总共有20多个项目,其中有很多是利用DV技术的LSD项目。

有没注意到LSD这个庞然大物也是该集团的一部分?

FDV:MC的比例是有利的,为1.56倍,64%的供应在流通。不像ETH[1x]那么好,但比APT[6x]高得多。但请记住:如果你希望这个比例尽可能地接近1倍,这意味着更少的稀释和通货膨胀。ST FDV是一个模因,LT它绝对重要。

$SSV和L2之间的区别

最近的新闻:

$SSV推出了一个5000万美元的生态系统基金,专门用于推动DVT的发展。"DVT和正在使用该技术构建的各种用例类似于早期的L2实施。"毕竟其是早期采用者。

很难想象一个没有L2的ETH世界;它们大大增加了ETH的可扩展性,而采用率却不断降低。DVT[阅读:$SSV]可能同样重要,因为它不仅提高了安全性,而且还提高了分散性。可谓一举三得。

$SSV估值:

在TradFi中确定价格目标已经很困难了;而加密货币则将其放大了一个数量级。无论如何,这都只是一个fugazi和神奇的互联网资金。尽管如此,我们可以进行一些比较,并将价格目标作为一个单纯的思想实验。

在此之前,让我们回顾一下:

- SSV在Vitalik的ETH路线图中发挥着巨大的作用

- 在DVT中拥有巨大的先发优势

- 受以太坊基金会委托,使ETH更加去中心化、安全并增强抗审查能力

- 成立了一个5000万美元的基金以支持DVT的发展,有20家公司正在建设中

- 有像LDO这样的重量级公司利用它的技术

- 良好的代币机制、价值累积机制和飞轮潜力

- 对于ETH的未来,可能与L2同样重要。

综上所述,$SSV的图表只涨不跌并不奇怪。

"ETH敬畏地看着,不确定$SSV是否能够完成它所承担的巨大任务。去中心化和安全的信念取决于它。"

估值和结论

估值判决:

SSV是在ETH基金会本身的祝福下,远远超过了LSD的基础设施游戏。以一个领先的L2[OP]和一个顶级LSD[RPL]之间的中位数计算,结果是:每个SSV为111.20美元[还有155%的上涨空间],但仅仅是理论。

代币

我摘录了SSV WP的一段话作为本文章的结尾:

SSV是不可避免的。谢谢你的阅读--希望你从中获得一些价值。

Related Reads

ETH Bull and Bear Views Compilation: Can Ethereum's Value Flow Back to ETH?

Titled "ETH Bull and Bear Views: Can Ethereum's Value Flow Back to ETH?", this article synthesizes the current heated debate around Ethereum's native token, ETH, following Bankless co-founder David Hoffman's decision to sell his entire ETH holdings. The **bullish case**, represented by figures like Tom Lee (BitMine CEO) and Raoul Pal, argues that ETH's core thesis remains intact. They contend Ethereum is the essential, secure, and neutral foundational layer for future finance—encompassing stablecoins, RWA, DeFi, L2s, and Agentic AI. Bulls bet on ETH's long-term revaluation as institutional adoption of on-chain finance grows, with significant buying activity from entities like BitMine and Consensys cited as evidence. Conversely, the **bearish perspective**, led by Hoffman and analysts like Markus Thielen, questions ETH's value capture mechanism. They acknowledge Ethereum's network success but argue that the value created by L2s, DeFi, and applications does not sufficiently accrue to the ETH token itself. Bears point to ETH's prolonged underperformance versus the broader crypto market, lack of traditional cash flows, weakening "ultrasound money" narrative, and apparent institutional retreat (e.g., Harvard Management Company exiting its ETH ETF position) as key concerns. The debate highlights a pivotal shift: ETH is no longer just a community belief asset. The central question is whether ETH can transition from being a "**used infrastructure**" to a "**continuously bought and held core asset**" as more value enters the Ethereum ecosystem. The market is now critically examining the direct link between network growth and ETH's value.

marsbit21m ago

ETH Bull and Bear Views Compilation: Can Ethereum's Value Flow Back to ETH?

marsbit21m ago

Crypto is dead, Perps are forever

The crypto industry is shifting from a focus on creating native assets (like altcoins and protocol tokens) to becoming a "global asset pipeline." Native cryptocurrencies, except for Bitcoin, are seen as failing in their value storage and utility promises, with demand driven largely by speculation. Attention and liquidity are now moving toward real-world assets (RWAs) like U.S. stocks, bonds, gold, and oil traded on-chain via perpetual contracts (Perps). Stablecoins like USDT and USDC set the precedent, proving blockchain's core strength is efficient global settlement and transfer, not inventing new monetary systems. Meanwhile, assets like Ethereum and many DeFi tokens struggle as their narratives weaken against tangible traditional assets and the rapid real-world progress of AI. Perpetual contracts have emerged as a pivotal innovation. They simplify trading by offering pure price exposure to any asset, bypassing complexities of ownership, custody, and traditional market hours. Projects like Hyperliquid gained traction by combining CEX-like efficiency with on-chain transparency, capitalizing on post-FTX distrust, macroeconomic volatility, and the surge in demand for 24/7 stock trading. In conclusion, while the era of speculative native "crypto assets" may be over, perpetual contracts persist as the industry's most potent financial instrument—transforming all assets into globally accessible, constantly tradable instruments centered on price speculation.

marsbit27m ago

Crypto is dead, Perps are forever

marsbit27m ago

Tencent, Alibaba, ByteDance in a Battle for the Skill Store

Skill is becoming a key concept in the AI field, essentially serving as a structured "instruction manual" for AI Agents that specifies tool calls, decision logic, and output standards. This allows Agents to execute predefined tasks. As the number of Skills grows, distribution platforms have emerged. Major tech companies are swiftly entering this space. In March, Tencent, Alibaba, and ByteDance launched Skill stores within their respective Agent platforms. Subsequently, players like Zhipu AI, Meituan, and Xiaohongshu joined the fray. This competition for the "Skill store" is fundamentally a battle for the AI-era user entry point; whoever controls distribution controls the users. While ByteDance's Coze has experimented with paid Skills, most platforms offer them for free. The real value lies not in the stores themselves but in using them to attract and retain users within an ecosystem, driving revenue from services like cloud computing, model calls, or advertising. The landscape features three main player types: 1) **Internet giants** (e.g., Alibaba, ByteDance, Tencent, Meituan), leveraging Skills to drive traffic and monetize through their broader ecosystems (cloud services, transactions, ads). 2) **Large model companies** (e.g., Zhipu AI, Moonshot AI), using Skill stores to increase user engagement and monetize model API calls. 3) **Content platforms** (e.g., Xiaohongshu), treating Skills as a new content format to generate traffic and ad revenue. However, transforming Skill stores into a sustainable business faces significant hurdles. Key challenges include: the **difficulty in pricing Skills** due to inconsistent outputs across different models and contexts; **lack of cost transparency** (varying token consumption); **security risks** like Skill poisoning; and the **absence of standardized protocols** for development and evaluation. Unlike standardized mobile apps, Skills are often personalized workflows resistant to uniformity, which hinders the establishment of a reliable review and monetization system akin to the App Store. While there is genuine user demand for paid Skills—particularly in enterprise (e.g., contract review) and certain personal productivity scenarios—current platforms offer developers limited and unpredictable distribution. The future of Skill stores depends on overcoming these standardization, evaluation, and safety challenges to make acquiring a Skill as straightforward as downloading an app. For now, the stores function more as display shelves than robust marketplaces.

marsbit27m ago

Tencent, Alibaba, ByteDance in a Battle for the Skill Store

marsbit27m ago

The Crypto Scene Is Dead, Perpetual Swaps Are Eternal

The crypto industry is undergoing a fundamental shift. The era defined by minting novel, native digital assets (altcoins) is fading. These assets, lacking real-world cash flows or clear value, are losing relevance as attention and capital flow elsewhere. Two powerful external forces are reshaping the space. First, traditional assets like U.S. stocks, bonds, gold, and oil are being tokenized and traded on-chain. Second, the explosive growth of AI, with its tangible products, has overshadowed crypto's once-dominant "future narrative." This marks a critical pivot: crypto is transitioning from being a "factory for new assets" to becoming a "global conduit for existing assets." Its validated utility is not complex financial reinvention but efficient global settlement, transfer, and trading—the original promise of blockchain. Stablecoins like USDT and USDC exemplify this, offering faster dollar movement rather than replacing it. Consequently, native ecosystems like Ethereum face profound challenges. While still crucial infrastructure, ETH struggles to capture value as users interact with Layer 2s or trade traditional assets without needing to hold it. DeFi's grand narrative of rebuilding finance has narrowed to core needs like cheap transfers and deep liquidity. The true breakout innovation is the perpetual contract (Perp). It brilliantly bypasses the complexities of direct asset ownership (custody, compliance, dividends) by creating pure price exposure. Users can speculate on the price movement of *any* asset—NVIDIA, gold, oil—24/7, globally, and with leverage. This "price casino" model, while risky and ethically fraught, delivers unmatched liquidity and accessibility. Projects like Hyperliquid succeeded not by inventing new mechanics but by perfecting the timing and execution of this model. Key drivers included making on-chain Perps feel like centralized exchanges, post-FTX trust migration towards transparency, and rising demand to trade macro assets and equities round-the-clock. In conclusion, the crypto world's most enduring successes are the dollar (via stablecoins), Bitcoin, and trading. Its new frontier is not creating alternative assets but providing a seamless, perpetual trading layer—a new API—for the world's existing financial system. The age of native altcoins is over; the age of perpetual synthetic exposure has begun.

Odaily星球日报36m ago

The Crypto Scene Is Dead, Perpetual Swaps Are Eternal

Odaily星球日报36m ago

Trading

Spot
Futures
活动图片