CME Group Launched Micro-sized Bitcoin and Ethereum Options

CryptoPotatoPublished on 2022-03-29Last updated on 2022-03-29

Abstract

CME Group has officially launched micro options on Bitcoin and Ethereum futures.

One of the largest derivatives trading platforms has indeed proceeded with releasing options on Micro Bitcoin and Micro Ether futures, as promised earlier this month. The company outlined the growing investor demand for such products as the main reason behind the launch.

CryptoPotato reported earlier in March CME Group’s intentions to launch options on Micro Bitcoin and Micro Ether futures. These products offer a tenth of the exposure of the underlying asset, making them more suitable alternatives for individual investors.
Futures contracts require investors to sell them on a specific date, while options provide them the right, but not the obligation, to buy or sell at a particular price at any time.
CME Group announced on March 28 that these products have officially gone live; thus, the firm expanded its “suite of cryptocurrency derivatives offerings.” The firm’s Global Head of Equity and FX Products – Tim McCourt – commented:

“The launch of these micro-sized options builds on the significant growth and liquidity we have seen in our Micro Bitcoin and Micro Ether futures. These contracts will offer a wide range of market participants – from institutions to sophisticated, active, individual traders – greater flexibility and precision to manage their exposure to the top two cryptocurrencies by market capitalization.”

On the other hand, Darek Devens, Senior Portfolio Manager at Neuberger Berman, said his company expects that these products will be appealing to “over-the-counter cryptocurrency options market participants.” He also believes they will facilitate “increased market liquidity and price stability across cryptocurrency futures and options in the US-listed markets.”
With the aforementioned launch, CME Group’s total micro products exceed 20. According to the company, they have “traded more than 1.2 billion contracts since their introduction.”
CME Group has been among the most open-minded regulated global exchanges in terms of cryptocurrency services, having added BTC futures contracts nearly five years ago.
Most recently, the company behind Google – the Internet mogul Alphabet – invested $1 billion in the Chicago Mercantile Exchange.

Aave just crossed $1M in swap revenue, but HERE’s what you’re missing

Aave is expanding beyond its core lending and deposit services, establishing new revenue streams. The launch of its Global Dollar Hub and increased user activity have driven momentum. Notably, Aave DAO's swap revenue has surpassed $1 million since the launch of "Aave Will Win," with Ethereum being the primary contributor. This provides a new income source alongside traditional lending fees, and future features like leverage tools could further boost this growth. On-chain activity surged around the V4 Global Dollar Hub launch, briefly pushing the AAVE token price from ~$72 to ~$95 before settling near $87. Importantly, user growth remained strong despite the price pullback, with new addresses reaching 1,806 on June 30th—far above typical daily levels—and active addresses peaking at 3,144. Technical indicators like an RSI of 58 and a positive CMF suggest some underlying market strength remains.

ambcrypto3m ago

Aave just crossed $1M in swap revenue, but HERE’s what you’re missing

ambcrypto3m ago

Securitize Goes Public, The True 'First RWA Stock' Has Arrived

Securitize (SECZ) debuted on the NYSE on July 2nd and simultaneously launched a tokenized version of its shares on Solana and Avalanche. This move, representing ~$295M in tokenized shares, is a significant step for the RWA narrative, shifting focus from private assets to public equities. Critically, this is a case of "issuer-led" tokenization, where Securitize itself aims for the tokens to represent the same underlying common stock, not a synthetic derivative. This provides a more credible sample for other public companies to evaluate. The model is not about permissionless trading. Access is restricted to eligible U.S. investors via Securitize's regulated platform, with full KYC/AML. Compliance is built into the product, leveraging its status as a registered broker-dealer and transfer agent. The blockchains act as an efficient execution layer for recording ownership and enabling programmable transfers (e.g., using Solana's Token-2022 for compliance rules), but within a hybrid, regulated framework. Key challenges remain: proving meaningful secondary liquidity, ensuring seamless execution of shareholder rights (voting, dividends), and, most importantly, attracting adoption from non-crypto-native public companies. If successful, SECZ could evolve from a proof-of-concept into early evidence of structural change in capital markets infrastructure.

marsbit32m ago

Securitize Goes Public, The True 'First RWA Stock' Has Arrived

marsbit32m ago

To Buy Discounted ETH, How to Choose Between Bitmine and SharpLink?

"Buying Discounted ETH: SharpLink vs. Bitmine" analyzes two major treasury companies during a period of low ETH prices. Both hold significant ETH positions at a loss: SharpLink (with ~886.7K ETH at an average cost of ~$3,609, unrealized loss >$1.7B) and Bitmine (with 5.7M ETH, ~4.7% of supply, cost ~$3,400, loss >$11B). Despite similar ETH price declines and inclusion in Russell indices, their market valuations differ markedly. SharpLink trades at a ~21% discount to its ETH net asset value (NAV), while Bitmine's discount is only ~6%. The article compares them across key dimensions: financing ability (Bitmine raised $19.2B aggressively vs. SharpLink's smaller, steady raises), stock liquidity (Bitmine is significantly more liquid), and narrative execution (both support Ethlabs; SharpLink plans RWA tokenization, yet to materialize). For short-term trading on an ETH rebound, Bitmine offers better liquidity and a smaller NAV discount. For long-term holding, SharpLink's deeper discount and simpler capital structure (vs. Bitmine's perpetual preferred shares) may offer more upside if ETH recovers, though it carries higher liquidity risk. The choice depends on the investor's risk preference between SharpLink's visible price/ liquidity weakness and Bitmine's hidden risks in its capital structure and past valuation premiums.

marsbit49m ago

To Buy Discounted ETH, How to Choose Between Bitmine and SharpLink?

marsbit49m ago

Racing with Robinhood, Is Lighter Playing a Big Game?

"Lighter, a perpetual and spot exchange founded in 2022 by Vladimir Novakovski, is making strategic moves. After raising $68 million in November 2025 from investors like Founders Fund and Ribbit Capital, the project has recently updated its tokenomics and deepened its partnership with Robinhood. Key updates include a shift to permanent token burns from protocol revenue, with the first burn scheduled post-Q2 2026, and a change in staking rewards to be funded from the ecosystem reserve instead of protocol revenue. In July, Lighter was designated as Robinhood's official perpetual contracts partner and integrated directly into the Robinhood Wallet, gaining access to its vast user base. The partnership includes a $11 million LIT rewards program for users. Furthermore, Lighter plans to launch options trading in Q3 2025 and is reportedly working with the CFTC towards becoming a compliant decentralized exchange in the US. The LIT token has a fixed supply of 1 billion, with significant portions allocated to the team and investors subject to a 1-year cliff followed by a 3-year linear vesting schedule, starting from the Token Generation Event in December 2025."

Foresight News56m ago

Racing with Robinhood, Is Lighter Playing a Big Game?

Foresight News56m ago

Buying Discounted ETH, Which One to Choose: Bitmine or SharpLink?

The article compares two major ETH treasury companies, SharpLink and Bitmine, for investors seeking indirect ETH exposure via stocks during a bear market. Both hold significant ETH at similar cost bases (~$3,609 and ~$3,400 respectively) and face comparable percentage losses (>50%). Key differences lie in scale, valuation, and financing. Bitmine holds 5.7M ETH (4.7% of supply) with a ~$76B market cap and trades at only a ~6% discount to its net asset value (NAV). It has superior liquidity, aggressive financing (raising $19.2B in 11 months), and inclusion in the Russell 1000 index. However, its structure includes perpetual preferred stock with dividend costs, and past investors paid significant premiums, adding an extra layer of valuation risk. SharpLink holds ~887k ETH, has a ~$10.2B market cap, and trades at a deeper ~21% discount to NAV. Its financing has been slower, relying on smaller offerings. It promotes an "institutional narrative" with ties to Ethereum co-founder Joe Lubin and RWA/tokenization plans, though these remain unimplemented. Its liquidity is lower, but its simpler capital structure means current investors aren't paying for past overvaluation. In summary: For tactical trading in a downturn, Bitmine offers better liquidity and tighter NAV pricing. For potential long-term upside if ETH recovers, SharpLink's deeper discount offers more theoretical repair room, though it faces execution risks. The choice depends on whether one prioritizes trading efficiency and scale (Bitmine) or a potentially larger discount and simpler structure (SharpLink).

链捕手58m ago

Buying Discounted ETH, Which One to Choose: Bitmine or SharpLink?

链捕手58m ago

Trading

Spot